Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Disqualification of Legal Representation Under Rule 1.09: A Landmark Decision

Disqualification of Legal Representation Under Rule 1.09: A Landmark Decision

Date: Jun 7, 1996
Disqualification of Legal Representation Under Rule 1.09: A Landmark Decision Introduction The case of National Medical Enterprises, Inc. and Psychiatric Institutes of America, Inc. versus Honorable...
Fee-Shifting in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Mayfield

Fee-Shifting in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Mayfield

Date: Jun 1, 1996
Fee-Shifting in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Mayfield Introduction The case of The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. The Honorable Alan Mayfield,...
Clarifying Participation Standards for Appeal by Writ of Error: TEXACO v. CENTRAL POWER LIGHT COMPANY

Clarifying Participation Standards for Appeal by Writ of Error: TEXACO v. CENTRAL POWER LIGHT COMPANY

Date: May 17, 1996
Clarifying Participation Standards for Appeal by Writ of Error: TEXACO v. CENTRAL POWER LIGHT COMPANY Introduction The case of TEXACO, Inc. v. Central Power Light Company (925 S.W.2d 586) presents a...
Sovereign Immunity Upheld in Kerrville State Hospital v. Clark: Implications for Texas Tort Claims

Sovereign Immunity Upheld in Kerrville State Hospital v. Clark: Implications for Texas Tort Claims

Date: May 11, 1996
Sovereign Immunity Upheld in Kerrville State Hospital v. Clark: Implications for Texas Tort Claims Introduction The case of Kerrville State Hospital v. James O. Clark and Genevie Clark (923 S.W.2d...
Vicarious Liability and Negligent Hiring: Insights from NationsBank v. Dilling

Vicarious Liability and Negligent Hiring: Insights from NationsBank v. Dilling

Date: May 11, 1996
Vicarious Liability and Negligent Hiring: Insights from NationsBank v. Dilling Introduction The case of NationsBank, N.A. f/k/a NCNB National Bank v. Harry Dilling, adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Assessing Jury Misconduct and Grounds for New Trials: A Commentary on PHARO v. CHAMBERS COUNTY

Assessing Jury Misconduct and Grounds for New Trials: A Commentary on PHARO v. CHAMBERS COUNTY

Date: May 11, 1996
Assessing Jury Misconduct and Grounds for New Trials: A Commentary on PHARO v. CHAMBERS COUNTY Introduction PHARO v. CHAMBERS COUNTY is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas in...
Enhancing Due Process Protections in Contempt Orders: Ex parte Judy Cox Swate

Enhancing Due Process Protections in Contempt Orders: Ex parte Judy Cox Swate

Date: May 11, 1996
Enhancing Due Process Protections in Contempt Orders: Ex parte Judy Cox Swate Introduction The case of Ex parte Judy Cox Swate (No. 94-0460), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on May 10,...
Texas Supreme Court Confirms Non-Deduction of Post-Production Costs in 'Market Value at the Well' Royalty Clauses

Texas Supreme Court Confirms Non-Deduction of Post-Production Costs in 'Market Value at the Well' Royalty Clauses

Date: Apr 26, 1996
Texas Supreme Court Confirms Non-Deduction of Post-Production Costs in 'Market Value at the Well' Royalty Clauses Introduction The case of Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBank (939 S.W.2d 118)...
Finality in Malicious Prosecution and the Role of Malice in Tortious Interference: Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. Jeff Green

Finality in Malicious Prosecution and the Role of Malice in Tortious Interference: Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. Jeff Green

Date: Apr 26, 1996
Finality in Malicious Prosecution and the Role of Malice in Tortious Interference: Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. Jeff Green Introduction In the landmark case of Texas Beef Cattle Company et al. v. Jeff...
UCC Section 2.306 Does Not Apply to Take-or-Pay Gas Purchase Agreements: Analysis of Lenape Resources v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline

UCC Section 2.306 Does Not Apply to Take-or-Pay Gas Purchase Agreements: Analysis of Lenape Resources v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline

Date: Apr 19, 1996
UCC Section 2.306 Does Not Apply to Take-or-Pay Gas Purchase Agreements: Analysis of Lenape Resources Corporation v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company Introduction In the landmark case of Lenape...
Clarifying Procedural Requirements for Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Bruns v. Texas

Clarifying Procedural Requirements for Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Bruns v. Texas

Date: Apr 18, 1996
Clarifying Procedural Requirements for Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Bruns v. Texas Introduction Bruns v. The State of Texas, 924 S.W.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio, 1996),...
ADA Preemption of Common-Law Negligence Claims Against Airlines: Insights from Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Kiefer and Shupe v. American Airlines, Inc.

ADA Preemption of Common-Law Negligence Claims Against Airlines: Insights from Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Kiefer and Shupe v. American Airlines, Inc.

Date: Apr 13, 1996
ADA Preemption of Common-Law Negligence Claims Against Airlines: Insights from Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Kiefer and Shupe v. American Airlines, Inc. Introduction The Supreme Court of Texas, in...
Establishing Jurisdiction through Timely Notice of Appeal: Olivo v. Texas

Establishing Jurisdiction through Timely Notice of Appeal: Olivo v. Texas

Date: Mar 28, 1996
Establishing Jurisdiction through Timely Notice of Appeal: Olivo v. Texas Introduction Jesus Olivo v. The State of Texas, 918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc, 1996), addresses...
S.V. v. R.V.: Supreme Court of Texas Affirms Statute of Limitations in Absence of Objective Verification in Repressed Memory Sexual Abuse Claims

S.V. v. R.V.: Supreme Court of Texas Affirms Statute of Limitations in Absence of Objective Verification in Repressed Memory Sexual Abuse Claims

Date: Mar 15, 1996
S.V. v. R.V.: Supreme Court of Texas Affirms Statute of Limitations in Absence of Objective Verification in Repressed Memory Sexual Abuse Claims Introduction In the landmark case S.V., Petitioner, v....
Enhancing Trade Secret Protections: Texas Supreme Court's Ruling in Computer Associates International v. Altai, Inc.

Enhancing Trade Secret Protections: Texas Supreme Court's Ruling in Computer Associates International v. Altai, Inc.

Date: Mar 15, 1996
Enhancing Trade Secret Protections: Texas Supreme Court's Ruling in Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Computer Associates International, Inc....
Limiting DTPA Liability to Direct Consumer Transactions: Texas Supreme Court’s Decision in Amstadt et al. v. United States Brass Corporation

Limiting DTPA Liability to Direct Consumer Transactions: Texas Supreme Court’s Decision in Amstadt et al. v. United States Brass Corporation

Date: Mar 8, 1996
Limiting DTPA Liability to Direct Consumer Transactions: Texas Supreme Court’s Decision in Amstadt et al. v. United States Brass Corporation Introduction In the landmark case Robert and Toni Amstadt...
Subrogation of Federal Tax Liens and Homestead Protection: Benchmark Bank v. Crowder

Subrogation of Federal Tax Liens and Homestead Protection: Benchmark Bank v. Crowder

Date: Mar 8, 1996
Subrogation of Federal Tax Liens and Homestead Protection: Benchmark Bank v. Crowder Introduction Benchmark Bank v. Crowder is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on March 7,...
Texas Supreme Court Affirms Section 43.901 Bars Municipal Challenges to Annexation After Two Years

Texas Supreme Court Affirms Section 43.901 Bars Municipal Challenges to Annexation After Two Years

Date: Feb 17, 1996
Texas Supreme Court Affirms Section 43.901 Bars Municipal Challenges to Annexation After Two Years Introduction The case City of Murphy, Texas, Petitioner, v. City of Parker, Texas, Respondent (932...
Enhancing Transparency in Class Action Settlements: The Imperative of Adequate Notice of Attorney's Fees

Enhancing Transparency in Class Action Settlements: The Imperative of Adequate Notice of Attorney's Fees

Date: Feb 10, 1996
Enhancing Transparency in Class Action Settlements: The Imperative of Adequate Notice of Attorney's Fees Introduction The case of General Motors Corporation v. Clyde Bloyed, Ron Godbey, and Regina...
Establishing Permissive Venue and Refining 'Good Faith' under the Texas Whistleblower Act

Establishing Permissive Venue and Refining 'Good Faith' under the Texas Whistleblower Act

Date: Feb 10, 1996
Establishing Permissive Venue and Refining 'Good Faith' under the Texas Whistleblower Act Introduction In the landmark case Wichita County, Texas v. Allen Hart and Ernie Williams, decided on February...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert