Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Nevada Case Commentaries

Brady Violation in Post-Conviction Habeas Corpus: The MAZZAN v. WARDEN Case

Brady Violation in Post-Conviction Habeas Corpus: The MAZZAN v. WARDEN Case

Date: Jan 28, 2000
Brady Violation in Post-Conviction Habeas Corpus: The MAZZAN v. WARDEN Case Introduction John Francis Mazzan, the appellant, was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death by the Supreme...
Expert Witness Qualification Standards and Harmless Error Doctrine Affirmed in Mulder v. Nevada

Expert Witness Qualification Standards and Harmless Error Doctrine Affirmed in Mulder v. Nevada

Date: Jan 19, 2000
Expert Witness Qualification Standards and Harmless Error Doctrine Affirmed in Mulder v. Nevada Introduction Mulder v. Nevada is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada on January...
Nevada Supreme Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Bystander NIED Claims Based on Family Relationships

Nevada Supreme Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Bystander NIED Claims Based on Family Relationships

Date: Dec 14, 1999
Nevada Supreme Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Bystander NIED Claims Based on Family Relationships Introduction The Supreme Court of Nevada, in the landmark case of Kellie Grotts v. Gertrude...
Establishing Due Diligence Standards for Service of Process: Insights from Abreu v. Gilmer

Establishing Due Diligence Standards for Service of Process: Insights from Abreu v. Gilmer

Date: Oct 21, 1999
Establishing Due Diligence Standards for Service of Process: Insights from Abreu v. Gilmer Introduction The case of Nancy Abreu and Roy Abreu v. Rachel J. Gilmer (No. 31663), decided on October 20,...
Defining Negligent Undertaking Liability in Corporate Structures: The Landmark Dow Chemical v. Mahlum Decision

Defining Negligent Undertaking Liability in Corporate Structures: The Landmark Dow Chemical v. Mahlum Decision

Date: Jan 1, 1999
Defining Negligent Undertaking Liability in Corporate Structures: The Landmark Dow Chemical v. Mahlum Decision Introduction In Dow Chemical Company v. Charlotte Mahlum and Marvin S. Mahlum, the...
Supreme Court of Nevada Establishes "Substantial Relationship" Test for Governing Law in Warranty Claims: Consolidated Generator-Nevada v. Cummins Engine Company

Supreme Court of Nevada Establishes "Substantial Relationship" Test for Governing Law in Warranty Claims: Consolidated Generator-Nevada v. Cummins Engine Company

Date: Dec 30, 1998
Supreme Court of Nevada Establishes "Substantial Relationship" Test for Governing Law in Warranty Claims: Consolidated Generator-Nevada v. Cummins Engine Company Introduction In the landmark case of...
Nevada Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Insurance Bad Faith and Unfair Claims Practices in Wohlers v. Bartgis

Nevada Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Insurance Bad Faith and Unfair Claims Practices in Wohlers v. Bartgis

Date: Dec 10, 1998
Nevada Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Insurance Bad Faith and Unfair Claims Practices in Wohlers v. Bartgis Introduction In the landmark case Albert H. Wohlers and Co. and North American Life and...
Affirmation of Capital Conviction: Leonard v. Nevada and Its Implications

Affirmation of Capital Conviction: Leonard v. Nevada and Its Implications

Date: Dec 10, 1998
Affirmation of Capital Conviction: Leonard v. Nevada and Its Implications Introduction Gregory N. Leonard, an employee at the Mark Twain Apartments in Las Vegas, was convicted of robbery and...
Bemis v. Estate of Bemis: Establishing the Discovery Rule in Statute of Limitations for Conversion and Breach of Contract Claims

Bemis v. Estate of Bemis: Establishing the Discovery Rule in Statute of Limitations for Conversion and Breach of Contract Claims

Date: Nov 26, 1998
Bemis v. Estate of Bemis: Establishing the Discovery Rule in Statute of Limitations for Conversion and Breach of Contract Claims Introduction Bemis v. Estate of Bemis is a seminal case adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Death Sentences and Upholding of Legal Standards in Batson Challenges and Testimony Admissibility

Affirmation of Death Sentences and Upholding of Legal Standards in Batson Challenges and Testimony Admissibility

Date: Nov 26, 1998
Affirmation of Death Sentences and Upholding of Legal Standards in Batson Challenges and Testimony Admissibility Introduction In the landmark case of Marlo Thomas v. The State of Nevada (114 Nev....
Middleton v. State of Nevada: Affirmation of Conviction and Death Sentence

Middleton v. State of Nevada: Affirmation of Conviction and Death Sentence

Date: Nov 26, 1998
Middleton v. State of Nevada: Affirmation of Conviction and Death Sentence Introduction The case of David Stephen Middleton versus the State of Nevada (No. 31499) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Res Judicata and Permissive Cross-Claims: Insights from Executive Management v. Ticor Title Insurance

Res Judicata and Permissive Cross-Claims: Insights from Executive Management v. Ticor Title Insurance

Date: Sep 2, 1998
Res Judicata and Permissive Cross-Claims: Insights from Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance Company Introduction The case Executive Management, Ltd., a California Corporation,...
Exclusions to the Statute of Repose in Construction Defect Claims: Supreme Court of Nevada's Landmark Ruling

Exclusions to the Statute of Repose in Construction Defect Claims: Supreme Court of Nevada's Landmark Ruling

Date: Jul 23, 1998
Exclusions to the Statute of Repose in Construction Defect Claims: Supreme Court of Nevada's Landmark Ruling Introduction The case of G and H Associates, A Partnership et al. v. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc....
Materiality as a Fact Question and Post-Judgment Interest on Punitive Damages Confirmed by Nevada Supreme Court in USAA v. Powers

Materiality as a Fact Question and Post-Judgment Interest on Punitive Damages Confirmed by Nevada Supreme Court in USAA v. Powers

Date: Jul 17, 1998
Materiality as a Fact Question and Post-Judgment Interest on Punitive Damages Confirmed by Nevada Supreme Court in USAA v. Powers Introduction The case of William R. Powers v. United Services...
Reaffirming At-Will Employment and Confidentiality in Employment Contracts: Reno Air Inc. v. Barmettler

Reaffirming At-Will Employment and Confidentiality in Employment Contracts: Reno Air Inc. v. Barmettler

Date: Apr 17, 1998
Reaffirming At-Will Employment and Confidentiality in Employment Contracts: Reno Air Inc. v. Barmettler Introduction Reno Air Inc. v. Andrew Barmettler is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Clarifying the Definition of Criminal Gang under NRS 193.168: Origel-Candido v. State of Nevada

Clarifying the Definition of Criminal Gang under NRS 193.168: Origel-Candido v. State of Nevada

Date: Apr 10, 1998
Clarifying the Definition of Criminal Gang under NRS 193.168: Origel-Candido v. State of Nevada Introduction The case of Genaro A. Origel-Candido v. The State of Nevada (114 Nev. 378) adjudicated by...
Duty to Gather Exculpatory Evidence: Insights from Daniels v. State of Nevada

Duty to Gather Exculpatory Evidence: Insights from Daniels v. State of Nevada

Date: Apr 3, 1998
Duty to Gather Exculpatory Evidence: Insights from Daniels v. State of Nevada Introduction Daniels v. State of Nevada (114 Nev. 261, 1998) is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Enhanced Liability Standards for Failure to Warn in Product Liability: Yamaha v. Arnoult

Enhanced Liability Standards for Failure to Warn in Product Liability: Yamaha v. Arnoult

Date: Feb 27, 1998
Enhanced Liability Standards for Failure to Warn in Product Liability: Yamaha v. Arnoult Introduction In the landmark case Yamaha Motor Company, U.S.A., appellant, v. Beth Arnoult, respondent, 114...
Reinstatement of Strict Liability Claims in Car Rental Negligence Cases: Maduike v. Agency Rent-A-Car

Reinstatement of Strict Liability Claims in Car Rental Negligence Cases: Maduike v. Agency Rent-A-Car

Date: Jan 23, 1998
Reinstatement of Strict Liability Claims in Car Rental Negligence Cases: Maduike v. Agency Rent-A-Car Introduction The case of Maduike v. Agency Rent-A-Car (114 Nev. 1) marks a significant decision...
Proper Filing and Service of Cross-Claims Under NRCP 7(a): Insights from Smith v. Clark Court

Proper Filing and Service of Cross-Claims Under NRCP 7(a): Insights from Smith v. Clark Court

Date: Dec 18, 1997
Proper Filing and Service of Cross-Claims Under NRCP 7(a): Insights from Smith v. Clark Court Introduction The case of Allen Smith and Joanne MacDougall v. The Eighth Judicial District Court of the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert