Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Application of Highest and Best Use in Eminent Domain Valuation Analysis of Ransom Williams and Wife, Edna Orders Williams v. State Highway Commission of North Carolina (252 N.C. 514) Introduction...
Eminent Domain and Fee Simple Acquisition: Insights from TOWN OF MORGANTON v. HUTTON BOURBONNAIS COMPANY Introduction The case of TOWN OF MORGANTON v. HUTTON BOURBONNAIS COMPANY, adjudicated by the...
Strict Standards for Setting aside Withdrawal of Criminal Appeals: STATE v. GRUNDLER and State v. Jelly Introduction The case of State v. Robert J. Grundler and State v. Joseph Leonid Jelly (Supreme...
Mary L. Barnes et al. v. North Carolina State Highway Commission: Establishing Unity of Tracts in Eminent Domain Introduction The case of Mary L. Barnes and others v. North Carolina State Highway...
Proper Jurisdiction for Motions for New Trial in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Analysis of In re Renfrow Introduction In re Benjamin Edgar Renfrow (State v. Renfrow) is a pivotal 1957 decision by the...
Establishing Contributor’s Rights and Joint Tortfeasor Liability in Norris v. Johnson Introduction The case MRS. MILLICENT T. NORRIS v. KING DAVID JOHNSON, ORIGINAL DEFENDANT, AND CHARLES S. NORRIS,...
Enforceability of Contractual Time Limits and Proof of Loss in Standard Fire Insurance Policies: Boyd v. Bankers Shippers Insurance Company Introduction The case of Arthur E. Boyd and Wife, Mary M....
Frank Roller v. Allen et al. (1957): Reaffirming the Limits of Legislative Police Power in Occupational Licensing Introduction Frank Roller v. David G. Allen, George W. Carter, O. A. Ritch, Frank R....
Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Expert Witness Qualification: A Commentary on State v. Squire Moore Jr. Introduction State v. Squire Moore Jr., 245 N.C. 158 (1956), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Establishing Seller's Responsibility in f.o.b. Delivery Contracts Under Conversion Claims: Analysis of Peed and Booth v. Burleson's Inc. et al. Introduction The case of Russell L. Peed and J. M....
Establishing Ejectment Criteria and Privilege Waiver: Insights from Hayes v. Ricard (1956) Introduction In the landmark case of Virginia Lamm Hayes et al. v. Eunice Williamson Decker Ricard and Free...
Substantial Evidence Standard in Nonsuit Motions: Insights from STATE v. O'BERRY STEPHENS Introduction STATE v. O'BERRY STEPHENS (244 N.C. 380), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of North Carolina on...
Res Judicata and Election of Remedies in J. G. Surratt v. Chas.E. Lambeth Insurance Agency, Inc. Introduction The case J. G. Surratt v. Chas.E. Lambeth Insurance Agency, Inc., Samuel L. Arrington,...
Establishing Standards for Punitive Damages in Automobile Collision Cases: HINSON v. DAWSON Introduction HINSON v. DAWSON, 244 N.C. 23 (1956), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Joint Tortfeasorship for Contribution under G.S. 1-240: Hayes Estate v. City of Wilmington and Co-defendants Introduction The case of W. J. Hayes, Administrator of the Estate of W. J....
Swink v. North Carolina: Clarifying Concurrent Sentencing and Commitment Validity Introduction IN THE MATTER OF JOE SWINK (243 N.C. 86) is a landmark 1955 decision by the Supreme Court of North...
Inclusion of Lesser Offenses in Robbery Charges: Insights from STATE v. MARSHALL NORMAN HICKS Introduction STATE v. MARSHALL NORMAN HICKS (241 N.C. 156), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of North...
Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations: Childress v. Abeles & Troutman Introduction The case of Sid P. Childress v. Murray J. Abeles and Clarence A. Troutman, T/A Universal Company...
Strict Enforcement of Evidence Exclusion for Separate Offenses: Insights from State v. Betty McClain Introduction State v. Betty McClain, 240 N.C. 171 (1954), is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Establishing Criteria for Interlocutory Injunctions in Land Disputes: Huskins v. Yancey Hospital Introduction The case of Sam J. Huskins and Wife, Mrs. Sam J. Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc. (238...