Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

Pro Safety Services LLC v. L & M Development Partners: Clarifying Liability Standards for Safety Consultants Under New York Labor Law

Pro Safety Services LLC v. L & M Development Partners: Clarifying Liability Standards for Safety Consultants Under New York Labor Law

Date: Jul 28, 2016
Pro Safety Services LLC v. L & M Development Partners: Clarifying Liability Standards for Safety Consultants Under New York Labor Law Introduction In the case of Victor Marquez v. L & M Development...
Affirmation of Sexual Abuse Conviction: Time Frame Specificity in Indictments

Affirmation of Sexual Abuse Conviction: Time Frame Specificity in Indictments

Date: Jul 15, 2016
Affirmation of Sexual Abuse Conviction: Time Frame Specificity in Indictments Introduction The People of the State of New York v. Angel Garcia is a significant appellate decision rendered by the...
New Precedent on Duty of Care in FAA Drug Testing and Third-Party Reliance in Fraud Claims: Pasternack v. LabCorp

New Precedent on Duty of Care in FAA Drug Testing and Third-Party Reliance in Fraud Claims: Pasternack v. LabCorp

Date: Jul 1, 2016
New Precedent on Duty of Care in FAA Drug Testing and Third-Party Reliance in Fraud Claims: Pasternack v. LabCorp Introduction Pasternack v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LabCorp) is a...
Establishing Limits on Admissibility of Consent Orders in Medical Malpractice Litigation: Mazella v. Beals

Establishing Limits on Admissibility of Consent Orders in Medical Malpractice Litigation: Mazella v. Beals

Date: Jul 1, 2016
Establishing Limits on Admissibility of Consent Orders in Medical Malpractice Litigation: Mazella v. Beals Introduction The case of Janice Mazella, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Mazella,...
Crane Co. v. Dummitt and Suttner: Establishing Manufacturer's Duty to Warn in Combined Product Use

Crane Co. v. Dummitt and Suttner: Establishing Manufacturer's Duty to Warn in Combined Product Use

Date: Jun 29, 2016
Crane Co. v. Dummitt and Suttner: Establishing Manufacturer's Duty to Warn in Combined Product Use Introduction The case of Doris Kay Dummitt, Indi v. dually and as Executrix of Ronald Dummitt,...
People v. Smith, Ingram, and McGhee: Affirming Defendants' Rights to Cross-Examine Law Enforcement Witnesses on Prior Civil Misconduct Allegations

People v. Smith, Ingram, and McGhee: Affirming Defendants' Rights to Cross-Examine Law Enforcement Witnesses on Prior Civil Misconduct Allegations

Date: Jun 29, 2016
People v. Smith, Ingram, and McGhee: Affirming Defendants' Rights to Cross-Examine Law Enforcement Witnesses on Prior Civil Misconduct Allegations Introduction The appellate decision in People v....
Limitation of Duty of Care for Medical Consultants in Malpractice Claims: Insights from Meade v. Yland

Limitation of Duty of Care for Medical Consultants in Malpractice Claims: Insights from Meade v. Yland

Date: Jun 16, 2016
Limitation of Duty of Care for Medical Consultants in Malpractice Claims: Insights from Meade v. Yland Introduction The case of Kathleen Meade, et al. v. J. Marc Yland, et al. (140 A.D.3d 931, 2016),...
Kordish v. The People: Reevaluation of Sentencing Discretion in Nonviolent Drug Offenses

Kordish v. The People: Reevaluation of Sentencing Discretion in Nonviolent Drug Offenses

Date: Jun 16, 2016
Kordish v. The People: Reevaluation of Sentencing Discretion in Nonviolent Drug Offenses Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE v. Robert KORDISH, decided on June 15, 2016, the Appellate...
Ensuring Comprehensive Hearings in Child Custody Determinations: A Landmark Decision in S.L. v. J.R.

Ensuring Comprehensive Hearings in Child Custody Determinations: A Landmark Decision in S.L. v. J.R.

Date: Jun 10, 2016
Ensuring Comprehensive Hearings in Child Custody Determinations: A Landmark Decision in S.L. v. J.R. Introduction The case of S.L., Appellant, v. J.R., Respondent (27 N.Y.3d 558) adjudicated by the...
Limitation of the Common Interest Doctrine to Litigation Contexts in New York: Ambac Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

Limitation of the Common Interest Doctrine to Litigation Contexts in New York: Ambac Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

Date: Jun 10, 2016
Limitation of the Common Interest Doctrine to Litigation Contexts in New York: Ambac Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. Introduction The case of Ambac Assurance Corporation et al. v....
Affirmation of Workers' Compensation Board's Authority in Employer-Employee Determinations Independent of Federal Court Judgments

Affirmation of Workers' Compensation Board's Authority in Employer-Employee Determinations Independent of Federal Court Judgments

Date: Jun 10, 2016
Affirmation of Workers' Compensation Board's Authority in Employer-Employee Determinations Independent of Federal Court Judgments Introduction The case of In the Matter of Danny ROSA v. JUNE...
Meaningful Counsel Notice Does Not Transform Court's Failure to Respond to Jury Inquiries into Mode of Proceedings Error

Meaningful Counsel Notice Does Not Transform Court's Failure to Respond to Jury Inquiries into Mode of Proceedings Error

Date: Jun 8, 2016
Meaningful Counsel Notice Does Not Transform Court's Failure to Respond to Jury Inquiries into Mode of Proceedings Error Introduction In The People of the State of New York v. Terrance L. Mack (27...
Legal Implications of Attorney Non-Cooperation in Grievance Proceedings: The Case of Fred Douglas Way III

Legal Implications of Attorney Non-Cooperation in Grievance Proceedings: The Case of Fred Douglas Way III

Date: May 19, 2016
Legal Implications of Attorney Non-Cooperation in Grievance Proceedings: The Case of Fred Douglas Way III Introduction The legal profession mandates adherence to ethical standards to maintain public...
Affirming Corroborative Evidence and Disclosure Standards in Child Sexual Assault Cases: People v. Hagaman

Affirming Corroborative Evidence and Disclosure Standards in Child Sexual Assault Cases: People v. Hagaman

Date: May 13, 2016
Affirming Corroborative Evidence and Disclosure Standards in Child Sexual Assault Cases: People v. Hagaman Introduction People v. Hagaman is a significant appellate decision from the Supreme Court,...
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Forcible Detention: People v. Morris

Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Forcible Detention: People v. Morris

Date: Apr 15, 2016
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Forcible Detention: People v. Morris Introduction Case: The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Brady D. Morris, Appellant. Court: Supreme Court,...
Affirmation of Evidentiary Standards in Aggravated Unlicensed Operation: Keener v. The People

Affirmation of Evidentiary Standards in Aggravated Unlicensed Operation: Keener v. The People

Date: Apr 8, 2016
Affirmation of Evidentiary Standards in Aggravated Unlicensed Operation: Keener v. The People Introduction In The People of the State of New York v. William R. Keener (138 A.D.3d 1162), the Supreme...
Justiciability of SEQRA Positive Declarations: Ranso v. Vecchio Establishes Ripeness Standards

Justiciability of SEQRA Positive Declarations: Ranso v. Vecchio Establishes Ripeness Standards

Date: Apr 1, 2016
Justiciability of SEQRA Positive Declarations: Ranco Sand and Stone Corp. v. Vecchio Establishes Ripeness Standards Introduction The landmark case of Ranco Sand and Stone Corp. v. Vecchio,...
Consent of Biological Father Not Required for Adoption Under DRL §111(1)(d)

Consent of Biological Father Not Required for Adoption Under DRL §111(1)(d)

Date: Apr 1, 2016
Consent of Biological Father Not Required for Adoption Under Domestic Relations Law §111(1)(d) Introduction The case of In the Matter of YSABEL M., an Infant involves the adoption proceedings...
Protecting Physician-Patient Confidentiality: Insights from Anita Chanko v. American Broadcasting Companies

Protecting Physician-Patient Confidentiality: Insights from Anita Chanko v. American Broadcasting Companies

Date: Apr 1, 2016
Protecting Physician-Patient Confidentiality: Insights from Anita Chanko v. American Broadcasting Companies Introduction The case of Anita Chanko, Individually and as Executor of Mark S. Chanko,...
Promissory Estoppel and Unjust Enrichment in Family Disputes: Castellotti v. Free

Promissory Estoppel and Unjust Enrichment in Family Disputes: Castellotti v. Free

Date: Mar 9, 2016
Promissory Estoppel and Unjust Enrichment in Family Disputes: Castellotti v. Free Introduction The case of Peter Castellotti v. Lisa Free, adjudicated by the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert