Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Mississippi Case Commentaries

Ambiguity in Contractual Terms: Dennis v. Searle Establishes Importance of Clear Contract Language in Real Estate Transactions

Ambiguity in Contractual Terms: Dennis v. Searle Establishes Importance of Clear Contract Language in Real Estate Transactions

Date: Oct 11, 1984
Ambiguity in Contractual Terms: Dennis v. Searle Establishes Importance of Clear Contract Language in Real Estate Transactions Introduction Norman George Dennis v. Charles Roger Searle and Wife,...
Enhancing the Sixth Amendment Protections: The Importance of Counsel Presence in Capital Sentencing

Enhancing the Sixth Amendment Protections: The Importance of Counsel Presence in Capital Sentencing

Date: Sep 13, 1984
Enhancing the Sixth Amendment Protections: The Importance of Counsel Presence in Capital Sentencing Introduction The case of Attina Marie Cannaday v. State of Mississippi (455 So. 2d 713) adjudicated...
Double Jeopardy Not Invoked for Multiple Capital Murders from a Single Criminal Act in WILCHER v. STATE

Double Jeopardy Not Invoked for Multiple Capital Murders from a Single Criminal Act in WILCHER v. STATE

Date: Aug 23, 1984
Double Jeopardy Not Invoked for Multiple Capital Murders from a Single Criminal Act in WILCHER v. STATE Introduction Bobby Glen WILCHER v. STATE of Mississippi, 455 So.2d 727 (1984), adjudicated by...
Reversing the Prosecution's Testimonial Handling: A New Precedent in Witness Credibility Assessment

Reversing the Prosecution's Testimonial Handling: A New Precedent in Witness Credibility Assessment

Date: Aug 23, 1984
Reversing the Prosecution's Testimonial Handling: A New Precedent in Witness Credibility Assessment Introduction The case of James Vincent Moffett v. State of Mississippi, decided by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction in James E. Billiot v. State of Mississippi

Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction in James E. Billiot v. State of Mississippi

Date: Aug 23, 1984
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction in James E. Billiot v. State of Mississippi Introduction James E. Billiot v. State of Mississippi, reported at 454 So. 2d 445 (1984), is a landmark case...
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Death Sentence in James R. Stringer v. State of Mississippi

Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Death Sentence in James R. Stringer v. State of Mississippi

Date: Aug 16, 1984
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Death Sentence in James R. Stringer v. State of Mississippi Introduction In the landmark case of James R. Stringer v. State of Mississippi, decided on...
Clarifying Juror Challenges in Capital Murder Cases: Dufour v. Mississippi Supreme Court

Clarifying Juror Challenges in Capital Murder Cases: Dufour v. Mississippi Supreme Court

Date: Jul 26, 1984
Clarifying Juror Challenges in Capital Murder Cases: Dufour v. State of Mississippi Introduction Donald William Dufour v. State of Mississippi is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Confessions in Capital Murder Cases Involving Defendants with Mild Mental Retardation: Howard Monte v. State of Mississippi

Admissibility of Confessions in Capital Murder Cases Involving Defendants with Mild Mental Retardation: Howard Monte v. State of Mississippi

Date: Jul 12, 1984
Admissibility of Confessions in Capital Murder Cases Involving Defendants with Mild Mental Retardation: Howard Monte v. State of Mississippi Introduction Howard Monte v. State of Mississippi is a...
Mandatory Manslaughter Instruction in Capital Murder Cases: Insights from Arthur Ray Lanier v. State of Mississippi

Mandatory Manslaughter Instruction in Capital Murder Cases: Insights from Arthur Ray Lanier v. State of Mississippi

Date: May 31, 1984
Mandatory Manslaughter Instruction in Capital Murder Cases: Insights from Arthur Ray Lanier v. State of Mississippi Introduction Arthur Ray Lanier v. State of Mississippi, 450 So. 2d 69 (Miss. 1984),...
Limits on Prosecutorial Comments Regarding Sentencing Reviewability in Capital Cases – Wiley v. State of Mississippi

Limits on Prosecutorial Comments Regarding Sentencing Reviewability in Capital Cases – Wiley v. State of Mississippi

Date: May 17, 1984
Limits on Prosecutorial Comments Regarding Sentencing Reviewability in Capital Cases – Wiley v. State of Mississippi Introduction Wiley v. State of Mississippi is a landmark case decided by the...
Capital Murder Sentencing and Procedural Integrity: Comprehensive Review of Bobby Glen WILCHER v. STATE of Mississippi

Capital Murder Sentencing and Procedural Integrity: Comprehensive Review of Bobby Glen WILCHER v. STATE of Mississippi

Date: Apr 26, 1984
Capital Murder Sentencing and Procedural Integrity: Comprehensive Review of Bobby Glen WILCHER v. STATE of Mississippi Introduction Bobby Glen WILCHER v. STATE of Mississippi, 448 So. 2d 927 (Miss....
Affirmation of Procedural Standards in Death Penalty Sentencing: John Earl Booker v. State of Mississippi

Affirmation of Procedural Standards in Death Penalty Sentencing: John Earl Booker v. State of Mississippi

Date: Apr 19, 1984
Affirmation of Procedural Standards in Death Penalty Sentencing: John Earl Booker v. State of Mississippi Introduction John Earl Booker v. State of Mississippi is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Equitable Estoppel in Unrecorded Subdivision Covenants: PMZ Oil Co. v. Lucroy

Equitable Estoppel in Unrecorded Subdivision Covenants: PMZ Oil Co. v. Lucroy

Date: Mar 22, 1984
Equitable Estoppel in Unrecorded Subdivision Covenants: PMZ Oil Co. v. Lucroy Introduction The case of PMZ Oil Company v. Robert Lucroy and Patricia Lucroy, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Williams v. Mississippi: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Capital Sentencing Procedures

Williams v. Mississippi: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Capital Sentencing Procedures

Date: Mar 1, 1984
Williams v. Mississippi: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Capital Sentencing Procedures Introduction Walter Williams, Jr. v. State of Mississippi is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing the Vortex Public Figure Doctrine in Defamation Law

Establishing the Vortex Public Figure Doctrine in Defamation Law

Date: Mar 1, 1984
Establishing the Vortex Public Figure Doctrine in Defamation Law Introduction Charles B. Ferguson, et al. v. William E. Watkins, et al. (448 So. 2d 271) is a landmark 1984 decision by the Supreme...
Sufficiency of Evidence in Capital Murder Convictions: The Ruffin v. State of Mississippi Ruling

Sufficiency of Evidence in Capital Murder Convictions: The Ruffin v. State of Mississippi Ruling

Date: Feb 23, 1984
Sufficiency of Evidence in Capital Murder Convictions: The Ruffin v. State of Mississippi Ruling Introduction The case of Larry Donnell Ruffin v. State of Mississippi (447 So. 2d 113, 1984) serves as...
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Standards for Warrantless Arrest: Caldwell v. State of Mississippi

Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Standards for Warrantless Arrest: Caldwell v. State of Mississippi

Date: Feb 2, 1984
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Standards for Warrantless Arrest: Caldwell v. State of Mississippi Introduction Bobby Caldwell v. State of Mississippi, 443 So. 2d 806 (1984), is a...
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Procedural Integrity in John Buford Irving, III v. State of Mississippi

Affirmation of Death Sentence and Procedural Integrity in John Buford Irving, III v. State of Mississippi

Date: Dec 15, 1983
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Procedural Integrity in John Buford Irving, III v. State of Mississippi Introduction John Buford Irving, III v. State of Mississippi, reported in 441 So. 2d 846...
Edwards v. Mississippi: Establishing Standards for Capital Sentencing and the Insanity Defense

Edwards v. Mississippi: Establishing Standards for Capital Sentencing and the Insanity Defense

Date: Dec 15, 1983
Edwards v. Mississippi: Establishing Standards for Capital Sentencing and the Insanity Defense Introduction Hezekiah Edwards v. State of Mississippi is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirmation of Jury Discretion in Insanity Defense: Insights from Robert Groseclose v. State of Mississippi

Reaffirmation of Jury Discretion in Insanity Defense: Insights from Robert Groseclose v. State of Mississippi

Date: Nov 24, 1983
Reaffirmation of Jury Discretion in Insanity Defense: Insights from Robert Groseclose v. State of Mississippi Introduction The case of Robert Groseclose v. State of Mississippi (440 So. 2d 297, 1983)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert