Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Trial Court's Custody Decision in Vangsness Case: Deference to Best Interests Standard

Affirmation of Trial Court's Custody Decision in Vangsness Case: Deference to Best Interests Standard

Date: Mar 18, 2000
Affirmation of Trial Court's Custody Decision in Vangsness Case: Deference to Best Interests Standard Introduction The case of In re the Marriage of Mamie Marie Vangsness vs. Michael Alan Vangsness,...
State of Minnesota v. Williams: Reinforcing Requirements for Separate Justifications in Sentencing Departures and Single Behavioral Incident Analysis

State of Minnesota v. Williams: Reinforcing Requirements for Separate Justifications in Sentencing Departures and Single Behavioral Incident Analysis

Date: Mar 3, 2000
State of Minnesota v. Williams: Reinforcing Requirements for Separate Justifications in Sentencing Departures and Single Behavioral Incident Analysis Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Hakim Jamal...
Reaffirming the Validity of Guilty Pleas Amid Mandatory Conditional Release: State v. Brown

Reaffirming the Validity of Guilty Pleas Amid Mandatory Conditional Release: State v. Brown

Date: Feb 25, 2000
Reaffirming the Validity of Guilty Pleas Amid Mandatory Conditional Release: State v. Brown Introduction State of Minnesota v. Paul Henry Brown, 606 N.W.2d 670 (Minn. 2000), addresses critical issues...
State v. Robinson: Clarifying the Admissibility of Spreigl Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct in Criminal Trials

State v. Robinson: Clarifying the Admissibility of Spreigl Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct in Criminal Trials

Date: Jan 14, 2000
State v. Robinson: Clarifying the Admissibility of Spreigl Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct in Criminal Trials Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Dameion Robinson, 604...
Broken Window Alone Insufficient for Terry Stop: Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Reasonable Suspicion

Broken Window Alone Insufficient for Terry Stop: Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Reasonable Suspicion

Date: Jan 14, 2000
Broken Window Alone Insufficient for Terry Stop: Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Reasonable Suspicion Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Launair Gerard Britton...
Supreme Court of Minnesota Clarifies Choice-of-Law in No-Fault Insurance: North Dakota Law Prevails in Cross-State Accidents

Supreme Court of Minnesota Clarifies Choice-of-Law in No-Fault Insurance: North Dakota Law Prevails in Cross-State Accidents

Date: Jan 14, 2000
Supreme Court of Minnesota Clarifies Choice-of-Law in No-Fault Insurance: North Dakota Law Prevails in Cross-State Accidents Introduction The landmark case of Nodak Mutual Insurance Company v....
Prescriptive Easement Established Through Continuous Use: Rogers v. Moore

Prescriptive Easement Established Through Continuous Use: Rogers v. Moore

Date: Dec 31, 1999
Prescriptive Easement Established Through Continuous Use: Rogers v. Moore Introduction The case of Rogers v. Moore presents a significant legal discourse on the establishment of a prescriptive...
Preservation of Civil Commitment Appeals Despite Discharge: The McCaskill Ruling

Preservation of Civil Commitment Appeals Despite Discharge: The McCaskill Ruling

Date: Dec 24, 1999
Preservation of Civil Commitment Appeals Despite Discharge: The McCaskill Ruling Introduction The case of Conelious McCaskill addressed a critical question in the realm of mental health law: Does the...
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds 30-Day Waiting Period for DUI Drivers with BAC ≥ .20: Procedural Due Process Not Violated

Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds 30-Day Waiting Period for DUI Drivers with BAC ≥ .20: Procedural Due Process Not Violated

Date: Oct 22, 1999
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds 30-Day Waiting Period for DUI Drivers with BAC ≥ .20: Procedural Due Process Not Violated Introduction In the landmark case of Paul D. HAMILTON v. COMMISSIONER OF...
Material Misrepresentation and Retroactive Child Support: Analysis of In re the Marriage of Benita A. Gully v. Edward R. Gully, Jr.

Material Misrepresentation and Retroactive Child Support: Analysis of In re the Marriage of Benita A. Gully v. Edward R. Gully, Jr.

Date: Sep 3, 1999
Material Misrepresentation and Retroactive Child Support: Analysis of In re the Marriage of Benita A. Gully v. Edward R. Gully, Jr. Introduction The case In re the Marriage of Benita A. Gully v....
Provider Data Exception Clarified in AMARAL v. SAINT CLOUD HOSPital

Provider Data Exception Clarified in AMARAL v. SAINT CLOUD HOSPital

Date: Aug 13, 1999
Provider Data Exception Clarified in AMARAL v. SAINT CLOUD HOSPital Introduction In AMARAL v. SAINT CLOUD HOSPital, decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on August 12, 1999, the court addressed...
Voluntariness of Confessions and Admissibility of Experimental Evidence: Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Kelly Jean Ritt

Voluntariness of Confessions and Admissibility of Experimental Evidence: Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Kelly Jean Ritt

Date: Aug 6, 1999
Voluntariness of Confessions and Admissibility of Experimental Evidence: Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Kelly Jean Ritt Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Kelly Jean Ritt, adjudicated...
Expansion of Respondeat Superior Liability in Minnesota: Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc.

Expansion of Respondeat Superior Liability in Minnesota: Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc.

Date: Aug 6, 1999
Expansion of Respondeat Superior Liability in Minnesota: Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc. Introduction Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Minnesota,...
Restitution for Culturally Specific Healing Practices: STATE v. TENERELLI

Restitution for Culturally Specific Healing Practices: STATE v. TENERELLI

Date: Aug 6, 1999
Restitution for Culturally Specific Healing Practices: STATE v. TENERELLI Introduction State of Minnesota v. Anthony Tenerelli, 598 N.W.2d 668 (1999), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota,...
Admissibility of Illustrative and Expert Evidence in Murder Trials: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Vincent Stephen Bauer

Admissibility of Illustrative and Expert Evidence in Murder Trials: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Vincent Stephen Bauer

Date: Jul 30, 1999
Admissibility of Illustrative and Expert Evidence in Murder Trials: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Vincent Stephen Bauer Introduction State of Minnesota v. Vincent Stephen Bauer, 598 N.W.2d 352...
Insanity Defense Rejection in First-Degree Murder: Analysis of Larry Dewayne Davis v. State of Minnesota

Insanity Defense Rejection in First-Degree Murder: Analysis of Larry Dewayne Davis v. State of Minnesota

Date: Jun 11, 1999
Insanity Defense Rejection in First-Degree Murder: Analysis of Larry Dewayne Davis v. State of Minnesota Introduction The case of Larry Dewayne Davis v. State of Minnesota (595 N.W.2d 520) presents a...
Reaffirmation of Volitional Impairment in Civil Commitment: In re Dennis Darol Linehan v. Minnesota

Reaffirmation of Volitional Impairment in Civil Commitment: In re Dennis Darol Linehan v. Minnesota

Date: May 28, 1999
Reaffirmation of Volitional Impairment in Civil Commitment: In re Dennis Darol Linehan v. Minnesota Introduction In re Dennis Darol Linehan (594 N.W.2d 867) is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Involuntary Intoxication Defense Limitations in State v. Voorhees

Affirmation of Involuntary Intoxication Defense Limitations in State v. Voorhees

Date: May 14, 1999
Affirmation of Involuntary Intoxication Defense Limitations in State of Minnesota v. Brad Alan Voorhees (596 N.W.2d 241) Introduction State of Minnesota v. Brad Alan Voorhees is a pivotal case...
State v. Williams: Clarifying Admissibility Standards for Third-Party Evidence and Affirming Brady Disclosure Requirements

State v. Williams: Clarifying Admissibility Standards for Third-Party Evidence and Affirming Brady Disclosure Requirements

Date: Apr 23, 1999
State v. Williams: Clarifying Admissibility Standards for Third-Party Evidence and Affirming Brady Disclosure Requirements Introduction State of Minnesota v. Edbert Neal Williams, 593 N.W.2d 227...
Expanding Predatory Offender Registration to Related Offenses: Boutin v. LaFleur

Expanding Predatory Offender Registration to Related Offenses: Boutin v. LaFleur

Date: Apr 23, 1999
Expanding Predatory Offender Registration to Related Offenses: Boutin v. LaFleur Introduction Parties Involved: Timothy Boutin (Petitioner/Appellant) versus Gothriel LaFleur, Commissioner of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert