Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Accessorial Liability in Juvenile Delinquency: The Tatiana N. Case

Affirmation of Accessorial Liability in Juvenile Delinquency: The Tatiana N. Case

Date: Apr 9, 2010
Affirmation of Accessorial Liability in Juvenile Delinquency: The Tatiana N. Case Introduction The case of Tatiana N. serves as a pivotal precedent in juvenile delinquency law, particularly...
Correct Application of Penal Law §70.45 in Sentencing: Insights from THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. DEAN A. GUAY

Correct Application of Penal Law §70.45 in Sentencing: Insights from THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. DEAN A. GUAY

Date: Apr 9, 2010
Correct Application of Penal Law §70.45 in Sentencing: Insights from The People of the State of New York v. Dean A. Guay Introduction The People of the State of New York v. Dean A. Guay, 72 A.D.3d...
Restricting Assumption of Risk to Sports and Recreation: Insights from Trupia v Lake George Central School District

Restricting Assumption of Risk to Sports and Recreation: Insights from Trupia v Lake George Central School District

Date: Apr 7, 2010
Restricting Assumption of Risk to Sports and Recreation: Insights from TRUPIA v. LAKE GEORGE CENTral School District Introduction The case of TRUPIA v. LAKE GEORGE CENTral School District revolves...
Documentary Evidence Criteria under CPLR 3211(a)(1): Insights from Fontanetta v. John Doe

Documentary Evidence Criteria under CPLR 3211(a)(1): Insights from Fontanetta v. John Doe

Date: Mar 31, 2010
Documentary Evidence Criteria under CPLR 3211(a)(1): Insights from Fontanetta v. John Doe Introduction The case of A. Philip Fontanetta et al. v. John Doe 1 et al., and Frank DiMaio et al....
Conflict of Interest in Defense Counsel: Insights from PEOPLE v. CARNCROSS

Conflict of Interest in Defense Counsel: Insights from PEOPLE v. CARNCROSS

Date: Mar 26, 2010
Conflict of Interest in Defense Counsel: Insights from PEOPLE v. CARNCROSS Introduction PEOPLE v. CARNCROSS, 14 N.Y.3d 319 (2010), is a pivotal decision by the Court of Appeals of the State of New...
Clarification of Charging Inconsistent Homicide Counts: People v. Avery V. Baker Jr.

Clarification of Charging Inconsistent Homicide Counts: People v. Avery V. Baker Jr.

Date: Mar 26, 2010
Clarification of Charging Inconsistent Homicide Counts: People v. Avery V. Baker Jr. Introduction People v. Avery V. Baker Jr. (14 N.Y.3d 266, 2010) is a seminal decision by the Court of Appeals of...
HETPA Notice Requirements as a Condition Precedent: Insights from First National Bank of Chicago v. Alvin Silver

HETPA Notice Requirements as a Condition Precedent: Insights from First National Bank of Chicago v. Alvin Silver

Date: Mar 24, 2010
HETPA Notice Requirements as a Condition Precedent: Insights from First National Bank of Chicago v. Alvin Silver Introduction The appellate case of First National Bank of Chicago, Respondent, v....
Affirmation of Burden of Proof in Disability Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Abram v. NY State Division of Human Rights

Affirmation of Burden of Proof in Disability Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Abram v. NY State Division of Human Rights

Date: Mar 20, 2010
Affirmation of Burden of Proof in Disability Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Abram v. NY State Division of Human Rights Introduction In the landmark case of Idella Abram v. New York State...
Inferring Intent in Possession of Forged Instruments: Rodriguez v. People

Inferring Intent in Possession of Forged Instruments: Rodriguez v. People

Date: Mar 10, 2010
Inferring Intent in Possession of Forged Instruments: Rodriguez v. People Introduction The People of the State of New York v. Isidro Rodriguez (71 A.D.3d 450) is a significant appellate decision from...
Double Jeopardy Protections in Resentencing: Insights from People v. Williams and Related Cases

Double Jeopardy Protections in Resentencing: Insights from People v. Williams and Related Cases

Date: Feb 24, 2010
Double Jeopardy Protections in Resentencing: Insights from People v. Williams and Related Cases Introduction The landmark decision in People v. Williams, along with accompanying cases People v....
Employer Liability for Safety Device Provision Under Labor Law §240(1)

Employer Liability for Safety Device Provision Under Labor Law §240(1)

Date: Feb 12, 2010
Employer Liability for Safety Device Provision Under Labor Law §240(1): Gallagher v. NYP Holdings, Inc. Introduction The case of Hugh Gallagher et al. v. The New York Post et al., reported in NYP...
Affirmation of Sole Custody Based on Significant Change in Circumstances and Best Interests of the Child

Affirmation of Sole Custody Based on Significant Change in Circumstances and Best Interests of the Child

Date: Jan 22, 2010
Affirmation of Sole Custody Based on Significant Change in Circumstances and Best Interests of the Child Introduction In the case of In the Matter of TROY SS. v. JUDY UU., the Appellate Division of...
General Business Law §349: Extending Consumer Protection to Insurance Subrogation Practices – Wilner v. Allstate Insurance Co.

General Business Law §349: Extending Consumer Protection to Insurance Subrogation Practices – Wilner v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Date: Jan 13, 2010
General Business Law §349: Extending Consumer Protection to Insurance Subrogation Practices – Wilner v. Allstate Insurance Co. Introduction In Wilner v. Allstate Insurance Co., the Appellate Division...
Denenberg v Rosen et al.: Clarifying Consumer-Oriented Standards under General Business Law §§ 349 & 350

Denenberg v Rosen et al.: Clarifying Consumer-Oriented Standards under General Business Law §§ 349 & 350

Date: Jan 8, 2010
Denenberg v Rosen et al.: Clarifying Consumer-Oriented Standards under General Business Law §§ 349 & 350 Introduction Denenberg v Rosen et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Appellate Division...
Expansion of 'Elevation Related Injury' Definition under NY Labor Law §240(1): Runner v. New York Stock Exchange

Expansion of 'Elevation Related Injury' Definition under NY Labor Law §240(1): Runner v. New York Stock Exchange

Date: Dec 18, 2009
Expansion of 'Elevation Related Injury' Definition under NY Labor Law §240(1): Runner v. New York Stock Exchange Introduction The case of Victor J. RUNNER v. NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. (13 N.Y.3d...
Establishing Adverse Possession: Key Insights from 2 North Street Corporation v. Getty Saugerties Corporation

Establishing Adverse Possession: Key Insights from 2 North Street Corporation v. Getty Saugerties Corporation

Date: Dec 18, 2009
Establishing Adverse Possession: Key Insights from 2 North Street Corporation v. Getty Saugerties Corporation Introduction The case of 2 North Street Corporation v. Getty Saugerties Corporation (68...
Priority of Insurance Coverage Established: Royal and SunAlliance Confirmed as Primary Insurer in William Floyd SD v. Maxner

Priority of Insurance Coverage Established: Royal and SunAlliance Confirmed as Primary Insurer in William Floyd SD v. Maxner

Date: Dec 16, 2009
Priority of Insurance Coverage Established: Royal and SunAlliance Confirmed as Primary Insurer in William Floyd SD v. Maxner Introduction The case of William Floyd School District et al. v. Frank...
NYU's Obligation to Extend Contractual Admission Considerations: Flomenbaum v. New York University

NYU's Obligation to Extend Contractual Admission Considerations: Flomenbaum v. New York University

Date: Dec 4, 2009
NYU's Obligation to Extend Contractual Admission Considerations: Flomenbaum v. New York University Introduction Flomenbaum v. New York University is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Appellate...
Clarifying Intent in New York's Gang Assault Statutes: PEOPLE v. SANCHEZ and PEOPLE v. MYNIN

Clarifying Intent in New York's Gang Assault Statutes: PEOPLE v. SANCHEZ and PEOPLE v. MYNIN

Date: Dec 2, 2009
Clarifying Intent in New York's Gang Assault Statutes: PEOPLE v. SANCHEZ and PEOPLE v. MYNIN Introduction In the landmark decisions of PEOPLE v. SANCHEZ and PEOPLE v. MYNIN, the Court of Appeals of...
Private Foundations Lack Legal Duty to Authenticate Art: Analysis of Thome v. Calder Foundation

Private Foundations Lack Legal Duty to Authenticate Art: Analysis of Thome v. Calder Foundation

Date: Dec 2, 2009
Private Foundations Lack Legal Duty to Authenticate Art: Analysis of Thome v. Calder Foundation Introduction Thome v. Calder Foundation is a landmark case adjudicated by the Appellate Division of the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert