Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Objective Reasonableness Affirmed in Warrantless Searches: STATE v. BRUZZESE (94 N.J. 210)

Objective Reasonableness Affirmed in Warrantless Searches: STATE v. BRUZZESE (94 N.J. 210)

Date: Aug 9, 1983
Objective Reasonableness Affirmed in Warrantless Searches: STATE v. BRUZZESE (94 N.J. 210) Introduction State of New Jersey v. Joseph P. Bruzzese is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of New...
Inclusion of State-of-the-Art Evidence in Risk-Utility Analysis for Strict Product Liability: O'Brien v. Muskin Corporation

Inclusion of State-of-the-Art Evidence in Risk-Utility Analysis for Strict Product Liability: O'Brien v. Muskin Corporation

Date: Aug 3, 1983
Inclusion of State-of-the-Art Evidence in Risk-Utility Analysis for Strict Product Liability: O'Brien v. Muskin Corporation Introduction In the landmark case Gary O'Brien v. Muskin Corporation,...
Establishing Strict Liability for Abnormally Dangerous Activities: Reaffirmation of Rylands v. Fletcher in State of New Jersey v. Ventron Corporation et al.

Establishing Strict Liability for Abnormally Dangerous Activities: Reaffirmation of Rylands v. Fletcher in State of New Jersey v. Ventron Corporation et al.

Date: Jul 22, 1983
Establishing Strict Liability for Abnormally Dangerous Activities: Reaffirmation of Rylands v. Fletcher in State of New Jersey v. Ventron Corporation et al. Introduction The landmark case of State of...
New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Clear Standards for Drug Paraphernalia Laws Based on Defendant's Intent and Knowledge

New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Clear Standards for Drug Paraphernalia Laws Based on Defendant's Intent and Knowledge

Date: Jul 20, 1983
New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Clear Standards for Drug Paraphernalia Laws Based on Defendant's Intent and Knowledge Introduction In the landmark case of Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Irwin I....
Modification of Parent-Child Immunity: Distinction Between Negligent and Willful Misconduct in Supervision Cases

Modification of Parent-Child Immunity: Distinction Between Negligent and Willful Misconduct in Supervision Cases

Date: Jul 14, 1983
Modification of Parent-Child Immunity: Distinction Between Negligent and Willful Misconduct in Supervision Cases Introduction The case of Jennifer Foldi v. Dorsie G. Jeffries and Florence Jeffries...
Strict Adherence to Prescribed Educational Qualifications in Civil Service Examinations

Strict Adherence to Prescribed Educational Qualifications in Civil Service Examinations

Date: Jun 22, 1983
Strict Adherence to Prescribed Educational Qualifications in Civil Service Examinations Introduction The case of Gloucester County Welfare Board v. State of New Jersey Civil Service Commission (93...
Rosenblum v. Adler: Establishing Auditor Liability for Negligent Misrepresentation to Foreseeable Third Parties

Rosenblum v. Adler: Establishing Auditor Liability for Negligent Misrepresentation to Foreseeable Third Parties

Date: Jun 10, 1983
Rosenblum v. Adler: Establishing Auditor Liability for Negligent Misrepresentation to Foreseeable Third Parties Introduction The case of Rosenblum v. Adler examined whether accountants should be held...
Telephonic Search Warrants: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Judicial Authorization

Telephonic Search Warrants: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Judicial Authorization

Date: May 17, 1983
Telephonic Search Warrants: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Judicial Authorization Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. Guillermo Leon Valencia et al. (93 N.J. 126, 1983),...
Constitutional Due Process in Parole Eligibility: Insights from New Jersey State Parole Board v. Byrne & Maples

Constitutional Due Process in Parole Eligibility: Insights from New Jersey State Parole Board v. Byrne & Maples

Date: May 12, 1983
Constitutional Due Process in Parole Eligibility: Insights from New Jersey State Parole Board v. Byrne & Maples Introduction The landmark case of New Jersey State Parole Board v. James Byrne and Tony...
Reaffirmation of Traditional Banking Practices under the Bank Holding Company Act: Continental Bank v. Barclay Equestrian Center

Reaffirmation of Traditional Banking Practices under the Bank Holding Company Act: Continental Bank v. Barclay Equestrian Center

Date: May 10, 1983
Reaffirmation of Traditional Banking Practices under the Bank Holding Company Act Continental Bank of Pennsylvania v. Barclay Equestrian Center, Inc., 93 N.J. 153 (1983) Introduction In the landmark...
Open Access to Pretrial Proceedings: Establishing New Standards in State v. Williams

Open Access to Pretrial Proceedings: Establishing New Standards in State v. Williams

Date: Apr 27, 1983
Open Access to Pretrial Proceedings: Establishing New Standards in State of New Jersey v. James E. Williams Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. James E. Williams, decided on...
Double Jeopardy Protections in Motor Vehicle Offenses: Insights from State v. Dively

Double Jeopardy Protections in Motor Vehicle Offenses: Insights from State v. Dively

Date: Apr 15, 1983
Double Jeopardy Protections in Motor Vehicle Offenses: Insights from State of New Jersey v. Russell P. Dively Introduction State of New Jersey v. Russell P. Dively is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Ensuring Fairness in Medical Malpractice Panels: The PERNA v. PIROZZI Decision

Ensuring Fairness in Medical Malpractice Panels: The PERNA v. PIROZZI Decision

Date: Mar 3, 1983
Ensuring Fairness in Medical Malpractice Panels: The PERNA v. PIROZZI Decision Introduction The case of BETTY L. PERNA AND THOMAS R. PERNA, JR. v. MICHAELJ. PIROZZI, M.D., ANTHONY DEL GAIZO, M.D.,...
Cohabitation as Grounds for Alimony Modification: Insights from Mary Ann Gayet v. George Gayet

Cohabitation as Grounds for Alimony Modification: Insights from Mary Ann Gayet v. George Gayet

Date: Feb 15, 1983
Cohabitation as Grounds for Alimony Modification: Insights from Mary Ann Gayet v. George Gayet Introduction The case of Mary Ann Gayet v. George Gayet, decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on...
Graves Act Mandates Fixed Sentences, Overriding Youthful Offender Indeterminate Terms

Graves Act Mandates Fixed Sentences, Overriding Youthful Offender Indeterminate Terms

Date: Jan 27, 1983
Graves Act Mandates Fixed Sentences, Overriding Youthful Offender Indeterminate Terms Introduction In the landmark cases of State of New Jersey v. Robert Des Marets and State of New Jersey v. Jeffrey...
Reinforcing the Mount Laurel Doctrine: Comprehensive Judicial Commentary on Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount Laurel

Reinforcing the Mount Laurel Doctrine: Comprehensive Judicial Commentary on Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount Laurel

Date: Jan 21, 1983
Reinforcing the Mount Laurel Doctrine: Comprehensive Judicial Commentary on Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount Laurel Introduction Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v....
Transportation-Related Voluntary Quitting Disqualifies Employees from Unemployment Compensation: Analysis of SELF v. BOARD OF REVIEW

Transportation-Related Voluntary Quitting Disqualifies Employees from Unemployment Compensation: Analysis of SELF v. BOARD OF REVIEW

Date: Dec 15, 1982
Transportation-Related Voluntary Quitting Disqualifies Employees from Unemployment Compensation: Analysis of SELF v. BOARD OF REVIEW Introduction The case of SELF v. BOARD OF REVIEW involves Annie M....
Enhancing Buyer Protections: DONOVAN v. BACHSTADT and the Adoption of the American Rule in Real Estate Contracts

Enhancing Buyer Protections: DONOVAN v. BACHSTADT and the Adoption of the American Rule in Real Estate Contracts

Date: Dec 10, 1982
Enhancing Buyer Protections: DONOVAN v. BACHSTADT and the Adoption of the American Rule in Real Estate Contracts Introduction DONOVAN v. BACHSTADT, 91 N.J. 434 (1982), is a landmark decision by the...
Frankkovack v. State of New Jersey: Mandatory Disclosure of Parole Ineligibility in Plea Agreements

Frankkovack v. State of New Jersey: Mandatory Disclosure of Parole Ineligibility in Plea Agreements

Date: Dec 8, 1982
Frankkovack v. State of New Jersey: Mandatory Disclosure of Parole Ineligibility in Plea Agreements Introduction Frankkovack v. State of New Jersey (91 N.J. 476) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Enhanced Privacy Protections under the New Jersey Constitution for Telephone Billing Records

Enhanced Privacy Protections under the New Jersey Constitution for Telephone Billing Records

Date: Aug 19, 1982
Enhanced Privacy Protections under the New Jersey Constitution for Telephone Billing Records Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. Merrell Hunt and Ralph Pirillo, Sr., decided...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert