Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Nevada Case Commentaries

Castle v. Simmons: Rebuttable Presumption in Custody Changes Due to Domestic Violence

Castle v. Simmons: Rebuttable Presumption in Custody Changes Due to Domestic Violence

Date: Apr 2, 2004
Castle v. Simmons: Rebuttable Presumption in Custody Changes Due to Domestic Violence Introduction Castle v. Simmons, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada on April 1, 2004, addresses a pivotal...
Thomas v. Nevada: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing Phase

Thomas v. Nevada: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing Phase

Date: Feb 11, 2004
Thomas v. Nevada: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing Phase Introduction Thomas v. The State of Nevada is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada on February...
Invalidating "At Random" Aggravator: Implications for Brady Violations in Capital Sentencing - State v. Bennett

Invalidating "At Random" Aggravator: Implications for Brady Violations in Capital Sentencing - State v. Bennett

Date: Dec 31, 2003
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney. Invalidating "At Random"...
Transition Instructions in Jury Deliberations: Adopting the 'Unable to Agree' Approach in Nevada Jurisprudence

Transition Instructions in Jury Deliberations: Adopting the 'Unable to Agree' Approach in Nevada Jurisprudence

Date: Dec 12, 2003
Transition Instructions in Jury Deliberations: Adopting the 'Unable to Agree' Approach in Nevada Jurisprudence Introduction The case of Frederick Green v. The State of Nevada (119 Nev. 542) serves as...
Reversal of Death Sentence Due to Cumulative Trial Errors in Daniel v. Nevada

Reversal of Death Sentence Due to Cumulative Trial Errors in Daniel v. Nevada

Date: Nov 4, 2003
Reversal of Death Sentence Due to Cumulative Trial Errors in Daniel v. Nevada Introduction Dorion Daniel v. The State of Nevada is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Nevada on...
Codification of the Undivided-Fee Rule in Eminent Domain: County of Clark v. Sun State Properties

Codification of the Undivided-Fee Rule in Eminent Domain: County of Clark v. Sun State Properties

Date: Jul 22, 2003
Codification of the Undivided-Fee Rule in Eminent Domain: County of Clark v. Sun State Properties Introduction The Supreme Court of Nevada's decision in County of Clark v. Sun State Properties, Ltd.,...
Severance of Charges and Admissibility of Hearsay: Insights from Tabish & Murphy v. Nevada

Severance of Charges and Admissibility of Hearsay: Insights from Tabish & Murphy v. Nevada

Date: Jul 15, 2003
Severance of Charges and Admissibility of Hearsay: Insights from Tabish & Murphy v. Nevada Introduction In the landmark case of Richard Bennett Tabish and Sandra Renee Murphy v. The State of Nevada,...
Defining Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations: Insights from J.J. Industries v. Bennett

Defining Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations: Insights from J.J. Industries v. Bennett

Date: Jul 9, 2003
Defining Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations: Insights from J.J. Industries v. Bennett Introduction The case of J.J. Industries, LLC v. Hale B. Bennett presents a pivotal examination...
Establishing Good Cause for Delayed Habeas Corpus Petitions: Hathaway v. Nevada

Establishing Good Cause for Delayed Habeas Corpus Petitions: Hathaway v. Nevada

Date: Jun 27, 2003
Establishing Good Cause for Delayed Habeas Corpus Petitions: Hathaway v. Nevada Introduction The case of Michael Joseph Hathaway v. The State of Nevada (119 Nev. 248) adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Limitation on Stipulations Disregarding Procedural Default Rules in Post-Conviction Habeas Proceedings

Limitation on Stipulations Disregarding Procedural Default Rules in Post-Conviction Habeas Proceedings

Date: May 31, 2003
Limitation on Stipulations Disregarding Procedural Default Rules in Post-Conviction Habeas Proceedings Introduction In the pivotal case of The State of Nevada v. Richard Haberstroh (119 Nev. 173,...
Affirmation of Murder Convictions in Buchanan v. State: Evidence Sufficiency and Due Process Considerations

Affirmation of Murder Convictions in Buchanan v. State: Evidence Sufficiency and Due Process Considerations

Date: May 31, 2003
Affirmation of Murder Convictions in Buchanan v. State: Evidence Sufficiency and Due Process Considerations Introduction Buchanan v. State, 119 Nev. 201 (2003), represents a significant judicial...
Non-Retroactive Application of RING v. ARIZONA in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Lawrence Colwell, Jr. v. State of Nevada

Non-Retroactive Application of RING v. ARIZONA in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Lawrence Colwell, Jr. v. State of Nevada

Date: Feb 21, 2003
Non-Retroactive Application of RING v. ARIZONA in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Lawrence Colwell, Jr. v. State of Nevada Introduction The case of Lawrence Colwell, Jr. v. The State of Nevada (No....
Establishing Limited-Purpose Public Figure Status and Defamation Protections in Restaurant Reviews: Pegasus v. Reno Gazette-Journal

Establishing Limited-Purpose Public Figure Status and Defamation Protections in Restaurant Reviews: Pegasus v. Reno Gazette-Journal

Date: Feb 21, 2003
Establishing Limited-Purpose Public Figure Status and Defamation Protections in Restaurant Reviews: Pegasus v. Reno Gazette-Journal Introduction In the landmark case of Pegasus v. Reno...
Supreme Court of Nevada Establishes Specific Intent Requirement for Aiding and Abetting Attempted Murder in Sharma v. Nevada

Supreme Court of Nevada Establishes Specific Intent Requirement for Aiding and Abetting Attempted Murder in Sharma v. Nevada

Date: Nov 1, 2002
Supreme Court of Nevada Establishes Specific Intent Requirement for Aiding and Abetting Attempted Murder in Sharma v. Nevada Introduction Sonu Sharma v. The State of Nevada is a pivotal case decided...
Ralph M. Gonzales v. State of Nevada: Clarification on Timeliness of Post-Conviction Habeas Petitions and Rejection of Prison Mailbox Rule

Ralph M. Gonzales v. State of Nevada: Clarification on Timeliness of Post-Conviction Habeas Petitions and Rejection of Prison Mailbox Rule

Date: Oct 31, 2002
Ralph M. Gonzales v. State of Nevada: Clarification on Timeliness of Post-Conviction Habeas Petitions and Rejection of Prison Mailbox Rule Introduction Ralph M. Gonzales v. The State of Nevada is a...
Unconscionability of Arbitration Clauses in Homebuyer Warranties: Nevada Supreme Court Sets Precedent

Unconscionability of Arbitration Clauses in Homebuyer Warranties: Nevada Supreme Court Sets Precedent

Date: Oct 30, 2002
Unconscionability of Arbitration Clauses in Homebuyer Warranties: Nevada Supreme Court Sets Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of James Burch and Linda Burch v. The Second Judicial District...
Hernandez v. Nevada: Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence Amid Juror Conduct and Custodial Kidnapping

Hernandez v. Nevada: Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence Amid Juror Conduct and Custodial Kidnapping

Date: Sep 6, 2002
Hernandez v. Nevada: Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence Amid Juror Conduct and Custodial Kidnapping Introduction Hernandez v. The State of Nevada, 118 Nev. 513 (2002), presents a critical...
Establishing the Boundaries of Absolute Privilege in Attorney Defamation Claims: Fink v. Oshins

Establishing the Boundaries of Absolute Privilege in Attorney Defamation Claims: Fink v. Oshins

Date: Jul 18, 2002
Establishing the Boundaries of Absolute Privilege in Attorney Defamation Claims: Fink v. Oshins Introduction The case of Donald M. Fink v. Richard A. Oshins (118 Nev. 428) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Supreme Court of Nevada Establishes Rigorous Standards for Writ of Mandamus in Dismissal Challenges

Supreme Court of Nevada Establishes Rigorous Standards for Writ of Mandamus in Dismissal Challenges

Date: May 9, 2002
Supreme Court of Nevada Establishes Rigorous Standards for Writ of Mandamus in Dismissal Challenges Introduction The case of State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General; Frankie Sue Del Papa,...
Estoppel in Appellate Challenges: Insights from Kelly Eugene Rhyne v. State of Nevada

Estoppel in Appellate Challenges: Insights from Kelly Eugene Rhyne v. State of Nevada

Date: Mar 7, 2002
Estoppel in Appellate Challenges: Insights from Kelly Eugene Rhyne v. State of Nevada Introduction Kelly Eugene Rhyne v. State of Nevada, 118 Nev. 1, decided by the Supreme Court of Nevada on March...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert