Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege in Indemnity Actions: Deutsche Bank Trust Co. of Americas v. Tri-Links Investment Trust

Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege in Indemnity Actions: Deutsche Bank Trust Co. of Americas v. Tri-Links Investment Trust

Date: May 16, 2007
Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege in Indemnity Actions: Deutsche Bank Trust Co. of Americas v. Tri-Links Investment Trust Introduction The case Deutsche Bank Trust Company of Americas,...
Rivera v. City of New York: Establishing Standards for Probable Cause and Damages in Malicious Prosecution and Excessive Force Claims

Rivera v. City of New York: Establishing Standards for Probable Cause and Damages in Malicious Prosecution and Excessive Force Claims

Date: May 16, 2007
Rivera v. City of New York: Establishing Standards for Probable Cause and Damages in Malicious Prosecution and Excessive Force Claims Introduction The case of Ildefonso Rivera, Sr., et al. v. City of...
Supervisory Control and Contractor Liability: Insights from Hughes v. Tishman Construction

Supervisory Control and Contractor Liability: Insights from Hughes v. Tishman Construction

Date: May 11, 2007
Supervisory Control and Contractor Liability: Insights from Hughes v. Tishman Construction Introduction The case of James Hughes et al. v. Tishman Construction Corp. et al. (40 A.D.3d 305) serves as...
Concurrent Sentencing in Multiple First-Degree Murders: Insights from People v. Abel Rosas

Concurrent Sentencing in Multiple First-Degree Murders: Insights from People v. Abel Rosas

Date: May 9, 2007
Concurrent Sentencing in Multiple First-Degree Murders: Insights from People v. Abel Rosas Introduction In the landmark case People of the State of New York v. Abel Rosas, decided by the Court of...
Majority Rule in Partnership Agreement Amendments: Insights from Bailey v Fish Neave

Majority Rule in Partnership Agreement Amendments: Insights from Bailey v Fish Neave

Date: May 9, 2007
Majority Rule in Partnership Agreement Amendments: Insights from Bailey v Fish Neave Introduction In the landmark case of W. Edward Bailey et al. v. Fish Neave et al., decided by the Court of Appeals...
Clarifying Employer Liability Under Labor Law §240(1): The Role of Control and Proximate Cause in Workplace Injury Cases

Clarifying Employer Liability Under Labor Law §240(1): The Role of Control and Proximate Cause in Workplace Injury Cases

Date: May 9, 2007
Clarifying Employer Liability Under Labor Law §240(1): The Role of Control and Proximate Cause in Workplace Injury Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Noel Delahaye v. Saint Anns School et...
Ross v Louise Wise Services, Inc.: Judicial Standards for Punitive Damages in Wrongful Adoption Cases

Ross v Louise Wise Services, Inc.: Judicial Standards for Punitive Damages in Wrongful Adoption Cases

Date: May 4, 2007
Ross v Louise Wise Services, Inc.: Judicial Standards for Punitive Damages in Wrongful Adoption Cases Introduction The case of Arthur Ross et al. v. Louise Wise Services, Inc. (8 N.Y.3d 478, 2007)...
Fraud in the Inducement in Sublease Agreements: Insights from Peach Parking Corp. v. Hertz Corporation

Fraud in the Inducement in Sublease Agreements: Insights from Peach Parking Corp. v. Hertz Corporation

Date: May 4, 2007
Fraud in the Inducement in Sublease Agreements: Insights from Peach Parking Corp. v. Hertz Corporation Introduction The case of Peach Parking Corp. v. Hertz Corporation (42 A.D.3d 82) revolves around...
Substantial Pain as Physical Injury: PEOPLE v. CHIDDICK Establishes Clarion Standard in New York Penal Law

Substantial Pain as Physical Injury: PEOPLE v. CHIDDICK Establishes Clarion Standard in New York Penal Law

Date: May 2, 2007
Substantial Pain as Physical Injury: PEOPLE v. CHIDDICK Establishes Clarion Standard in New York Penal Law Introduction People of the State of New York v. James Chiddick, 8 N.Y.3d 445 (2007), is a...
Affirming Legal Malpractice Standards and Procedural Due Process: Insights from AmBase Corp. v. Davis Polk Wardwell

Affirming Legal Malpractice Standards and Procedural Due Process: Insights from AmBase Corp. v. Davis Polk Wardwell

Date: Apr 27, 2007
Affirming Legal Malpractice Standards and Procedural Due Process: Insights from AMBASE CORPORATION v. DAVIS POLK WARDWELL Introduction AMBASE CORPORATION v. DAVIS POLK WARDWELL (8 N.Y.3d 428, 2007)...
Emphasizing the Necessity of Explicit Damages Clauses: Awards.com v. Kinko's, Inc. Commentary

Emphasizing the Necessity of Explicit Damages Clauses: Awards.com v. Kinko's, Inc. Commentary

Date: Apr 20, 2007
Emphasizing the Necessity of Explicit Damages Clauses: Awards.com v. Kinko's, Inc. Commentary Introduction In the case of Awards.com et al. v. Kinko's, Inc., the Appellate Division of the Supreme...
Denial of Summary Judgment Based on Credibility Disputes in Medical Malpractice Case: Dallas-Stephenson v. Waisman

Denial of Summary Judgment Based on Credibility Disputes in Medical Malpractice Case: Dallas-Stephenson v. Waisman

Date: Apr 13, 2007
Denial of Summary Judgment Based on Credibility Disputes in Medical Malpractice Case: Dallas-Stephenson v. Waisman Introduction The case of Victoria Dallas-Stephenson et al. v. Jerry Waisman, M.D.,...
Rubenstein v. Ganea: Quantum Meruit Fee Recovery Permitted Despite Absence of Written Retainer under 22 NYCRR 1215.1

Rubenstein v. Ganea: Quantum Meruit Fee Recovery Permitted Despite Absence of Written Retainer under 22 NYCRR 1215.1

Date: Apr 4, 2007
Rubenstein v. Ganea: Quantum Meruit Fee Recovery Permitted Despite Absence of Written Retainer under 22 NYCRR 1215.1 Introduction The case of Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v. Cynthia Ganea (41 A.D.3d 54)...
Absolute Privilege Affirmed for Employer Statements on NASD Form U-5 in Defamation Suits

Absolute Privilege Affirmed for Employer Statements on NASD Form U-5 in Defamation Suits

Date: Mar 30, 2007
Absolute Privilege Affirmed for Employer Statements on NASD Form U-5 in Defamation Suits Introduction The landmark case of Chaskie J. ROSENBERG v. METLIFE, INC. (8 N.Y.3d 359) adjudicated by the...
Admissibility of Eyewitness Identification Expert Testimony: PEOPLE v. LeGRAND

Admissibility of Eyewitness Identification Expert Testimony: PEOPLE v. LeGRAND

Date: Mar 28, 2007
Admissibility of Eyewitness Identification Expert Testimony: PEOPLE v. LeGRAND Introduction PEOPLE v. LeGRAND (8 N.Y.3d 449) is a landmark decision by the Court of Appeals of the State of New York...
Conversion of Electronic Data: Thyroff v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Conversion of Electronic Data: Thyroff v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Date: Mar 23, 2007
Conversion of Electronic Data: Thyroff v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Introduction In the landmark case Louis E. Thyroff v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, decided by the Court of...
Affirming Collective Enforcement in Syndicated Loans: BEAL SAVINGS BANK v. SOMMER Trustees

Affirming Collective Enforcement in Syndicated Loans: BEAL SAVINGS BANK v. SOMMER Trustees

Date: Mar 23, 2007
Affirming Collective Enforcement in Syndicated Loans: BEAL SAVINGS BANK v. SOMMER Trustees Introduction The case of Beal Savings Bank, Appellant, v. Viola Sommer et al., Trustees of a Trust under the...
Treble Damages Defined as Penalties under CPLR 901(b): Insights from Paul Sperry v. Crompton Corp.

Treble Damages Defined as Penalties under CPLR 901(b): Insights from Paul Sperry v. Crompton Corp.

Date: Feb 23, 2007
Treble Damages Defined as Penalties under CPLR 901(b): Insights from Paul SPERRY v. CROMPTON CORPORATION Introduction The legal landscape surrounding class actions and the recoverability of enhanced...
Burden of Proof in Restitution Hearings: PEOPLE v. TZITZIKALAKIS

Burden of Proof in Restitution Hearings: PEOPLE v. TZITZIKALAKIS

Date: Feb 16, 2007
Burden of Proof in Restitution Hearings: PEOPLE v. TZITZIKALAKIS Introduction People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Jimmy Tzitzikalakis, Respondent (8 N.Y.3d 217) is a landmark case decided...
Liability for Negligent Misrepresentation to Nonprivy Parties: Insights from J.A.O. ACQUISITION CORP. v. STAVITSKY

Liability for Negligent Misrepresentation to Nonprivy Parties: Insights from J.A.O. ACQUISITION CORP. v. STAVITSKY

Date: Feb 14, 2007
Liability for Negligent Misrepresentation to Nonprivy Parties: Insights from J.A.O. ACQUISITION CORP. v. STAVITSKY Introduction The case of J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. v. Jeffrey D. Stavitsky et al....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert