Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Reasonable Care Standard for Passenger Carriers Established in Gulf Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Conley

Reasonable Care Standard for Passenger Carriers Established in Gulf Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Conley

Date: Mar 13, 1924
Reasonable Care Standard for Passenger Carriers Established in Gulf Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Conley Introduction The case of Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Company v. Charles L. Conley and...
Severance of Mineral Rights and the Limitations of Vendor's Lien: Insights from Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. Gammon

Severance of Mineral Rights and the Limitations of Vendor's Lien: Insights from Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. Gammon

Date: Jul 1, 1923
Severance of Mineral Rights and the Limitations of Vendor's Lien: Insights from Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. Gammon Introduction The landmark case of Humphreys-Mexia Company et al. v. J.L. Gammon et al....
Severance of Mineral Rights as Taxable Real Property: Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil Gas Company

Severance of Mineral Rights as Taxable Real Property: Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil Gas Company

Date: Jul 1, 1923
Severance of Mineral Rights as Taxable Real Property: Stephens County et al. v. Mid-Kansas Oil Gas Company Introduction The case of Stephens County et al. v. Mid-Kansas Oil Gas Company, decided by...
Determinate Mineral Estate and Forfeiture due to Abandonment in Texas Oil Leases

Determinate Mineral Estate and Forfeiture due to Abandonment in Texas Oil Leases

Date: Jul 1, 1923
Determinate Mineral Estate and Forfeiture due to Abandonment in Texas Oil Leases Introduction The Texas Company et al. v. Nelson Davis et al. (113 Tex. 321), decided by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Proof of Injury Essential for Rescinding Contracts on Fraud: T.J. RUSSELL v. INDUSTRIAL TRANSPORTATION CO.

Proof of Injury Essential for Rescinding Contracts on Fraud: T.J. RUSSELL v. INDUSTRIAL TRANSPORTATION CO.

Date: May 31, 1923
Proof of Injury Essential for Rescinding Contracts on Fraud: T.J. RUSSELL v. INDUSTRIAL TRANSPORTATION CO. Introduction The case of T.J. RUSSELL v. INDUSTRIAL TRANSPORTATION COmpany (113 Tex. 441)...
Equitable Distribution of Separate Real Estate in Divorce: Insights from J.C. Hedtke v. Lena Hedtke (112 Tex. 404)

Equitable Distribution of Separate Real Estate in Divorce: Insights from J.C. Hedtke v. Lena Hedtke (112 Tex. 404)

Date: Feb 15, 1923
Equitable Distribution of Separate Real Estate in Divorce: Insights from J.C. Hedtke v. Lena Hedtke (112 Tex. 404) Introduction J.C. Hedtke v. Lena Hedtke is a landmark decision rendered by the...
Legislative Authority to Donate State Tax Revenues to Municipalities: City of Aransas Pass v. Keeling

Legislative Authority to Donate State Tax Revenues to Municipalities: City of Aransas Pass v. Keeling

Date: Jan 25, 1923
Legislative Authority to Donate State Tax Revenues to Municipalities: City of Aransas Pass v. Keeling Introduction City of Aransas Pass et al. v. W.A. Keeling, Attorney-General is a landmark 1923...
Affirmation of General Verdicts Based on Multiple Grounds of Negligence: The LANCASTER v. FITCH Decision

Affirmation of General Verdicts Based on Multiple Grounds of Negligence: The LANCASTER v. FITCH Decision

Date: Jan 11, 1923
Affirmation of General Verdicts Based on Multiple Grounds of Negligence: The LANCASTER v. FITCH Decision 1. Introduction The case of J.L. Lancaster et al. v. Ben E. Fitch (112 Tex. 293) adjudicated...
Defining 'Injury in the Course of Employment' and Lump Sum Compensation in Workmen's Compensation Law: A Commentary on Lumberman's Reciprocal Association v. Behnken

Defining 'Injury in the Course of Employment' and Lump Sum Compensation in Workmen's Compensation Law: A Commentary on Lumberman's Reciprocal Association v. Behnken

Date: Nov 30, 1922
Defining 'Injury in the Course of Employment' and Lump Sum Compensation in Workmen's Compensation Law: A Commentary on Lumberman's Reciprocal Association v. Behnken Introduction Lumberman's...
Reaffirming Third-Party Liability in Workers' Compensation Cases: GUSSIE FOX v. DALLAS HOTEL COMPANY

Reaffirming Third-Party Liability in Workers' Compensation Cases: GUSSIE FOX v. DALLAS HOTEL COMPANY

Date: Apr 20, 1922
Reaffirming Third-Party Liability in Workers' Compensation Cases Introduction GUSSIE FOX v. DALLAS HOTEL COMPANY, 111 Tex. 461 (1922), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Texas that...
Limitation of Municipal Police Power in Regulating Property Use: Spann v. City of Dallas

Limitation of Municipal Police Power in Regulating Property Use: Spann v. City of Dallas

Date: Nov 3, 1921
Limitation of Municipal Police Power in Regulating Property Use: Spann v. City of Dallas Introduction The case of John R. Spann v. City of Dallas ET AL. (111 Tex. 350), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Enforcement of Parol Contracts in Real Estate Transfers: Hooks v. Bridgewater

Enforcement of Parol Contracts in Real Estate Transfers: Hooks v. Bridgewater

Date: Apr 14, 1921
Enforcement of Parol Contracts in Real Estate Transfers: Hooks v. Bridgewater Introduction H.A. Hooks, Administrator, et al. v. Bob Bridgewater, 111 Tex. 122 (1921), is a landmark case decided by the...
MRS. ALMA KOY v. WILLIAM SCHNEIDER: Pioneering Women’s Suffrage in Primary Elections

MRS. ALMA KOY v. WILLIAM SCHNEIDER: Pioneering Women’s Suffrage in Primary Elections

Date: Apr 22, 1920
MRS. ALMA KOY v. WILLIAM SCHNEIDER: Pioneering Women’s Suffrage in Primary Elections Introduction The landmark case of MRS. ALMA KOY v. WILLIAM SCHNEIDER, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on...
Bexar County v. W.C. Linden: Upholding State Control Over Excess District Attorney Fees

Bexar County v. W.C. Linden: Upholding State Control Over Excess District Attorney Fees

Date: Apr 15, 1920
Bexar County v. W.C. Linden: Upholding State Control Over Excess District Attorney Fees Introduction Bexar County v. W.C. Linden (110 Tex. 339), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on April 14,...
SUSAN S. SIMMONS ET AL. v. F.F. ARNIM ET AL. (110 Tex. 309): Safeguarding Minor's Estates Against Improper Execution Sales

SUSAN S. SIMMONS ET AL. v. F.F. ARNIM ET AL. (110 Tex. 309): Safeguarding Minor's Estates Against Improper Execution Sales

Date: Mar 21, 1920
SUSAN S. SIMMONS ET AL. v. F.F. ARNIM ET AL. (110 Tex. 309): Safeguarding Minor's Estates Against Improper Execution Sales Introduction The case of Susan S. Simmons et al. v. F.F. Arnim et al. (110...
Mandate Issuance Timelines in Reversed and Remanded Cases: Insights from DIGNOWITY v. COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

Mandate Issuance Timelines in Reversed and Remanded Cases: Insights from DIGNOWITY v. COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

Date: Mar 27, 1919
Mandate Issuance Timelines in Reversed and Remanded Cases: Insights from DIGNOWITY v. COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS Introduction The case of Hallie B. Dignowity et al. v. Court of Civil Appeals for Fourth...
Supreme Court of Texas Validates Employers' Liability Act: A Landmark Decision in Workers' Compensation

Supreme Court of Texas Validates Employers' Liability Act: A Landmark Decision in Workers' Compensation

Date: Apr 27, 1916
Supreme Court of Texas Validates Employers' Liability Act: A Landmark Decision in Workers' Compensation Introduction The case of Charlie MIDDLETON v. TEXAS POWER LIGHT Company (108 Tex. 96), decided...
Municipal Ordinances Cannot Supersede State Injunction Statutes: Analysis of FRANK. A. SPENCE ET AL. v. W.H. FENCHLER ET AL.

Municipal Ordinances Cannot Supersede State Injunction Statutes: Analysis of FRANK. A. SPENCE ET AL. v. W.H. FENCHLER ET AL.

Date: Dec 9, 1915
Municipal Ordinances Cannot Supersede State Injunction Statutes: Analysis of FRANK. A. SPENCE ET AL. v. W.H. FENCHLER ET AL. Introduction The case of FRANK. A. SPENCE ET AL. v. W.H. FENCHLER ET AL....
Taxation of Oil and Gas Leases as Property Interests: Texas Company v. Daugherty

Taxation of Oil and Gas Leases as Property Interests: Texas Company v. Daugherty

Date: May 22, 1915
Taxation of Oil and Gas Leases as Property Interests: Texas Company v. Daugherty Introduction Texas Company v. W.H. Daugherty et al., 107 Tex. 226 (1915), is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Interpretation of Deeds: Conveyance vs. Quit Claim in H.P. Cook v. J.M. Smith

Interpretation of Deeds: Conveyance vs. Quit Claim in H.P. Cook v. J.M. Smith

Date: Apr 1, 1915
Interpretation of Deeds: Conveyance vs. Quit Claim in H.P. Cook v. J.M. Smith Introduction The case H.P. Cook et al. v. J.M. Smith, decided by the Supreme Court of Texas on March 31, 1915, addresses...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert