Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Voluntary Plea Acceptance and Judicial Sentencing Discretion: The Ruling in Perkins v. Minnesota

Voluntary Plea Acceptance and Judicial Sentencing Discretion: The Ruling in Perkins v. Minnesota

Date: Jan 31, 1997
Voluntary Plea Acceptance and Judicial Sentencing Discretion: The Ruling in Perkins v. Minnesota Introduction Perkins v. Minnesota is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of Minnesota...
Ensuring Objectivity and Voluntariness in Traffic Stops and Searches: Insights from State v. George

Ensuring Objectivity and Voluntariness in Traffic Stops and Searches: Insights from State v. George

Date: Jan 17, 1997
Ensuring Objectivity and Voluntariness in Traffic Stops and Searches: Insights from State v. George 1. Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Thomas Otto George, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Broad Immunity for Uncompensated Nonprofit Directors Under Minn. Stat. § 317A.257: Rehn v. Fischley

Broad Immunity for Uncompensated Nonprofit Directors Under Minn. Stat. § 317A.257: Rehn v. Fischley

Date: Jan 3, 1997
Broad Immunity for Uncompensated Nonprofit Directors Under Minn. Stat. § 317A.257: Rehn v. Fischley Introduction In the landmark case of Garry M. Rehn v. Barbara Fischley, decided by the Supreme...
Rairdon v. State: Reinforcement of Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Evidence Exclusion

Rairdon v. State: Reinforcement of Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Evidence Exclusion

Date: Dec 13, 1996
Rairdon v. State: Reinforcement of Standards for Prosecutorial Misconduct and Evidence Exclusion Introduction In the landmark case of John Albert Rairdon v. State of Minnesota, decided by the Supreme...
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Sexually Dangerous Persons Act: Reaffirming Civil Commitment Standards

Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Sexually Dangerous Persons Act: Reaffirming Civil Commitment Standards

Date: Dec 13, 1996
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Sexually Dangerous Persons Act: Reaffirming Civil Commitment Standards Introduction The Minnesota Supreme Court deliberated on the constitutionality of the Sexually...
Admittance of Co-Defendant Statements and Harmless Error in Jury Identification: Minnesota v. Marlow De Jones

Admittance of Co-Defendant Statements and Harmless Error in Jury Identification: Minnesota v. Marlow De Jones

Date: Nov 1, 1996
Admittance of Co-Defendant Statements and Harmless Error in Jury Identification: Minnesota v. Marlow De Jones Introduction Minnesota v. Marlow De Jones is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Statutory and Official Immunity in Negligence Claims Against Public Transit Authorities: Watson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission

Statutory and Official Immunity in Negligence Claims Against Public Transit Authorities: Watson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission

Date: Oct 11, 1996
Statutory and Official Immunity in Negligence Claims Against Public Transit Authorities: Watson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission Introduction Watson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission is a pivotal...
Establishing Parental Abandonment in Terminating Parental Rights: In re Welfare of L.A.F.

Establishing Parental Abandonment in Terminating Parental Rights: In re Welfare of L.A.F.

Date: Oct 4, 1996
Establishing Parental Abandonment in Terminating Parental Rights: In re Welfare of L.A.F. Introduction In the Matter of the Welfare of L.A.F., 554 N.W.2d 393 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1996) is a...
Immunity in Supervised Release Liability: Analysis of Da v. Johnson (1996)

Immunity in Supervised Release Liability: Analysis of Da v. Johnson (1996)

Date: Aug 30, 1996
Immunity in Supervised Release Liability: Analysis of Da v. Johnson (1996) Introduction The case of Da v. d and Gayle Johnson, decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on August 29, 1996, addresses...
Strict Timeframes for Probable Cause Determinations Under Minnesota Human Rights Act: Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.

Strict Timeframes for Probable Cause Determinations Under Minnesota Human Rights Act: Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.

Date: Aug 30, 1996
Strict Timeframes for Probable Cause Determinations Under Minnesota Human Rights Act: Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc. Introduction The case State of Minnesota, by Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc., decided by the Supreme...
Expanded Standing for Health Organizations in Antitrust and Consumer Protection Claims: Analysis of STATE of Minnesota v. Philip Morris et al.

Expanded Standing for Health Organizations in Antitrust and Consumer Protection Claims: Analysis of STATE of Minnesota v. Philip Morris et al.

Date: Jul 26, 1996
Expanded Standing for Health Organizations in Antitrust and Consumer Protection Claims: Analysis of STATE of Minnesota v. Philip Morris et al. Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Minnesota,...
Defining Defendant Standing and Rights in Self-Representation: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. RICHARDS

Defining Defendant Standing and Rights in Self-Representation: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. RICHARDS

Date: Jul 19, 1996
Defining Defendant Standing and Rights in Self-Representation: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. RICHARDS Introduction STATE of Minnesota v. Leonard Joseph Richards is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Admissibility of Prior Bad Act Evidence and Sentencing Guidelines in State v. Spaeth

Admissibility of Prior Bad Act Evidence and Sentencing Guidelines in State v. Spaeth

Date: Jul 12, 1996
Admissibility of Prior Bad Act Evidence and Sentencing Guidelines in State of Minnesota v. Spaeth Introduction State of Minnesota v. David Arthur Spaeth is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of the Common Enterprise Exception under Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act: O'Malley v. Ulland Brothers

Affirmation of the Common Enterprise Exception under Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act: O'Malley v. Ulland Brothers

Date: Jul 9, 1996
Affirmation of the Common Enterprise Exception under Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act: O'Malley v. Ulland Brothers Introduction In the landmark case of Michael C. O'Malley v. Ulland Brothers, et...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion Through Knowledge of Revoked License: STATE v. PIKE

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion Through Knowledge of Revoked License: STATE v. PIKE

Date: Jul 4, 1996
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion Through Knowledge of Revoked License: STATE v. PIKE Introduction State of Minnesota v. John Keith Pike (551 N.W.2d 919, 1996) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Termination of Parental Rights Based on Palpable Unfitness: In the Matter of the Welfare of S.Z.

Termination of Parental Rights Based on Palpable Unfitness: In the Matter of the Welfare of S.Z.

Date: May 24, 1996
Termination of Parental Rights Based on Palpable Unfitness: In the Matter of the Welfare of S.Z. Introduction The case In the Matter of the Welfare of S.Z. (547 N.W.2d 886) adjudicated by the Supreme...
STATE v. ROBY: Upholding the Waiver Doctrine in Postconviction Relief

STATE v. ROBY: Upholding the Waiver Doctrine in Postconviction Relief

Date: Apr 27, 1996
STATE v. ROBY: Upholding the Waiver Doctrine in Postconviction Relief Introduction State v. Gary L. Roby, 547 N.W.2d 354 (Minn. 1996), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Minnesota that...
Expansion of 'Terroristic Threats' to Include Physical Acts: Commentary on State of Minnesota v. John Patrick Murphy

Expansion of 'Terroristic Threats' to Include Physical Acts: Commentary on State of Minnesota v. John Patrick Murphy

Date: Apr 13, 1996
Expansion of 'Terroristic Threats' to Include Physical Acts: Commentary on State of Minnesota v. John Patrick Murphy Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. John Patrick Murphy, decided by the...
LOLLING v. MIDWEST PATROL: Expanding Jurisdiction on Late Employer Protests in Reemployment Insurance Claims

LOLLING v. MIDWEST PATROL: Expanding Jurisdiction on Late Employer Protests in Reemployment Insurance Claims

Date: Mar 23, 1996
LOLLING v. MIDWEST PATROL: Expanding Jurisdiction on Late Employer Protests in Reemployment Insurance Claims Introduction LOLLING v. MIDWEST PATROL, Commissioner of Economic Security is a landmark...
Adequacy of Legal Remedies Precludes Equitable Claims: ServiceMaster v. Sentry Insurance

Adequacy of Legal Remedies Precludes Equitable Claims: ServiceMaster v. Sentry Insurance

Date: Mar 9, 1996
Adequacy of Legal Remedies Precludes Equitable Claims: ServiceMaster v. Sentry Insurance Introduction The case of ServiceMaster of St. Cloud, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance, a Mutual Company (544 N.W.2d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert