Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Establishing the Right to Counsel in Parole Revocation Appeals: Purcell Bronson v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Establishing the Right to Counsel in Parole Revocation Appeals: Purcell Bronson v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Date: Mar 21, 1980
Establishing the Right to Counsel in Parole Revocation Appeals: Purcell Bronson v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Introduction The case of Purcell Bronson v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania reached the...
Recommitment Standards in Parole Violations: Insights from Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

Recommitment Standards in Parole Violations: Insights from Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

Date: Mar 21, 1980
Recommitment Standards in Parole Violations: Insights from Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole Introduction Joseph Gaito, Jr. appealed the decision of the Pennsylvania Board of...
Costopoulos v. Thornburgh: Reaffirming Standing Requirements in Grand Jury Applications

Costopoulos v. Thornburgh: Reaffirming Standing Requirements in Grand Jury Applications

Date: Dec 27, 1979
Costopoulos v. Thornburgh: Reaffirming Standing Requirements in Grand Jury Applications Introduction Costopoulos v. Thornburgh, a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in 1979,...
Affirmation of Parole Board's Authority to Recompute Sentences Without Street Time Credit Under P. S. § 331.21a

Affirmation of Parole Board's Authority to Recompute Sentences Without Street Time Credit Under P. S. § 331.21a

Date: Dec 22, 1979
Affirmation of Parole Board's Authority to Recompute Sentences Without Street Time Credit Under P. S. § 331.21a Introduction The case of Jose C. Young v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of...
Expansion of Bystander Recovery for Emotional Distress in Pennsylvania

Expansion of Bystander Recovery for Emotional Distress in Pennsylvania

Date: Jul 12, 1979
Expansion of Bystander Recovery for Emotional Distress in Pennsylvania Introduction The case of Robert G. Sinn and JoAnne Marie Sinn vs. Brad Lee Burd marked a significant turning point in...
Strict Enforcement of Post-Verdict Motion Requirements in Commonwealth v. Gravely

Strict Enforcement of Post-Verdict Motion Requirements in Commonwealth v. Gravely

Date: Jul 7, 1979
Strict Enforcement of Post-Verdict Motion Requirements in Commonwealth v. Gravely Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. William Gravely is a pivotal 1979 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Implied Warranty of Habitability in Residential Leases: PUGH v. HOLMES (1979)

Implied Warranty of Habitability in Residential Leases: PUGH v. HOLMES (1979)

Date: Jul 7, 1979
Implied Warranty of Habitability in Residential Leases: PUGH v. HOLMES (1979) Introduction In the landmark case of PUGH v. HOLMES (486 Pa. 272, 1979), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania revolutionized...
Defining 'Offensive Weapons' and Upholding Probable Cause: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Harper

Defining 'Offensive Weapons' and Upholding Probable Cause: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Harper

Date: Jul 6, 1979
Defining 'Offensive Weapons' and Upholding Probable Cause: Insights from Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Harper Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Anthony Harper, 485 Pa. 572...
Summary Judgment Standards in Tortious Interference: Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.

Summary Judgment Standards in Tortious Interference: Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.

Date: Jun 2, 1979
Summary Judgment Standards in Tortious Interference: Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co. Introduction Thompson Coal Company and Leroy Thompson v. Pike Coal Company et al. is a pivotal case decided by...
Enhanced Privacy Protections in Subpoenaed Bank Records: Commonwealth v. DeJohn

Enhanced Privacy Protections in Subpoenaed Bank Records: Commonwealth v. DeJohn

Date: May 18, 1979
Enhanced Privacy Protections in Subpoenaed Bank Records: Commonwealth v. DeJohn Introduction In the landmark case Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jill V. DeJohn, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Expansion of Standards for Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc in Pennsylvania Law

Expansion of Standards for Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc in Pennsylvania Law

Date: May 4, 1979
Expansion of Standards for Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc in Pennsylvania Law Introduction The case of Shirley Lillian Bass, Administratrix of the Estate of Stanley Bass, Deceased v. Commonwealth of...
Interlocutory Appeals and Mandatory Arbitration Costs: Insights from PUGAR v. GRECO (1978)

Interlocutory Appeals and Mandatory Arbitration Costs: Insights from PUGAR v. GRECO (1978)

Date: Nov 19, 1978
Interlocutory Appeals and Mandatory Arbitration Costs: Insights from PUGAR v. GRECO (1978) Introduction Pugar v. Greco and Brunwasser is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in...
Limitations on Preliminary Injunctions in Non-Compete Agreements: New Precedent in New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. John T. Burns

Limitations on Preliminary Injunctions in Non-Compete Agreements: New Precedent in New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. John T. Burns

Date: Nov 2, 1978
Limitations on Preliminary Injunctions in Non-Compete Agreements: New Precedent in New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. John T. Burns Introduction The case of New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. John...
Preserving Client-Lawyer Relationships: Insights from Adler v. Epstein

Preserving Client-Lawyer Relationships: Insights from Adler v. Epstein

Date: Oct 6, 1978
Preserving Client-Lawyer Relationships: Insights from Adler v. Epstein Introduction The legal landscape governing the relationships between law firms and their clients was notably shaped by the 1978...
Establishing Causation in Medical Malpractice: HAMIL v. BASHLINE Hospital Association

Establishing Causation in Medical Malpractice: HAMIL v. BASHLINE Hospital Association

Date: Oct 6, 1978
Establishing Causation in Medical Malpractice: HAMIL v. BASHLINE Hospital Association Introduction The case of Martha S. HAMIL v. BASHLINE Hospital Association, Ltd. was adjudicated by the Supreme...
Azzarello v. Black Brothers Company, Inc.: Clarifying Jury Instructions in Strict Product Liability

Azzarello v. Black Brothers Company, Inc.: Clarifying Jury Instructions in Strict Product Liability

Date: Oct 6, 1978
Azzarello v. Black Brothers Company, Inc.: Clarifying Jury Instructions in Strict Product Liability Introduction The case of Orca C. Azzarello v. Black Brothers Company, Inc. addressed a pivotal...
ASHLEY v. ASHLEY: Establishing the Validity of Informal Stock Gifts Despite Procedural Irregularities

ASHLEY v. ASHLEY: Establishing the Validity of Informal Stock Gifts Despite Procedural Irregularities

Date: Oct 6, 1978
ASHLEY v. ASHLEY: Establishing the Validity of Informal Stock Gifts Despite Procedural Irregularities Introduction The case of Helen Ashley, Appellant, v. Joseph Ashley, Ashley Machine Tool Co., and...
Recognition of Franchise Relationships within Lessor-Lessee Agreements and Limitations on Termination Rights: Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Razumic

Recognition of Franchise Relationships within Lessor-Lessee Agreements and Limitations on Termination Rights: Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Razumic

Date: Aug 11, 1978
Recognition of Franchise Relationships within Lessor-Lessee Agreements and Limitations on Termination Rights: Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Razumic Introduction The case of Atlantic Richfield Company v....
Holzer v. Commonwealth: Upholding Standards for Automobile Searches and the Right to Counsel of Choice

Holzer v. Commonwealth: Upholding Standards for Automobile Searches and the Right to Counsel of Choice

Date: Jul 28, 1978
Holzer v. Commonwealth: Upholding Standards for Automobile Searches and the Right to Counsel of Choice Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edward J. Holzer, Jr. is a pivotal case decided by...
Abolition of Sovereign Immunity in Pennsylvania: Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways (1978)

Abolition of Sovereign Immunity in Pennsylvania: Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways (1978)

Date: Jul 15, 1978
Abolition of Sovereign Immunity in Pennsylvania: Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways (479 Pa. 384, 1978) Introduction The landmark case of Jimmy V. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert