Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Title Nine Custody Proceedings Standard Established in D.Y.F.S. v. G.M.

Title Nine Custody Proceedings Standard Established in D.Y.F.S. v. G.M.

Date: Apr 8, 2009
Title Nine Custody Proceedings Standard Established in D.Y.F.S. v. G.M. Introduction The case of New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services (D.Y.F.S.) v. G.M. concerns a Title Nine abuse and...
Deliberative Process Privilege Expanded in ABBOTT v. BURKE

Deliberative Process Privilege Expanded in ABBOTT v. BURKE

Date: Mar 27, 2009
Deliberative Process Privilege Expanded in ABBOTT v. BURKE Introduction The landmark case of Education Law Center v. New Jersey Department of Education (ABBOTT v. BURKE) addresses the tension between...
Enforceability of Consent Judgments in Zoning Ordinance Challenges: Insights from DEG, LLC v. Township of Fairfield

Enforceability of Consent Judgments in Zoning Ordinance Challenges: Insights from DEG, LLC v. Township of Fairfield

Date: Mar 26, 2009
Enforceability of Consent Judgments in Zoning Ordinance Challenges: Insights from DEG, LLC v. Township of Fairfield Introduction The case of DEG, LLC v. Township of Fairfield delves into the...
State of New Jersey v. Terrence Echols: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

State of New Jersey v. Terrence Echols: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Mar 13, 2009
State of New Jersey v. Terrence Echols: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Introduction In State of New Jersey v. Terrence Echols, 199 N.J. 344 (2009), the Supreme Court of...
STATE v. CASSADY: Affirming the Proper Application of Lesser-Included Offense Doctrine in Robbery Convictions

STATE v. CASSADY: Affirming the Proper Application of Lesser-Included Offense Doctrine in Robbery Convictions

Date: Mar 12, 2009
STATE v. CASSADY: Affirming the Proper Application of Lesser-Included Offense Doctrine in Robbery Convictions Introduction State of New Jersey v. Marcus Cassady, 198 N.J. 165 (2009), represents a...
Impact of Improper Admission of Prior Bad Acts and Restraining Orders: State v. Vallejo

Impact of Improper Admission of Prior Bad Acts and Restraining Orders: State v. Vallejo

Date: Mar 11, 2009
Impact of Improper Admission of Prior Bad Acts and Restraining Orders: State v. Vallejo Introduction In the landmark case State of New Jersey v. Diego Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122 (2009), the Supreme Court...
No PIP Benefits for Unauthorized Occupants of Stolen Vehicles: Insights from HARDY v. ABDUL-MATIN

No PIP Benefits for Unauthorized Occupants of Stolen Vehicles: Insights from HARDY v. ABDUL-MATIN

Date: Mar 6, 2009
No PIP Benefits for Unauthorized Occupants of Stolen Vehicles: Insights from HARDY v. ABDUL-MATIN Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in HARDY v. ABDUL-MATIN established a pivotal...
Limiting the Admissibility of MRI Reports in AICRA Litigation: Analysis of Agha v. Feiner

Limiting the Admissibility of MRI Reports in AICRA Litigation: Analysis of Agha v. Feiner

Date: Feb 27, 2009
Limiting the Admissibility of MRI Reports in AICRA Litigation: Analysis of Agha v. Feiner Introduction In the landmark case of Mahmoud Agha v. Valerie M. Feiner and Barbara A. Delillo, decided by the...
Reaffirming Probable Cause and Exigent Circumstances in Automobile Searches: State v. Pena-Flores and Fuller

Reaffirming Probable Cause and Exigent Circumstances in Automobile Searches: State v. Pena-Flores and Fuller

Date: Feb 26, 2009
Reaffirming Probable Cause and Exigent Circumstances in Automobile Searches: State v. Pena-Flores and Fuller Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey delivered a landmark decision in the...
Expanding the Definition of Sexually Violent Offenses under New Jersey's SVPA

Expanding the Definition of Sexually Violent Offenses under New Jersey's SVPA

Date: Feb 24, 2009
Expanding the Definition of Sexually Violent Offenses under New Jersey's SVPA Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey issued a pivotal decision on February 23, 2009, in the case In the Matter of...
Broadening Consumer Protections: No Pre-Suit Refund Requirement Under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act

Broadening Consumer Protections: No Pre-Suit Refund Requirement Under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act

Date: Feb 20, 2009
Broadening Consumer Protections: No Pre-Suit Refund Requirement Under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act Introduction In the landmark case of Rhonda BOSLAND v. WARNOCK Dodge, Inc., the Supreme Court...
Slater v. State of New Jersey: A New Precedent on Withdrawing Guilty Pleas

Slater v. State of New Jersey: A New Precedent on Withdrawing Guilty Pleas

Date: Feb 5, 2009
Slater v. State of New Jersey: A New Precedent on Withdrawing Guilty Pleas Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Tony L. Slater (198 N.J. 145) serves as a landmark decision in the realm of...
Nyhammer v. State: Reinforcing the Totality-of-Circumstances Standard for Miranda Waivers and Confrontation Rights

Nyhammer v. State: Reinforcing the Totality-of-Circumstances Standard for Miranda Waivers and Confrontation Rights

Date: Feb 4, 2009
Nyhammer v. State: Reinforcing the Totality-of-Circumstances Standard for Miranda Waivers and Confrontation Rights Introduction Nyhammer v. State, decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on...
Reaffirmation of Jury Autonomy in Damages Awards: Tiffany N. Jastram v. Scott M. Kruse

Reaffirmation of Jury Autonomy in Damages Awards: Tiffany N. Jastram v. Scott M. Kruse

Date: Dec 24, 2008
Reaffirmation of Jury Autonomy in Damages Awards: Tiffany N. Jastram v. Scott M. Kruse Introduction The case of Tiffany N. Jastram v. Scott M. Kruse presents a pivotal moment in New Jersey...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from State v. Amelio

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from State v. Amelio

Date: Dec 23, 2008
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from State v. Amelio Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Paul Amelio, reported at 197 N.J. 207, serves as a pivotal decision in understanding...
Maria Tartaglia v. UBS PaineWebber Inc.: Clarifying the Pierce Doctrine and Spoliation Remedies in Employment Discrimination Cases

Maria Tartaglia v. UBS PaineWebber Inc.: Clarifying the Pierce Doctrine and Spoliation Remedies in Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: Dec 17, 2008
Maria Tartaglia v. UBS PaineWebber Inc.: Clarifying the Pierce Doctrine and Spoliation Remedies in Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Maria Tartaglia v. UBS...
New Jersey Supreme Court Rules Pennsylvania Law Overrides Charitable Immunity Statute in Out-of-State Tort Cases

New Jersey Supreme Court Rules Pennsylvania Law Overrides Charitable Immunity Statute in Out-of-State Tort Cases

Date: Nov 25, 2008
New Jersey Supreme Court Rules Pennsylvania Law Overrides Charitable Immunity Statute in Out-of-State Tort Cases Introduction In the landmark case of P.V. v. Camp Jaycee, the Supreme Court of New...
Impartiality in Judicial Conduct: DENIKE v. CUPO Establishes Strict Standards for Post-Retirement Employment Negotiations

Impartiality in Judicial Conduct: DENIKE v. CUPO Establishes Strict Standards for Post-Retirement Employment Negotiations

Date: Sep 25, 2008
Impartiality in Judicial Conduct: DENIKE v. CUPO Establishes Strict Standards for Post-Retirement Employment Negotiations Introduction The case of Lawrence DeNike v. Michael Cupo, adjudicated by the...
Rethinking Child Support and Income Imputation in High-Income Divorces: Insights from Michael A. Strahan v. Jean M. Strahan

Rethinking Child Support and Income Imputation in High-Income Divorces: Insights from Michael A. Strahan v. Jean M. Strahan

Date: Aug 27, 2008
Rethinking Child Support and Income Imputation in High-Income Divorces: Insights from Michael A. Strahan v. Jean M. Strahan Introduction The appellate case of Michael A. Strahan v. Jean M. Strahan...
Limitation of Statutory Immunity in Insurance Misrepresentation: Pizzullo v. N.J. Manufacturers Insurance Company

Limitation of Statutory Immunity in Insurance Misrepresentation: Pizzullo v. N.J. Manufacturers Insurance Company

Date: Aug 8, 2008
Limitation of Statutory Immunity in Insurance Misrepresentation: Pizzullo v. N.J. Manufacturers Insurance Company Introduction The case of Michael Pizzullo and Dorothea Pizzullo versus New Jersey...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert