Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Nevada Case Commentaries

Establishing the Counsel's Duty to Inform Clients of Appeal Rights: Lozada v. State of Nevada

Establishing the Counsel's Duty to Inform Clients of Appeal Rights: Lozada v. State of Nevada

Date: Mar 31, 1994
Establishing the Counsel's Duty to Inform Clients of Appeal Rights: Lozada v. State of Nevada Introduction Lozada v. State of Nevada is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada in...
Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Extended to Tort Claims: Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Butch Lewis Productions

Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Extended to Tort Claims: Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Butch Lewis Productions

Date: Nov 16, 1993
Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Extended to Tort Claims: Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Butch Lewis Productions Introduction Hilton Hotels Corporation v. Butch Lewis Productions, Inc. is a...
Defining Prevailing Parties and Attorney's Fees: Insights from Chowdhry v. NLVH, Inc.

Defining Prevailing Parties and Attorney's Fees: Insights from Chowdhry v. NLVH, Inc.

Date: Nov 3, 1993
Defining Prevailing Parties and Attorney's Fees: Insights from Chowdhry v. NLVH, Inc. Introduction The case of Bashir A. Chowdhry, M.D., Appellant v. NLVH, Inc. et al., adjudicated by the Supreme...
Establishing the Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Uninsured Motorist Claims: Pemberton v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Establishing the Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Uninsured Motorist Claims: Pemberton v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Date: Aug 26, 1993
Establishing the Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Uninsured Motorist Claims: Pemberton v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Introduction The case of Sherry Pemberton v. Farmers Insurance Exchange (No....
Clarifying Attorney’s Fees and Offer of Judgment Standards: Bergmann v. Boyce

Clarifying Attorney’s Fees and Offer of Judgment Standards: Bergmann v. Boyce

Date: Jul 21, 1993
Clarifying Attorney’s Fees and Offer of Judgment Standards: Bergmann v. Boyce Introduction Bergmann v. Boyce, 109 Nev. 670 (1993), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada, is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Death Sentence Based on Multiple Aggravating Factors in Parker v. State (1993)

Affirmation of Death Sentence Based on Multiple Aggravating Factors in Parker v. State (1993)

Date: Jul 8, 1993
Affirmation of Death Sentence Based on Multiple Aggravating Factors in Parker v. State (1993) Introduction Parker v. State, 109 Nev. 383 (1993), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada, is a...
Establishing Actual Malice in Defamation Claims Involving Public Officials: Posadas v. City of Reno

Establishing Actual Malice in Defamation Claims Involving Public Officials: Posadas v. City of Reno

Date: May 8, 1993
Establishing Actual Malice in Defamation Claims Involving Public Officials: Posadas v. City of Reno Introduction In the landmark case Posadas v. City of Reno, decided by the Supreme Court of Nevada...
Arajakis v. The State of Nevada: Affirmation of Self-Representation Rights and Habitual Criminal Statute Application

Arajakis v. The State of Nevada: Affirmation of Self-Representation Rights and Habitual Criminal Statute Application

Date: Mar 20, 1993
Arajakis v. The State of Nevada: Affirmation of Self-Representation Rights and Habitual Criminal Statute Application Introduction The case of William Sakie Arajakis v. The State of Nevada (108 Nev....
Equitable Estoppel in Fraudulent Utility Loan Agreements: Topaz Mutual Co. v. Marsh

Equitable Estoppel in Fraudulent Utility Loan Agreements: Topaz Mutual Co. v. Marsh

Date: Sep 30, 1992
Equitable Estoppel in Fraudulent Utility Loan Agreements: Topaz Mutual Co. v. Marsh Introduction This commentary examines the landmark decision in Topaz Mutual Company, Inc. v. Florence Marsh,...
Prejudice to the Administration of Justice: Defining Lawyer Misconduct Beyond Tribunal Disruption

Prejudice to the Administration of Justice: Defining Lawyer Misconduct Beyond Tribunal Disruption

Date: Aug 21, 1992
Prejudice to the Administration of Justice: Defining Lawyer Misconduct Beyond Tribunal Disruption Introduction The case of In Re Discipline of Michael V. Stuhoff (108 Nev. 629) adjudicated by the...
Establishing Consent Standards in Medical Contexts: KIMBLE McNAIR, II, M.D. v. State of Nevada

Establishing Consent Standards in Medical Contexts: KIMBLE McNAIR, II, M.D. v. State of Nevada

Date: May 28, 1992
Establishing Consent Standards in Medical Contexts: KIMBLE McNAIR, II, M.D. v. State of Nevada Introduction The case of KIMBLE McNAIR, II, M.D., APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, RESPONDENT (108...
Clarifying NRCP 10(a): Nevada Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Nurenberger Hercules-Werke GmbH v. Virostek

Clarifying NRCP 10(a): Nevada Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Nurenberger Hercules-Werke GmbH v. Virostek

Date: Feb 22, 1992
Clarifying NRCP 10(a): Nevada Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Nurenberger Hercules-Werke GmbH v. Virostek Introduction The case of Nurenberger Hercules-Werke GmbH v. Frank Virostek (No. 21110),...
Automobile Not Classified as Deadly Weapon for Sentencing Enhancements: Kazalyn v. State

Automobile Not Classified as Deadly Weapon for Sentencing Enhancements: Kazalyn v. State

Date: Jan 25, 1992
Automobile Not Classified as Deadly Weapon for Sentencing Enhancements: Kazalyn v. State Introduction Joseph Robert Kazalyn v. The State of Nevada, 108 Nev. 67 (1992), is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Affirmation of Liability Limitation in Public Utility Tariffs for Contract and Warranty Claims: Insights from Bulbman v. Nevada Bell

Affirmation of Liability Limitation in Public Utility Tariffs for Contract and Warranty Claims: Insights from Bulbman v. Nevada Bell

Date: Jan 25, 1992
Affirmation of Liability Limitation in Public Utility Tariffs for Contract and Warranty Claims: Insights from Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada Bell Introduction The case of Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada Bell (108...
Nevada Supreme Court Recognizes Liability of Self-Insured Employers for Negligent and Bad Faith Claims Processing under Workmen’s Compensation Law

Nevada Supreme Court Recognizes Liability of Self-Insured Employers for Negligent and Bad Faith Claims Processing under Workmen’s Compensation Law

Date: Jan 1, 1992
Nevada Supreme Court Recognizes Liability of Self-Insured Employers for Negligent and Bad Faith Claims Processing under Workmen’s Compensation Law Introduction In the landmark case of Norman Falline...
Recognizing Implied Contracts in Employment: Analysis of D'Angelo v. Gardner and Western States Minerals Corp. v. Jones

Recognizing Implied Contracts in Employment: Analysis of D'Angelo v. Gardner and Western States Minerals Corp. v. Jones

Date: Oct 25, 1991
Recognizing Implied Contracts in Employment: Analysis of D'Angelo v. Gardner and Western States Minerals Corp. v. Jones Introduction The Supreme Court of Nevada, in its October 24, 1991 decision,...
Peremptory Challenge to Succeeding Judge: Upholding SCR 48.1 in Smith v. Clark County

Peremptory Challenge to Succeeding Judge: Upholding SCR 48.1 in Smith v. Clark County

Date: Oct 9, 1991
Peremptory Challenge to Succeeding Judge: Upholding SCR 48.1 in Smith v. Clark County Introduction Smith v. Clark County is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada on October 8,...
Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Davis v. Nevada: Application of the Strickland Test

Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Davis v. Nevada: Application of the Strickland Test

Date: Sep 18, 1991
Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Davis v. Nevada: Application of the Strickland Test Introduction Davis v. Nevada is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada on...
Implied Covenant of Good Faith: Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Dynamic Duo, Inc.

Implied Covenant of Good Faith: Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Dynamic Duo, Inc.

Date: Aug 29, 1991
Implied Covenant of Good Faith: Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Dynamic Duo, Inc. Introduction The case of Hilton Hotels Corporation v. Dynamic Duo, Inc. (107 Nev. 226) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Sanborn v. Nevada: Reinforcing the Right to Effective Counsel and Self-Representation in Criminal Trials

Sanborn v. Nevada: Reinforcing the Right to Effective Counsel and Self-Representation in Criminal Trials

Date: Jun 7, 1991
Sanborn v. Nevada: Reinforcing the Right to Effective Counsel and Self-Representation in Criminal Trials Introduction Sanborn v. Nevada is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert