Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Hutton Park Gardens v. West Orange: Establishing 'Just and Reasonable Return' Standard for Municipal Rent Control

Hutton Park Gardens v. West Orange: Establishing 'Just and Reasonable Return' Standard for Municipal Rent Control

Date: Dec 12, 1975
Hutton Park Gardens v. West Orange: Establishing 'Just and Reasonable Return' Standard for Municipal Rent Control Introduction The case of Hutton Park Gardens, a Partnership, Plaintiff-Respondent,...
Enhanced Protections in Consent Searches: Insights from State of New Jersey v. Arthur Johnson

Enhanced Protections in Consent Searches: Insights from State of New Jersey v. Arthur Johnson

Date: Oct 9, 1975
Enhanced Protections in Consent Searches: Insights from State of New Jersey v. Arthur Johnson Introduction State of New Jersey v. Arthur Johnson, decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on October...
State of New Jersey v. Stefan Krol: Establishing the Dangerousness Standard for Involuntary Commitment

State of New Jersey v. Stefan Krol: Establishing the Dangerousness Standard for Involuntary Commitment

Date: Aug 5, 1975
State of New Jersey v. Stefan Krol: Establishing the Dangerousness Standard for Involuntary Commitment Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. Stefan Krol, 68 N.J. 236 (1975), the...
Establishing Criteria for Terminating Disability Pensions: Reasonable Diligence and Pensioners’ Reliance

Establishing Criteria for Terminating Disability Pensions: Reasonable Diligence and Pensioners’ Reliance

Date: Jul 18, 1975
Establishing Criteria for Terminating Disability Pensions: Reasonable Diligence and Pensioners’ Reliance Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in Anthony Skulski et al. v. Joseph M....
Establishing Use Immunity in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings: The State v. Avant and Associates

Establishing Use Immunity in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings: The State v. Avant and Associates

Date: Jun 24, 1975
Establishing Use Immunity in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings: The State v. Avant and Associates Introduction In 1975, the Supreme Court of New Jersey rendered a landmark decision in the case of...
Separate Convictions for Possession and Sale of Narcotics Confirmed in State v. Davis

Separate Convictions for Possession and Sale of Narcotics Confirmed in State v. Davis

Date: Jun 20, 1975
Separate Convictions for Possession and Sale of Narcotics Confirmed in State v. Davis Introduction State of New Jersey v. Carl Alexander Davis, 68 N.J. 69 (1975), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Non-Waivability of Material Bidding Conditions: Insights from Terminal Construction Corp. v. Atlantic County Sewerage Authority

Non-Waivability of Material Bidding Conditions: Insights from Terminal Construction Corp. v. Atlantic County Sewerage Authority

Date: Jun 13, 1975
Non-Waivability of Material Bidding Conditions: Insights from Terminal Construction Corp. v. Atlantic County Sewerage Authority Introduction The case of Terminal Construction Corporation v. Atlantic...
Reversing the Presumption: Lind v. Schmid and the Evolution of Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution

Reversing the Presumption: Lind v. Schmid and the Evolution of Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution

Date: May 1, 1975
Reversing the Presumption: Lind v. Schmid and the Evolution of Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution Introduction DIANE S. LIND AND HELEN SPRECHER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOAN SCHMID,...
Establishing the Mount Laurel Doctrine: A Landmark Decision on Fair Share Housing in New Jersey

Establishing the Mount Laurel Doctrine: A Landmark Decision on Fair Share Housing in New Jersey

Date: Mar 25, 1975
Establishing the Mount Laurel Doctrine: A Landmark Decision on Fair Share Housing in New Jersey Introduction The case of Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. et al. v. Township of Mount Laurel,...
Statute of Limitations Applied Under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1 in O'Connor v. Altus & Harrison Park, Inc.

Statute of Limitations Applied Under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1 in O'Connor v. Altus & Harrison Park, Inc.

Date: Mar 12, 1975
Statute of Limitations Applied Under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1 in O'Connor v. Altus & Harrison Park, Inc. Introduction O'Connor v. Altus & Harrison Park, Inc., 67 N.J. 106 (1975), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Circumstantial Evidence in Product Liability: Analysis of MORACA v. FORD MOTOR CO.

Circumstantial Evidence in Product Liability: Analysis of MORACA v. FORD MOTOR CO.

Date: Feb 7, 1975
Circumstantial Evidence in Product Liability: Analysis of MORACA v. FORD MOTOR CO. Introduction The case of Thomas MORACA v. FORD MOTOR CO. (1968 Lincoln Continental Accident) presents a pivotal...
Recognition of Grandparent Visitation Rights Post Adoption Under N.J.S.A. 9:2-7.1

Recognition of Grandparent Visitation Rights Post Adoption Under N.J.S.A. 9:2-7.1

Date: Feb 7, 1975
Recognition of Grandparent Visitation Rights Post Adoption Under N.J.S.A. 9:2-7.1 Introduction The case of Rose Deitellbaum Mimkon v. Donald Ford and Adele Ford, decided by the Supreme Court of New...
Exclusion of Earning Capacity from Equitable Distribution: Stern v. Stern

Exclusion of Earning Capacity from Equitable Distribution: Stern v. Stern

Date: Jan 24, 1975
Exclusion of Earning Capacity from Equitable Distribution: Stern v. Stern Introduction The case of SUSANNE H. STERN vs. MILTON H. STERN (66 N.J. 340), decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on...
Shift in Burden of Proof for Damages in Medical Malpractice: Fosgate v. Corona

Shift in Burden of Proof for Damages in Medical Malpractice: Fosgate v. Corona

Date: Dec 19, 1974
Shift in Burden of Proof for Damages in Medical Malpractice: Fosgate v. Corona (66 N.J. 268) Introduction Mary Fosgate, Patricia Fosgate, Frank Fosgate as Guardian ad Litem Formarilyn Fosgate, an...
Invalidation of "Other Insurance" Exclusion in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: NJ Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Invalidation of "Other Insurance" Exclusion in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: NJ Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Dec 19, 1974
Invalidation of "Other Insurance" Exclusion in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: NJ Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of Motor Club of America Insurance Company v. Charles R. Phillips...
Defining Product Defect Liability and Burden of Proof in Strict Liability: The Scanlon v. General Motors Decision

Defining Product Defect Liability and Burden of Proof in Strict Liability: The Scanlon v. General Motors Decision

Date: Oct 17, 1974
Defining Product Defect Liability and Burden of Proof in Strict Liability: The Scanlon v. General Motors Decision Introduction The case of Michael J. Scanlon v. General Motors Corporation, Chevrolet...
Establishing the Duty of Insurance Companies to Act in Good Faith Regarding Settlements within Policy Limits: Analysis of Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Insurance Co.

Establishing the Duty of Insurance Companies to Act in Good Faith Regarding Settlements within Policy Limits: Analysis of Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Insurance Co.

Date: Aug 8, 1974
Establishing the Duty of Insurance Companies to Act in Good Faith Regarding Settlements within Policy Limits: Analysis of Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Insurance Co. Introduction The landmark case...
Establishing Strict Liability for Used Car Dealers in Product Liability Cases: Realmuto v. Straubmotors, Inc.

Establishing Strict Liability for Used Car Dealers in Product Liability Cases: Realmuto v. Straubmotors, Inc.

Date: Jul 10, 1974
Establishing Strict Liability for Used Car Dealers in Product Liability Cases: Realmuto v. Straubmotors, Inc. Introduction The case of Salvatore Realmuto and Jeanette Realmuto v. Straubmotors, Inc....
Equitable Distribution of Marital Assets: Rothman v. Rothman (1974)

Equitable Distribution of Marital Assets: Rothman v. Rothman (1974)

Date: Jun 6, 1974
Equitable Distribution of Marital Assets: Rothman v. Rothman (1974) Introduction Rothman v. Rothman is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of New Jersey, rendered on June 5, 1974. The case...
PAINTER v. PAINTER: Affirming No-Fault Divorce and Equitable Distribution in New Jersey

PAINTER v. PAINTER: Affirming No-Fault Divorce and Equitable Distribution in New Jersey

Date: Jun 6, 1974
PAINTER v. PAINTER: Affirming No-Fault Divorce and Equitable Distribution in New Jersey Introduction The PAINTER v. PAINTER case, decided on June 5, 1974, by the Supreme Court of New Jersey, stands...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert