Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Missouri Case Commentaries

Missouri Supreme Court Sets Standards for Mootness and Effective Counsel in Juvenile Delinquency Cases

Missouri Supreme Court Sets Standards for Mootness and Effective Counsel in Juvenile Delinquency Cases

Date: Aug 14, 2019
Missouri Supreme Court Sets Standards for Mootness and Effective Counsel in Juvenile Delinquency Cases Introduction The landmark case IN THE INTEREST OF: D.C.M., A MINOR, Appellant, v. PEMISCOT...
Affirmation of Apportionment Standards in Wrongful Death Settlements: Macke v. Patton

Affirmation of Apportionment Standards in Wrongful Death Settlements: Macke v. Patton

Date: Jul 17, 2019
Affirmation of Apportionment Standards in Wrongful Death Settlements: Macke v. Patton Introduction In the landmark case Macke v. Patton, the Supreme Court of Missouri addressed critical issues...
R.M.A. v. Blue Springs School District: Expanding the Scope of 'Sex' Discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act

R.M.A. v. Blue Springs School District: Expanding the Scope of 'Sex' Discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act

Date: Feb 27, 2019
R.M.A. v. Blue Springs School District: Expanding the Scope of 'Sex' Discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act Introduction The case of R.M.A. (A Minor Child) v. Blue Springs R-IV School...
Affirmation of Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Proportionality in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of STATE v. ANDERSON, 564 S.W.3d 592

Affirmation of Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Proportionality in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of STATE v. ANDERSON, 564 S.W.3d 592

Date: Nov 21, 2018
Affirmation of Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Proportionality in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of STATE v. ANDERSON, 564 S.W.3d 592 Introduction The case of Terrance ANDERSON v....
Preservation of Appellate Claims in After-Trial Motions: Insights from Heifetz v. Apex Clayton, Inc.

Preservation of Appellate Claims in After-Trial Motions: Insights from Heifetz v. Apex Clayton, Inc.

Date: Jul 18, 2018
Preservation of Appellate Claims in After-Trial Motions: Insights from Heifetz v. Apex Clayton, Inc. Introduction The case of Gary S. Heifetz, Jeffrey S. Gershman, Steven B. Spewak, Jean Maylack,...
Missouri Supreme Court Upholds Freedom of Association in Candidate Filing

Missouri Supreme Court Upholds Freedom of Association in Candidate Filing

Date: Jun 26, 2018
Missouri Supreme Court Upholds Freedom of Association in Candidate Filing Introduction In the landmark case of Courtney Curtis v. The Missouri Democratic Party, et al. (548 S.W.3d 909, 2018), the...
Affirmation of Circuit Court's Decision on Juror Nondisclosure and Verdict Instructions in Spence v. BNSF Railway Co.

Affirmation of Circuit Court's Decision on Juror Nondisclosure and Verdict Instructions in Spence v. BNSF Railway Co.

Date: May 23, 2018
Affirmation of Circuit Court's Decision on Juror Nondisclosure and Verdict Instructions in Spence v. BNSF Railway Co. Introduction In Sherry Spence v. BNSF Railway Company, 547 S.W.3d 769 (2018), the...
Missouri Supreme Court Upholds Felon Firearm Prohibition in Alpert v. State of Missouri

Missouri Supreme Court Upholds Felon Firearm Prohibition in Alpert v. State of Missouri

Date: Apr 4, 2018
Missouri Supreme Court Upholds Felon Firearm Prohibition in Alpert v. State of Missouri Introduction In the landmark case of Alpert v. State of Missouri, 543 S.W.3d 589 (Mo. Sup. Ct. 2018), the...
Third-Party Custody in Dissolution Proceedings: The Precedent Set by Bowers v. Bowers

Third-Party Custody in Dissolution Proceedings: The Precedent Set by Bowers v. Bowers

Date: Apr 4, 2018
Third-Party Custody in Dissolution Proceedings: The Precedent Set by Bowers v. Bowers Introduction In the landmark case of Bowers v. Bowers, 543 S.W.3d 608 (2018), the Supreme Court of Missouri...
Establishing Duty in Premises Liability: Wieland v. Owner-Operator Services, Inc.

Establishing Duty in Premises Liability: Wieland v. Owner-Operator Services, Inc.

Date: Feb 14, 2018
Establishing Duty in Premises Liability: Wieland v. Owner-Operator Services, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Amie Wieland v. Owner-Operator Services, Inc., the Supreme Court of Missouri...
Enforcement of Forum Selection Clauses: Insights from Reed v. The Reilly Company

Enforcement of Forum Selection Clauses: Insights from Reed v. The Reilly Company

Date: Dec 6, 2017
Enforcement of Forum Selection Clauses: Insights from Reed v. The Reilly Company Introduction In the landmark case Reed v. The Reilly Company, LLC, decided by the Supreme Court of Missouri on...
Narrow Interpretation of "Industrial, Maintenance and Construction Power Equipment" and Damage Limitations under the Franchise Act in SUN AVIATION, INC. v. L-3 Communications Avionics Systems, Inc.

Narrow Interpretation of "Industrial, Maintenance and Construction Power Equipment" and Damage Limitations under the Franchise Act in SUN AVIATION, INC. v. L-3 Communications Avionics Systems, Inc.

Date: Nov 1, 2017
Narrow Interpretation of "Industrial, Maintenance and Construction Power Equipment" and Damage Limitations under the Franchise Act in SUN AVIATION, INC. v. L-3 Communications Avionics Systems, Inc....
Missouri Supreme Court Establishes Requirements for Lesser-Included Offense Instructions in Burglary Cases

Missouri Supreme Court Establishes Requirements for Lesser-Included Offense Instructions in Burglary Cases

Date: Jul 12, 2017
Missouri Supreme Court Establishes Requirements for Lesser-Included Offense Instructions in Burglary Cases Introduction In State of Missouri v. James Calvin Smith, 522 S.W.3d 221 (Mo. 2017), the...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Analyzing Michael TISIUS v. STATE of Missouri

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Analyzing Michael TISIUS v. STATE of Missouri

Date: Apr 26, 2017
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Analyzing Michael TISIUS v. STATE of Missouri Introduction Michael TISIUS v. STATE of Missouri, 519 S.W.3d 413 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2017),...
Missouri Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Terminating Parental Rights Based on Incarceration and Parental Unfitness

Missouri Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Terminating Parental Rights Based on Incarceration and Parental Unfitness

Date: Jan 6, 2017
Missouri Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Terminating Parental Rights Based on Incarceration and Parental Unfitness Introduction In the landmark case In the Interest of J.P.B. M.R.S.,...
Missouri Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standards for Race-Neutral Explanations in Batson Challenges

Missouri Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standards for Race-Neutral Explanations in Batson Challenges

Date: Aug 24, 2016
Missouri Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standards for Race-Neutral Explanations in Batson Challenges Introduction In the landmark case State of Missouri v. Roscoe R. Meeks, 495 S.W.3d 168 (Miss....
Limits on Punitive Damages Against Statutorily Defined Insurance Funds: City of Harrisonville v. McCall Service Stations

Limits on Punitive Damages Against Statutorily Defined Insurance Funds: City of Harrisonville v. McCall Service Stations

Date: Aug 24, 2016
Limits on Punitive Damages Against Statutorily Defined Insurance Funds: City of Harrisonville v. McCall Service Stations Introduction In the case of City of Harrisonville v. McCall Service Stations...
Double Jeopardy Protections in Felony Stealing Cases: State v. Bazell

Double Jeopardy Protections in Felony Stealing Cases: State v. Bazell

Date: Aug 24, 2016
Double Jeopardy Protections in Felony Stealing Cases: State v. Bazell Introduction In the landmark case of State of Missouri v. Amanda N. Bazell (497 S.W.3d 263), the Supreme Court of Missouri...
Missouri Supreme Court Upholds Firearm Restrictions for Nonviolent Felons

Missouri Supreme Court Upholds Firearm Restrictions for Nonviolent Felons

Date: Feb 10, 2016
Missouri Supreme Court Upholds Firearm Restrictions for Nonviolent Felons Introduction The case of State of Missouri v. Pierre Clay (481 S.W.3d 531) addresses the constitutionality of Missouri's...
Clarifying the 'Substantial Step' Standard in Attempted First-Degree Assault: State of Missouri v. Lammers

Clarifying the 'Substantial Step' Standard in Attempted First-Degree Assault: State of Missouri v. Lammers

Date: Feb 10, 2016
Clarifying the 'Substantial Step' Standard in Attempted First-Degree Assault: State of Missouri v. Lammers Introduction In State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Blaec James Lammers, Appellant (479 S.W.3d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert