Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

Ensuring Effective Representation in Family Law Appeals: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jasmin A. v. Administration for Children's Services

Ensuring Effective Representation in Family Law Appeals: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jasmin A. v. Administration for Children's Services

Date: Nov 2, 2011
Ensuring Effective Representation in Family Law Appeals: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jasmin A. v. Administration for Children's Services Introduction The case of Jasmin A. v. Administration for...
Enhancing Worker Safety Standards: Harrison v. State of New York and the Application of Labor Law §240(1)

Enhancing Worker Safety Standards: Harrison v. State of New York and the Application of Labor Law §240(1)

Date: Oct 26, 2011
Enhancing Worker Safety Standards: Harrison v. State of New York and the Application of Labor Law §240(1) Introduction In the landmark case of Michael J. Harrison v. State of New York, adjudicated by...
Enhanced Pleading Standards for Fraudulent Claims: High Tides, LLC v. DeMichele et al.

Enhanced Pleading Standards for Fraudulent Claims: High Tides, LLC v. DeMichele et al.

Date: Oct 26, 2011
Enhanced Pleading Standards for Fraudulent Claims: High Tides, LLC v. Don DeMichele et al. Introduction The case of High Tides, LLC vs. Don DeMichele, Jeffrey Serkes, Kenneth Kellaway, and Dunkin'...
Labor Law §240(1) Liability Not Precluded by Falling Objects at Same Elevation: An Analysis of Wilinski v. Housing Development Fund Corp.

Labor Law §240(1) Liability Not Precluded by Falling Objects at Same Elevation: An Analysis of Wilinski v. Housing Development Fund Corp.

Date: Oct 26, 2011
Labor Law §240(1) Liability Not Precluded by Falling Objects at Same Elevation: An Analysis of Wilinski v. Housing Development Fund Corp. Introduction The case of Antoni Wilinski et al. v. 334 East...
Establishing the Boundaries of Repugnant Verdicts: Insights from PEOPLE v. MUHAMMAD and PEOPLE v. HILL

Establishing the Boundaries of Repugnant Verdicts: Insights from PEOPLE v. MUHAMMAD and PEOPLE v. HILL

Date: Oct 21, 2011
Establishing the Boundaries of Repugnant Verdicts: Insights from PEOPLE v. MUHAMMAD and PEOPLE v. HILL Introduction In the realm of criminal law, the coherence of jury verdicts is paramount to...
Clarifying Standards for Downward Departures under New York’s Sex Offender Registration Act: Analysis of PEOPLE v. Rahiem Wyatt

Clarifying Standards for Downward Departures under New York’s Sex Offender Registration Act: Analysis of PEOPLE v. Rahiem Wyatt

Date: Oct 19, 2011
Clarifying Standards for Downward Departures under New York’s Sex Offender Registration Act: Analysis of PEOPLE v. Rahiem Wyatt Introduction In the landmark case PEOPLE of State of New York v. Rahiem...
Special Relationship and Municipal Immunity in Police Protection: VALDEZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Special Relationship and Municipal Immunity in Police Protection: VALDEZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Date: Oct 19, 2011
Special Relationship and Municipal Immunity in Police Protection: VALDEZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK Introduction The case of Carmen VALDEZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK presents a pivotal examination of the legal...
Clarifying the Scope of Bank Duties Under UCC: Insights from Greenberg v. HSBC Bank USA

Clarifying the Scope of Bank Duties Under UCC: Insights from Greenberg v. HSBC Bank USA

Date: Oct 14, 2011
Clarifying the Scope of Bank Duties Under UCC: Insights from Greenberg v. HSBC Bank USA Introduction The legal landscape governing banking operations, particularly concerning the duties banks owe to...
Establishing Municipal Liability Under 42 USC § 1983 and Respondeat Superior: Analysis of Dean Eckardt v. City of White Plains

Establishing Municipal Liability Under 42 USC § 1983 and Respondeat Superior: Analysis of Dean Eckardt v. City of White Plains

Date: Sep 21, 2011
Establishing Municipal Liability Under 42 USC § 1983 and Respondeat Superior: Analysis of Dean Eckardt v. City of White Plains Introduction In Dean Eckardt v. City of White Plains, et al., decided by...
Out-of-Possession Landlords and Duty of Care: Insights from Doronish K. Alnashmi v. Certified Analytical Group, Inc.

Out-of-Possession Landlords and Duty of Care: Insights from Doronish K. Alnashmi v. Certified Analytical Group, Inc.

Date: Sep 14, 2011
Out-of-Possession Landlords and Duty of Care: Insights from Doronish K. Alnashmi v. Certified Analytical Group, Inc. Introduction The case of Doronish K. Alnashmi v. Certified Analytical Group, Inc....
Enforcement of Exclusive Remedy Provisions in Education Law: Mulgrew v. Board of Education

Enforcement of Exclusive Remedy Provisions in Education Law: Mulgrew v. Board of Education

Date: Jul 29, 2011
Enforcement of Exclusive Remedy Provisions in Education Law: Mulgrew v. Board of Education (88 A.D.3d 72) Introduction The case of Michael Mulgrew, as President of the United Federation of Teachers,...
Unjust Enrichment in Real Estate Brokerage: Georgia Malone Co. v. Ralph Rieder et al.

Unjust Enrichment in Real Estate Brokerage: Georgia Malone Co. v. Ralph Rieder et al.

Date: Jul 8, 2011
Unjust Enrichment in Real Estate Brokerage: Georgia Malone Co. v. Ralph Rieder et al. Introduction Georgia Malone Company, Inc. v. Ralph Rieder et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Appellate...
Fraud Claims in Securitization: MBIA v. Countrywide Establishes Distinction from Contractual Breaches

Fraud Claims in Securitization: MBIA v. Countrywide Establishes Distinction from Contractual Breaches

Date: Jul 1, 2011
Fraud Claims in Securitization: MBIA v. Countrywide Establishes Distinction from Contractual Breaches Introduction The legal landscape governing financial securitizations and associated fraud claims...
Superintendent’s Approval of Restructuring Does Not Bar Policyholders’ Common Law Claims: ABN AMRO Bank v MBIA Inc. Commentary

Superintendent’s Approval of Restructuring Does Not Bar Policyholders’ Common Law Claims: ABN AMRO Bank v MBIA Inc. Commentary

Date: Jun 29, 2011
Superintendent’s Approval of Restructuring Does Not Bar Policyholders’ Common Law Claims: ABN AMRO Bank v MBIA Inc. Commentary Introduction The case of ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., et al. v. MBIA Inc. et al....
Paulin v. The People: Resentencing Eligibility for Parole Violators under the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act

Paulin v. The People: Resentencing Eligibility for Parole Violators under the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act

Date: Jun 29, 2011
Paulin v. The People: Resentencing Eligibility for Parole Violators under the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act Introduction The case of The People of the State of New York v. David Lance Paulin, decided by...
Commencement of Termination Clauses in Settlement Agreements: Analysis of BRAD H. v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Commencement of Termination Clauses in Settlement Agreements: Analysis of BRAD H. v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Date: Jun 29, 2011
Commencement of Termination Clauses in Settlement Agreements: Analysis of BRAD H. v. CITY OF NEW YORK Introduction The case of Brad H. et al. v. City of New York (17 N.Y.3d 180) addresses a pivotal...
Unanimous Consent in Defending Foreclosure Actions: Crane v. 206 West 41st Street Hotel Associates

Unanimous Consent in Defending Foreclosure Actions: Crane v. 206 West 41st Street Hotel Associates

Date: Jun 24, 2011
Unanimous Consent in Defending Foreclosure Actions: Crane v. 206 West 41st Street Hotel Associates Introduction The case of Crane, A.G. v. 206 West 41st Street Hotel Associates, L.P. adjudicated by...
Clerks' Authority Limited to Sum Certain Claims: Gleich v. Gritsipis Establishes New Precedent

Clerks' Authority Limited to Sum Certain Claims: Gleich v. Gritsipis Establishes New Precedent

Date: Jun 22, 2011
Clerks' Authority Limited to Sum Certain Claims: Gleich v. Gritsipis Establishes New Precedent Introduction In Stephane B. Gleich Associates v. Louis Gritsipis (87 A.D.3d 216), the Appellate Division...
Amendment of Pleadings under the Statute of Frauds: Insights from KOCOUREK v. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Amendment of Pleadings under the Statute of Frauds: Insights from KOCOUREK v. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Date: Jun 15, 2011
Amendment of Pleadings under the Statute of Frauds: Insights from Kocourek v. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. Introduction The case of Paul Kocourek v. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., 85 A.D.3d 502 (2011),...
Establishing Timeliness Criteria for Default Judgments on Counterclaims and the Binding Effect of Releases under GOL §15-108: Insights from Giglio v NTIMP, Inc.

Establishing Timeliness Criteria for Default Judgments on Counterclaims and the Binding Effect of Releases under GOL §15-108: Insights from Giglio v NTIMP, Inc.

Date: Jun 15, 2011
Establishing Timeliness Criteria for Default Judgments on Counterclaims and the Binding Effect of Releases under GOL §15-108: Insights from Giglio v NTIMP, Inc. Introduction The case of SUSANNE...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert