Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Unambiguous Consent Required for Arbitration Clauses in Employment Handbooks: Leodori v. Cigna Corp.

Unambiguous Consent Required for Arbitration Clauses in Employment Handbooks: Leodori v. Cigna Corp.

Date: Feb 14, 2003
Unambiguous Consent Required for Arbitration Clauses in Employment Handbooks: Leodori v. Cigna Corp. Introduction Leodori v. Cigna Corporation is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming the Presumption of Imprisonment in Second-Degree Child Endangerment: State v. Evers

Reaffirming the Presumption of Imprisonment in Second-Degree Child Endangerment: State v. Evers

Date: Feb 14, 2003
Reaffirming the Presumption of Imprisonment in Second-Degree Child Endangerment: State of New Jersey v. William T. Evers Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. William T. Evers...
Establishing Presumptive Workers' Compensation for Emphysema in Firefighters under N.J.S.A. 34:15-43.2

Establishing Presumptive Workers' Compensation for Emphysema in Firefighters under N.J.S.A. 34:15-43.2

Date: Feb 12, 2003
Establishing Presumptive Workers' Compensation for Emphysema in Firefighters under N.J.S.A. 34:15-43.2 Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey, in the landmark case of Richard Lindquist v. City...
Strengthening Due Process and Defining Harassment in New Jersey's Domestic Violence Act: H.E.S. v. J.C.S. Judgment Analysis

Strengthening Due Process and Defining Harassment in New Jersey's Domestic Violence Act: H.E.S. v. J.C.S. Judgment Analysis

Date: Feb 7, 2003
Strengthening Due Process and Defining Harassment in New Jersey's Domestic Violence Act: H.E.S. v. J.C.S. Judgment Analysis Introduction The case of H.E.S. v. J.C.S., decided on February 6, 2003, by...
Application of Mode of Operation Doctrine in Slip and Fall Cases: Nisioccia v. Glass Gardens

Application of Mode of Operation Doctrine in Slip and Fall Cases: Nisioccia v. Glass Gardens

Date: Jan 23, 2003
Application of Mode of Operation Doctrine in Slip and Fall Cases: Nisioccia v. Glass Gardens Introduction Nisioccia v. Glass Gardens, Inc. is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey...
New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Advocacy by Post-Confinement Relief Counsel under Rule 3:22-6

New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Advocacy by Post-Confinement Relief Counsel under Rule 3:22-6

Date: Dec 13, 2002
New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Advocacy by Post-Confinement Relief Counsel under Rule 3:22-6 Introduction State of New Jersey v. Dudley Rue, 175 N.J. 1 (2002), adjudicated by the...
Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence and Jury Unanimity in Child Welfare Cases: Insights from State v. Frisby

Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence and Jury Unanimity in Child Welfare Cases: Insights from State v. Frisby

Date: Dec 12, 2002
Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence and Jury Unanimity in Child Welfare Cases: Insights from State v. Frisby Introduction State of New Jersey v. Monica L. Frisby is a landmark case decided by the...
Limits on Prosecutorial Consideration of Juvenile and Dismissed Offenses in Pretrial Intervention Applications: State of New Jersey v. James T. Brooks

Limits on Prosecutorial Consideration of Juvenile and Dismissed Offenses in Pretrial Intervention Applications: State of New Jersey v. James T. Brooks

Date: Nov 26, 2002
Limits on Prosecutorial Consideration of Juvenile and Dismissed Offenses in Pretrial Intervention Applications: State of New Jersey v. James T. Brooks Introduction In the landmark case of State of...
New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines for Admissibility of Other-Crime Evidence in Darby v. State

New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines for Admissibility of Other-Crime Evidence in Darby v. State

Date: Nov 20, 2002
New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Strict Guidelines for Admissibility of Other-Crime Evidence in Darby v. State Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Roderick S. Darby (174 N.J. 509)...
Affirmation of Continuing Violation Doctrine Under New Jersey Law Against Discrimination in Hostile Work Environment Claims

Affirmation of Continuing Violation Doctrine Under New Jersey Law Against Discrimination in Hostile Work Environment Claims

Date: Aug 8, 2002
Affirmation of Continuing Violation Doctrine Under New Jersey Law Against Discrimination in Hostile Work Environment Claims Introduction The case of William Shepherd and Richard Saylor v....
Strict Enforcement of Procedural Bars: Reinforcing Rule 3:22-12 in Postconviction Relief

Strict Enforcement of Procedural Bars: Reinforcing Rule 3:22-12 in Postconviction Relief

Date: Aug 7, 2002
Strict Enforcement of Procedural Bars: Reinforcing Rule 3:22-12 in Postconviction Relief Introduction In the case of State of New Jersey v. David Goodwin (173 N.J. 583, 2002), the Supreme Court of...
Enforcement of Mount Laurel Doctrine: NJ Supreme Court Affirms Builder’s Remedy in Toll Brothers v. Township of West Windsor

Enforcement of Mount Laurel Doctrine: NJ Supreme Court Affirms Builder’s Remedy in Toll Brothers v. Township of West Windsor

Date: Aug 2, 2002
Enforcement of Mount Laurel Doctrine: NJ Supreme Court Affirms Builder’s Remedy in Toll Brothers v. Township of West Windsor Introduction The landmark case Toll Brothers, Inc., a Delaware Corporation...
Marshall v. New Jersey: Procedural and Time Bar Implications on Post-Conviction Relief in Capital Cases

Marshall v. New Jersey: Procedural and Time Bar Implications on Post-Conviction Relief in Capital Cases

Date: Jul 31, 2002
Marshall v. New Jersey: Procedural and Time Bar Implications on Post-Conviction Relief in Capital Cases Introduction In the landmark case State of New Jersey v. Robert O. Marshall (173 N.J. 343), the...
Unanimous Finding of Aggravating Factors and Prosecutorial Impartiality in Capital Punishment: A Commentary on State v. Nelson

Unanimous Finding of Aggravating Factors and Prosecutorial Impartiality in Capital Punishment: A Commentary on State v. Nelson

Date: Jul 31, 2002
Unanimous Finding of Aggravating Factors and Prosecutorial Impartiality in Capital Punishment: A Commentary on State v. Nelson Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. Leslie Ann...
Applicability of NJ Affidavit of Merit Statute to Breach of Contract Claims: Couri v. Gardner

Applicability of NJ Affidavit of Merit Statute to Breach of Contract Claims: Couri v. Gardner

Date: Jul 30, 2002
Applicability of NJ Affidavit of Merit Statute to Breach of Contract Claims: Couri v. Gardner Introduction Couri v. Gardner (173 N.J. 328) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of New...
Affirming the 'Ascertainable Loss' Requirement for Private Plaintiffs under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act

Affirming the 'Ascertainable Loss' Requirement for Private Plaintiffs under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act

Date: Jul 23, 2002
Affirming the 'Ascertainable Loss' Requirement for Private Plaintiffs under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act Introduction The case of Martin Weinberg v. Sprint Corporation (173 N.J. 233) addresses a...
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Applications Affirmed in Martindale v Sandvik

Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Applications Affirmed in Martindale v Sandvik

Date: Jul 18, 2002
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Applications Affirmed in Martindale v. Sandvik Introduction In the landmark case of Martindale v. Sandvik, Inc., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Extrajudicial Declarations Under Res Gestae Exception: Insights from State of New Jersey v. Carole Long

Admissibility of Extrajudicial Declarations Under Res Gestae Exception: Insights from State of New Jersey v. Carole Long

Date: Jul 16, 2002
Admissibility of Extrajudicial Declarations Under Res Gestae Exception: Insights from State of New Jersey v. Carole Long Introduction In the landmark case State of New Jersey v. Carole Long, 173 N.J....
Judgment Commentary: State of New Jersey v. Daron Josephs (174 N.J. 44)

Judgment Commentary: State of New Jersey v. Daron Josephs (174 N.J. 44)

Date: Jul 16, 2002
Establishing the "Own Conduct" Standard in Capital Cases: Commentary on State of New Jersey v. Daron Josephs Introduction In State of New Jersey v. Daron Josephs (2002), the Supreme Court of New...
New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds SVPA's Control Standard in Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators

New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds SVPA's Control Standard in Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators

Date: Jul 12, 2002
New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds SVPA's Control Standard in Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators Introduction In the Matter of the Commitment of W.Z., decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert