Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Tennessee Case Commentaries

Supersession of Pinkston: Establishing New Procedural Framework for Delayed Appeals Under Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 28(9)(D)

Supersession of Pinkston: Establishing New Procedural Framework for Delayed Appeals Under Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 28(9)(D)

Date: Jun 20, 2003
Supersession of Pinkston: Establishing New Procedural Framework for Delayed Appeals Under Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 28(9)(D) Introduction In the landmark case of State of Tennessee v. Michael D....
Establishing the Standard for Custody Modification Based on Material Change of Circumstances: Insights from Cranston v. Combs

Establishing the Standard for Custody Modification Based on Material Change of Circumstances: Insights from Cranston v. Combs

Date: Jun 4, 2003
Establishing the Standard for Custody Modification Based on Material Change of Circumstances: Insights from Cranston v. Combs Introduction Melissa Combs Cranston v. Edward Scott Combs, 106 S.W.3d 641...
Reinstatement of Dismissed Claims Under Rule 60.02: Insights from Henry v. Goins

Reinstatement of Dismissed Claims Under Rule 60.02: Insights from Henry v. Goins

Date: May 14, 2003
Reinstatement of Dismissed Claims Under Rule 60.02: Insights from Henry v. Goins Introduction The case of Victoria L. Henry, et al. v. Timothy A. Goins, et al. serves as a pivotal precedent in...
Strict Adherence to Procedural Rules for Pro Se Prisoner Litigants: Hessmer v. Hessmer

Strict Adherence to Procedural Rules for Pro Se Prisoner Litigants: Hessmer v. Hessmer

Date: May 13, 2003
Strict Adherence to Procedural Rules for Pro Se Prisoner Litigants: Hessmer v. Hessmer Introduction John Allen Hessmer v. Rosa Blanca Hessmer is a notable case adjudicated by the Court of Appeals of...
Confidentiality Obligations in Professional Responsibility Proceedings: Applicability to Laypersons and Contempt Sanctions

Confidentiality Obligations in Professional Responsibility Proceedings: Applicability to Laypersons and Contempt Sanctions

Date: May 9, 2003
Confidentiality Obligations in Professional Responsibility Proceedings: Applicability to Laypersons and Contempt Sanctions Introduction The case of John Doe, et al. v. Board of Professional...
Dee Ann Curtis Gallaher v. Curtis J. Elam: Upholding Child Support Guidelines' Constitutionality

Dee Ann Curtis Gallaher v. Curtis J. Elam: Upholding Child Support Guidelines' Constitutionality

Date: May 3, 2003
Dee Ann Curtis Gallaher v. Curtis J. Elam: Upholding Child Support Guidelines' Constitutionality Introduction Dee Ann Curtis Gallaher v. Curtis J. Elam (104 S.W.3d 455) is a pivotal case decided by...
Elkins v. State: Establishing Substantial Step in Child Rape and Attempted Child Rape Convictions

Elkins v. State: Establishing Substantial Step in Child Rape and Attempted Child Rape Convictions

Date: Apr 30, 2003
Elkins v. State: Establishing Substantial Step in Child Rape and Attempted Child Rape Convictions Introduction State of Tennessee v. Darryl Lee Elkins is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Supreme Court of Tennessee Clarifies Post-Conviction Relief Grounds and Coram Nobis Procedures in Harris v. State of Tennessee

Supreme Court of Tennessee Clarifies Post-Conviction Relief Grounds and Coram Nobis Procedures in Harris v. State of Tennessee

Date: Apr 17, 2003
Supreme Court of Tennessee Clarifies Post-Conviction Relief Grounds and Coram Nobis Procedures in Harris v. State of Tennessee Introduction In the landmark case of Ricky Harris v. State of Tennessee,...
Ensuring No Duplication of Tax: Tennessee Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in BellSouth Advertising v. Johnson

Ensuring No Duplication of Tax: Tennessee Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in BellSouth Advertising v. Johnson

Date: Mar 13, 2003
Ensuring No Duplication of Tax: Tennessee Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in BellSouth Advertising v. Johnson Introduction The case of Bellsouth Advertising and Publishing Company v. Ruth Johnson,...
Proper Procedures for Reserving a Certified Question of Law in Nolo Contendere Pleas: Analysis of STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL ARMSTRONG

Proper Procedures for Reserving a Certified Question of Law in Nolo Contendere Pleas: Analysis of STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL ARMSTRONG

Date: Feb 6, 2003
Proper Procedures for Reserving a Certified Question of Law in Nolo Contendere Pleas: Analysis of STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL ARMSTRONG Introduction STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL ARMSTRONG, 126...
Reaffirmation of Adams Factors in Confidential Marital Communications Privilege

Reaffirmation of Adams Factors in Confidential Marital Communications Privilege

Date: Jan 7, 2003
Reaffirmation of Adams Factors in Confidential Marital Communications Privilege Introduction State of Tennessee v. Gerald Powers, 101 S.W.3d 383 (Tenn. 2003), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Stringent Standards for Post-Conviction Relief: Burnett v. State of Tennessee

Affirmation of Stringent Standards for Post-Conviction Relief: Burnett v. State of Tennessee

Date: Dec 31, 2002
Affirmation of Stringent Standards for Post-Conviction Relief: Burnett v. State of Tennessee Introduction Burnett v. State of Tennessee, 92 S.W.3d 403 (Tenn. 2002), is a seminal case adjudicated by...
Limitations of Tennessee's Parental Rights Termination Statute: A Commentary on Jones v. Garrett

Limitations of Tennessee's Parental Rights Termination Statute: A Commentary on Jones v. Garrett

Date: Dec 31, 2002
Limitations of Tennessee's Parental Rights Termination Statute: A Commentary on Jones v. Garrett Introduction JAMES LEE JONES, III, et al. v. PIERCE BRANDON GARRETT a/k/a PERRY GARRETT (92 S.W.3d...
Due Process Violation in Custody Transfer: Keisling v. Keisling

Due Process Violation in Custody Transfer: Keisling v. Keisling

Date: Dec 24, 2002
Due Process Violation in Custody Transfer: Keisling v. Keisling Introduction The case of Sharon M. Keisling v. Daniel Kerry Keisling, decided by the Supreme Court of Tennessee in 2002, addresses...
Establishing Prima Facie Agency Under Tennessee Code Annotated Section 55-10-311(a): Insights from Godfrey v. Ruiz

Establishing Prima Facie Agency Under Tennessee Code Annotated Section 55-10-311(a): Insights from Godfrey v. Ruiz

Date: Dec 6, 2002
Establishing Prima Facie Agency Under Tennessee Code Annotated Section 55-10-311(a): Insights from Godfrey v. Ruiz Introduction The case of Godfrey v. Ruiz (90 S.W.3d 692), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Sentences in Tennessee: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PAUL DENNIS REID, JR.

Affirmation of Death Sentences in Tennessee: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PAUL DENNIS REID, JR.

Date: Nov 27, 2002
Affirmation of Death Sentences in Tennessee: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PAUL DENNIS REID, JR. Introduction In the landmark case of STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PAUL DENNIS REID, JR....
Timeliness of Appeals in Post-Conviction Relief: Thomas Eugene Graham v. State of Tennessee

Timeliness of Appeals in Post-Conviction Relief: Thomas Eugene Graham v. State of Tennessee

Date: Nov 27, 2002
Timeliness of Appeals in Post-Conviction Relief: Thomas Eugene Graham v. State of Tennessee Introduction The case of Thomas Eugene Graham v. State of Tennessee (90 S.W.3d 687) addressed critical...
Strict Construction of Vicarious Liability in Day Care Regulations: Houghton v. Aramark

Strict Construction of Vicarious Liability in Day Care Regulations: Houghton v. Aramark

Date: Nov 23, 2002
Strict Construction of Vicarious Liability in Day Care Regulations: Houghton v. Aramark Introduction Houghton v. Aramark Educational Resources, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: Natural and Probable Consequences & Lesser-Included Offenses in State v. Linnell Richmond

Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: Natural and Probable Consequences & Lesser-Included Offenses in State v. Linnell Richmond

Date: Nov 2, 2002
Harmless Error in Jury Instructions: Natural and Probable Consequences & Lesser-Included Offenses in State of Tennessee v. Linnell Richmond Introduction State of Tennessee v. Linnell Richmond, 90...
Kendrick v. Shoemake: Establishing the Standard for Custody Modification in Tennessee

Kendrick v. Shoemake: Establishing the Standard for Custody Modification in Tennessee

Date: Nov 2, 2002
Kendrick v. Shoemake: Establishing the Standard for Custody Modification in Tennessee Introduction Kendrick v. Shoemake, 90 S.W.3d 566 (Tenn. 2002), is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert