Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Nevada Case Commentaries

Valjo v. Euphoria Wellness: Nevada Supreme Court Bars Revival of Time-Barred Claims Through Post-Hoc Ownership Agreements

Valjo v. Euphoria Wellness: Nevada Supreme Court Bars Revival of Time-Barred Claims Through Post-Hoc Ownership Agreements

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Valjo v. Euphoria Wellness – Nevada Supreme Court Bars Revival of Time-Barred Claims Through Post-Hoc Ownership Agreements 1. Introduction In Valjo, Inc. v. Euphoria Wellness, LLC (Nos. 87929 &...
“No Second Bite at the Apple” – Nevada Supreme Court Bars Renewal of Statute-of-Limitations Period by Later Assignment (Valjo, Inc. v. Euphoria Wellness, LLC)

“No Second Bite at the Apple” – Nevada Supreme Court Bars Renewal of Statute-of-Limitations Period by Later Assignment (Valjo, Inc. v. Euphoria Wellness, LLC)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“No Second Bite at the Apple” – Nevada Supreme Court Bars Renewal of Statute-of-Limitations Period by Later Assignment Commentary on Valjo, Inc. v. Euphoria Wellness, LLC, Nos. 87929 & 88137 (Nev....
“Beyond the Final Whistle” – Nevada Clarifies Post-Employment Arbitrability and Unconscionability in The National Football League v. Gruden

“Beyond the Final Whistle” – Nevada Clarifies Post-Employment Arbitrability and Unconscionability in The National Football League v. Gruden

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Beyond the Final Whistle” – Nevada Clarifies Post-Employment Arbitrability and Unconscionability in The National Football League v. Gruden I. Introduction On 11 August 2025 the Supreme Court of...
A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment

A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment

Date: Aug 13, 2025
A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment Introduction In A Cab Series, LLC f/k/a A Cab, LLC v....
“The Davis Doctrine” – Post-Verdict Juror Statements Are Inadmissible Under NRS 50.065(2)(a)

“The Davis Doctrine” – Post-Verdict Juror Statements Are Inadmissible Under NRS 50.065(2)(a)

Date: Jul 5, 2025
“The Davis Doctrine” – Post-Verdict Juror Statements Are Inadmissible Under NRS 50.065(2)(a) Introduction Davis (Laron) v. State, decided by the Supreme Court of Nevada on 2 July 2025, concerns the...
Expanding the Scope of Res Gestae in Nevada: Lessons from Sanchez-Ramirez v. State (2025)

Expanding the Scope of Res Gestae in Nevada: Lessons from Sanchez-Ramirez v. State (2025)

Date: Jun 29, 2025
Expanding the Scope of Res Gestae in Nevada: Lessons from Sanchez-Ramirez v. State (2025) 1. Introduction In Sanchez-Ramirez v. State, the Supreme Court of Nevada reviewed multiple challenges arising...
Kosor v. Southern Highlands: Nevada Supreme Court Holds NRS 38.310’s ADR Requirement is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule, Not a Jurisdictional Bar

Kosor v. Southern Highlands: Nevada Supreme Court Holds NRS 38.310’s ADR Requirement is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule, Not a Jurisdictional Bar

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Kosor v. Southern Highlands: Nevada Supreme Court Holds NRS 38.310’s ADR Requirement is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule, Not a Jurisdictional Bar Introduction The Supreme Court of Nevada, in Kosor,...
Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.: Nevada Supreme Court Limits the Calder “Effects” Test to Intentional Torts

Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.: Nevada Supreme Court Limits the Calder “Effects” Test to Intentional Torts

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.: Nevada Supreme Court Limits the Calder “Effects” Test to Intentional Torts Introduction In Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 141 Nev., Adv. Op. 33 (2025), the...
“Conflict-Based Recusal as Good Cause” – The New Standard for Extending Time to Serve the Nevada Attorney General in Petitions for Judicial Review

“Conflict-Based Recusal as Good Cause” – The New Standard for Extending Time to Serve the Nevada Attorney General in Petitions for Judicial Review

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Conflict-Based Recusal as Good Cause” – The New Standard for Extending Time to Serve the Nevada Attorney General in Petitions for Judicial Review 1. Introduction In Lombardo v. Nevada Commission on...
Ponder v. State: Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies that Temporary Bruising Constitutes “Disfigurement” and that Foreseeability, not Intent, Defines “Non-Accidental” Injury under NRS 432B

Ponder v. State: Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies that Temporary Bruising Constitutes “Disfigurement” and that Foreseeability, not Intent, Defines “Non-Accidental” Injury under NRS 432B

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Ponder v. State: Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies that Temporary Bruising Constitutes “Disfigurement” and that Foreseeability, not Intent, Defines “Non-Accidental” Injury under NRS 432B Introduction In...
Wills v. Collins Capital, LLC: Clarifying Nevada Courts’ Power to Impose Case-Terminating Discovery Sanctions Without an Evidentiary Hearing

Wills v. Collins Capital, LLC: Clarifying Nevada Courts’ Power to Impose Case-Terminating Discovery Sanctions Without an Evidentiary Hearing

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Wills v. Collins Capital, LLC: Clarifying Nevada Courts’ Power to Impose Case-Terminating Discovery Sanctions Without an Evidentiary Hearing Introduction Wills v. Collins Capital, LLC, decided by the...
From “Suicide Rule” to “Foreseeability Test” — Nevada Affirms Potential Liability of Health-Care Providers for a Patient’s Post-Treatment Suicide

From “Suicide Rule” to “Foreseeability Test” — Nevada Affirms Potential Liability of Health-Care Providers for a Patient’s Post-Treatment Suicide

Date: Jun 18, 2025
From “Suicide Rule” to “Foreseeability Test”: Nevada Affirms Potential Liability of Health-Care Providers for a Patient’s Post-Treatment Suicide 1. Introduction In Bourne v. Valdes, 141 Nev., Advance...
Clark County v. District Court (Eggleston): Establishing Interlocutory Mandamus Review of Immunity Denials and Clarifying Social-Worker Qualified & Discretionary-Act Immunity

Clark County v. District Court (Eggleston): Establishing Interlocutory Mandamus Review of Immunity Denials and Clarifying Social-Worker Qualified & Discretionary-Act Immunity

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Clark County v. District Court (Eggleston): Interlocutory Mandamus Review Recognised for Immunity Denials and the Scope of Social-Worker Immunities in Parental-Rights Investigations Introduction The...
Nevada Supreme Court Authorizes No-Contest Pleas in Child-Dependency Cases – Commentary on In re A.T., 141 Nev., Adv. Op. 32 (2025)

Nevada Supreme Court Authorizes No-Contest Pleas in Child-Dependency Cases – Commentary on In re A.T., 141 Nev., Adv. Op. 32 (2025)

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Nevada Supreme Court Authorizes No-Contest Pleas in Child-Dependency Cases Commentary on In re A.T., a Minor, 141 Nev., Advance Opinion 32 (2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Nevada, sitting...
United Healthcare v. Fremont Emergency (Nev. 2025): Recognising Unjust-Enrichment Recovery for EMTALA Providers and Re-setting the Limits on Punitive Damages

United Healthcare v. Fremont Emergency (Nev. 2025): Recognising Unjust-Enrichment Recovery for EMTALA Providers and Re-setting the Limits on Punitive Damages

Date: Jun 18, 2025
United Healthcare v. Fremont Emergency (Mandavia), Ltd. New Nevada Precedent: Emergency-room providers lacking a contract may sue insurers for unjust enrichment, but not for implied-in-fact contract...
Hayes v. Watson: Clarifying Preservation After Motions in Limine and the “Any-Purpose” Rule for Adverse-Party Depositions

Hayes v. Watson: Clarifying Preservation After Motions in Limine and the “Any-Purpose” Rule for Adverse-Party Depositions

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Hayes v. Watson: Clarifying Preservation After Motions in Limine and the “Any-Purpose” Rule for Adverse-Party Depositions Introduction Hayes v. Watson, No. 85087 (Nev. Sup. Ct. June 6, 2025), is a...
Hyatt v. Franchise Tax Board: Nevada Supreme Court Reinforces Detailed Documentation for Discovery-Related Travel Costs and Confirms Broad Judicial Discretion for Enhanced Expert Fees

Hyatt v. Franchise Tax Board: Nevada Supreme Court Reinforces Detailed Documentation for Discovery-Related Travel Costs and Confirms Broad Judicial Discretion for Enhanced Expert Fees

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Hyatt v. Franchise Tax Board: Nevada Supreme Court Reinforces Detailed Documentation for Discovery-Related Travel Costs and Confirms Broad Judicial Discretion for Enhanced Expert Fees 1. Introduction...
Expanding the State’s Right of Appeal: Nevada Supreme Court Holds that Orders Granting or Denying Motions to Correct an Illegal Sentence Are Appealable

Expanding the State’s Right of Appeal: Nevada Supreme Court Holds that Orders Granting or Denying Motions to Correct an Illegal Sentence Are Appealable

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Expanding the State’s Right of Appeal: Nevada Supreme Court Holds that Orders Granting or Denying Motions to Correct an Illegal Sentence Are Appealable Introduction In State v. Eighth Judicial...
Exclusion of Metropolitan Police Departments from Nevada’s Judicial Confirmation Law and the NPRA’s Exclusive Public Records Remedy

Exclusion of Metropolitan Police Departments from Nevada’s Judicial Confirmation Law and the NPRA’s Exclusive Public Records Remedy

Date: May 30, 2025
Exclusion of Metropolitan Police Departments from Nevada’s Judicial Confirmation Law and the NPRA’s Exclusive Public Records Remedy Introduction In In re: Public Records Request to Las Vegas Metro....
Judicial Review as a “Special Proceeding” under NRS 18.020(4): Recoverability, Apportionment, and Cost Accrual

Judicial Review as a “Special Proceeding” under NRS 18.020(4): Recoverability, Apportionment, and Cost Accrual

Date: May 30, 2025
Judicial Review as a “Special Proceeding” under NRS 18.020(4): Recoverability, Apportionment, and Cost Accrual Introduction In In re: D.O.T. Litigation, the Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert