Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

North Carolina Case Commentaries

Application of Highest and Best Use in Eminent Domain Valuation: Analysis of Ransom Williams v. State Highway Commission of North Carolina

Application of Highest and Best Use in Eminent Domain Valuation: Analysis of Ransom Williams v. State Highway Commission of North Carolina

Date: May 2, 1960
Application of Highest and Best Use in Eminent Domain Valuation Analysis of Ransom Williams and Wife, Edna Orders Williams v. State Highway Commission of North Carolina (252 N.C. 514) Introduction...
Eminent Domain and Fee Simple Acquisition: Insights from TOWN OF MORGANTON v. HUTTON BOURBONNAIS COMPANY

Eminent Domain and Fee Simple Acquisition: Insights from TOWN OF MORGANTON v. HUTTON BOURBONNAIS COMPANY

Date: Jan 2, 1960
Eminent Domain and Fee Simple Acquisition: Insights from TOWN OF MORGANTON v. HUTTON BOURBONNAIS COMPANY Introduction The case of TOWN OF MORGANTON v. HUTTON BOURBONNAIS COMPANY, adjudicated by the...
Strict Standards for Setting Aside Withdrawal of Criminal Appeals: STATE v. GRUNDLER and State v. Jelly

Strict Standards for Setting Aside Withdrawal of Criminal Appeals: STATE v. GRUNDLER and State v. Jelly

Date: Nov 2, 1959
Strict Standards for Setting aside Withdrawal of Criminal Appeals: STATE v. GRUNDLER and State v. Jelly Introduction The case of State v. Robert J. Grundler and State v. Joseph Leonid Jelly (Supreme...
Mary L. Barnes et al. v. North Carolina State Highway Commission: Establishing Unity of Tracts in Eminent Domain

Mary L. Barnes et al. v. North Carolina State Highway Commission: Establishing Unity of Tracts in Eminent Domain

Date: Jun 2, 1959
Mary L. Barnes et al. v. North Carolina State Highway Commission: Establishing Unity of Tracts in Eminent Domain Introduction The case of Mary L. Barnes and others v. North Carolina State Highway...
Proper Jurisdiction for Motions for New Trial in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Analysis of In re Renfrow

Proper Jurisdiction for Motions for New Trial in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Analysis of In re Renfrow

Date: Oct 2, 1957
Proper Jurisdiction for Motions for New Trial in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Analysis of In re Renfrow Introduction In re Benjamin Edgar Renfrow (State v. Renfrow) is a pivotal 1957 decision by the...
Establishing Contributor’s Rights and Joint Tortfeasor Liability in Norris v. Johnson

Establishing Contributor’s Rights and Joint Tortfeasor Liability in Norris v. Johnson

Date: May 2, 1957
Establishing Contributor’s Rights and Joint Tortfeasor Liability in Norris v. Johnson Introduction The case MRS. MILLICENT T. NORRIS v. KING DAVID JOHNSON, ORIGINAL DEFENDANT, AND CHARLES S. NORRIS,...
Enforceability of Contractual Time Limits and Proof of Loss in Standard Fire Insurance Policies: Boyd v. Bankers Shippers Insurance Company

Enforceability of Contractual Time Limits and Proof of Loss in Standard Fire Insurance Policies: Boyd v. Bankers Shippers Insurance Company

Date: Feb 2, 1957
Enforceability of Contractual Time Limits and Proof of Loss in Standard Fire Insurance Policies: Boyd v. Bankers Shippers Insurance Company Introduction The case of Arthur E. Boyd and Wife, Mary M....
Frank Roller v. Allen et al. (1957): Reaffirming the Limits of Legislative Police Power in Occupational Licensing

Frank Roller v. Allen et al. (1957): Reaffirming the Limits of Legislative Police Power in Occupational Licensing

Date: Feb 2, 1957
Frank Roller v. Allen et al. (1957): Reaffirming the Limits of Legislative Police Power in Occupational Licensing Introduction Frank Roller v. David G. Allen, George W. Carter, O. A. Ritch, Frank R....
Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Expert Witness Qualification: A Commentary on State v. Squire Moore Jr.

Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Expert Witness Qualification: A Commentary on State v. Squire Moore Jr.

Date: Dec 2, 1956
Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Expert Witness Qualification: A Commentary on State v. Squire Moore Jr. Introduction State v. Squire Moore Jr., 245 N.C. 158 (1956), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Establishing Seller's Responsibility in f.o.b. Delivery Contracts Under Conversion Claims: Analysis of Peed and Booth v. Burleson's Inc. et al.

Establishing Seller's Responsibility in f.o.b. Delivery Contracts Under Conversion Claims: Analysis of Peed and Booth v. Burleson's Inc. et al.

Date: Sep 2, 1956
Establishing Seller's Responsibility in f.o.b. Delivery Contracts Under Conversion Claims: Analysis of Peed and Booth v. Burleson's Inc. et al. Introduction The case of Russell L. Peed and J. M....
Establishing Ejectment Criteria and Privilege Waiver: Insights from Hayes v. Ricard (1956)

Establishing Ejectment Criteria and Privilege Waiver: Insights from Hayes v. Ricard (1956)

Date: Jun 2, 1956
Establishing Ejectment Criteria and Privilege Waiver: Insights from Hayes v. Ricard (1956) Introduction In the landmark case of Virginia Lamm Hayes et al. v. Eunice Williamson Decker Ricard and Free...
Substantial Evidence Standard in Nonsuit Motions: Insights from STATE v. O'BERRY STEPHENS

Substantial Evidence Standard in Nonsuit Motions: Insights from STATE v. O'BERRY STEPHENS

Date: Jun 2, 1956
Substantial Evidence Standard in Nonsuit Motions: Insights from STATE v. O'BERRY STEPHENS Introduction STATE v. O'BERRY STEPHENS (244 N.C. 380), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of North Carolina on...
Res Judicata and Election of Remedies in J. G. Surratt v. Chas.E. Lambeth Insurance Agency, Inc.

Res Judicata and Election of Remedies in J. G. Surratt v. Chas.E. Lambeth Insurance Agency, Inc.

Date: May 2, 1956
Res Judicata and Election of Remedies in J. G. Surratt v. Chas.E. Lambeth Insurance Agency, Inc. Introduction The case J. G. Surratt v. Chas.E. Lambeth Insurance Agency, Inc., Samuel L. Arrington,...
Establishing Standards for Punitive Damages in Automobile Collision Cases: HINSON v. DAWSON

Establishing Standards for Punitive Damages in Automobile Collision Cases: HINSON v. DAWSON

Date: May 2, 1956
Establishing Standards for Punitive Damages in Automobile Collision Cases: HINSON v. DAWSON Introduction HINSON v. DAWSON, 244 N.C. 23 (1956), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Joint Tortfeasorship for Contribution under G.S. 1-240: Hayes Estate v. City of Wilmington and Co-defendants

Establishing Joint Tortfeasorship for Contribution under G.S. 1-240: Hayes Estate v. City of Wilmington and Co-defendants

Date: Feb 2, 1956
Establishing Joint Tortfeasorship for Contribution under G.S. 1-240: Hayes Estate v. City of Wilmington and Co-defendants Introduction The case of W. J. Hayes, Administrator of the Estate of W. J....
Swink v. North Carolina: Clarifying Concurrent Sentencing and Commitment Validity

Swink v. North Carolina: Clarifying Concurrent Sentencing and Commitment Validity

Date: Nov 2, 1955
Swink v. North Carolina: Clarifying Concurrent Sentencing and Commitment Validity Introduction IN THE MATTER OF JOE SWINK (243 N.C. 86) is a landmark 1955 decision by the Supreme Court of North...
Inclusion of Lesser Offenses in Robbery Charges: Insights from STATE v. MARSHALL NORMAN HICKS

Inclusion of Lesser Offenses in Robbery Charges: Insights from STATE v. MARSHALL NORMAN HICKS

Date: Nov 2, 1954
Inclusion of Lesser Offenses in Robbery Charges: Insights from STATE v. MARSHALL NORMAN HICKS Introduction STATE v. MARSHALL NORMAN HICKS (241 N.C. 156), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of North...
Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations: Childress v. Abeles & Troutman

Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations: Childress v. Abeles & Troutman

Date: Oct 2, 1954
Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations: Childress v. Abeles & Troutman Introduction The case of Sid P. Childress v. Murray J. Abeles and Clarence A. Troutman, T/A Universal Company...
Strict Enforcement of Evidence Exclusion for Separate Offenses: Insights from State v. Betty McClain

Strict Enforcement of Evidence Exclusion for Separate Offenses: Insights from State v. Betty McClain

Date: Apr 2, 1954
Strict Enforcement of Evidence Exclusion for Separate Offenses: Insights from State v. Betty McClain Introduction State v. Betty McClain, 240 N.C. 171 (1954), is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Establishing Criteria for Interlocutory Injunctions in Land Disputes: Huskins v. Yancey Hospital

Establishing Criteria for Interlocutory Injunctions in Land Disputes: Huskins v. Yancey Hospital

Date: Oct 2, 1953
Establishing Criteria for Interlocutory Injunctions in Land Disputes: Huskins v. Yancey Hospital Introduction The case of Sam J. Huskins and Wife, Mrs. Sam J. Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc. (238...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert