Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Reaffirmation of Frye Standard for Admissibility of DNA Evidence in Minnesota Courts

Reaffirmation of Frye Standard for Admissibility of DNA Evidence in Minnesota Courts

Date: Dec 12, 1989
Reaffirmation of Frye Standard for Admissibility of DNA Evidence in Minnesota Courts Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Thomas Robert Schwartz, reported at 447 N.W.2d 422 (Minn. 1989),...
Defining 'Misconduct' in Unemployment Compensation: Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital

Defining 'Misconduct' in Unemployment Compensation: Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital

Date: Dec 9, 1989
Defining 'Misconduct' in Unemployment Compensation: Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital Introduction The case of Randy W. Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc. (448 N.W.2d 519) was adjudicated...
Constitutionality of Area-Limited Homestead Exemptions under Minn. Const. Art. 1, § 12

Constitutionality of Area-Limited Homestead Exemptions under Minn. Const. Art. 1, § 12

Date: Dec 2, 1989
Constitutionality of Area-Limited Homestead Exemptions under Minn. Const. Art. 1, § 12 Introduction In the landmark case In re Mark Eugene Haggerty and Linda Jean Haggerty, Debtors (448 N.W.2d 363),...
Expansion of Arbitral Immunity in Minnesota: Insights from L H Airco v. Rapistan Corp.

Expansion of Arbitral Immunity in Minnesota: Insights from L H Airco v. Rapistan Corp.

Date: Nov 30, 1989
Expansion of Arbitral Immunity in Minnesota: Insights from L H Airco, Inc. v. Rapistan Corp. Introduction The Supreme Court of Minnesota delivered a landmark decision in the case of L H Airco, Inc....
Strict Interpretation of 'Counterfeited' and Enforcement of Physical Possession in Bankers Blanket Bond Claims: National City Bank v. St. Paul Fire Marine Insurance Co.

Strict Interpretation of 'Counterfeited' and Enforcement of Physical Possession in Bankers Blanket Bond Claims: National City Bank v. St. Paul Fire Marine Insurance Co.

Date: Nov 4, 1989
Strict Interpretation of 'Counterfeited' and Enforcement of Physical Possession in Bankers Blanket Bond Claims: National City Bank v. St. Paul Fire Marine Insurance Co. Introduction The case of...
Erickson v. Curtis: Establishing Duty of Care for Commercial Parking Ramp Operators

Erickson v. Curtis: Establishing Duty of Care for Commercial Parking Ramp Operators

Date: Oct 28, 1989
Erickson v. Curtis: Establishing Duty of Care for Commercial Parking Ramp Operators Introduction In Erickson v. Curtis Investment Company, the Supreme Court of Minnesota addressed a pivotal issue...
Reaffirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops: STATE v. JOHNSON

Reaffirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops: STATE v. JOHNSON

Date: Sep 2, 1989
Reaffirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops: STATE v. JOHNSON Introduction State of Minnesota v. Mark Craig Johnson (444 N.W.2d 824) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Protection of Patient Rights in Neuroleptic Medication Administration: Commentary on In re the Matter of Everett Schmidt

Protection of Patient Rights in Neuroleptic Medication Administration: Commentary on In re the Matter of Everett Schmidt

Date: Sep 1, 1989
Protection of Patient Rights in Neuroleptic Medication Administration: Commentary on In re the Matter of Everett Schmidt Introduction In re the Matter of Everett Schmidt (443 N.W.2d 824), adjudicated...
Affirmation of Clear Policy Exclusions in Employee Health Plans: Hubred v. Control Data Corporation

Affirmation of Clear Policy Exclusions in Employee Health Plans: Hubred v. Control Data Corporation

Date: Jul 15, 1989
Affirmation of Clear Policy Exclusions in Employee Health Plans: Hubred v. Control Data Corporation Introduction In the landmark case of Chester Hubred, et al. v. Control Data Corporation, the...
Exception to Municipal Discretionary Immunity in Building Permit Issuance: Snyder v. City of Minneapolis

Exception to Municipal Discretionary Immunity in Building Permit Issuance: Snyder v. City of Minneapolis

Date: Jul 14, 1989
Exception to Municipal Discretionary Immunity in Building Permit Issuance: Snyder v. City of Minneapolis Introduction Snyder v. City of Minneapolis, 441 N.W.2d 781 (Minn. 1989), is a landmark case in...
Reaffirming the Harmless Error Doctrine in Accomplice Corroboration: STATE of Minnesota v. Shoop

Reaffirming the Harmless Error Doctrine in Accomplice Corroboration: STATE of Minnesota v. Shoop

Date: Jul 7, 1989
Reaffirming the Harmless Error Doctrine in Accomplice Corroboration: STATE of Minnesota v. Shoop Introduction In STATE of Minnesota v. David Paul Shoop (441 N.W.2d 475, 1989), the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in STATE v. HENNUM

Admissibility of Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in STATE v. HENNUM

Date: Jun 17, 1989
Admissibility of Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in STATE v. HENNUM Introduction State of Minnesota v. JoAnn Hennum, 441 N.W.2d 793 (Minn. 1989), marks a...
Open Fields Doctrine Affirmed: STATE v. SORENSON Upholds Warrantless Entry for Law Enforcement

Open Fields Doctrine Affirmed: STATE v. SORENSON Upholds Warrantless Entry for Law Enforcement

Date: Jun 3, 1989
Open Fields Doctrine Affirmed: STATE v. SORENSON Upholds Warrantless Entry for Law Enforcement Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Cal S. Sorenson (441 N.W.2d 455) revolves around the...
State v. Webb: Reinforcing the Necessity for Circumstantial Evidence to Exclude Rational Alternate Hypotheses

State v. Webb: Reinforcing the Necessity for Circumstantial Evidence to Exclude Rational Alternate Hypotheses

Date: May 27, 1989
State v. Webb: Reinforcing the Necessity for Circumstantial Evidence to Exclude Rational Alternate Hypotheses Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Robert Gene Webb, decided by the Supreme...
Lyon Marriage Dissolution: Reversal of Spousal Maintenance Award

Lyon Marriage Dissolution: Reversal of Spousal Maintenance Award

Date: May 6, 1989
Lyon Marriage Dissolution: Reversal of Spousal Maintenance Award Introduction In re the Marriage of George J. Lyon et al. (439 N.W.2d 18) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Murder Conviction in STATE of Minnesota v. Ke: Legal Principles and Implications

Affirmation of Murder Conviction in STATE of Minnesota v. Ke: Legal Principles and Implications

Date: Apr 1, 1989
Affirmation of Murder Conviction in STATE of Minnesota v. Ke: Legal Principles and Implications Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Minnesota v. Ke (438 N.W.2d 101, 1989), the Supreme Court...
Proper Interpretation of Agency Rules for Hospital-Attached Nursing Homes Under Minn.R. 9549.0020

Proper Interpretation of Agency Rules for Hospital-Attached Nursing Homes Under Minn.R. 9549.0020

Date: Mar 11, 1989
Proper Interpretation of Agency Rules for Hospital-Attached Nursing Homes Under Minn.R. 9549.0020 Introduction The Supreme Court of Minnesota's decision in In the Matter of the Contested Cases of St....
State v. Kelly: Reinforcing Trial Court Discretion and Impeachment Use of Pre-Miranda Statements

State v. Kelly: Reinforcing Trial Court Discretion and Impeachment Use of Pre-Miranda Statements

Date: Feb 18, 1989
Disclaimer: This commentary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for legal matters. State v. Kelly: Reinforcing Trial Court Discretion...
STATE v. FRIBERG: Minnesota Supreme Court Defines 'Speedy Trial' and Validates Geographical Probation Restrictions

STATE v. FRIBERG: Minnesota Supreme Court Defines 'Speedy Trial' and Validates Geographical Probation Restrictions

Date: Feb 1, 1989
STATE v. FRIBERG: Minnesota Supreme Court Defines 'Speedy Trial' and Validates Geographical Probation Restrictions Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Mary Friberg, Bernard Boyle, Jr.,...
KIM v. STATE: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas

KIM v. STATE: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas

Date: Jan 31, 1989
KIM v. STATE: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas Introduction KIM v. STATE (434 N.W.2d 263, Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1989) addresses the intricate dynamics of withdrawing...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert