Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

State v. Blackmon: Affirming the Limits of Allocution Rights for Defendant’s Family Members in Sentencing Proceedings

State v. Blackmon: Affirming the Limits of Allocution Rights for Defendant’s Family Members in Sentencing Proceedings

Date: Jun 10, 2010
State v. Blackmon: Affirming the Limits of Allocution Rights for Defendant’s Family Members in Sentencing Proceedings Introduction State of New Jersey v. Karlton L. Blackmon, 202 N.J. 283 (2010),...
Legal Malpractice Claims Post-Settlement: Insights from Guido v. Duane Morris LLP

Legal Malpractice Claims Post-Settlement: Insights from Guido v. Duane Morris LLP

Date: Jun 9, 2010
Legal Malpractice Claims Post-Settlement: Insights from Guido v. Duane Morris LLP Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in Guido v. Duane Morris LLP, 202 N.J. 468, 983 A.2d 196...
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator's Discretion in Determining Just Cause and Remedies

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator's Discretion in Determining Just Cause and Remedies

Date: Jun 9, 2010
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator's Discretion in Determining Just Cause and Remedies Introduction The case of Linden Board of Education v. Linden Education Association on behalf of John Mizichko (202...
Reaffirming Totality of Circumstances for Tender Years Statements and Restricting Other-Crimes Evidence: State of New Jersey v. P.S.

Reaffirming Totality of Circumstances for Tender Years Statements and Restricting Other-Crimes Evidence: State of New Jersey v. P.S.

Date: Jun 8, 2010
Reaffirming Totality of Circumstances for Tender Years Statements and Restricting Other-Crimes Evidence: State of New Jersey v. P.S. Introduction In State of New Jersey v. P.S. (2010), the Supreme...
Supreme Court of New Jersey Reinforces Strict Standards for Termination of Parental Rights

Supreme Court of New Jersey Reinforces Strict Standards for Termination of Parental Rights

Date: Jun 2, 2010
Supreme Court of New Jersey Reinforces Strict Standards for Termination of Parental Rights Introduction In the case of New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services, Plaintiff, v. I.S., Defendant,...
Interpretation of N.J.S.A. 18A:6-7a: Implications for Tenured Teachers Post-Unfounded DCF Findings

Interpretation of N.J.S.A. 18A:6-7a: Implications for Tenured Teachers Post-Unfounded DCF Findings

Date: May 13, 2010
Interpretation of N.J.S.A. 18A:6-7a: Implications for Tenured Teachers Post-Unfounded DCF Findings Introduction In the Supreme Court of New Jersey case Young v. Commissioner of Education (202 N.J....
Expansion of Fair-Report Privilege to Include Initial Court Pleadings: SALZANO v. NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP Inc.

Expansion of Fair-Report Privilege to Include Initial Court Pleadings: SALZANO v. NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP Inc.

Date: May 12, 2010
Expansion of Fair-Report Privilege to Include Initial Court Pleadings: SALZANO v. NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of SALZANO v. NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP Inc., the...
Defining 'Substantially Related' Matters Under RPC 1.9: Insights from CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY v. TRUPOS

Defining 'Substantially Related' Matters Under RPC 1.9: Insights from CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY v. TRUPOS

Date: Apr 27, 2010
Defining 'Substantially Related' Matters Under RPC 1.9: Insights from CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY v. TRUPOS Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in City of Atlantic City v. Zachirias...
Doctrine of Invited Error in the Admissibility of Evidence in Child Abuse Proceedings: NJ Supreme Court Decision in DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.C. III

Doctrine of Invited Error in the Admissibility of Evidence in Child Abuse Proceedings: NJ Supreme Court Decision in DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. M.C. III

Date: Apr 1, 2010
Doctrine of Invited Error in the Admissibility of Evidence in Child Abuse Proceedings: NJ Supreme Court Decision in Division of Youth and Family Services v. M.C. III Introduction The case of Division...
Limitation on Campaign Fund Usage for Criminal Defense: In re Election Law Enforcement Commission Advisory Opinion No. 01-2008

Limitation on Campaign Fund Usage for Criminal Defense: In re Election Law Enforcement Commission Advisory Opinion No. 01-2008

Date: Mar 9, 2010
Limitation on Campaign Fund Usage for Criminal Defense: In re Election Law Enforcement Commission Advisory Opinion No. 01-2008 Introduction The case of In re Election Law Enforcement Commission...
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Vacating Kinship Legal Guardianship: NJ Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Burden of Proof

Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Vacating Kinship Legal Guardianship: NJ Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Burden of Proof

Date: Feb 25, 2010
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Vacating Kinship Legal Guardianship: NJ Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Burden of Proof Introduction The case of New Jersey Division of Youth and Family...
Clarifying Mens Rea in Anti-Stalking Law: Insights from State v. Gandhi

Clarifying Mens Rea in Anti-Stalking Law: Insights from State v. Gandhi

Date: Feb 24, 2010
Clarifying Mens Rea in Anti-Stalking Law: Insights from State of New Jersey v. Gandhi Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. Fareed M. Gandhi, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Municipal Court Judge Recusal Standards: New Precedent in STATE v. McCABE

Municipal Court Judge Recusal Standards: New Precedent in STATE v. McCABE

Date: Jan 26, 2010
Municipal Court Judge Recusal Standards: New Precedent in State of New Jersey v. Terence McCabe Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Terence McCabe, decided by the Supreme Court of New...
Affirmation of Sentencing Discretion in STATE v. BIENIEK: Upholding Trial Court’s Authority under NJ Criminal Code

Affirmation of Sentencing Discretion in STATE v. BIENIEK: Upholding Trial Court’s Authority under NJ Criminal Code

Date: Jan 22, 2010
Affirmation of Sentencing Discretion in STATE v. BIENIEK: Upholding Trial Court’s Authority under NJ Criminal Code Introduction State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cory J. Bieniek,...
New Precedent on Statute of Limitations for Retaliation Claims under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination

New Precedent on Statute of Limitations for Retaliation Claims under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination

Date: Jan 15, 2010
New Precedent on Statute of Limitations for Retaliation Claims under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination Introduction The case of Fernando Roa and Liliana Roa v. LaFe and MarinoRoa marked a...
Distinct Standards of Probable Cause for Search and Arrest Established in STATE v. CHIPPERO

Distinct Standards of Probable Cause for Search and Arrest Established in STATE v. CHIPPERO

Date: Dec 30, 2009
Distinct Standards of Probable Cause for Search and Arrest Established in State of New Jersey v. Richard Chippero Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey, in the landmark case State of New...
Limitation-on-Lawsuit Threshold Clarified under New Jersey's Deemer Statute

Limitation-on-Lawsuit Threshold Clarified under New Jersey's Deemer Statute

Date: Dec 18, 2009
Limitation-on-Lawsuit Threshold Clarified under New Jersey's Deemer Statute Introduction The case of Edward Zabilowicz v. Roslyne Kelsey, decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on December 17,...
Interpretation of "Prior Offense" in N.J. Unsafe Driving Statute: Patel v. New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission

Interpretation of "Prior Offense" in N.J. Unsafe Driving Statute: Patel v. New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission

Date: Nov 11, 2009
Interpretation of "Prior Offense" in N.J. Unsafe Driving Statute: Patel v. New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission Introduction In the landmark case Hina K. Patel v. New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission,...
Balancing Contractual Fee-Shifting Provisions and Proportionality: Insights from Litton Industries v. IMO Industries, Inc.

Balancing Contractual Fee-Shifting Provisions and Proportionality: Insights from Litton Industries v. IMO Industries, Inc.

Date: Nov 3, 2009
Balancing Contractual Fee-Shifting Provisions and Proportionality: Insights from Litton Industries v. IMO Industries, Inc. Introduction The case of Litton Industries, Inc. and Litton Systems, Inc. v....
Separate Regulatory Frameworks for Interment and Disinterment Affirm Decedent's Burial Intent

Separate Regulatory Frameworks for Interment and Disinterment Affirm Decedent's Burial Intent

Date: Sep 25, 2009
Separate Regulatory Frameworks for Interment and Disinterment Affirm Decedent's Burial Intent Introduction In the landmark case of Joan Marino v. Larry L. Marino, Jr. et al., the Supreme Court of New...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert