Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

George M. Hodgson v. Leroy Applegate: Establishing Procedural Boundaries for Appeals under R.R. 4:62-2

George M. Hodgson v. Leroy Applegate: Establishing Procedural Boundaries for Appeals under R.R. 4:62-2

Date: Oct 27, 1959
George M. Hodgson v. Leroy Applegate: Establishing Procedural Boundaries for Appeals under R.R. 4:62-2 Introduction In the landmark case of George M. Hodgson v. Leroy Applegate, decided by the...
Clarifying Assumption of Risk: Integration with Contributory Negligence in Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions

Clarifying Assumption of Risk: Integration with Contributory Negligence in Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions

Date: Oct 27, 1959
Clarifying Assumption of Risk: Integration with Contributory Negligence in Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions Introduction MEISTRICH v. CASINO ARENA ATTRACTIONS, INC., 31 N.J. 44 (1959), is a...
Paramus Ordinance Regulation on Solicitors: Establishing Limits on Municipal Licensing and Commerce

Paramus Ordinance Regulation on Solicitors: Establishing Limits on Municipal Licensing and Commerce

Date: Aug 4, 1959
Paramus Ordinance Regulation on Solicitors: Establishing Limits on Municipal Licensing and Commerce Introduction The case of John Moyant, Jr. v. Borough of Paramus (1959) addresses the legality and...
Non-Delegable Duty in Demolition Operations: Majestic Realty Associates v. Toti Contracting Co., Inc.

Non-Delegable Duty in Demolition Operations: Majestic Realty Associates v. Toti Contracting Co., Inc.

Date: Jul 7, 1959
Non-Delegable Duty in Demolition Operations: Majestic Realty Associates v. Toti Contracting Co., Inc. 1. Introduction The case of Majestic Realty Associates, Inc., and Bohen's, Inc. v. Toti...
Reasonable Classification and Legislative Discretion in Employee Retirement: An Analysis of Harvey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County

Reasonable Classification and Legislative Discretion in Employee Retirement: An Analysis of Harvey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County

Date: Jul 1, 1959
Reasonable Classification and Legislative Discretion in Employee Retirement: An Analysis of Harvey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County Introduction The case of William F. Harvey v. The...
Affirmation of Corroboration Standards and Upholding the M'Naghten Rule in State v. Lucas

Affirmation of Corroboration Standards and Upholding the M'Naghten Rule in State v. Lucas

Date: Jun 2, 1959
Affirmation of Corroboration Standards and Upholding the M'Naghten Rule in State v. Lucas Introduction State of New Jersey v. Elber Cooper Lucas, 30 N.J. 37 (1959), is a pivotal case decided by the...
Affirming Municipal Residency Requirements: Newark v. City of Newark

Affirming Municipal Residency Requirements: Newark v. City of Newark

Date: Feb 17, 1959
Affirming Municipal Residency Requirements: Newark v. City of Newark Introduction The case of Jerome M. Kennedy et al. v. City of Newark, decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on February 16,...
Termination of Municipal Finance Commission Authority Requires Formal Action

Termination of Municipal Finance Commission Authority Requires Formal Action

Date: Feb 17, 1959
Termination of Municipal Finance Commission Authority Requires Formal Action Introduction The case of Oscar A. Schierstead v. City of Brigantine (29 N.J. 220) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of New...
Equitable Apportionment of Liability in Concurrent Excess Insurance Policies: Insights from Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.

Equitable Apportionment of Liability in Concurrent Excess Insurance Policies: Insights from Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.

Date: Jan 6, 1959
Equitable Apportionment of Liability in Concurrent Excess Insurance Policies: Insights from Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co. Introduction The landmark case Cosmopolitan...
Affirmation of Direct Liability in Unconditional Guarantee Agreements

Affirmation of Direct Liability in Unconditional Guarantee Agreements

Date: Oct 7, 1958
Affirmation of Direct Liability in Unconditional Guarantee Agreements Introduction The case of SAMUEL S. SALITAN, ET AL., t/a CREDIT INDUSTRIAL COMPANY v. FINN H. MAGNUS AND ELSIE A. MAGNUS, decided...
State of New Jersey v. Butler, Williams, and Williams: Landmark Ruling on Felony Murder and Jury Instructions

State of New Jersey v. Butler, Williams, and Williams: Landmark Ruling on Felony Murder and Jury Instructions

Date: Jun 28, 1958
State of New Jersey v. Butler, Williams, and Williams: Landmark Ruling on Felony Murder and Jury Instructions Introduction The case of The State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William...
Municipal Redevelopment and Police Power: Upholding Blighted Area Acts – Wilson v. City of Long Branch

Municipal Redevelopment and Police Power: Upholding Blighted Area Acts – Wilson v. City of Long Branch

Date: Jun 17, 1958
Municipal Redevelopment and Police Power: Upholding Blighted Area Acts – Wilson v. City of Long Branch Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey, in the landmark case Wilson v. City of Long...
Established Precedent on Equitable Property Settlement in Divorce Decrees

Established Precedent on Equitable Property Settlement in Divorce Decrees

Date: May 27, 1958
Established Precedent on Equitable Property Settlement in Divorce Decrees Introduction The case of West Jersey Title and Guaranty Company v. Industrial Trust Company and William H. Scott, Jr.,...
Municipal Utilities Must Adhere to Local Zoning Ordinances: Commentary on Ridgewood v. Ho-Ho-Kus

Municipal Utilities Must Adhere to Local Zoning Ordinances: Commentary on Ridgewood v. Ho-Ho-Kus

Date: May 6, 1958
Municipal Utilities Must Adhere to Local Zoning Ordinances: Commentary on Ridgewood v. Ho-Ho-Kus Introduction The landmark case Ridgewood v. Ho-Ho-Kus (1958) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of New...
Constitutional Upholding of N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(d) in Robson v. Rodriquez: Exclusions for Uninsured Motor Vehicle Operators

Constitutional Upholding of N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(d) in Robson v. Rodriquez: Exclusions for Uninsured Motor Vehicle Operators

Date: Apr 29, 1958
Constitutional Upholding of N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(d) in Robson v. Rodriquez: Exclusions for Uninsured Motor Vehicle Operators Introduction In the landmark case of Robson v. Rodriquez, adjudicated by the...
Rejection of Charitable Immunity in Nonprofit Hospitals: Establishing Tort Liability Standards

Rejection of Charitable Immunity in Nonprofit Hospitals: Establishing Tort Liability Standards

Date: Apr 29, 1958
Rejection of Charitable Immunity in Nonprofit Hospitals: Establishing Tort Liability Standards Introduction In the landmark case of William Stephen Colloepy v. Newark Eye and Ear Infirmary, the...
Landlord’s Duty to Repair Under Lease and Statutory Obligations: Analysis of Michaels v. Brookchester

Landlord’s Duty to Repair Under Lease and Statutory Obligations: Analysis of Michaels v. Brookchester

Date: Apr 1, 1958
Landlord’s Duty to Repair Under Lease and Statutory Obligations: Analysis of Michaels v. Brookchester Introduction Victoria Michaels and Frank Michaels v. Brookchester, Inc. is a landmark case...
Establishing Negligence through Res Ipsa Loquitur: BORNSTEIN v. METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COmpany, Inc.

Establishing Negligence through Res Ipsa Loquitur: BORNSTEIN v. METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COmpany, Inc.

Date: Mar 4, 1958
Establishing Negligence through Res Ipsa Loquitur: BORNSTEIN v. METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COmpany, Inc. Introduction The case of BORNSTEIN v. METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COmpany, Inc. (1958) centers on an...
Admissibility of Gruesome Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from State v. Bucanis

Admissibility of Gruesome Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from State v. Bucanis

Date: Feb 4, 1958
Admissibility of Gruesome Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from State of New Jersey v. John Bucanis Introduction State of New Jersey v. John Bucanis, 26 N.J. 45 (1958), addresses critical...
Prohibition of Mathematical Formulas in Admeasuring Pain and Suffering: BOTTA v. BRUNNER

Prohibition of Mathematical Formulas in Admeasuring Pain and Suffering: BOTTA v. BRUNNER

Date: Feb 4, 1958
Prohibition of Mathematical Formulas in Admeasuring Pain and Suffering: BOTTA v. BRUNNER Introduction BOTTA v. BRUNNER, 26 N.J. 82, is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert