Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Missouri Case Commentaries

Klemme v. Best: Clarifying Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice Claims

Klemme v. Best: Clarifying Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice Claims

Date: Mar 26, 1997
Klemme v. Best: Clarifying Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice Claims Introduction Klemme v. Best is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court of Missouri...
STATE v. WHITE: Reinforcing Strict Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims under Rule 29.15

STATE v. WHITE: Reinforcing Strict Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims under Rule 29.15

Date: Mar 26, 1997
STATE v. WHITE: Reinforcing Strict Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims under Rule 29.15 Introduction In STATE v. WHITE, decided by the Supreme Court of Missouri on March 25, 1997, Leamon...
Pre-Judgment Dissolution of Marriage Prevents Abatement Upon Death: Hoffman v. Hoffman

Pre-Judgment Dissolution of Marriage Prevents Abatement Upon Death: Hoffman v. Hoffman

Date: Feb 26, 1997
Pre-Judgment Dissolution of Marriage Prevents Abatement Upon Death: Hoffman v. Hoffman Introduction Hoffman v. Hoffman, 937 S.W.2d 723 (Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc, 1997), addresses a pivotal...
Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.: New Standards for Alcohol Evidence and Punitive Damages in Missouri Civil Cases

Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.: New Standards for Alcohol Evidence and Punitive Damages in Missouri Civil Cases

Date: Jan 22, 1997
Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.: New Standards for Alcohol Evidence and Punitive Damages in Missouri Civil Cases Introduction Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corporation (No. 78539), adjudicated by the...
Impartiality in Judicial Proceedings: Analysis of State v. Brian J. Kinder

Impartiality in Judicial Proceedings: Analysis of State v. Brian J. Kinder

Date: Jan 22, 1997
Impartiality in Judicial Proceedings: Analysis of State of Missouri v. Brian J. Kinder Introduction The case of State of Missouri v. Brian J. Kinder (942 S.W.2d 313) adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Missouri Supreme Court Clarifies CGL Policy Ambiguity and Establishes Reasonableness Standard for Section 537.065 Settlements

Missouri Supreme Court Clarifies CGL Policy Ambiguity and Establishes Reasonableness Standard for Section 537.065 Settlements

Date: Jan 22, 1997
Missouri Supreme Court Clarifies CGL Policy Ambiguity and Establishes Reasonableness Standard for Section 537.065 Settlements Introduction The case of Gulf Insurance Co. v. Noble Broadcast, et al....
Mandatory Voluntary Manslaughter Instructions in Provocation Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Missouri v. Redmond

Mandatory Voluntary Manslaughter Instructions in Provocation Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Missouri v. Redmond

Date: Dec 18, 1996
Mandatory Voluntary Manslaughter Instructions in Provocation Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Missouri v. Redmond Introduction State of Missouri v. Marlon Redmond, 937 S.W.2d 205 (Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Accomplice Liability and Evidentiary Standards in Capital Murder: State of Missouri v. Faye Copeland

Affirmation of Accomplice Liability and Evidentiary Standards in Capital Murder: State of Missouri v. Faye Copeland

Date: Sep 18, 1996
Affirmation of Accomplice Liability and Evidentiary Standards in Capital Murder: State of Missouri v. Faye Copeland Introduction State of Missouri v. Faye Copeland, 928 S.W.2d 828 (1996), adjudicated...
Withdrawal of Guilty Plea and Sentencing Procedures: Analysis of STATE OF MISSOURI v. MICHAEL TAYLOR

Withdrawal of Guilty Plea and Sentencing Procedures: Analysis of STATE OF MISSOURI v. MICHAEL TAYLOR

Date: Sep 18, 1996
Withdrawal of Guilty Plea and Sentencing Procedures: Analysis of STATE OF MISSOURI v. MICHAEL TAYLOR Introduction STATE OF MISSOURI v. MICHAEL TAYLOR (929 S.W.2d 209), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Comprehensive Commentary on State of Missouri v. Paul Kreutzer: Establishing Standards for Voir Dire and Admissibility of Evidence in Capital Cases

Comprehensive Commentary on State of Missouri v. Paul Kreutzer: Establishing Standards for Voir Dire and Admissibility of Evidence in Capital Cases

Date: Sep 18, 1996
Comprehensive Commentary on State of Missouri v. Paul Kreutzer: Establishing Standards for Voir Dire and Admissibility of Evidence in Capital Cases Introduction State of Missouri v. Paul Kreutzer,...
Call v. Heard: Affirming Restricted Civil Court Access for Incarcerated Persons and Upholding Punitive Damages Standards in Missouri

Call v. Heard: Affirming Restricted Civil Court Access for Incarcerated Persons and Upholding Punitive Damages Standards in Missouri

Date: Aug 21, 1996
Call v. Heard: Affirming Restricted Civil Court Access for Incarcerated Persons and Upholding Punitive Damages Standards in Missouri Introduction The case of Mary Beth Call, et al. v. Joseph Allen...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in State of Missouri v. Antonio Richardson

Affirmation of Death Penalty in State of Missouri v. Antonio Richardson

Date: Jun 26, 1996
Affirmation of Death Penalty in State of Missouri v. Antonio Richardson Introduction State of Missouri v. Antonio Richardson, 923 S.W.2d 301 (Mo. 1996), is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of...
Judicial Recusal and Plea Withdrawal: Analyzing State of Missouri v. Roderick Nunley

Judicial Recusal and Plea Withdrawal: Analyzing State of Missouri v. Roderick Nunley

Date: May 29, 1996
Judicial Recusal and Plea Withdrawal: Analyzing State of Missouri v. Roderick Nunley Introduction State of Missouri v. Roderick Nunley is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Missouri on...
Clear and Explicit Language Required for Enforceability of Exculpatory Clauses in Contracts Relieving Parties from Future Negligence

Clear and Explicit Language Required for Enforceability of Exculpatory Clauses in Contracts Relieving Parties from Future Negligence

Date: May 29, 1996
Clear and Explicit Language Required for Enforceability of Exculpatory Clauses in Contracts Relieving Parties from Future Negligence Introduction In the case of Charles Alack v. Vic Tanny...
Affirmation of Qualified Privilege in Intra-Corporate Defamation: Rice v. Hodapp et al.

Affirmation of Qualified Privilege in Intra-Corporate Defamation: Rice v. Hodapp et al.

Date: Apr 27, 1996
Affirmation of Qualified Privilege in Intra-Corporate Defamation: Rice v. Hodapp et al. Introduction The case of Richard B. Rice v. Virginia Hodapp, et al. (919 S.W.2d 240) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction and Death Sentence: State of Missouri v. Tokar

Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction and Death Sentence: State of Missouri v. Tokar

Date: Apr 24, 1996
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction and Death Sentence: State of Missouri v. Tokar Introduction State of Missouri v. Jeffrey Lane Tokar is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Statute of Limitations for Battery in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: An Analysis of K.G. v. R.T.R.

Statute of Limitations for Battery in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: An Analysis of K.G. v. R.T.R.

Date: Apr 24, 1996
Statute of Limitations for Battery in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: An Analysis of K.G. v. R.T.R. Introduction The case of K.G. v. R.T.R. (918 S.W.2d 795) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Missouri in...
Woolridge v. Woolridge: Guidelines for Marital Property Division and Child Support Calculations

Woolridge v. Woolridge: Guidelines for Marital Property Division and Child Support Calculations

Date: Feb 14, 1996
Woolridge v. Woolridge: Guidelines for Marital Property Division and Child Support Calculations Introduction In the case of Evelyn Nan Woolridge v. Virgil E. Woolridge (915 S.W.2d 372), the Missouri...
Affirmation of Race-Neutral Peremptory Strikes in Jury Selection: STATE OF MISSOURI v. WILLIAM WEAVER

Affirmation of Race-Neutral Peremptory Strikes in Jury Selection: STATE OF MISSOURI v. WILLIAM WEAVER

Date: Jan 24, 1996
Affirmation of Race-Neutral Peremptory Strikes in Jury Selection: STATE OF MISSOURI v. WILLIAM WEAVER Introduction STATE OF MISSOURI v. WILLIAM WEAVER, 912 S.W.2d 499, adjudicated on January 23,...
Missouri v. Driver: Enhancing Rule 29.07(b)(4) Inquiries to Address Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Missouri v. Driver: Enhancing Rule 29.07(b)(4) Inquiries to Address Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Date: Dec 20, 1995
Missouri v. Driver: Enhancing Rule 29.07(b)(4) Inquiries to Address Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction In the landmark case of State of Missouri v. Patrice Driver, 912 S.W.2d 52...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert