Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Reaffirmation of "Patent and Gross Abuse of Discretion" Standard in Pretrial Intervention Admissions

Reaffirmation of "Patent and Gross Abuse of Discretion" Standard in Pretrial Intervention Admissions

Date: Jul 8, 1981
Reaffirmation of "Patent and Gross Abuse of Discretion" Standard in Pretrial Intervention Admissions Introduction The case State of New Jersey v. Lawrence Dalghlish (86 N.J. 503) represents a pivotal...
Joint Custody in Matrimonial Cases: Analyzing BECK v. BECK, 86 N.J. 480 (1981)

Joint Custody in Matrimonial Cases: Analyzing BECK v. BECK, 86 N.J. 480 (1981)

Date: Jul 3, 1981
Joint Custody in Matrimonial Cases: Analyzing BECK v. BECK, 86 N.J. 480 (1981) Introduction M. Arthur Beck, the plaintiff-appellant, filed for divorce and sought liberal visitation rights with his...
New Jersey Conflicts of Interest Law Extends to Municipal Court Judges: An In-Depth Analysis

New Jersey Conflicts of Interest Law Extends to Municipal Court Judges: An In-Depth Analysis

Date: Jun 26, 1981
New Jersey Conflicts of Interest Law Extends to Municipal Court Judges: An In-Depth Analysis Introduction The landmark case of EDWARD R. KNIGHT et al. v. CITY OF MARGATE et al., decided by the...
Amsted Industries v. Ramirez: Establishing the Product Line Approach for Successor Corporation Liability in New Jersey

Amsted Industries v. Ramirez: Establishing the Product Line Approach for Successor Corporation Liability in New Jersey

Date: Jun 19, 1981
Amsted Industries v. Ramirez: Establishing the Product Line Approach for Successor Corporation Liability in New Jersey Introduction The case of EFRAIN RAMIREZ AND LAURA RAMIREZ, HIS WIFE,...
Mandate for Specific Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification: State of New Jersey v. Norman Green

Mandate for Specific Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification: State of New Jersey v. Norman Green

Date: Jun 11, 1981
Mandate for Specific Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification: State of New Jersey v. Norman Green Introduction State of New Jersey v. Norman Green, 86 N.J. 281 (1981), is a landmark case in...
Establishing Mandatory Disclosure to Prevent Arbitrator Partiality in Commercial Arbitration

Establishing Mandatory Disclosure to Prevent Arbitrator Partiality in Commercial Arbitration

Date: May 29, 1981
Establishing Mandatory Disclosure to Prevent Arbitrator Partiality in Commercial Arbitration Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey, in the landmark case of Barcon Associates, Inc. v....
Establishing Common Law Remedies for Retaliatory Discharges: LALLY v. COPYGRAPHICS

Establishing Common Law Remedies for Retaliatory Discharges: LALLY v. COPYGRAPHICS

Date: Apr 28, 1981
Establishing Common Law Remedies for Retaliatory Discharges: LALLY v. COPYGRAPHICS Introduction Jo Ann LALLY v. COPYGRAPHICS, decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on April 27, 1981, is a...
Mitigation in Back Pay Awards under the Law Against Discrimination: Goodman v. London Metals Exchange

Mitigation in Back Pay Awards under the Law Against Discrimination: Goodman v. London Metals Exchange

Date: Apr 23, 1981
Mitigation in Back Pay Awards under the Law Against Discrimination: Goodman v. London Metals Exchange Introduction Bonnie Goodman v. London Metals Exchange, Inc., Dr. Merrill K. Gellis, and Irene...
Enforceability of Escalation Clauses in Divorce Agreements: Insights from PETERSEN v. PETERSEN

Enforceability of Escalation Clauses in Divorce Agreements: Insights from PETERSEN v. PETERSEN

Date: Apr 22, 1981
Enforceability of Escalation Clauses in Divorce Agreements: Insights from PETERSEN v. PETERSEN Introduction PETERSEN v. PETERSEN, 85 N.J. 638 (1981), is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court...
Establishing Supreme Court Authority and Mandatory Arbitration in Attorney-Client Fee Disputes: A New Jersey Supreme Court Precedent

Establishing Supreme Court Authority and Mandatory Arbitration in Attorney-Client Fee Disputes: A New Jersey Supreme Court Precedent

Date: Apr 14, 1981
Establishing Supreme Court Authority and Mandatory Arbitration in Attorney-Client Fee Disputes: A New Jersey Supreme Court Precedent Introduction The case of Philip J. LiVolsi v. New Jersey State Bar...
Aetna Subrogation Rights Limited by Single Controversy Doctrine under New Jersey No-Fault Act

Aetna Subrogation Rights Limited by Single Controversy Doctrine under New Jersey No-Fault Act

Date: Apr 8, 1981
Aetna Subrogation Rights Limited by Single Controversy Doctrine under New Jersey No-Fault Act Introduction The case of AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUBROGEE OF HIGINIO OTERO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v....
Non-Retroactive Application of Sealing Delay Sanctions under the New Jersey Wiretap Act

Non-Retroactive Application of Sealing Delay Sanctions under the New Jersey Wiretap Act

Date: Mar 17, 1981
Non-Retroactive Application of Sealing Delay Sanctions under the New Jersey Wiretap Act Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey, in the case of State of New Jersey v. Burstein et al., addressed...
Disclosure and Interpretation of Polygraph Evidence: New Jersey Supreme Court Sets Precedent in State v. Carter

Disclosure and Interpretation of Polygraph Evidence: New Jersey Supreme Court Sets Precedent in State v. Carter

Date: Mar 4, 1981
Disclosure and Interpretation of Polygraph Evidence: New Jersey Supreme Court Sets Precedent in State v. Carter Introduction State of New Jersey v. Rubin Carter and John Artis, 85 N.J. 300 (1981), is...
Implied Financial Disclosure Obligations in Life-Care Contracts: Presbyterian Homes of New Jersey v. Meadow Lakes Residents Forum

Implied Financial Disclosure Obligations in Life-Care Contracts: Presbyterian Homes of New Jersey v. Meadow Lakes Residents Forum

Date: Feb 3, 1981
Implied Financial Disclosure Obligations in Life-Care Contracts: Presbyterian Homes of New Jersey v. Meadow Lakes Residents Forum Introduction Presbyterian Homes of New Jersey v. Meadow Lakes...
Reaffirming the Discovery Rule: Knowledge of Fault Essential for Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice Cases

Reaffirming the Discovery Rule: Knowledge of Fault Essential for Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice Cases

Date: Jan 28, 1981
Reaffirming the Discovery Rule: Knowledge of Fault Essential for Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice Cases Introduction The case Isabel Lynch v. Gerald E. Rubacky, M.D. ([85 N.J. 65](#)),...
No Automatic Resentencing for Mandatory Life Sentences under New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice

No Automatic Resentencing for Mandatory Life Sentences under New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice

Date: Dec 3, 1980
No Automatic Resentencing for Mandatory Life Sentences under New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. John Maguire (84 N.J. 508) addressed a pivotal issue...
New Jersey Establishes State Constitutional Protection for Free Speech on Private Educational Campuses in Schmid

New Jersey Establishes State Constitutional Protection for Free Speech on Private Educational Campuses in Schmid

Date: Nov 26, 1980
New Jersey Establishes State Constitutional Protection for Free Speech on Private Educational Campuses in Schmid Introduction In the landmark case State of New Jersey v. Chris Schmid, decided on...
Revocability of Settlement Consent and Attorney-Client Duties in Medical Malpractice Insurance Contracts

Revocability of Settlement Consent and Attorney-Client Duties in Medical Malpractice Insurance Contracts

Date: Sep 16, 1980
Revocability of Settlement Consent and Attorney-Client Duties in Medical Malpractice Insurance Contracts Introduction The case of Howard LIEBERMAN v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU and Robert...
Portee v. Jaffee: Establishing Foreseeable Emotional Distress Liability Without Physical Harm

Portee v. Jaffee: Establishing Foreseeable Emotional Distress Liability Without Physical Harm

Date: Jul 30, 1980
Portee v. Jaffee: Establishing Foreseeable Emotional Distress Liability Without Physical Harm Introduction Portee v. Jaffee, 84 N.J. 88 (1980), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of New...
State of New Jersey v. Larry Powell: Mandating Manslaughter Instructions on Provocation and Passion in Murder Convictions

State of New Jersey v. Larry Powell: Mandating Manslaughter Instructions on Provocation and Passion in Murder Convictions

Date: Jul 29, 1980
State of New Jersey v. Larry Powell: Mandating Manslaughter Instructions on Provocation and Passion in Murder Convictions Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Larry Powell (84 N.J. 305,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert