Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Administrative Reconsideration and Wilful Misconduct in Unemployment Compensation: Insights from KFC of Altoona v. UCC Board

Administrative Reconsideration and Wilful Misconduct in Unemployment Compensation: Insights from KFC of Altoona v. UCC Board

Date: Sep 8, 1973
Administrative Reconsideration and Wilful Misconduct in Unemployment Compensation: Insights from KFC of Altoona v. UCC Board 1. Introduction The case of Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v....
Judicial Discretion in Consolidating Similar Offenses Affirmed in COMMONWEALTH v. PETERSON

Judicial Discretion in Consolidating Similar Offenses Affirmed in COMMONWEALTH v. PETERSON

Date: Jul 3, 1973
Judicial Discretion in Consolidating Similar Offenses Affirmed in COMMONWEALTH v. PETERSON Introduction COMMONWEALTH v. PETERSON is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in...
Impeachment of Defendant’s Credibility through Prior Convictions: Commonwealth v. Bighum

Impeachment of Defendant’s Credibility through Prior Convictions: Commonwealth v. Bighum

Date: Jul 3, 1973
Impeachment of Defendant’s Credibility through Prior Convictions: Commonwealth v. Bighum Introduction Commonwealth v. Bighum is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on July...
Commonwealth v. Swanger: Establishing Probable Cause for Vehicle Stops

Commonwealth v. Swanger: Establishing Probable Cause for Vehicle Stops

Date: Jul 3, 1973
Commonwealth v. Swanger: Establishing Probable Cause for Vehicle Stops Introduction Commonwealth v. Swanger is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on July 2, 1973. The...
Reevaluation of 'Course of Employment' in Workmen's Compensation: Uni v. Cyclops Steel Corp.

Reevaluation of 'Course of Employment' in Workmen's Compensation: Uni v. Cyclops Steel Corp.

Date: Jun 12, 1973
Reevaluation of 'Course of Employment' in Workmen's Compensation: Uni v. Cyclops Steel Corp. Introduction In the landmark case Universal Cyclops Steel Corporation, et al. v. Joseph P. Krawczynski,...
Abolition of Governmental Immunity in Pennsylvania: Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education Commentary

Abolition of Governmental Immunity in Pennsylvania: Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education Commentary

Date: May 24, 1973
Abolition of Governmental Immunity in Pennsylvania: Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education Introduction The case of Ayala et al. v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, decided by the...
Commonwealth v. Kates: Pre-Trial Probation Revocation Hearings Upheld

Commonwealth v. Kates: Pre-Trial Probation Revocation Hearings Upheld

Date: May 9, 1973
Commonwealth v. Kates: Pre-Trial Probation Revocation Hearings Upheld Introduction Commonwealth v. Kates, Appellant. Commonwealth (452 Pa. 102) is a seminal decision by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing the "Same Criminal Episode" Test for Double Jeopardy in COMMONWEALTH v. CAMPANA

Establishing the "Same Criminal Episode" Test for Double Jeopardy in COMMONWEALTH v. CAMPANA

Date: May 5, 1973
Establishing the "Same Criminal Episode" Test for Double Jeopardy in COMMONWEALTH v. CAMPANA Introduction In COMMONWEALTH v. CAMPANA, decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on May 4, 1973, the...
Clarity in Contractual Waivers: The Felte v. White Decision

Clarity in Contractual Waivers: The Felte v. White Decision

Date: Mar 17, 1973
Clarity in Contractual Waivers: The Felte v. White Decision Introduction Robert F. Felte, Inc. v. White (et al., Appellant). is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on...
Causation and Legal Malice in Second-Degree Murder: An Analysis of Commonwealth v. Paquette

Causation and Legal Malice in Second-Degree Murder: An Analysis of Commonwealth v. Paquette

Date: Mar 17, 1973
Causation and Legal Malice in Second-Degree Murder: An Analysis of Commonwealth v. Paquette Introduction Commonwealth v. Paquette is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on...
Comprehensive Treatment Requirements for Mine Drainage Established in Commonwealth v. Harmar Coal Company

Comprehensive Treatment Requirements for Mine Drainage Established in Commonwealth v. Harmar Coal Company

Date: Mar 17, 1973
Comprehensive Treatment Requirements for Mine Drainage Established in Commonwealth v. Harmar Coal Company Introduction The case of Commonwealth v. Harmar Coal Company, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Eiland Doctrine: Enhancing Standards for Voluntary Confessions in Pennsylvania

Eiland Doctrine: Enhancing Standards for Voluntary Confessions in Pennsylvania

Date: Mar 17, 1973
Eiland Doctrine: Enhancing Standards for Voluntary Confessions in Pennsylvania Introduction Commonwealth v. Eiland, Appellant (450 Pa. 566) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Right to Hearing and Counsel in Parole Revocation: Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. Rundle

Right to Hearing and Counsel in Parole Revocation: Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. Rundle

Date: Mar 17, 1973
Right to Hearing and Counsel in Parole Revocation: Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. Rundle Introduction The case of Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. Rundle, decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania...
Withdrawal of Guilty Plea Post-Sentencing: Insights from Commonwealth v. Starr

Withdrawal of Guilty Plea Post-Sentencing: Insights from Commonwealth v. Starr

Date: Mar 17, 1973
Withdrawal of Guilty Plea Post-Sentencing: Insights from Commonwealth v. Starr Introduction Commonwealth v. Starr, 450 Pa. 485 (1973), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania...
Commonwealth v. Forbes: Voluntariness of Guilty Pleas and the Right to Withdrawal

Commonwealth v. Forbes: Voluntariness of Guilty Pleas and the Right to Withdrawal

Date: Jan 20, 1973
Commonwealth v. Forbes: Voluntariness of Guilty Pleas and the Right to Withdrawal Introduction Commonwealth v. Forbes is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on January 19,...
Enhancing the Right to a Speedy Trial: Commonwealth v. Hamilton (1972)

Enhancing the Right to a Speedy Trial: Commonwealth v. Hamilton (1972)

Date: Nov 23, 1972
Enhancing the Right to a Speedy Trial: Commonwealth v. Hamilton (1972) Introduction Commonwealth v. Hamilton is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that significantly reshaped...
Admission of Psychiatric Evidence in Voluntary Manslaughter: Insights from Commonwealth v. McCusker

Admission of Psychiatric Evidence in Voluntary Manslaughter: Insights from Commonwealth v. McCusker

Date: Jun 29, 1972
Admission of Psychiatric Evidence in Voluntary Manslaughter: Insights from Commonwealth v. McCusker Introduction Commonwealth v. McCusker, 448 Pa. 382 (1972), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Strengthening Probable Cause Standards and Clarifying the Exclusionary Rule in Commonwealth v. Garvin

Strengthening Probable Cause Standards and Clarifying the Exclusionary Rule in Commonwealth v. Garvin

Date: Jun 29, 1972
Strengthening Probable Cause Standards and Clarifying the Exclusionary Rule in Commonwealth v. Garvin Introduction Commonwealth v. Garvin, 448 Pa. 258 (1972), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Impact of Photographic Evidence on Jury Inference of Prior Criminal Activity: COMMONWEALTH v. ALLEN

Impact of Photographic Evidence on Jury Inference of Prior Criminal Activity: COMMONWEALTH v. ALLEN

Date: Jun 29, 1972
Impact of Photographic Evidence on Jury Inference of Prior Criminal Activity: COMMONWEALTH v. ALLEN Introduction COMMONWEALTH v. ALLEN, Appellant. (448 Pa. 177) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Commonwealth v. Futch: Reinforcing the McNabb-Mallory Rule on Unnecessary Delay and Its Impact on Identification Evidence

Commonwealth v. Futch: Reinforcing the McNabb-Mallory Rule on Unnecessary Delay and Its Impact on Identification Evidence

Date: Apr 21, 1972
Commonwealth v. Futch: Reinforcing the McNabb-Mallory Rule on Unnecessary Delay and Its Impact on Identification Evidence Introduction Commonwealth v. Futch, 447 Pa. 389, decided by the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert