Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Preemption of State DTPA Claims under the Medical Device Amendments: Tempie Fortson WORTHY v. COLLAGEN CORPoration

Preemption of State DTPA Claims under the Medical Device Amendments: Tempie Fortson WORTHY v. COLLAGEN CORPoration

Date: Feb 14, 1998
Preemption of State DTPA Claims under the Medical Device Amendments: Tempie Fortson WORTHY v. COLLAGEN CORPoration Introduction In Tempie Fortson WORTHY v. COLLAGEN CORPoration, decided by the...
Pretextual Investigations as Breach of Good Faith: State Farm v. Simmons

Pretextual Investigations as Breach of Good Faith: State Farm v. Simmons

Date: Feb 14, 1998
Pretextual Investigations as Breach of Good Faith: State Farm v. Simmons Introduction In the landmark case State Farm Fire Casualty Company v. James and Cynthia Simmons, the Supreme Court of Texas...
Judicial Accountability and Removal: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Bill R. Lowery Decision

Judicial Accountability and Removal: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Bill R. Lowery Decision

Date: Feb 14, 1998
Judicial Accountability and Removal: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Bill R. Lowery Decision Introduction The case of In re Bill R. Lowery, reported at 999 S.W.2d 639, addresses the critical issue of...
Establishing Employer Liability for Independent Contractors' Employee Safety Under Retained Control: Hoechst-Celanese v. Mendez

Establishing Employer Liability for Independent Contractors' Employee Safety Under Retained Control: Hoechst-Celanese v. Mendez

Date: Feb 14, 1998
Establishing Employer Liability for Independent Contractors' Employee Safety Under Retained Control: Hoechst-Celanese v. Mendez Introduction In the landmark case of Hoechst-Celanese Corporation v....
DAWSON-AUSTIN v. AUSTIN: Reinforcing Strict Standards for Special Appearances and Personal Jurisdiction in Texas Divorce Cases

DAWSON-AUSTIN v. AUSTIN: Reinforcing Strict Standards for Special Appearances and Personal Jurisdiction in Texas Divorce Cases

Date: Feb 14, 1998
DAWSON-AUSTIN v. AUSTIN: Reinforcing Strict Standards for Special Appearances and Personal Jurisdiction in Texas Divorce Cases Introduction Case Citation: Cynthia Lee Dawson-Austin v. William...
Clarifying Consumer Status and DTPA Violations: Brown v. Bank of Galveston

Clarifying Consumer Status and DTPA Violations: Brown v. Bank of Galveston

Date: Feb 14, 1998
Clarifying Consumer Status and DTPA Violations: Brown v. Bank of Galveston Introduction Vincent A. Brown v. Bank of Galveston, N.A., 963 S.W.2d 511 (Tex. 1998), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Clarification on the Application of Family Code Section 1.91(b) in Wrongful Death Actions: SHEPHERD v. LEDFORD and Transamerican v. Fuentes

Clarification on the Application of Family Code Section 1.91(b) in Wrongful Death Actions: SHEPHERD v. LEDFORD and Transamerican v. Fuentes

Date: Jan 30, 1998
Clarification on the Application of Family Code Section 1.91(b) in Wrongful Death Actions: SHEPHERD v. LEDFORD and Transamerican v. Fuentes Introduction The Supreme Court of Texas, in the landmark...
Reaffirming Tort Remedies for Fraudulent Inducement in Contractual Contexts: Analysis of Formosa Plastics Corp. v. Presidio Engineers (960 S.W.2d 41)

Reaffirming Tort Remedies for Fraudulent Inducement in Contractual Contexts: Analysis of Formosa Plastics Corp. v. Presidio Engineers (960 S.W.2d 41)

Date: Jan 17, 1998
Reaffirming Tort Remedies for Fraudulent Inducement in Contractual Contexts Introduction In the landmark case of Formosa Plastics Corporation USA and Formosa Plastic Corporation, Texas, Petitioners,...
Clarification of Prejudgment Interest and Collateral Estoppel in Insurance Law: Johnson Higgins v. Kenneco

Clarification of Prejudgment Interest and Collateral Estoppel in Insurance Law: Johnson Higgins v. Kenneco

Date: Jan 17, 1998
Clarification of Prejudgment Interest and Collateral Estoppel in Insurance Law: Johnson Higgins v. Kenneco Introduction The Supreme Court of Texas, in the landmark case of Johnson Higgins of Texas,...
Reaffirming Deferential Standards in Factual Sufficiency Reviews: Cain v. State of Texas

Reaffirming Deferential Standards in Factual Sufficiency Reviews: Cain v. State of Texas

Date: Dec 19, 1997
Reaffirming Deferential Standards in Factual Sufficiency Reviews: Cain v. State of Texas Introduction Cain v. State of Texas, 958 S.W.2d 404 (1997), represents a pivotal moment in Texas criminal...
Mental Anguish Not Recoverable for Negligent Property Damage: Tyler v. Likes

Mental Anguish Not Recoverable for Negligent Property Damage: Tyler v. Likes

Date: Dec 12, 1997
Mental Anguish Not Recoverable for Negligent Property Damage: City of Tyler v. Adeline Likes Introduction City of Tyler v. Adeline Likes (962 S.W.2d 489) is a significant judgment by the Supreme...
Murphy v. Campbell: Defining Statute of Limitations for Accounting Malpractice under the Discovery Rule

Murphy v. Campbell: Defining Statute of Limitations for Accounting Malpractice under the Discovery Rule

Date: Dec 12, 1997
Murphy v. Campbell: Defining Statute of Limitations for Accounting Malpractice under the Discovery Rule Introduction Murphy v. Campbell is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Texas that...
Disclaimer of Reliance Precludes Fraudulent Inducement Claims in Arm's-Length Business Settlements: Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. Swansons

Disclaimer of Reliance Precludes Fraudulent Inducement Claims in Arm's-Length Business Settlements: Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. Swansons

Date: Dec 12, 1997
Disclaimer of Reliance Precludes Fraudulent Inducement Claims in Arm's-Length Business Settlements: Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. Swansons Introduction Schlumberger Technology Corporation and...
Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Darrell Edwards: Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Strict Criteria for Corporate Liability in Punitive Damages

Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Darrell Edwards: Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Strict Criteria for Corporate Liability in Punitive Damages

Date: Dec 12, 1997
Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v. Darrell Edwards: Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Strict Criteria for Corporate Liability in Punitive Damages Introduction In the landmark case of Hammerly Oaks, Inc. v....
Implied Motion for Extension of Time Under Rule 41(a)(2): A New Precedent

Implied Motion for Extension of Time Under Rule 41(a)(2): A New Precedent

Date: Dec 5, 1997
Implied Motion for Extension of Time Under Rule 41(a)(2): A New Precedent Introduction The case of John Verburgt v. Patricia M. Dorner and Methodist Mission Home, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Duty to Defend and Indemnify in Insurance Contracts: Insights from Farmers Texas County Mutual v. Griffin

Duty to Defend and Indemnify in Insurance Contracts: Insights from Farmers Texas County Mutual v. Griffin

Date: Nov 14, 1997
Duty to Defend and Indemnify in Insurance Contracts: Insights from Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company v. Robert Griffin Introduction The case of Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance...
Clarifying Procedures for Withdrawal of Counsel on Frivolous Appeals: Wilson v. Texas

Clarifying Procedures for Withdrawal of Counsel on Frivolous Appeals: Wilson v. Texas

Date: Nov 13, 1997
Clarifying Procedures for Withdrawal of Counsel on Frivolous Appeals: Wilson v. Texas Introduction In the landmark case of Dickie Bruce Wilson v. The STATE of Texas, decided by the Court of Appeals...
Restricting Warranty Damages to Direct Users and Individual Claims: Implications of Minnesota Mining v. Nishika in Texas Jurisprudence

Restricting Warranty Damages to Direct Users and Individual Claims: Implications of Minnesota Mining v. Nishika in Texas Jurisprudence

Date: Oct 3, 1997
Restricting Warranty Damages to Direct Users and Individual Claims: Implications of Minnesota Mining v. Nishika in Texas Jurisprudence Introduction In the realm of commercial litigation, the...
De Novo Review Standard Established for Probable Cause in GUZMAN v. STATE

De Novo Review Standard Established for Probable Cause in GUZMAN v. STATE

Date: Sep 25, 1997
De Novo Review Standard Established for Probable Cause in GUZMAN v. STATE Introduction GUZMAN v. STATE, decided on September 24, 1997, by the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas en banc, marks a...
Redefining Sufficiency of Evidence: Malik v. State of Texas Establishes New Standards

Redefining Sufficiency of Evidence: Malik v. State of Texas Establishes New Standards

Date: Sep 11, 1997
Redefining Sufficiency of Evidence: Malik v. State of Texas Establishes New Standards Introduction Urfan S. Malik v. The State of Texas is a landmark decision by the Court of Criminal Appeals of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert