Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

South Carolina Case Commentaries

Statute of Limitations and the Discovery Rule: An In-Depth Commentary on Dean v. Ruscon Corporation

Statute of Limitations and the Discovery Rule: An In-Depth Commentary on Dean v. Ruscon Corporation

Date: Mar 26, 1996
Statute of Limitations and the Discovery Rule: An In-Depth Commentary on Dean v. Ruscon Corporation Introduction Dean v. Ruscon Corporation, 321 S.C. 360 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1996),...
Judicial Discretion in Remedying Batson Violations: South Carolina v. Franklin

Judicial Discretion in Remedying Batson Violations: South Carolina v. Franklin

Date: Jan 31, 1995
Judicial Discretion in Remedying Batson Violations: South Carolina v. Franklin Introduction The State v. Ellis Franklin (318 S.C. 47), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of South Carolina on January...
Enforcement of Commercial Lease Terms: Materiality of Breach in KIRIAKIDES v. UNITED ARTISTS COMMUNICATIONS

Enforcement of Commercial Lease Terms: Materiality of Breach in KIRIAKIDES v. UNITED ARTISTS COMMUNICATIONS

Date: Jan 18, 1994
Enforcement of Commercial Lease Terms: Materiality of Breach in KIRIAKIDES v. UNITED ARTISTS COMMUNICATIONS Introduction The case of Alex Kiriakides, Jr. and John KIRIAKIDES v. UNITED ARTISTS...
Admissibility of Rape Trauma Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases: Analysis of State v. Schumpert

Admissibility of Rape Trauma Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases: Analysis of State v. Schumpert

Date: Aug 24, 1993
Admissibility of Rape Trauma Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases: Analysis of State v. Schumpert Introduction State v. Frank Carlton Schumpert is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Reversal of New Trial Nisi Additur in Contract Dispute: Pelican Building Centers v. Dutton

Reversal of New Trial Nisi Additur in Contract Dispute: Pelican Building Centers v. Dutton

Date: Feb 23, 1993
Reversal of New Trial Nisi Additur in Contract Dispute: Pelican Building Centers v. Dutton Introduction Pelican Building Centers of Horry-Georgetown, Inc., d/b/a Myrtle Beach Lumber Company, Inc. v....
South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Jury Malice Instructions as Harmless Error in Murder Convictions

South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Jury Malice Instructions as Harmless Error in Murder Convictions

Date: Sep 1, 1992
South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Jury Malice Instructions as Harmless Error in Murder Convictions Introduction The cases of John D. Arnold and John H. Plath v. State of South Carolina were...
State Farm v. Crossley: Defining Good Faith in Insurance Contracts

State Farm v. Crossley: Defining Good Faith in Insurance Contracts

Date: Mar 3, 1992
State Farm v. Crossley: Defining Good Faith in Insurance Contracts Introduction The case of Clarence A. Crossley vs. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (307 S.C. 354) adjudicated by the...
South Carolina Tax Commission v. Catherine L. Thayer: Reinforcing the Establishment Clause in Tax Exemptions

South Carolina Tax Commission v. Catherine L. Thayer: Reinforcing the Establishment Clause in Tax Exemptions

Date: Jan 14, 1992
South Carolina Tax Commission v. Catherine L. Thayer: Reinforcing the Establishment Clause in Tax Exemptions Introduction In the landmark case Catherine L. Thayer d/b/a C R Marketing v. South...
Death Penalty Permitted for 'Guilty But Mentally Ill' Defendants Under the Eighth Amendment: Wilson v. State

Death Penalty Permitted for 'Guilty But Mentally Ill' Defendants Under the Eighth Amendment: Wilson v. State

Date: Jan 7, 1992
Death Penalty Permitted for 'Guilty But Mentally Ill' Defendants Under the Eighth Amendment: Wilson v. State Introduction The State v. James William Wilson (306 S.C. 498) is a landmark case...
South Carolina Tax Commission v. United Oil Marketers, Inc.: Severability and Constitutional Challenges in Fuel Ethanol Taxation

South Carolina Tax Commission v. United Oil Marketers, Inc.: Severability and Constitutional Challenges in Fuel Ethanol Taxation

Date: Dec 17, 1991
South Carolina Tax Commission v. United Oil Marketers, Inc.: Severability and Constitutional Challenges in Fuel Ethanol Taxation Introduction South Carolina Tax Commission v. United Oil Marketers,...
Affirmation of Procedural Finality in Successive Post-Conviction Relief Applications: Michael AICE v. STATE of South Carolina

Affirmation of Procedural Finality in Successive Post-Conviction Relief Applications: Michael AICE v. STATE of South Carolina

Date: Sep 10, 1991
Affirmation of Procedural Finality in Successive Post-Conviction Relief Applications: Michael AICE v. STATE of South Carolina Introduction The case of Michael AICE v. STATE of South Carolina...
Affirmation of Punitive Damages and Agency Determination in Cellisa E. Gamble v. Ke

Affirmation of Punitive Damages and Agency Determination in Cellisa E. Gamble v. Ke

Date: Jun 25, 1991
Affirmation of Punitive Damages and Agency Determination in Cellisa E. Gamble v. Ke Introduction Cellisa E. Gamble v. Ke is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of South Carolina on June...
Abolition of In Favorem Vitae Doctrine in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of The State v. Torrence

Abolition of In Favorem Vitae Doctrine in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of The State v. Torrence

Date: May 21, 1991
Abolition of In Favorem Vitae Doctrine in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of The State v. Torrence Introduction The State v. Michael R. Torrence is a landmark 1991 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Reevaluation of Summary Judgment Standards in Toxic Tort Litigation: Baughman v. AT&T Nassau Metals Corporation

Reevaluation of Summary Judgment Standards in Toxic Tort Litigation: Baughman v. AT&T Nassau Metals Corporation

Date: May 14, 1991
Reevaluation of Summary Judgment Standards in Toxic Tort Litigation: Baughman v. AT&T Nassau Metals Corporation Introduction The case of Frank Joe Baughman, et al. v. American Telephone and Telegraph...
Establishing Fiduciary Breach and Conversion of Funds: SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. Cox

Establishing Fiduciary Breach and Conversion of Funds: SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. Cox

Date: Jun 30, 1990
Establishing Fiduciary Breach and Conversion of Funds: SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. Cox Introduction The case of SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. Donald L. Cox revolves around allegations of financial...
Exclusion of Goodwill in Equitable Distribution: Analysis of Donahue v. Donahue

Exclusion of Goodwill in Equitable Distribution: Analysis of Donahue v. Donahue

Date: Sep 26, 1989
Exclusion of Goodwill in Equitable Distribution: Analysis of Donahue v. Donahue Introduction The case of Janis F. Donahue v. James M. Donahue, decided by the Supreme Court of South Carolina on...
Judicial Standards for Partnership Dissolution in Granny Apple Associates v. Fisher Agro

Judicial Standards for Partnership Dissolution in Granny Apple Associates v. Fisher Agro

Date: Jun 27, 1989
Judicial Standards for Partnership Dissolution in Granny Apple Associates v. Fisher Agro Introduction The Supreme Court of South Carolina, in the case of Granny Apple Associates v. Fisher Agro,...
Enforcing Audit Time Constraints in Medicaid Reimbursement Contracts: Oakmont v. South Carolina Health and Human Services Finance Commission

Enforcing Audit Time Constraints in Medicaid Reimbursement Contracts: Oakmont v. South Carolina Health and Human Services Finance Commission

Date: Oct 25, 1988
Enforcing Audit Time Constraints in Medicaid Reimbursement Contracts: Oakmont v. South Carolina Health and Human Services Finance Commission Introduction The case of C. A.N. Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a...
Equitable Distribution and Alimony: Johnson v. Johnson (296 S.C. 289)

Equitable Distribution and Alimony: Johnson v. Johnson (296 S.C. 289)

Date: Aug 30, 1988
Equitable Distribution and Alimony: Johnson v. Johnson (296 S.C. 289) Introduction Johnson v. Johnson is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Court of Appeals of South Carolina on August 29, 1988. This...
Supreme Court of South Carolina Declares Local Family Court Rules Unconstitutional Under Article V

Supreme Court of South Carolina Declares Local Family Court Rules Unconstitutional Under Article V

Date: Aug 2, 1988
Supreme Court of South Carolina Declares Local Family Court Rules Unconstitutional Under Article V Introduction In the landmark case Spartanburg County Department of Social Services v. Linda Padgett...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert