Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Affirmation of McDonnell Douglas Framework in Mixed-Motive Discrimination Cases Under Minnesota Human Rights Act

Affirmation of McDonnell Douglas Framework in Mixed-Motive Discrimination Cases Under Minnesota Human Rights Act

Date: Jan 9, 1988
Affirmation of McDonnell Douglas Framework in Mixed-Motive Discrimination Cases Under Minnesota Human Rights Act Introduction The case of LaVonne ANDERSON v. HUNTER, KEITH, MARSHALL CO., Inc. (417...
Equitable Distribution of Business Interests in Marital Dissolution: NARDINI v. NARDINI

Equitable Distribution of Business Interests in Marital Dissolution: NARDINI v. NARDINI

Date: Oct 24, 1987
Equitable Distribution of Business Interests in Marital Dissolution: NARDINI v. NARDINI Introduction In re the Marriage of Marguerite I. NARDINI, petitioner, Appellant, v. Ralph E. NARDINI,...
Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts (Spreigl) Evidence in First-Degree Murder Cases: Minnesota Supreme Court's Rainer Decision

Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts (Spreigl) Evidence in First-Degree Murder Cases: Minnesota Supreme Court's Rainer Decision

Date: Aug 22, 1987
Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts (Spreigl) Evidence in First-Degree Murder Cases: Minnesota Supreme Court's Rainer Decision Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Minnesota v. Joseph Leander...
Jurisdiction to Modify Pre-1973 Child Support Orders: In re the Marriage of Gail D. Katz v. A. Larry Katz

Jurisdiction to Modify Pre-1973 Child Support Orders: In re the Marriage of Gail D. Katz v. A. Larry Katz

Date: Jul 3, 1987
Jurisdiction to Modify Pre-1973 Child Support Orders: In re the Marriage of Gail D. Katz v. A. Larry Katz Introduction In re the Marriage of Gail D. Katz, Respondent, v. A. Larry Katz, Petitioner,...
Wrongful Discharge and Defamation: Analysis of PHIPPS v. CLARK OIL REFINING CORPoration

Wrongful Discharge and Defamation: Analysis of PHIPPS v. CLARK OIL REFINING CORPoration

Date: Jun 27, 1987
Wrongful Discharge and Defamation: Analysis of PHIPPS v. CLARK OIL REFINING CORPoration Introduction The case of Mark A. PHIPPS v. CLARK OIL REFINING CORPoration addressed critical issues surrounding...
Clarifying Plaintiffs’ Burden in Design Defect Product Liability: Insights from KALLIO v. FORD MOTOR COmpany

Clarifying Plaintiffs’ Burden in Design Defect Product Liability: Insights from KALLIO v. FORD MOTOR COmpany

Date: Jun 6, 1987
Clarifying Plaintiffs’ Burden in Design Defect Product Liability: Insights from KALLIO v. FORD MOTOR COmpany Introduction KALLIO v. FORD MOTOR COmpany, 407 N.W.2d 92 (Minn. 1987), is a pivotal case...
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Punitive Damages: Fundamental Error in Jury Instructions

Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Punitive Damages: Fundamental Error in Jury Instructions

Date: Mar 7, 1987
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Punitive Damages: Fundamental Error in Jury Instructions Introduction In the landmark case of William BECKER v. ALLOY HARDFACING ENGINEERING Company, the...
Discharge of a Resigned Partner from Partnership Debts Through Implied Agreement: Grant GJOVIK v. Lawrence STROPE

Discharge of a Resigned Partner from Partnership Debts Through Implied Agreement: Grant GJOVIK v. Lawrence STROPE

Date: Mar 7, 1987
Discharge of a Resigned Partner from Partnership Debts Through Implied Agreement: Grant GJOVIK v. Lawrence STROPE Introduction The case of Grant Gjovik v. Lawrence Strope adjudicated by the Supreme...
Honeywell v. Balder: Reinforcing Judicial Standards on Duty to Warn in Negligence Cases

Honeywell v. Balder: Reinforcing Judicial Standards on Duty to Warn in Negligence Cases

Date: Jan 10, 1987
Honeywell v. Balder: Reinforcing Judicial Standards on Duty to Warn in Negligence Cases Introduction The case of Michael Balder and Zita Balder v. Thomas W. Haley et al., adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reinforcing Strickland Standards: Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in GATES v. STATE

Reinforcing Strickland Standards: Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in GATES v. STATE

Date: Jan 10, 1987
Reinforcing Strickland Standards: Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in GATES v. STATE 1. Introduction The case of Coley (NMN) GATES v. STATE of Minnesota, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
STATE v. KIM: Upholding the Exclusion of Statistical Population Frequency Evidence in Criminal Prosecutions

STATE v. KIM: Upholding the Exclusion of Statistical Population Frequency Evidence in Criminal Prosecutions

Date: Jan 3, 1987
STATE v. KIM: Upholding the Exclusion of Statistical Population Frequency Evidence in Criminal Prosecutions Introduction State of Minnesota v. Joon Kyu Kim, 398 N.W.2d 544 (Minn. 1987), is a pivotal...
Duty to Warn in Detachable Safety Devices: Insights from Germann v. F.L. Smithe Machine Co.

Duty to Warn in Detachable Safety Devices: Insights from Germann v. F.L. Smithe Machine Co.

Date: Nov 15, 1986
Duty to Warn in Detachable Safety Devices: Insights from Germann v. F.L. Smithe Machine Co. Introduction Germann v. F.L. Smithe Machine Co., 395 N.W.2d 922 (Minn. 1986) is a landmark case decided by...
ALHOLM v. WILT: Reinforcing Procedural Integrity in Jury Selection and Innkeeper Liability Standards

ALHOLM v. WILT: Reinforcing Procedural Integrity in Jury Selection and Innkeeper Liability Standards

Date: Oct 11, 1986
ALHOLM v. WILT: Reinforcing Procedural Integrity in Jury Selection and Innkeeper Liability Standards Introduction The case of Terrance Alholm v. Richard Wilt, d.b.a. Lakeside Bar (394 N.W.2d 488)...
State v. Jones: Affirming Due Process in Plea Negotiations and Spreigl Evidence Admissibility

State v. Jones: Affirming Due Process in Plea Negotiations and Spreigl Evidence Admissibility

Date: Aug 16, 1986
State v. Jones: Affirming Due Process in Plea Negotiations and Spreigl Evidence Admissibility Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Lemoyne Peter Jones (392 N.W.2d 224, 1986) presents...
Enhancing Accountability in Corporate Stock Sales: Specialized Tours, Inc. v. Ronald D. Hagen

Enhancing Accountability in Corporate Stock Sales: Specialized Tours, Inc. v. Ronald D. Hagen

Date: Aug 9, 1986
Enhancing Accountability in Corporate Stock Sales: Specialized Tours, Inc. v. Ronald D. Hagen Introduction Specialized Tours, Inc., Respondent, v. Ronald D. Hagen, Appellant, adjudicated by the...
Best Interests of the Child Standard Affirmed in Termination of Parental Rights Case

Best Interests of the Child Standard Affirmed in Termination of Parental Rights Case

Date: Jul 12, 1986
Best Interests of the Child Standard Affirmed in Termination of Parental Rights Case Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Welfare of J.J.B., a Minor Child (390 N.W.2d 274) adjudicated by the...
Enforceability of Employee Handbooks and Compelled Self-Publication in Defamation: Insights from Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Enforceability of Employee Handbooks and Compelled Self-Publication in Defamation: Insights from Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Date: Jul 4, 1986
Enforceability of Employee Handbooks and Compelled Self-Publication in Defamation: Insights from Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society Introduction In the landmark case of Carole Lewis, et al. v....
Reaffirming the Felony-Murder Rule and Aggressor's Duty to Withdraw: Insights from Bellcourt v. State of Minnesota

Reaffirming the Felony-Murder Rule and Aggressor's Duty to Withdraw: Insights from Bellcourt v. State of Minnesota

Date: Jun 28, 1986
Reaffirming the Felony-Murder Rule and Aggressor's Duty to Withdraw: Insights from Bellcourt v. State of Minnesota Introduction Bellcourt v. State of Minnesota is a landmark case decided by the...
Explicit Application of McDonnell Douglas Analysis in Employment Discrimination Under Minnesota Human Rights Act: The SIGURDSON v. ISANTI COUNTY Decision

Explicit Application of McDonnell Douglas Analysis in Employment Discrimination Under Minnesota Human Rights Act: The SIGURDSON v. ISANTI COUNTY Decision

Date: May 10, 1986
Explicit Application of McDonnell Douglas Analysis in Employment Discrimination Under Minnesota Human Rights Act: The SIGURDSON v. ISANTI COUNTY Decision Introduction Renja SIGURDSON v. ISANTI...
FLORENZANO v. OLSON: Establishing the Applicability of Comparative Negligence to Negligent Misrepresentation

FLORENZANO v. OLSON: Establishing the Applicability of Comparative Negligence to Negligent Misrepresentation

Date: May 10, 1986
FLORENZANO v. OLSON: Establishing the Applicability of Comparative Negligence to Negligent Misrepresentation Introduction FLORENZANO v. OLSON, 387 N.W.2d 168, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert