Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Inclusion of Adopted Children as Trust Beneficiaries: Insights from Carol Daniels Toombs v. Daniels et al.

Inclusion of Adopted Children as Trust Beneficiaries: Insights from Carol Daniels Toombs v. Daniels et al.

Date: Jan 26, 1985
Inclusion of Adopted Children as Trust Beneficiaries: Insights from Carol Daniels Toombs v. Daniels et al. Introduction Carol Daniels Toombs v. Daniels et al. is a landmark case decided by the...
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: STATE of Minnesota v. James Alan Myers

Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: STATE of Minnesota v. James Alan Myers

Date: Dec 22, 1984
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: STATE of Minnesota v. James Alan Myers Introduction STATE of Minnesota v. James Alan Myers is a landmark case decided by the Minnesota...
MPUC's Lack of Jurisdiction Over Unregulated Cooperatives: The Frost-Benco Decision

MPUC's Lack of Jurisdiction Over Unregulated Cooperatives: The Frost-Benco Decision

Date: Dec 1, 1984
MPUC's Lack of Jurisdiction Over Unregulated Cooperatives: The Frost-Benco Decision Introduction The Frost-Benco Electric Association v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission case, adjudicated by the...
Establishing the 'Substantial Evidence' Standard in Workers' Compensation Appeals: Norman Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees

Establishing the 'Substantial Evidence' Standard in Workers' Compensation Appeals: Norman Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees

Date: Nov 22, 1984
Establishing the 'Substantial Evidence' Standard in Workers' Compensation Appeals: Norman Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees Introduction The case of Norman Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees,...
Restitution in Criminal Convictions: Insights from State v. Fader

Restitution in Criminal Convictions: Insights from State v. Fader

Date: Nov 3, 1984
Restitution in Criminal Convictions: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Roger Merlin Fader Introduction State of Minnesota v. Roger Merlin Fader is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Agency Discretion in Initiating Contested Case Hearings: Minnesota Supreme Court's Ruling in Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West

Agency Discretion in Initiating Contested Case Hearings: Minnesota Supreme Court's Ruling in Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West

Date: Oct 27, 1984
Agency Discretion in Initiating Contested Case Hearings: Minnesota Supreme Court's Ruling in Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Introduction The case of Cable Communications Board of the State of...
Reevaluation of the Fireman’s Rule and Res Judicata in Workers' Compensation Claims: Insights from Kaiser v. Northern States Power Company

Reevaluation of the Fireman’s Rule and Res Judicata in Workers' Compensation Claims: Insights from Kaiser v. Northern States Power Company

Date: Aug 4, 1984
Reevaluation of the Fireman’s Rule and Res Judicata in Workers' Compensation Claims: Insights from Kaiser v. Northern States Power Company Introduction The case of Kaiser et al. v. Northern States...
Affirmation of Sufficiency of Evidence and Prosecutorial Discretion in Felony Murder Convictions: State v. Parker

Affirmation of Sufficiency of Evidence and Prosecutorial Discretion in Felony Murder Convictions: State v. Parker

Date: Aug 4, 1984
Affirmation of Sufficiency of Evidence and Prosecutorial Discretion in Felony Murder Convictions: State v. Parker Introduction State of Minnesota v. Stanford Lee Parker, 353 N.W.2d 122 (Minn. 1984),...
State of Minnesota v. Brechon and Carpenter: Establishing the Burden of Proof for 'Claim of Right' in Trespass Cases

State of Minnesota v. Brechon and Carpenter: Establishing the Burden of Proof for 'Claim of Right' in Trespass Cases

Date: Aug 4, 1984
State of Minnesota v. Brechon and Carpenter: Establishing the Burden of Proof for "Claim of Right" in Trespass Cases Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. John Brechon and Scott...
TURE v. STATE: Defining Sixth Amendment Counsel Rights in Multi-Jurisdictional Cases and Standards for Hypnotically-Induced Testimony

TURE v. STATE: Defining Sixth Amendment Counsel Rights in Multi-Jurisdictional Cases and Standards for Hypnotically-Induced Testimony

Date: Jun 30, 1984
TURE v. STATE: Defining Sixth Amendment Counsel Rights in Multi-Jurisdictional Cases and Standards for Hypnotically-Induced Testimony Introduction State of Minnesota v. Joseph Donald Ture, Jr., 353...
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Award of Nonmarital Property to Prevent Unfair Hardship in Divorce Cases

Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Award of Nonmarital Property to Prevent Unfair Hardship in Divorce Cases

Date: Apr 14, 1984
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Award of Nonmarital Property to Prevent Unfair Hardship in Divorce Cases Introduction In the landmark case of In re the Marriage of Gayle A. Rutten v. James W. Rutten...
Clarifying Appeal Timelines and Equitable Division of Marital Property: In Re the Marriage of Ruth Servin v. Donald Servin

Clarifying Appeal Timelines and Equitable Division of Marital Property: In Re the Marriage of Ruth Servin v. Donald Servin

Date: Mar 17, 1984
Clarifying Appeal Timelines and Equitable Division of Marital Property: In Re the Marriage of Ruth Servin v. Donald Servin Introduction The case of In Re the Marriage of Ruth Servin, Petitioner,...
Kelley Company Inc. v. Bilotta: Redefining Design-Defect Liability in Product Safety

Kelley Company Inc. v. Bilotta: Redefining Design-Defect Liability in Product Safety

Date: Mar 17, 1984
Kelley Company Inc. v. Bilotta: Redefining Design-Defect Liability in Product Safety Introduction The landmark case of Albert J. Bilotta, Jr., et al., v. Kelley Company, Inc., et al. adjudicated by...
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction and Admissibility of Prior Convictions in STATE v. Wornice Lloyd

Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction and Admissibility of Prior Convictions in STATE v. Wornice Lloyd

Date: Feb 25, 1984
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction and Admissibility of Prior Convictions in STATE of Minnesota v. Wornice Lloyd Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Minnesota v. Wornice Lloyd,...
LaTourelle v. State of Minnesota: Clarifying Insanity Defense Standards and Consolidation of Criminal Charges

LaTourelle v. State of Minnesota: Clarifying Insanity Defense Standards and Consolidation of Criminal Charges

Date: Jan 21, 1984
LaTourelle v. State of Minnesota: Clarifying Insanity Defense Standards and Consolidation of Criminal Charges Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Charles LaTourelle, decided on...
Limits on Durational Departures in Sentencing: State v. Mar

Limits on Durational Departures in Sentencing: State v. Mar

Date: Jan 21, 1984
Limits on Durational Departures in Sentencing: State v. Mar Introduction State of Minnesota v. Marvin William Wall (343 N.W.2d 22) is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on...
Drive-Thru Services Affirmed as Permitted Uses in C-2 Commercial Zones: Chanhassen Estates Ruling

Drive-Thru Services Affirmed as Permitted Uses in C-2 Commercial Zones: Chanhassen Estates Ruling

Date: Jan 14, 1984
Drive-Thru Services Affirmed as Permitted Uses in C-2 Commercial Zones: Chanhassen Estates Ruling Introduction The case of Chanhassen Estates Residents Association v. McDonald's Corporation (Supreme...
Felony-Murder Sentencing: Insights from STATE v. Back and Croft

Felony-Murder Sentencing: Insights from STATE v. Back and Croft

Date: Dec 10, 1983
Felony-Murder Sentencing: Insights from STATE of Minnesota v. Ronald William Back and James Croft Introduction The case STATE of Minnesota v. Ronald William Back and James Croft (CX-83-554,...
Voidness of Policy Exhaustion Clauses in Underinsured Motorist Claims: Minnesota Supreme Court's Ruling in Schmidt v. Ke

Voidness of Policy Exhaustion Clauses in Underinsured Motorist Claims: Minnesota Supreme Court's Ruling in Schmidt v. Ke

Date: Nov 17, 1983
Voidness of Policy Exhaustion Clauses in Underinsured Motorist Claims: Minnesota Supreme Court's Ruling in Schmidt v. Ke Introduction The landmark case of H. Rosemarie Schmidt v. Kevin J. Clothier,...
Ensuring the Integrity of Guilty Pleas and Understanding Mandatory Minimum Sentences: An Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Larry Trott

Ensuring the Integrity of Guilty Pleas and Understanding Mandatory Minimum Sentences: An Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Larry Trott

Date: Sep 17, 1983
Ensuring the Integrity of Guilty Pleas and Understanding Mandatory Minimum Sentences: An Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Larry Trott 1. Introduction State of Minnesota v. Larry Trott is a pivotal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert