Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Application of Statutory Discharge Criteria in Psychopathic Personality Commitments

Application of Statutory Discharge Criteria in Psychopathic Personality Commitments

Date: Aug 5, 1995
Application of Statutory Discharge Criteria in Psychopathic Personality Commitments Introduction The case of Gordon B. Call v. Maria Gomez, Commissioner of Human Services addresses the critical issue...
James Ir v. Dale: Affirmation of Conviction Due to Insufficiently Material Newly Discovered Evidence and Sufficient Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct

James Ir v. Dale: Affirmation of Conviction Due to Insufficiently Material Newly Discovered Evidence and Sufficient Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct

Date: Aug 5, 1995
James Ir v. Dale: Affirmation of Conviction Due to Insufficiently Material Newly Discovered Evidence and Sufficient Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct Introduction The case of James Irving Dale v....
Establishing Grandparent Visitation Rights: Olson v. Olson-Farr (534 N.W.2d 547)

Establishing Grandparent Visitation Rights: Olson v. Olson-Farr (534 N.W.2d 547)

Date: Jul 22, 1995
Establishing Grandparent Visitation Rights: Olson v. Olson-Farr (534 N.W.2d 547) Introduction The case of Sherry A. Olson, n/k/a Sherry A. Olson-Kelm v. Scott M. Olson and Ann G. Farr, decided by the...
Affirming Voluntary Confessions: Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. Williams Establishes Clarity on the Right to Remain Silent

Affirming Voluntary Confessions: Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. Williams Establishes Clarity on the Right to Remain Silent

Date: Jul 15, 1995
Affirming Voluntary Confessions: Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. Williams Establishes Clarity on the Right to Remain Silent Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Jason Ryan Williams, 535 N.W.2d...
Governmental Immunity and Detrimental Reliance: Insights from Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. Paul

Governmental Immunity and Detrimental Reliance: Insights from Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. Paul

Date: Jul 8, 1995
Governmental Immunity and Detrimental Reliance: Insights from Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. Paul Introduction The case Nicollet Restoration, Inc., v. The City of St. Paul, adjudicated by...
Defining Seizure and Individualized Suspicion: Insights from State v. Cripps

Defining Seizure and Individualized Suspicion: Insights from State v. Cripps

Date: Jul 7, 1995
Defining Seizure and Individualized Suspicion: Insights from State v. Cripps Introduction State of Minnesota v. Heidi Anna Cripps is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on...
Interpretation of Franchise Fees under the Minnesota Franchise Act: CURRENT TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc.

Interpretation of Franchise Fees under the Minnesota Franchise Act: CURRENT TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc.

Date: Apr 29, 1995
Interpretation of Franchise Fees under the Minnesota Franchise Act Supreme Court of Minnesota Decision in CURRENT TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc. Introduction The case of CURRENT...
Anonymous Jury Usage in Criminal Trials: Insights from State v. Bowles

Anonymous Jury Usage in Criminal Trials: Insights from State v. Bowles

Date: Apr 22, 1995
Anonymous Jury Usage in Criminal Trials: Insights from State v. Bowles Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Shannon Noah Bowles (530 N.W.2d 521) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
State v. Bolte: Supreme Court of Minnesota Defines Scope of Other-Crime Evidence Admissibility

State v. Bolte: Supreme Court of Minnesota Defines Scope of Other-Crime Evidence Admissibility

Date: Apr 15, 1995
State v. Bolte: Supreme Court of Minnesota Defines Scope of Other-Crime Evidence Admissibility Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Stanley Scott Bolte, 530 N.W.2d 191 (Supreme Court of Minnesota,...
Assault Exception under Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act: McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church

Assault Exception under Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act: McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church

Date: Feb 18, 1995
Assault Exception under Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act: McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church Introduction The case of Diane McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran Church (527 N.W.2d 830) presents a...
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Consecutive Sentencing in Vehicular Homicide – STATE v. CHAKLOS

Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Consecutive Sentencing in Vehicular Homicide – STATE v. CHAKLOS

Date: Feb 11, 1995
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Consecutive Sentencing in Vehicular Homicide – STATE v. CHAKLOS Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Mark Richard Chaklos (528 N.W.2d 225) represents a...
Guarding Against Fair Trial Violations: The Impact of Inadmissible Evidence and Jury Selection in STATE v. WILLIAMS

Guarding Against Fair Trial Violations: The Impact of Inadmissible Evidence and Jury Selection in STATE v. WILLIAMS

Date: Feb 11, 1995
Guarding Against Fair Trial Violations: The Impact of Inadmissible Evidence and Jury Selection in STATE v. WILLIAMS Introduction STATE of Minnesota v. Paula Michele Williams, 525 N.W.2d 538 (1995),...
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Actual Exposure Requirement for Emotional Distress Claims Relating to HIV Transmission

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Actual Exposure Requirement for Emotional Distress Claims Relating to HIV Transmission

Date: Feb 11, 1995
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Actual Exposure Requirement for Emotional Distress Claims Relating to HIV Transmission Introduction In the landmark case of K.A.C., et al. v. Dr. Philip D. Benson,...
Reaffirming the At-Will Employment Doctrine: Ke v. Ruud, 526 N.W.2d 369 (Minn. 1995)

Reaffirming the At-Will Employment Doctrine: Ke v. Ruud, 526 N.W.2d 369 (Minn. 1995)

Date: Jan 21, 1995
Reaffirming the At-Will Employment Doctrine Ke v. Ruud, 526 N.W.2d 369 (Minn. 1995) Introduction The Supreme Court of Minnesota's decision in Ke v. Ruud, 526 N.W.2d 369 (Minn. 1995), addresses...
Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments and the Right to a Fair Trial: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in State v. Porter

Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments and the Right to a Fair Trial: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in State v. Porter

Date: Jan 14, 1995
Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments and the Right to a Fair Trial: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in State v. Porter Introduction Background: In State of Minnesota v. James...
Validation of Alford-Type Pleas Without Express Admission of Intent: State v. Ecker

Validation of Alford-Type Pleas Without Express Admission of Intent: State v. Ecker

Date: Dec 10, 1994
Validation of Alford-Type Pleas Without Express Admission of Intent: State v. Ecker Introduction State of Minnesota v. Joseph Arne Ecker, 524 N.W.2d 712 (Minn. 1994), represents a significant...
Enforceability of Waivers in Modifying Spousal Maintenance: The Loo v. Loo Decision

Enforceability of Waivers in Modifying Spousal Maintenance: The Loo v. Loo Decision

Date: Sep 1, 1994
Enforceability of Waivers in Modifying Spousal Maintenance: The Loo v. Loo Decision Introduction The case In re the Marriage of Thomas Gilbert Loo, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Dorothy Ione Loo,...
Race-Neutral Justifications in Batson Challenges: Insights from State v. Ian Garfield James

Race-Neutral Justifications in Batson Challenges: Insights from State v. Ian Garfield James

Date: Aug 27, 1994
Race-Neutral Justifications in Batson Challenges: Insights from State v. Ian Garfield James Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Ian Garfield James, 520 N.W.2d 399 (Minn. 1994), serves as a...
Ensuring Fair Trial Rights: Limiting Use of Witness Protection and Character Evidence in Criminal Prosecutions

Ensuring Fair Trial Rights: Limiting Use of Witness Protection and Character Evidence in Criminal Prosecutions

Date: Aug 27, 1994
Ensuring Fair Trial Rights: Limiting Use of Witness Protection and Character Evidence in Criminal Prosecutions Introduction State of Minnesota v. Mark Orlando Harris, 521 N.W.2d 348 (Minn. 1994), is...
Balancing Prosecutorial Misconduct and Confrontation Rights: Insights from State v. Washington

Balancing Prosecutorial Misconduct and Confrontation Rights: Insights from State v. Washington

Date: Aug 27, 1994
Balancing Prosecutorial Misconduct and Confrontation Rights: Insights from State v. Washington Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. David Wayne Washington, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert