Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

Redefining Attorney Fiduciary Duties: Insights from Ulico Casualty Co. v. Wilson et al.

Redefining Attorney Fiduciary Duties: Insights from Ulico Casualty Co. v. Wilson et al.

Date: Sep 17, 2008
Redefining Attorney Fiduciary Duties: Insights from Ulico Casualty Co. v. Wilson et al. Introduction The case of Ulico Casualty Company v. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker et al. adjudicated...
Establishing Contractual Ambiguity Standards in ATM Branding Agreements: Duane Reade, Inc. v. Cardtronics, LP

Establishing Contractual Ambiguity Standards in ATM Branding Agreements: Duane Reade, Inc. v. Cardtronics, LP

Date: Aug 6, 2008
Establishing Contractual Ambiguity Standards in ATM Branding Agreements: Duane Reade, Inc. v. Cardtronics, LP Introduction The case of Duane Reade, Inc. v. Cardtronics, LP revolves around a...
Sufficiency and Specificity Requirements for Fraud and Defamation Claims in Employment Contract Cases: Mañas v. VMS Associates

Sufficiency and Specificity Requirements for Fraud and Defamation Claims in Employment Contract Cases: Mañas v. VMS Associates

Date: Jul 23, 2008
Sufficiency and Specificity Requirements for Fraud and Defamation Claims in Employment Contract Cases: Mañas v. VMS Associates Introduction The case of Daniela Mañas v. VMS Associates, LLC, Doing...
Non-Preemption of State Deceptive Practice Claims under TILA and the Role of Res Judicata in Consumer Restitution: People of New York v. Applied Card Systems, Inc.

Non-Preemption of State Deceptive Practice Claims under TILA and the Role of Res Judicata in Consumer Restitution: People of New York v. Applied Card Systems, Inc.

Date: Jun 27, 2008
Non-Preemption of State Deceptive Practice Claims under TILA and the Role of Res Judicata in Consumer Restitution Introduction The case of People of the State of New York v. Applied Card Systems,...
Res Judicata and Corporate Succession: Landau, P.C. v. LaRossa, Mitchell Ross et al.

Res Judicata and Corporate Succession: Landau, P.C. v. LaRossa, Mitchell Ross et al.

Date: Jun 26, 2008
Res Judicata and Corporate Succession: Landau, P.C. v. LaRossa, Mitchell Ross et al. (11 N.Y.3d 8) Introduction The case of Landau, P.C. v. LaRossa, Mitchell Ross et al. addresses pivotal issues...
Establishing Fiduciary Duty Between Cleric and Parishioner: Insights from MARMELSTEIN v. KEHILLAT New Hempstead

Establishing Fiduciary Duty Between Cleric and Parishioner: Insights from MARMELSTEIN v. KEHILLAT New Hempstead

Date: Jun 26, 2008
Establishing Fiduciary Duty Between Cleric and Parishioner: Insights from MARMELSTEIN v. KEHILLAT New Hempstead Introduction MARMELSTEIN v. KEHILLAT New Hempstead: The Rav Aron Jofen Community...
Limitations on Indemnification Releases: Trustees' Tort Liability under the Trust Indenture Act

Limitations on Indemnification Releases: Trustees' Tort Liability under the Trust Indenture Act

Date: Jun 26, 2008
Limitations on Indemnification Releases: Trustees' Tort Liability under the Trust Indenture Act Introduction The case of AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v. State Street Bank and Trust Company...
Establishing Strict Liability Through Evidence of Vicious Propensities: Dykeman v. Heht

Establishing Strict Liability Through Evidence of Vicious Propensities: Dykeman v. Heht

Date: Jun 25, 2008
Establishing Strict Liability Through Evidence of Vicious Propensities: Dykeman v. Heht Introduction In the case of Crysta Dykeman et al. v. Raymond Heht (52 A.D.3d 767), the Appellate Division of...
Apparent Authority of Corporate Officers in Binding Retainer Agreements: Goldston v. Bandwidth Technology Corp.

Apparent Authority of Corporate Officers in Binding Retainer Agreements: Goldston v. Bandwidth Technology Corp.

Date: Jun 20, 2008
Apparent Authority of Corporate Officers in Binding Retainer Agreements: Goldston v. Bandwidth Technology Corp. Introduction Alan M. Goldston, as Assignee of Goldston Schwab, LLP v. Bandwidth...
Executives Recognized as Employees Under NY Labor Law Article 6 and Commission Earnings Governed by Employer-Employee Agreements

Executives Recognized as Employees Under NY Labor Law Article 6 and Commission Earnings Governed by Employer-Employee Agreements

Date: Jun 11, 2008
Executives Recognized as Employees Under NY Labor Law Article 6 and Commission Earnings Governed by Employer-Employee Agreements Introduction In the landmark case ELAINE PACHTER v. BERNARD HODES...
Affirmation of Preclusion of Fraud Defenses in No-Fault Insurance Claims: Insights from Fair Price Medical Supply Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Affirmation of Preclusion of Fraud Defenses in No-Fault Insurance Claims: Insights from Fair Price Medical Supply Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Date: Jun 6, 2008
Affirmation of Preclusion of Fraud Defenses in No-Fault Insurance Claims: Insights from Fair Price Medical Supply Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. Introduction The case of Fair Price Medical Supply...
State Law Enforcement of Federal Prevailing Wage Provisions: Cox v NAP Construction Co. Sets New Precedent

State Law Enforcement of Federal Prevailing Wage Provisions: Cox v NAP Construction Co. Sets New Precedent

Date: Jun 6, 2008
State Law Enforcement of Federal Prevailing Wage Provisions: Cox v NAP Construction Co. Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark decision of Cox v. NAP Construction Co., Inc., the Court of...
Tree Wells Excluded from Sidewalk Liability Under NYC Administrative Code §7-210

Tree Wells Excluded from Sidewalk Liability Under NYC Administrative Code §7-210

Date: Jun 4, 2008
Tree Wells Excluded from Sidewalk Liability Under NYC Administrative Code §7-210 Introduction The case of Dzafer Vucetovic et al. v. Epsom Downs, Inc. revolved around the legal interpretation of the...
Reaffirming Disciplinary Standards in Education: Pattern of Misconduct Justifies Termination

Reaffirming Disciplinary Standards in Education: Pattern of Misconduct Justifies Termination

Date: May 28, 2008
Reaffirming Disciplinary Standards in Education: Pattern of Misconduct Justifies Termination Introduction The case of Douglas Lackow v. Department of Education of the City of New York, decided by the...
Ensuring Equal Access to Legal Representation: The Prichep v. Prichep Decision

Ensuring Equal Access to Legal Representation: The Prichep v. Prichep Decision

Date: May 7, 2008
Ensuring Equal Access to Legal Representation: The Prichep v. Prichep Decision Introduction The case of Robert N. Prichep, Respondent, versus Patti Bloom Prichep, Appellant, adjudicated in the...
Affirming Fraud Claims Against Corporate Officers under CPLR 3016(b): PLUDEMAN v. NORTHERN LEASing Systems, Inc.

Affirming Fraud Claims Against Corporate Officers under CPLR 3016(b): PLUDEMAN v. NORTHERN LEASing Systems, Inc.

Date: May 7, 2008
Affirming Fraud Claims Against Corporate Officers under CPLR 3016(b): PLUDEMAN v. NORTHERN LEASing Systems, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of PLUDEMAN v. NORTHERN LEASing Systems, Inc.,...
Clarifying Insurer's Duty to Defend Additional Insureds: Worth Construction Co., Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company

Clarifying Insurer's Duty to Defend Additional Insureds: Worth Construction Co., Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company

Date: May 2, 2008
Clarifying Insurer's Duty to Defend Additional Insureds: Worth Construction Co., Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company Introduction The case of Worth Construction Co., Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company...
Judicial Exclusivity in Imposing Postrelease Supervision: Garner v. NY Department of Correctional Services

Judicial Exclusivity in Imposing Postrelease Supervision: Garner v. NY Department of Correctional Services

Date: Apr 30, 2008
Judicial Exclusivity in Imposing Postrelease Supervision: Garner v. NY Department of Correctional Services Introduction Garner v. New York State Department of Correctional Services is a landmark...
Oral Pronouncement of Postrelease Supervision Terms: A New Precedent in New York Sentencing Procedures

Oral Pronouncement of Postrelease Supervision Terms: A New Precedent in New York Sentencing Procedures

Date: Apr 30, 2008
Oral Pronouncement of Postrelease Supervision Terms: A New Precedent in New York Sentencing Procedures Introduction The case of The People of the State of New York v. Daniel Sparber et al. (10 N.Y.3d...
Strict Liability of Property Owners under Labor Law § 240(1): Sanatass v. Consolidated Investing Co.

Strict Liability of Property Owners under Labor Law § 240(1): Sanatass v. Consolidated Investing Co.

Date: Apr 25, 2008
Strict Liability of Property Owners under Labor Law § 240(1): Sanatass v. Consolidated Investing Co. Introduction Sanatass v. Consolidated Investing Company, Inc. (10 N.Y.3d 333) is a pivotal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert