Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

South Carolina Case Commentaries

Clemson University v. Hendricks: Establishing Limits on Duty of Care in Educational Institutions

Clemson University v. Hendricks: Establishing Limits on Duty of Care in Educational Institutions

Date: Mar 18, 2003
Clemson University v. Hendricks: Establishing Limits on Duty of Care in Educational Institutions Introduction R. J. Hendricks, II v. Clemson University is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
State v. Shuler: Admissibility of 911 Tapes in Capital Sentencing

State v. Shuler: Admissibility of 911 Tapes in Capital Sentencing

Date: Feb 4, 2003
State v. Shuler: Admissibility of 911 Tapes in Capital Sentencing Introduction The State v. Charles O. Shuler is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of South Carolina decided on February 3,...
Life Without Parole Sentencing for Juvenile Offenses: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. James R. Standard

Life Without Parole Sentencing for Juvenile Offenses: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. James R. Standard

Date: Aug 13, 2002
Life Without Parole Sentencing for Juvenile Offenses: A Comprehensive Analysis of State v. James R. Standard Introduction State v. James R. Standard is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming the 'Actual Malice' Standard in Libel Claims by Public Officials: Insights from FLEMING v. ROSE

Reaffirming the 'Actual Malice' Standard in Libel Claims by Public Officials: Insights from FLEMING v. ROSE

Date: Jul 23, 2002
Reaffirming the 'Actual Malice' Standard in Libel Claims by Public Officials: Insights from FLEMING v. ROSE Introduction Lt. J. A. Fleming, Jr. v. Boykin Rose and James Caulder, 350 S.C. 488 (Supreme...
South Carolina Supreme Court Reinforces Procedural Standards and Upholds Sexually Violent Predator Act

South Carolina Supreme Court Reinforces Procedural Standards and Upholds Sexually Violent Predator Act

Date: Jul 23, 2002
South Carolina Supreme Court Reinforces Procedural Standards and Upholds Sexually Violent Predator Act 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of South Carolina delivered a pivotal ruling in the case of In...
Exclusivity Provision of Workers' Compensation Act Does Not Constitute Subject Matter Jurisdiction: SC Supreme Court Decision in Sabb v. South Carolina State University

Exclusivity Provision of Workers' Compensation Act Does Not Constitute Subject Matter Jurisdiction: SC Supreme Court Decision in Sabb v. South Carolina State University

Date: Jul 16, 2002
Exclusivity Provision of Workers' Compensation Act Does Not Constitute Subject Matter Jurisdiction: SC Supreme Court Decision in Sabb v. South Carolina State University Introduction The case of...
Dual Office Holding Restrictions: Municipal Police Officers as Constables under South Carolina Law

Dual Office Holding Restrictions: Municipal Police Officers as Constables under South Carolina Law

Date: Jul 2, 2002
Dual Office Holding Restrictions: Municipal Police Officers as Constables under South Carolina Law Introduction The case Henry Richardson v. Town of Mount Pleasant and Charles M. Condon, Attorney...
Clarifying Standards for Willful Failure to Support and Visit in Parental Rights Termination

Clarifying Standards for Willful Failure to Support and Visit in Parental Rights Termination

Date: Jun 13, 2002
Clarifying Standards for Willful Failure to Support and Visit in Parental Rights Termination Introduction The case of South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Robin Headden, 354 S.C. 602...
Survivability of Fraudulent Claims under the Dealers Act and Implications for Class Actions: FERGUSON v. CHARLESTON LINCOLN/MERCURY, INC.

Survivability of Fraudulent Claims under the Dealers Act and Implications for Class Actions: FERGUSON v. CHARLESTON LINCOLN/MERCURY, INC.

Date: May 21, 2002
Survivability of Fraudulent Claims under the Dealers Act and Implications for Class Actions: Ferguson v. Charleston Lincoln Mercury, Inc. Introduction Ferguson v. Charleston Lincoln Mercury, Inc.,...
Affirmation of South Carolina’s Sexually Violent Predator Act in State v. Gaster

Affirmation of South Carolina’s Sexually Violent Predator Act in State v. Gaster

Date: May 21, 2002
Affirmation of South Carolina’s Sexually Violent Predator Act in State v. Gaster Introduction In the landmark case of The State v. Frank M. Gaster, the Supreme Court of South Carolina affirmed the...
Clarifying Stormwater Runoff Calculations and Coastal Management Consistency: Insights from Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

Clarifying Stormwater Runoff Calculations and Coastal Management Consistency: Insights from Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

Date: Feb 26, 2002
Clarifying Stormwater Runoff Calculations and Coastal Management Consistency: Insights from Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control Introduction The case of Mike Brown,...
Establishing Exhaustion of State Remedies: South Carolina’s Approach in State v. McKennedy

Establishing Exhaustion of State Remedies: South Carolina’s Approach in State v. McKennedy

Date: Feb 12, 2002
Establishing Exhaustion of State Remedies: South Carolina’s Approach in State v. McKennedy Introduction State v. William C. McKennedy (348 S.C. 270) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Glasscock v. USFG: Affirmation of Underinsured Motorist Coverage Including Loss of Use Damages

Glasscock v. USFG: Affirmation of Underinsured Motorist Coverage Including Loss of Use Damages

Date: Dec 4, 2001
Glasscock v. USFG: Affirmation of Underinsured Motorist Coverage Including Loss of Use Damages Introduction In the landmark case Glasscock, Inc. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USFG),...
Ensuring Impartial Guardians Ad Litem: Due Process in Child Custody – Patel v. Patel

Ensuring Impartial Guardians Ad Litem: Due Process in Child Custody – Patel v. Patel

Date: Nov 1, 2001
Ensuring Impartial Guardians Ad Litem: Due Process in Child Custody – Patel v. Patel Introduction Patel v. Patel, 347 S.C. 281 (2001) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of South Carolina...
STATE v. OWENS: Upholding Due Process in Capital Sentencing with After-Discovered Evidence

STATE v. OWENS: Upholding Due Process in Capital Sentencing with After-Discovered Evidence

Date: Sep 5, 2001
STATE v. OWENS: Upholding Due Process in Capital Sentencing with After-Discovered Evidence Introduction State v. Freddie Eugene Owens, 346 S.C. 637 (2001), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
South Carolina Supreme Court Establishes Federal Arbitration Act Supremacy in Partnership Disputes

South Carolina Supreme Court Establishes Federal Arbitration Act Supremacy in Partnership Disputes

Date: Sep 5, 2001
South Carolina Supreme Court Establishes Federal Arbitration Act Supremacy in Partnership Disputes Introduction In the landmark case of Leo Zabinski and John Brainard, Appellants, v. Bright Acres...
Affirmation of Evidence Handling and Witness Identification Standards in State v. Felix Cheeseboro

Affirmation of Evidence Handling and Witness Identification Standards in State v. Felix Cheeseboro

Date: Aug 28, 2001
Affirmation of Evidence Handling and Witness Identification Standards in State v. Felix Cheeseboro Introduction The State v. Felix Cheeseboro, 346 S.C. 526, is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Exclusive Remedy under Workers' Compensation Act: Reversal in Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina

Exclusive Remedy under Workers' Compensation Act: Reversal in Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina

Date: Aug 21, 2001
Exclusive Remedy under Workers' Compensation Act: Reversal in Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina Introduction In the landmark case of Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina, 346...
Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements Under Rule 801(d)(1)(B): Insights from State v. Saltz

Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements Under Rule 801(d)(1)(B): Insights from State v. Saltz

Date: Aug 7, 2001
Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements Under Rule 801(d)(1)(B): Insights from State v. Saltz Introduction State v. Michael Paul Saltz, 346 S.C. 114 (2001), is a pivotal Supreme Court of South...
South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Town's Permit Fee Ordinance under Restrictive Land Covenants

South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Town's Permit Fee Ordinance under Restrictive Land Covenants

Date: Jul 24, 2001
South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Town's Permit Fee Ordinance under Restrictive Land Covenants Introduction The case of South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. The Town of McClellanville...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert