Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Texas Supreme Court Limits COGS Deductions for Movie Theaters: Hegar v. American Multi-Cinema

Texas Supreme Court Limits COGS Deductions for Movie Theaters: Hegar v. American Multi-Cinema

Date: Apr 4, 2020
Texas Supreme Court Limits COGS Deductions for Movie Theaters: Hegar v. American Multi-Cinema Introduction In the landmark case Hegar v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. (2020), the Supreme Court of Texas...
Limitations on EDJA Jurisdiction Established in San Jacinto River Authority v. Cities of Conroe et al.

Limitations on EDJA Jurisdiction Established in San Jacinto River Authority v. Cities of Conroe et al.

Date: Mar 28, 2020
Limitations on EDJA Jurisdiction Established in San Jacinto River Authority v. Cities of Conroe, Magnolia, and Splendora Introduction The case of San Jacinto River Authority v. Cities of Conroe,...
Standing in PIP Insurance Claims: Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company v. Rodney Beasley

Standing in PIP Insurance Claims: Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company v. Rodney Beasley

Date: Mar 28, 2020
Standing in PIP Insurance Claims: Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company v. Rodney Beasley Introduction The case of Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company v. Rodney Beasley (598 S.W.3d...
Affirmative Consideration of Late-Filed Responses in Summary Judgment: Insights from B.C. v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.

Affirmative Consideration of Late-Filed Responses in Summary Judgment: Insights from B.C. v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc.

Date: Mar 28, 2020
Affirmative Consideration of Late-Filed Responses in Summary Judgment: Insights from B.C. v. Steak N Shake Operations, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of B.C., Petitioner, v. Steak N Shake...
Establishing Standards for Terminating Teachers: Insights from NORTH EAST ISD v. Dehann Riou

Establishing Standards for Terminating Teachers: Insights from NORTH EAST ISD v. Dehann Riou

Date: Mar 28, 2020
Establishing Standards for Terminating Teachers: Insights from NORTH EAST ISD v. Dehann Riou Introduction The case of NORTH EAST INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT and Texas Commissioner of Education v....
Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of the Eight-Corners Rule Without Groundless-Claims Clause

Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of the Eight-Corners Rule Without Groundless-Claims Clause

Date: Mar 21, 2020
Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of the Eight-Corners Rule Without Groundless-Claims Clause Introduction The case of Janet Richards, Melvin Richards, and Amanda Culver Meals v. State Farm...
Limitations on Landowner Liability for Indigenous Wild Animals: Hillis v. McCall

Limitations on Landowner Liability for Indigenous Wild Animals: Hillis v. McCall

Date: Mar 14, 2020
Limitations on Landowner Liability for Indigenous Wild Animals: Hillis v. McCall Introduction In the landmark case of Hillis v. McCall, the Supreme Court of Texas addressed the scope of a landowner's...
Timeliness in Designating Responsible Third Parties: In re Mobile Mini, Inc. Sets New Precedent under TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 33.004(d)

Timeliness in Designating Responsible Third Parties: In re Mobile Mini, Inc. Sets New Precedent under TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 33.004(d)

Date: Mar 14, 2020
Timeliness in Designating Responsible Third Parties: In re Mobile Mini, Inc. Sets New Precedent under TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 33.004(d) Introduction In the landmark case of In re Mobile Mini,...
Affirmation and Partial Reversal in Parental Rights Termination: In the Interest of L.G., A Child

Affirmation and Partial Reversal in Parental Rights Termination: In the Interest of L.G., A Child

Date: Mar 14, 2020
Affirmation and Partial Reversal in Parental Rights Termination: In the Interest of L.G., A Child (596 S.W.3d 778) Introduction The case of In the Interest of L.G., A Child (596 S.W.3d 778) presents...
Definitive Agreement Requirement: Texas Supreme Court Rules Emails Insufficient for Contract Formation

Definitive Agreement Requirement: Texas Supreme Court Rules Emails Insufficient for Contract Formation

Date: Feb 29, 2020
Definitive Agreement Requirement: Texas Supreme Court Rules Emails Insufficient for Contract Formation Introduction In the landmark case of Chalker Energy Partners III, LLC, et al. v. Le Norman...
Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Precedence on the Scope of General Easements in Southwestern Electric Power Company v. Lynch et al.

Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Precedence on the Scope of General Easements in Southwestern Electric Power Company v. Lynch et al.

Date: Feb 29, 2020
Supreme Court of Texas Establishes Precedence on the Scope of General Easements in Southwestern Electric Power Company v. Lynch et al. Introduction In the landmark case of Southwestern Electric Power...
Comprehensive Commentary on Piranha Partners v. Neuhoff et al. (596 S.W.3d 740)

Comprehensive Commentary on Piranha Partners v. Neuhoff et al. (596 S.W.3d 740)

Date: Feb 22, 2020
Comprehensive Commentary on Piranha Partners v. Neuhoff et al. (596 S.W.3d 740) Establishing Clear Boundaries in Property Conveyance Assignments Introduction The case of Piranha Partners, Randolph...
Affirmation of Attorney Immunity in Rule 91a Dismissals: Bethel v. Quilling

Affirmation of Attorney Immunity in Rule 91a Dismissals: Bethel v. Quilling

Date: Feb 22, 2020
Affirmation of Attorney Immunity in Rule 91a Dismissals: Bethel v. Quilling Introduction In Cherlyn Bethel v. Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C., and James H. Moody, III, the Supreme...
Appellate Authority to Order Supplemental Briefing Under Rule 38.9: Insights from St. John Missionary Baptist Church v. Flakes

Appellate Authority to Order Supplemental Briefing Under Rule 38.9: Insights from St. John Missionary Baptist Church v. Flakes

Date: Feb 8, 2020
Appellate Authority to Order Supplemental Briefing Under Rule 38.9: Insights from St. John Missionary Baptist Church v. Flakes Introduction The case of St. John Missionary Baptist Church, Symphuel...
Riot Exception Affirmed: Immunity Upheld in Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice v. Rangel

Riot Exception Affirmed: Immunity Upheld in Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice v. Rangel

Date: Feb 8, 2020
Riot Exception Affirmed: Immunity Upheld in Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice v. Rangel Introduction The case of Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. Cesar Rangel (595 S.W.3d 198) addresses the...
Supreme Court of Texas Upholds Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clauses in ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER v. ImageFIRST

Supreme Court of Texas Upholds Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clauses in ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER v. ImageFIRST

Date: Feb 8, 2020
Supreme Court of Texas Upholds Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clauses in ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER v. ImageFIRST Introduction The case of Atrium Medical Center, LP and Texas Healthcare Alliance LLC...
Section 143.102 Prevails Over Local Stock Laws in Determining Livestock Owner Liability on Highways

Section 143.102 Prevails Over Local Stock Laws in Determining Livestock Owner Liability on Highways

Date: Feb 1, 2020
Section 143.102 Prevails Over Local Stock Laws in Determining Livestock Owner Liability on Highways Introduction In the case of Shary Pruski v. Joshua Garcia (594 S.W.3d 322), decided by the Supreme...
Texas Supreme Court Affirms Contractual Conditions Precluding Partnership Formation in ETP v. Enterprise

Texas Supreme Court Affirms Contractual Conditions Precluding Partnership Formation in ETP v. Enterprise

Date: Feb 1, 2020
Freedom of Contract in Partnership Formation: Texas Supreme Court in ETP v. Enterprise Introduction The case of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. and Energy Transfer Fuel, L.P. v. Enterprise Products...
Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Venue-Selection Agreements Over Injunctive Relief Venue Requirements

Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Venue-Selection Agreements Over Injunctive Relief Venue Requirements

Date: Feb 1, 2020
Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Venue-Selection Agreements Over Injunctive Relief Venue Requirements Introduction In re Fox River Real Estate Holdings, Inc. (596 S.W.3d 759, 2020) presents a pivotal...
Enforcement of Restrictive Easements: Teal Trading v. Champee Springs

Enforcement of Restrictive Easements: Teal Trading v. Champee Springs

Date: Feb 1, 2020
Enforcement of Restrictive Easements: Teal Trading v. Champee Springs Introduction The case of Teal Trading and Development, LP v. Champee Springs Ranches Property Owners Association addresses the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert