Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

Validity of Inventory Searches Following Vehicle Impoundment: Insights from People v. Padilla

Validity of Inventory Searches Following Vehicle Impoundment: Insights from People v. Padilla

Date: Jun 7, 2013
Validity of Inventory Searches Following Vehicle Impoundment: Insights from People v. Padilla 1. Introduction The case of PEOPLE of the State of New York v. Kenneth Padilla, adjudicated by the Court...
Establishing Standards for Conflict of Interest and Ineffective Assistance in Dual Representation Cases: People v. Sanchez

Establishing Standards for Conflict of Interest and Ineffective Assistance in Dual Representation Cases: People v. Sanchez

Date: Jun 5, 2013
Establishing Standards for Conflict of Interest and Ineffective Assistance in Dual Representation Cases: People v. Sanchez Introduction People v. Sanchez (21 N.Y.3d 216) is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Enhanced Non-Punitive Application of SORA Affirmed in PEOPLE v. Scott Parilla

Enhanced Non-Punitive Application of SORA Affirmed in PEOPLE v. Scott Parilla

Date: May 31, 2013
Enhanced Non-Punitive Application of SORA Affirmed in PEOPLE v. Scott Parilla Introduction The case of PEOPLE of the State of New York v. Scott Parilla (109 A.D.3d 20) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Invalidation of Prenuptial Agreements Due to Defective Acknowledgment: Galetta v. Galetta

Invalidation of Prenuptial Agreements Due to Defective Acknowledgment: Galetta v. Galetta

Date: May 31, 2013
Invalidation of Prenuptial Agreements Due to Defective Acknowledgment: Galetta v. Galetta Introduction In the landmark case of Michelle Galetta v. Gary Galetta (2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3871), the Court of...
Cumulative Counsel Errors Undermine Meaningful Representation: People v. Oathout

Cumulative Counsel Errors Undermine Meaningful Representation: People v. Oathout

Date: May 3, 2013
Cumulative Counsel Errors Undermine Meaningful Representation: People v. Oathout Introduction The case of People v. Christopher Oathout, decided by the Court of Appeals of New York on May 2, 2013,...
Municipal Zoning Authority Affirmed: Oil, Gas, and Solution Mining Law Does Not Preempt Local Land Use Regulations

Municipal Zoning Authority Affirmed: Oil, Gas, and Solution Mining Law Does Not Preempt Local Land Use Regulations

Date: May 3, 2013
Municipal Zoning Authority Affirmed: Oil, Gas, and Solution Mining Law Does Not Preempt Local Land Use Regulations Introduction The case of Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden addresses the...
Enforcing Good Faith Negotiations in Foreclosure Actions: Insights from WELLS FARGO BANK v. MEYERS

Enforcing Good Faith Negotiations in Foreclosure Actions: Insights from WELLS FARGO BANK v. MEYERS

Date: May 2, 2013
Enforcing Good Faith Negotiations in Foreclosure Actions: Insights from WELLS FARGO BANK v. MEYERS Introduction The case Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., appellant, v. Paul Meyers, et al., respondents,...
Actual Possession Required for Turnover Orders under CPLR § 5225(b) - Commonwealth v. CIBC

Actual Possession Required for Turnover Orders under CPLR § 5225(b) - Commonwealth v. CIBC

Date: May 1, 2013
Actual Possession Required for Turnover Orders under CPLR § 5225(b) - Commonwealth v. CIBC Introduction The case Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce...
Presumption of Visitation Rights for Incarcerated Parents Affirmed in Granger v. Misercola

Presumption of Visitation Rights for Incarcerated Parents Affirmed in Granger v. Misercola

Date: May 1, 2013
Presumption of Visitation Rights for Incarcerated Parents Affirmed in Granger v. Misercola Introduction Granger v. Misercola (21 N.Y.3d 86), adjudicated by the Court of Appeals of New York on April...
Rebuttable Presumption in World Trade Center Accidental Disability Retirement Claims: Cardno v. NYS&LR System

Rebuttable Presumption in World Trade Center Accidental Disability Retirement Claims: Cardno v. NYS&LR System

Date: Apr 12, 2013
Rebuttable Presumption in World Trade Center Accidental Disability Retirement Claims: Cardno v. New York State and Local Retirement System Introduction The case of Thomas Cardno v. New York State and...
Right to Adverse Inference Instruction When State Destroys Material Evidence – PEOPLE v. HANDY

Right to Adverse Inference Instruction When State Destroys Material Evidence – PEOPLE v. HANDY

Date: Mar 29, 2013
Right to Adverse Inference Instruction When State Destroys Material Evidence – PEOPLE v. HANDY Introduction People v. Dayshawn P. Handy is a landmark decision by the Court of Appeals of New York,...
Strengthening Fiduciary Responsibilities: Analysis of the Zimmerman Suspension Judgment

Strengthening Fiduciary Responsibilities: Analysis of the Zimmerman Suspension Judgment

Date: Mar 28, 2013
Strengthening Fiduciary Responsibilities: Analysis of the Zimmerman Suspension Judgment Introduction The case of In the Matter of Richard J. Zimmerman, reported in 106 A.D.3d 20 by the Supreme Court,...
Validity of Warrant Authority and Retention of Seized Property: People v. Deprospero

Validity of Warrant Authority and Retention of Seized Property: People v. Deprospero

Date: Mar 27, 2013
Validity of Warrant Authority and Retention of Seized Property: People v. Deprospero Introduction The case of The People of the State of New York v. Stephen DeProspero, decided by the Court of...
Strict Adherence to Judicial Diversion Eligibility Criteria: Doorley v. DeMarco & Schwartz

Strict Adherence to Judicial Diversion Eligibility Criteria: Doorley v. DeMarco & Schwartz

Date: Mar 23, 2013
Strict Adherence to Judicial Diversion Eligibility Criteria: Doorley v. DeMarco & Schwartz Introduction In the case of Doorley v. DeMarco & Schwartz (106 A.D.3d 27), the Supreme Court, Appellate...
Liability of General Contractors for Unsecured Floor Openings under Labor Law §§ 240 and 241(6) – Alonzo v. Safe Harbors

Liability of General Contractors for Unsecured Floor Openings under Labor Law §§ 240 and 241(6) – Alonzo v. Safe Harbors

Date: Mar 13, 2013
Liability of General Contractors for Unsecured Floor Openings under Labor Law §§ 240 and 241(6) – Alonzo v. Safe Harbors Introduction The case of Victor Alonzo v. Safe Harbors of the Hudson Housing...
Affirmation of Conviction in People v. Izzo III: Juror Impartiality and Sufficiency of Evidence Standards

Affirmation of Conviction in People v. Izzo III: Juror Impartiality and Sufficiency of Evidence Standards

Date: Mar 8, 2013
Affirmation of Conviction in People v. Izzo III: Juror Impartiality and Sufficiency of Evidence Standards Introduction In People v. William R. Izzo III, the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third...
Enforcement of Option Contracts Without External Consideration: Rubinschorn v. Troutman Sanders LLP

Enforcement of Option Contracts Without External Consideration: Rubinschorn v. Troutman Sanders LLP

Date: Feb 15, 2013
Enforcement of Option Contracts Without External Consideration: Rubinschorn v. Troutman Sanders LLP Introduction Rubin Schron et al. v. Troutman Sanders LLP et al., decided by the Court of Appeals of...
Clarifying the Standard of Proof for Substance Abuse under New York SORA Guidelines in People v. Palmer and People v. Long

Clarifying the Standard of Proof for Substance Abuse under New York SORA Guidelines in People v. Palmer and People v. Long

Date: Feb 13, 2013
Clarifying the Standard of Proof for Substance Abuse under New York SORA Guidelines in People v. Palmer and People v. Long Introduction The cases of People v. Palmer and People v. Long before the...
Enhanced Liability Standards for Health Clubs Under General Business Law § 627–a

Enhanced Liability Standards for Health Clubs Under General Business Law § 627–a

Date: Feb 8, 2013
Enhanced Liability Standards for Health Clubs Under General Business Law § 627–a Introduction The case of Gregory C. Miglino, Jr. v. Bally Total Fitness of Greater New York, Inc. (20 N.Y.3d 342)...
Retaliatory Discharge under NY Human Rights Law: Insights from Joyce Asabor v. Archdiocese of New York

Retaliatory Discharge under NY Human Rights Law: Insights from Joyce Asabor v. Archdiocese of New York

Date: Jan 23, 2013
Retaliatory Discharge under NY Human Rights Law: Insights from Joyce Asabor v. Archdiocese of New York Introduction In Joyce Asabor v. Archdiocese of New York, et al., the Supreme Court, Appellate...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert