Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Setting Aside Default Judgments in Parental Termination: Insights from In the Interest of R.R. and S.J.S., Children

Setting Aside Default Judgments in Parental Termination: Insights from In the Interest of R.R. and S.J.S., Children

Date: Dec 2, 2006
Setting Aside Default Judgments in Parental Termination: Insights from In the Interest of R.R. and S.J.S., Children Introduction In the Interest of R.R. and S.J.S., Children (209 S.W.3d 112) is a...
Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards for Termination of Parental Rights under Texas Family Code Section 161.001(1)(Q)

Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards for Termination of Parental Rights under Texas Family Code Section 161.001(1)(Q)

Date: Dec 2, 2006
Reaffirming Evidentiary Standards for Termination of Parental Rights under Texas Family Code Section 161.001(1)(Q) Introduction The Supreme Court of Texas, in the landmark case In the Interest of...
Accrual of Statute of Limitations in Bailment Agreements and Its Implications on Attorney's Fees: Analysis of Emzy T. Barker, III and A v. Barker d/b/a Brushy Creek Brahman Center and Brushy Creek Custom Sires

Accrual of Statute of Limitations in Bailment Agreements and Its Implications on Attorney's Fees: Analysis of Emzy T. Barker, III and A v. Barker d/b/a Brushy Creek Brahman Center and Brushy Creek Custom Sires

Date: Dec 2, 2006
Accrual of Statute of Limitations in Bailment Agreements and Its Implications on Attorney's Fees: Analysis of Emzy T. Barker, III and A v. Barker d/b/a Brushy Creek Brahman Center and Brushy Creek...
Texas Supreme Court Rules on Premium Tax Liability for Surplus Lines Insurers

Texas Supreme Court Rules on Premium Tax Liability for Surplus Lines Insurers

Date: Dec 2, 2006
Texas Supreme Court Rules on Premium Tax Liability for Surplus Lines Insurers Introduction The case of Lexington Insurance Company, Landmark Insurance Company, and American International Specialty...
Termination Fee Provisions in Contingent Fee Agreements: Insights from Hoover Slovacek LLP v. Walton

Termination Fee Provisions in Contingent Fee Agreements: Insights from Hoover Slovacek LLP v. Walton

Date: Nov 4, 2006
Termination Fee Provisions in Contingent Fee Agreements: Insights from Hoover Slovacek LLP v. Walton Introduction The case of Hoover Slovacek LLP v. Walton, decided by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Supreme Court of Texas Upholds Exclusion of Unreliable Expert Testimony: Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Tamez

Supreme Court of Texas Upholds Exclusion of Unreliable Expert Testimony: Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Tamez

Date: Oct 28, 2006
Supreme Court of Texas Upholds Exclusion of Unreliable Expert Testimony: Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Tamez Introduction Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Elizabeth Tamez et al., 206 S.W.3d 572 (Tex. 2006), is a pivotal...
Enforceability of Non-Compete Covenants in At-Will Employment: Sheshunoff Management Services v. Johnson and Strunk Associates

Enforceability of Non-Compete Covenants in At-Will Employment: Sheshunoff Management Services v. Johnson and Strunk Associates

Date: Oct 21, 2006
Enforceability of Non-Compete Covenants in At-Will Employment: Sheshunoff Management Services v. Johnson and Strunk Associates Introduction The case of Sheshunoff Management Services, L.P. v. Kenneth...
Overruling Zuniga: Clarifying Factual Sufficiency in Texas Criminal Appeals

Overruling Zuniga: Clarifying Factual Sufficiency in Texas Criminal Appeals

Date: Oct 19, 2006
Overruling Zuniga: Clarifying Factual Sufficiency in Texas Criminal Appeals Introduction In the landmark case of Delair WATSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas (204 S.W.3d 404, 2006), the Court of...
Recognition of En Banc Motions as Rehearing Motions and Affirmation of Emergency Immunity under the Texas Tort Claims Act: CITY OF SAN ANTONIO v. HARTMAN

Recognition of En Banc Motions as Rehearing Motions and Affirmation of Emergency Immunity under the Texas Tort Claims Act: CITY OF SAN ANTONIO v. HARTMAN

Date: Sep 1, 2006
Recognition of En Banc Motions as Rehearing Motions and Affirmation of Emergency Immunity under the Texas Tort Claims Act: CITY OF SAN ANTONIO v. HARTMAN Introduction In the landmark decision of CITY...
Texas Supreme Court Upholds Mold Exclusion in Homeowners Insurance Policy

Texas Supreme Court Upholds Mold Exclusion in Homeowners Insurance Policy

Date: Sep 1, 2006
Texas Supreme Court Upholds Mold Exclusion in Homeowners Insurance Policy Introduction In the landmark case of Richard Fiess and Stephanie FIESS v. STATE FARM LLOYDS, 202 S.W.3d 744 (Tex. 2006), the...
Reata Construction v. City of Dallas: Defining Scope of Governmental Immunity in Affirmative Claims

Reata Construction v. City of Dallas: Defining Scope of Governmental Immunity in Affirmative Claims

Date: Jul 1, 2006
Reata Construction v. City of Dallas: Defining Scope of Governmental Immunity in Affirmative Claims Introduction Reata Construction Corporation initiated a legal dispute against the City of Dallas,...
Jurisdiction Over Interlocutory Appeals and Arbitration Clause Clarity: Insights from In re D. Wilson Construction Co. et al. v. Browns

Jurisdiction Over Interlocutory Appeals and Arbitration Clause Clarity: Insights from In re D. Wilson Construction Co. et al. v. Browns

Date: Jul 1, 2006
Jurisdiction Over Interlocutory Appeals and Arbitration Clause Clarity: Insights from In re D. Wilson Construction Co. et al. v. Browns Introduction The case of In re D. Wilson Construction Company,...
Sovereign Immunity Reinforced: Tooke v. City of Mexia Establishes Clear Standards

Sovereign Immunity Reinforced: Tooke v. City of Mexia Establishes Clear Standards

Date: Jul 1, 2006
Sovereign Immunity Reinforced: Tooke v. City of Mexia Establishes Clear Standards Introduction The Supreme Court of Texas, in the landmark case Judy Tooke and E.v. City of Mexia (197 S.W.3d 325,...
Reaffirmation of the Eight-Corners Rule in Determining Insurer’s Duty to Defend

Reaffirmation of the Eight-Corners Rule in Determining Insurer’s Duty to Defend

Date: Jul 1, 2006
Reaffirmation of the Eight-Corners Rule in Determining Insurer’s Duty to Defend GuideOne Elite Insurance Company v. Fielder Road Baptist Church Supreme Court of Texas, 197 S.W.3d 305 (2006)...
Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Control Standard in Vicarious Liability for Independent Contractors

Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Control Standard in Vicarious Liability for Independent Contractors

Date: Jul 1, 2006
Supreme Court of Texas Reinforces Control Standard in Vicarious Liability for Independent Contractors Introduction The Supreme Court of Texas issued a decisive ruling in Fifth Club, Inc. and Da v....
Texas Supreme Court Limits Employer Liability for Employees’ Off-Duty Conduct

Texas Supreme Court Limits Employer Liability for Employees’ Off-Duty Conduct

Date: Jul 1, 2006
Texas Supreme Court Limits Employer Liability for Employees’ Off-Duty Conduct Introduction In the landmark case of Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. v. David Ianni (2006), the Supreme Court of Texas...
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Tortious Interference Claims Affirmed by Texas Supreme Court

Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Tortious Interference Claims Affirmed by Texas Supreme Court

Date: Jul 1, 2006
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Tortious Interference Claims Affirmed by Texas Supreme Court Introduction The case of In re VESTA INSURANCE GROUP, INC., et al. (192 S.W.3d 759) presents a...
Recreational Use Statute Enhances Premises Liability Standards Without Restoring Sovereign Immunity

Recreational Use Statute Enhances Premises Liability Standards Without Restoring Sovereign Immunity

Date: Jun 24, 2006
Recreational Use Statute Enhances Premises Liability Standards Without Restoring Sovereign Immunity Introduction In the landmark case of The STATE of Texas and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department...
Reinforcing Expert Testimony Standards in Product Liability: Cooper Tire Rubber Co. v. Oscar Mendez

Reinforcing Expert Testimony Standards in Product Liability: Cooper Tire Rubber Co. v. Oscar Mendez

Date: Jun 17, 2006
Reinforcing Expert Testimony Standards in Product Liability: Cooper Tire Rubber Company v. Oscar Mendez Introduction Cooper Tire Rubber Company v. Oscar Mendez, Jr., 204 S.W.3d 797 (Tex. 2006), is a...
Continuing Obligations under Oil and Gas Operating Agreements After Assignment: Insights from Seagull Energy EP, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc.

Continuing Obligations under Oil and Gas Operating Agreements After Assignment: Insights from Seagull Energy EP, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc.

Date: Jun 17, 2006
Continuing Obligations under Oil and Gas Operating Agreements After Assignment: Insights from Seagull Energy EP, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc. (207 S.W.3d 342) Introduction The Supreme Court of Texas,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert