Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Establishing the Elements of Deceit in Contract Law: Insights from Emery v. Third National Bank of Pittsburgh

Establishing the Elements of Deceit in Contract Law: Insights from Emery v. Third National Bank of Pittsburgh

Date: Apr 10, 1934
Establishing the Elements of Deceit in Contract Law: Insights from Emery v. Third National Bank of Pittsburgh Introduction The case of Emery v. Third National Bank of Pittsburgh, adjudicated by the...
Defining 'Accident' in Workmen's Compensation: The Lacey v. Washburn Williams Co. Decision

Defining 'Accident' in Workmen's Compensation: The Lacey v. Washburn Williams Co. Decision

Date: Jan 4, 1933
Defining 'Accident' in Workmen's Compensation: The Lacey v. Washburn Williams Co. Decision Introduction Lacey v. Washburn Williams Co., 309 Pa. 574 (1933), is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Legislative Authority in Special Sessions: Insights from Commonwealth ex rel. Schnader v. Li

Affirmation of Legislative Authority in Special Sessions: Insights from Commonwealth ex rel. Schnader v. Li

Date: Apr 8, 1932
Affirmation of Legislative Authority in Special Sessions: Insights from Commonwealth ex rel. Schnader v. Li Introduction Commonwealth ex rel. Schnader v. Li (308 Pa. 35) is a landmark decision by the...
Williams v. Commonwealth: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Insanity Defense and Mitigating Evidence Admissibility

Williams v. Commonwealth: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Insanity Defense and Mitigating Evidence Admissibility

Date: Jan 6, 1932
Williams v. Commonwealth: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Insanity Defense and Mitigating Evidence Admissibility Introduction The case of Commonwealth v. Harold E. Williams, reported in 307 Pa. 134,...
Owner as Non-Statutory Employer under the Workmen's Compensation Act: McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.

Owner as Non-Statutory Employer under the Workmen's Compensation Act: McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.

Date: Nov 25, 1930
Owner as Non-Statutory Employer under the Workmen's Compensation Act: McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co. Introduction The case of McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co. (302 Pa. 287), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Waiver and Estoppel in Insurance Claims: Fedas v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania

Waiver and Estoppel in Insurance Claims: Fedas v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania

Date: May 28, 1930
Waiver and Estoppel in Insurance Claims: Fedas v. Insurance Company of Pennsylvania Introduction Fedas v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania is a significant case decided by the Supreme...
Commonwealth v. Widovich et al.: Upholding the Sedition Act and Balancing Free Speech with State Security

Commonwealth v. Widovich et al.: Upholding the Sedition Act and Balancing Free Speech with State Security

Date: Jan 8, 1929
Commonwealth v. Widovich et al.: Upholding the Sedition Act and Balancing Free Speech with State Security Introduction Commonwealth v. Widovich et al. is a landmark 1929 decision by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Judicial Discretion and Statutory Interpretation in Commonwealth v. Meyers

Affirmation of Judicial Discretion and Statutory Interpretation in Commonwealth v. Meyers

Date: Jun 26, 1927
Affirmation of Judicial Discretion and Statutory Interpretation in Commonwealth v. Meyers Introduction Commonwealth v. Meyers, decided on June 25, 1927, by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, serves...
Set-Back Lines in Zoning Ordinances Unconstitutional Under Pennsylvania Law

Set-Back Lines in Zoning Ordinances Unconstitutional Under Pennsylvania Law

Date: Jun 27, 1926
Set-Back Lines in Zoning Ordinances Unconstitutional Under Pennsylvania Law Introduction The case White's Appeal. (287 Pa. 259) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in 1926 addresses the...
Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.: Defining Judicial Boundaries in Workmen's Compensation Cases

Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.: Defining Judicial Boundaries in Workmen's Compensation Cases

Date: Apr 13, 1926
Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.: Defining Judicial Boundaries in Workmen's Compensation Cases Introduction Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co. et al. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Proper Jurisdiction and Estate Interpretation under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's Decision in Kariher's Petition

Establishing Proper Jurisdiction and Estate Interpretation under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's Decision in Kariher's Petition

Date: Nov 24, 1925
Establishing Proper Jurisdiction and Estate Interpretation under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's Decision in Kariher's Petition Introduction Case: Kariher's...
Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co. (1925): Establishing Standards for Causation in Workmen's Compensation

Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co. (1925): Establishing Standards for Causation in Workmen's Compensation

Date: Nov 24, 1925
Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co. (1925): Establishing Standards for Causation in Workmen's Compensation Introduction In Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on...
Reinforcement of the Parol Evidence Rule in Gianni v. R. Russell Co., Inc.

Reinforcement of the Parol Evidence Rule in Gianni v. R. Russell Co., Inc.

Date: Nov 25, 1924
Reinforcement of the Parol Evidence Rule in Gianni v. R. Russell Co., Inc. Introduction The case of Gianni v. R. Russell Co., Inc., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in 1924, addresses...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert