Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Tennessee Case Commentaries

Double Jeopardy Protections Reinforced in STATE v. Mounce

Double Jeopardy Protections Reinforced in STATE v. Mounce

Date: Aug 3, 1993
Double Jeopardy Protections Reinforced in STATE v. Mounce Introduction STATE of Tennessee v. Roy L. Mounce, 859 S.W.2d 319 (Tenn. 1993), addresses the critical issue of double jeopardy protections in...
The Beare Company v. Tennessee Department of Revenue: Expanding the Definition of "Processing" in Manufacturing Exemptions

The Beare Company v. Tennessee Department of Revenue: Expanding the Definition of "Processing" in Manufacturing Exemptions

Date: Jul 13, 1993
The Beare Company v. Tennessee Department of Revenue: Expanding the Definition of "Processing" in Manufacturing Exemptions Introduction The Beare Company v. Tennessee Department of Revenue is a...
Aggravation of Pre-Existing Conditions in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Fink v. Caudle

Aggravation of Pre-Existing Conditions in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Fink v. Caudle

Date: Jul 8, 1993
Aggravation of Pre-Existing Conditions in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Fink v. Caudle Introduction The case of Judy L. Fink, Plaintiff-Appellant v. June Caudle, et al., decided by the Supreme...
Reaffirming Federal Boykin Standards: Tennessee Supreme Court in Blankenship v. State of Tennessee

Reaffirming Federal Boykin Standards: Tennessee Supreme Court in Blankenship v. State of Tennessee

Date: Jul 7, 1993
Reaffirming Federal Boykin Standards: Tennessee Supreme Court in Blankenship v. State of Tennessee Introduction In the landmark case of Blankenship v. State of Tennessee (858 S.W.2d 897, 1993), the...
Reaffirming the Boundaries of Retaliatory Discharge Claims under Neutral Absence Policies: Insights from Anderson v. Standard Register Company

Reaffirming the Boundaries of Retaliatory Discharge Claims under Neutral Absence Policies: Insights from Anderson v. Standard Register Company

Date: Jun 29, 1993
Reaffirming the Boundaries of Retaliatory Discharge Claims under Neutral Absence Policies: Insights from Anderson v. Standard Register Company Introduction Angela Anderson, a long-term employee of...
Impact of Improper Admission of Prior Sentencing on Capital Cases: Insights from STATE v. Leonard Edward Smith

Impact of Improper Admission of Prior Sentencing on Capital Cases: Insights from STATE v. Leonard Edward Smith

Date: Jun 29, 1993
Impact of Improper Admission of Prior Sentencing on Capital Cases: Insights from STATE of Tennessee v. Leonard Edward Smith Introduction STATE of Tennessee v. Leonard Edward Smith, 857 S.W.2d 1...
Pearson v. Tennessee: Dual-Statute Sentencing to Comply with Ex Post Facto Prohibitions

Pearson v. Tennessee: Dual-Statute Sentencing to Comply with Ex Post Facto Prohibitions

Date: Jun 15, 1993
Pearson v. Tennessee: Dual-Statute Sentencing to Comply with Ex Post Facto Prohibitions Introduction Pearson v. Tennessee, 858 S.W.2d 879 (Tenn. 1993), is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court...
Constitutional Protection of Parental Rights Over Grandparent Visitation in Tennessee

Constitutional Protection of Parental Rights Over Grandparent Visitation in Tennessee

Date: Jun 2, 1993
Constitutional Protection of Parental Rights Over Grandparent Visitation in Tennessee Introduction In the landmark case of B.F. Hawk, Jr. and Sue Hawk, Petitioners/Appellees, v. Robert S. Hawk and...
Establishing Physician's Duty to Warn Third Parties of Disease Exposure Risks in Bradshaw v. Daniel

Establishing Physician's Duty to Warn Third Parties of Disease Exposure Risks in Bradshaw v. Daniel

Date: Jun 2, 1993
Establishing Physician's Duty to Warn Third Parties of Disease Exposure Risks in Bradshaw v. Daniel Introduction Bradshaw v. Daniel, 854 S.W.2d 865 (Tenn. 1993), is a landmark case in Tennessee...
STATE v. BALLARD (1993): Reinforcing Discovery Obligations and Scrutinizing Expert PTSD Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Trials

STATE v. BALLARD (1993): Reinforcing Discovery Obligations and Scrutinizing Expert PTSD Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Trials

Date: May 25, 1993
STATE v. BALLARD (1993): Reinforcing Discovery Obligations and Scrutinizing Expert PTSD Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Trials Introduction State of Tennessee v. Frances Lucindy Ballard is a pivotal...
Finality of Lump-Sum Workers' Compensation Awards Under Tenn.R.Civ.P. Rule 60.02(5)

Finality of Lump-Sum Workers' Compensation Awards Under Tenn.R.Civ.P. Rule 60.02(5)

Date: May 11, 1993
Finality of Lump-Sum Workers' Compensation Awards Under Tenn.R.Civ.P. Rule 60.02(5) Introduction Cas N. Underwood v. Zurich Insurance Company and BASF Corporation is a pivotal case in Tennessee's...
State of Tennessee v. Gary Caughron (855 S.W.2d 526): Upholding Capital Sentencing and Procedural Adherence

State of Tennessee v. Gary Caughron (855 S.W.2d 526): Upholding Capital Sentencing and Procedural Adherence

Date: May 11, 1993
State of Tennessee v. Gary Caughron (855 S.W.2d 526): Upholding Capital Sentencing and Procedural Adherence Introduction The case of State of Tennessee v. Gary June Caughron is a notable decision by...
Classification of Capital Gains as Nonbusiness Earnings: Insights from Union Carbide v. Commissioner of Revenue

Classification of Capital Gains as Nonbusiness Earnings: Insights from Union Carbide v. Commissioner of Revenue

Date: May 4, 1993
Classification of Capital Gains as Nonbusiness Earnings: Insights from Union Carbide Corporation v. Commissioner of Revenue Introduction The case of Union Carbide Corporation v. Commissioner of...
Reinstatement of the Thirteenth Juror Rule and Admissibility of Psychological Testimony: Insights from State v. Barone

Reinstatement of the Thirteenth Juror Rule and Admissibility of Psychological Testimony: Insights from State v. Barone

Date: May 4, 1993
Reinstatement of the Thirteenth Juror Rule and Admissibility of Psychological Testimony: Insights from State of Tennessee v. Michael Barone Introduction State of Tennessee v. Michael Barone is a...
Retroactive Application of the Savings Statute Impairs Contractual Obligations: Kee v. Shelter Insurance

Retroactive Application of the Savings Statute Impairs Contractual Obligations: Kee v. Shelter Insurance

Date: Apr 6, 1993
Retroactive Application of the Savings Statute Impairs Contractual Obligations: Kee v. Shelter Insurance Introduction The case of Roger Kee v. Shelter Insurance Mutual Insurance Company revolves...
Limits on Admitting Prior Fraudulent Acts and Proper Calculation of Prejudgment Interest in Insurance Litigation: Otis v. Cambridge Mutual

Limits on Admitting Prior Fraudulent Acts and Proper Calculation of Prejudgment Interest in Insurance Litigation: Otis v. Cambridge Mutual

Date: Mar 30, 1993
Limits on Admitting Prior Fraudulent Acts and Proper Calculation of Prejudgment Interest in Insurance Litigation: Otis v. Cambridge Mutual Introduction In the seminal case Otis v. Cambridge Mutual...
Requiring Election of Specific Offenses in Sexual Crime Cases: Insights from STATE of Tennessee v. William Shelton

Requiring Election of Specific Offenses in Sexual Crime Cases: Insights from STATE of Tennessee v. William Shelton

Date: Mar 23, 1993
Requiring Election of Specific Offenses in Sexual Crime Cases: Insights from STATE of Tennessee v. William Shelton Introduction The case of STATE of Tennessee v. William Shelton (851 S.W.2d 134)...
Substantial Equality in Public School Funding: Tennessee Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Substantial Equality in Public School Funding: Tennessee Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Mar 23, 1993
Substantial Equality in Public School Funding: Tennessee Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of Tennessee Small School Systems, et al. v. Ned Ray McWherter, et al. addresses a...
Challenges to Voluntariness of Guilty Pleas in Tennessee Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Challenges to Voluntariness of Guilty Pleas in Tennessee Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: Mar 23, 1993
Challenges to Voluntariness of Guilty Pleas in Tennessee Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction The case of Mark D. Archer v. State of Tennessee (851 S.W.2d 157, 1993) addresses a pivotal issue in...
Affirmation of Malice in Second-Degree Murder and the Boundaries of Diminished Capacity: STATE of Tennessee v. Robert Earl Shelton

Affirmation of Malice in Second-Degree Murder and the Boundaries of Diminished Capacity: STATE of Tennessee v. Robert Earl Shelton

Date: Mar 23, 1993
Affirmation of Malice in Second-Degree Murder and the Boundaries of Diminished Capacity: STATE of Tennessee v. Robert Earl Shelton Introduction The case of STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Robert...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert