Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

New Jersey DEP's Volume-Based NJPDES Permit Fees Upholding: A Comprehensive Analysis

New Jersey DEP's Volume-Based NJPDES Permit Fees Upholding: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Nov 26, 1985
New Jersey DEP's Volume-Based NJPDES Permit Fees Upholding: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of Public Service Electric and Gas Company et al. v. New Jersey Department of Environmental...
STATE v. MATULEWICZ: Admissibility of Forensic Chemist Reports under NJ Evidence Rules

STATE v. MATULEWICZ: Admissibility of Forensic Chemist Reports under NJ Evidence Rules

Date: Nov 22, 1985
STATE v. MATULEWICZ: Admissibility of Forensic Chemist Reports under NJ Evidence Rules Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Stanley A. Matulewicz (101 N.J. 27) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Hollendonner v. Supreme Court of New Jersey: Misuse of Escrow Funds and Ethical Violations

Hollendonner v. Supreme Court of New Jersey: Misuse of Escrow Funds and Ethical Violations

Date: Oct 18, 1985
Hollendonner v. Supreme Court of New Jersey: Misuse of Escrow Funds and Ethical Violations Introduction In the Matter of Anton J. Hollendonner, an Attorney-At-Law, 102 N.J. 21, 1985, is a landmark...
STATE v. YARBOUGH and Smith: Establishing Standards for Consecutive and Concurrent Sentencing in New Jersey

STATE v. YARBOUGH and Smith: Establishing Standards for Consecutive and Concurrent Sentencing in New Jersey

Date: Oct 8, 1985
STATE v. YARBOUGH and Smith: Establishing Standards for Consecutive and Concurrent Sentencing in New Jersey Introduction In the landmark case State of New Jersey v. John Yarbough and Judy Wilson...
Pantasote Co. v. City of Passaic: Upholding the Presumption of Validity in Property Tax Assessments

Pantasote Co. v. City of Passaic: Upholding the Presumption of Validity in Property Tax Assessments

Date: Jul 31, 1985
Upholding the Presumption of Validity in Property Tax Assessments: Pantasote Co. v. City of Passaic 1. Introduction The case of Pantasote Company v. City of Passaic (100 N.J. 408, 1985) revolves...
Strict Adherence to Statutory Deadlines in Property Tax Appeals Affirmed in F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris Plains

Strict Adherence to Statutory Deadlines in Property Tax Appeals Affirmed in F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris Plains

Date: Jul 31, 1985
Strict Adherence to Statutory Deadlines in Property Tax Appeals Affirmed in F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris Plains Introduction The case of F.M.C. Stores Co., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Borough...
Recognizing Pure Economic Loss in Negligence Claims: People Express Airlines v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Recognizing Pure Economic Loss in Negligence Claims: People Express Airlines v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Date: Jul 27, 1985
Recognizing Pure Economic Loss in Negligence Claims: People Express Airlines v. Consolidated Rail Corporation Introduction The case of People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corporation,...
Enforceability of "Claims Made" Insurance Policies Under Public Policy: Sparks v. St. Paul Insurance Co.

Enforceability of "Claims Made" Insurance Policies Under Public Policy: Sparks v. St. Paul Insurance Co.

Date: Jul 26, 1985
Enforceability of "Claims Made" Insurance Policies Under Public Policy: Sparks v. St. Paul Insurance Co. Introduction Sparks v. St. Paul Insurance Co. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Strict Enforcement of "Claims Made" Policies Affirmed in Zuckerman v. National Union Fire Insurance Company

Strict Enforcement of "Claims Made" Policies Affirmed in Zuckerman v. National Union Fire Insurance Company

Date: Jul 26, 1985
Strict Enforcement of "Claims Made" Policies Affirmed in Zuckerman v. National Union Fire Insurance Company 1. Introduction In the landmark case of Zuckerman v. National Union Fire Insurance Company,...
State of New Jersey v. Robert Reldan: Affirming the Scope and Reasonableness of Automobile Searches Under Warrant

State of New Jersey v. Robert Reldan: Affirming the Scope and Reasonableness of Automobile Searches Under Warrant

Date: Jul 25, 1985
State of New Jersey v. Robert Reldan: Affirming the Scope and Reasonableness of Automobile Searches Under Warrant Introduction In State of New Jersey v. Robert Reldan (100 N.J. 187, 1985), the...
Tainted Witnesses and the Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence: STATE v. SUGAR (1985)

Tainted Witnesses and the Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence: STATE v. SUGAR (1985)

Date: Jul 25, 1985
Tainted Witnesses and the Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence: STATE v. SUGAR (1985) Introduction State of New Jersey v. Harry D. Sugar, 100 N.J. 214 (1985), is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Supreme Court of New Jersey Reinforces Strict Adherence to Franchise Agreements in Dunkin' Donuts v. Smothergill

Supreme Court of New Jersey Reinforces Strict Adherence to Franchise Agreements in Dunkin' Donuts v. Smothergill

Date: Jul 24, 1985
Supreme Court of New Jersey Reinforces Strict Adherence to Franchise Agreements in Dunkin' Donuts v. Smothergill Introduction In the landmark case Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc. v. Smothergill,...
ABBOTT v. BURKE: Establishing Procedural Pathways for Constitutional Challenges in New Jersey Public School Funding

ABBOTT v. BURKE: Establishing Procedural Pathways for Constitutional Challenges in New Jersey Public School Funding

Date: Jul 24, 1985
ABBOTT v. BURKE: Establishing Procedural Pathways for Constitutional Challenges in New Jersey Public School Funding Introduction ABBOTT v. BURKE is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
State Immunity Reinforced in New Jersey Tort Claims Act: KOLITCH v. LINDEDAHL

State Immunity Reinforced in New Jersey Tort Claims Act: KOLITCH v. LINDEDAHL

Date: Jul 23, 1985
State Immunity Reinforced in New Jersey Tort Claims Act: KOLITCH v. LINDEDAHL Introduction In the landmark case of KOLITCH v. LINDEDAHL, the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed critical issues of...
Enhancing Consumer Protection in Automobile Advertising: Barry v. Arrow Pontiac

Enhancing Consumer Protection in Automobile Advertising: Barry v. Arrow Pontiac

Date: Jul 19, 1985
Enhancing Consumer Protection in Automobile Advertising: Barry v. Arrow Pontiac Introduction James S. Barry, Jr., Director of Consumer Affairs appealed against Arrow Pontiac, Inc., a New Jersey-based...
Preserving Judicial Integrity: Upholding Casino Employment Restrictions for Judicial Spouses

Preserving Judicial Integrity: Upholding Casino Employment Restrictions for Judicial Spouses

Date: Jul 3, 1985
Preserving Judicial Integrity: Upholding Casino Employment Restrictions for Judicial Spouses Introduction Barbara A. Greenberg v. Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, 99 N.J. 552...
Unconstitutionally Vague: The Precedent Set in State of New Jersey v. Robert J. Cameron on Zoning Ordinances and Religious Activities

Unconstitutionally Vague: The Precedent Set in State of New Jersey v. Robert J. Cameron on Zoning Ordinances and Religious Activities

Date: Jun 20, 1985
Unconstitutionally Vague: The Precedent Set in State of New Jersey v. Robert J. Cameron on Zoning Ordinances and Religious Activities Introduction State of New Jersey v. Robert J. Cameron, reported...
Judicial Authority to Dismiss Indictments After Multiple Mistrials: The New Precedent in STATE v. ABBATI

Judicial Authority to Dismiss Indictments After Multiple Mistrials: The New Precedent in STATE v. ABBATI

Date: Jun 6, 1985
Judicial Authority to Dismiss Indictments After Multiple Mistrials: The New Precedent in STATE v. ABBATI Introduction State of New Jersey v. Vincent M. Abbati, Jr. (99 N.J. 418) is a landmark...
Chiropractors’ Duty to Recognize and Refer: Comprehensive Analysis of Rosenberg v. Cahill et al. (99 N.J. 318)

Chiropractors’ Duty to Recognize and Refer: Comprehensive Analysis of Rosenberg v. Cahill et al. (99 N.J. 318)

Date: May 14, 1985
Chiropractors’ Duty to Recognize and Refer: Comprehensive Analysis of Rosenberg v. Cahill et al. (99 N.J. 318) Introduction The landmark case Rosenberg v. Cahill et al. adjudicated by the Supreme...
Glen Wall Associates v. Township of Wall: Establishing Comprehensive Standards for Property Valuation under Building Residual Technique

Glen Wall Associates v. Township of Wall: Establishing Comprehensive Standards for Property Valuation under Building Residual Technique

Date: May 10, 1985
Glen Wall Associates v. Township of Wall: Establishing Comprehensive Standards for Property Valuation under Building Residual Technique Introduction The case of Glen Wall Associates,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert