Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

New Jersey Supreme Court Declares UFPA's Mandatory Arbitration Unconstitutional

New Jersey Supreme Court Declares UFPA's Mandatory Arbitration Unconstitutional

Date: Jan 25, 2013
New Jersey Supreme Court Declares UFPA's Mandatory Arbitration Unconstitutional Introduction In the landmark case of Jersey Central Power & Light Company v. Melcar Utility Company, the Supreme Court...
State v. Nash: Reinforcing the Importance of Newly Discovered Evidence in Post-Conviction Relief

State v. Nash: Reinforcing the Importance of Newly Discovered Evidence in Post-Conviction Relief

Date: Jan 23, 2013
State v. Nash: Reinforcing the Importance of Newly Discovered Evidence in Post-Conviction Relief Introduction State of New Jersey v. Askia Nash, 212 N.J. 518 (2013), represents a pivotal moment in...
Reaffirming the Jury's Role: Restrictions on Expert Testimony in Simple Drug Cases – State v. Sowell

Reaffirming the Jury's Role: Restrictions on Expert Testimony in Simple Drug Cases – State v. Sowell

Date: Jan 15, 2013
Reaffirming the Jury's Role: Restrictions on Expert Testimony in Simple Drug Cases – State v. Sowell Introduction State of New Jersey v. Ralph Sowell, 213 N.J. 89 (2013), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reaffirming the Adequate Factual Basis for Guilty Pleas in Reckless Manslaughter: Insights from State v. Campfield

Reaffirming the Adequate Factual Basis for Guilty Pleas in Reckless Manslaughter: Insights from State v. Campfield

Date: Jan 11, 2013
Reaffirming the Adequate Factual Basis for Guilty Pleas in Reckless Manslaughter: Insights from State of New Jersey v. Campfield Introduction State of New Jersey v. Kevin M. Campfield is a landmark...
State v. Shaw: Restricting the Attenuation Doctrine in Unlawful Investigatory Stops

State v. Shaw: Restricting the Attenuation Doctrine in Unlawful Investigatory Stops

Date: Dec 14, 2012
State v. Shaw: Restricting the Attenuation Doctrine in Unlawful Investigatory Stops Introduction In State of New Jersey v. Don C. Shaw (213 N.J. 398, 2012), the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed...
Right to Counsel in New Jersey Domestic Violence Proceedings: Insights from D.N. v. K.M.

Right to Counsel in New Jersey Domestic Violence Proceedings: Insights from D.N. v. K.M.

Date: Dec 12, 2012
Right to Counsel in New Jersey Domestic Violence Proceedings: Insights from D.N. v. K.M. Introduction The case of D.N., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. K.M., Defendant–Respondent (429 N.J. Super. 592)...
Deutsche Bank v. Russo: Establishing Timeliness and Standing Standards in New Jersey Foreclosure Law

Deutsche Bank v. Russo: Establishing Timeliness and Standing Standards in New Jersey Foreclosure Law

Date: Nov 15, 2012
Deutsche Bank v. Russo: Establishing Timeliness and Standing Standards in New Jersey Foreclosure Law Introduction The case of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee on behalf of HSI Asset...
State v. Smith: Upholding the Independent Source Exception in the Admissibility of Illicitly Obtained Telephone Records

State v. Smith: Upholding the Independent Source Exception in the Admissibility of Illicitly Obtained Telephone Records

Date: Oct 26, 2012
State v. Smith: Upholding the Independent Source Exception in the Admissibility of Illicitly Obtained Telephone Records Introduction In the landmark case State of New Jersey v. Stanley Cliff Smith...
Double Jeopardy Protections Prevent Post-Completion Amendments to Conviction Sentences: State v. Schubert

Double Jeopardy Protections Prevent Post-Completion Amendments to Conviction Sentences: State v. Schubert

Date: Oct 23, 2012
Double Jeopardy Protections Prevent Post-Completion Amendments to Conviction Sentences: State of New Jersey v. Joseph Schubert, Jr. Introduction State of New Jersey v. Joseph Schubert, Jr., 212 N.J....
Clark v. Clark: Egregious Marital Misconduct Can Preclude Alimony in New Jersey

Clark v. Clark: Egregious Marital Misconduct Can Preclude Alimony in New Jersey

Date: Oct 20, 2012
Clark v. Clark: Egregious Marital Misconduct Can Preclude Alimony in New Jersey Introduction The case Francis Nathaniel Clark v. Denise Lockwood Clark, decided by the Superior Court of New Jersey,...
Affirmation of Best Interests Standard in Termination of Parental Rights: NJ Div of Youth & Family Services v. L.J.D.

Affirmation of Best Interests Standard in Termination of Parental Rights: NJ Div of Youth & Family Services v. L.J.D.

Date: Oct 18, 2012
Affirmation of Best Interests Standard in Termination of Parental Rights: NJ Div of Youth & Family Services v. L.J.D. Introduction The case of New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v....
Right to Oral Argument in Post-Conviction Relief Petitions: STATE v. PARKER

Right to Oral Argument in Post-Conviction Relief Petitions: STATE v. PARKER

Date: Oct 17, 2012
Right to Oral Argument in Post-Conviction Relief Petitions: STATE v. PARKER Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of New Jersey v. Johnnie Parker, the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed a...
R.W. v. D.B.: New Standards for Compelling Genetic Testing in Parentage Disputes

R.W. v. D.B.: New Standards for Compelling Genetic Testing in Parentage Disputes

Date: Oct 11, 2012
R.W. v. D.B.: New Standards for Compelling Genetic Testing in Parentage Disputes Introduction The case of R.W. v. D.B. (212 N.J. 232), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on October 10,...
Collateral Estoppel Bars CEPA Retaliation Claims in Public Employment Discipline

Collateral Estoppel Bars CEPA Retaliation Claims in Public Employment Discipline

Date: Sep 14, 2012
Collateral Estoppel Bars CEPA Retaliation Claims in Public Employment Discipline Introduction In the landmark case of Winters v. North Hudson Regional Fire and Rescue, the Supreme Court of New Jersey...
Parenting Coordinator Appointment Must Adhere to Supreme Court Guidelines: Milne v. Goldenberg

Parenting Coordinator Appointment Must Adhere to Supreme Court Guidelines: Milne v. Goldenberg

Date: Sep 13, 2012
Parenting Coordinator Appointment Must Adhere to Supreme Court Guidelines: Milne v. Goldenberg Introduction Katherine Milne v. Robert Goldenberg is a pivotal appellate decision from the Superior...
Protection Against Self-Incrimination in Quasi-Criminal Proceedings: State of New Jersey v. Manaf Stas

Protection Against Self-Incrimination in Quasi-Criminal Proceedings: State of New Jersey v. Manaf Stas

Date: Sep 13, 2012
Protection Against Self-Incrimination in Quasi-Criminal Proceedings: State of New Jersey v. Manaf Stas Introduction State of New Jersey v. Manaf Stas (212 N.J. 37) is a landmark judgment by the...
Termination of Parental Rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15(c): Insights from DYFS v. F.M.

Termination of Parental Rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15(c): Insights from DYFS v. F.M.

Date: Aug 15, 2012
Termination of Parental Rights under N.J.S.A. 30:4C-15(c): Insights from DYFS v. F.M. Introduction The case of New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS) v. F.M. serves as a pivotal...
STATE v. JACKSON: Defining 'Substantial Confinement' in NJ Kidnapping and Limits on Prosecutorial Remarks

STATE v. JACKSON: Defining 'Substantial Confinement' in NJ Kidnapping and Limits on Prosecutorial Remarks

Date: Aug 14, 2012
STATE v. JACKSON: Defining 'Substantial Confinement' in NJ Kidnapping and Limits on Prosecutorial Remarks Introduction In the landmark case State of New Jersey v. Norman Jackson, the Supreme Court of...
Application of Kentucky Discovery Rule and Federal Preemption in Product Liability: Cornett v. Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corp.

Application of Kentucky Discovery Rule and Federal Preemption in Product Liability: Cornett v. Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corp.

Date: Aug 10, 2012
Affirmation of Kentucky Discovery Rule Application and Federal Preemption in Product Liability Litigation: Cornett v. Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corp. Introduction The case of Vonnie Cornett v....
Recovery of Fees by Parenting Coordinators in Grievance Proceedings: N.J. Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Recovery of Fees by Parenting Coordinators in Grievance Proceedings: N.J. Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Aug 3, 2012
Recovery of Fees by Parenting Coordinators in Grievance Proceedings: N.J. Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of Moses Segal v. Cynthia Lynch, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert