Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Reinforcing Sentencing Proportionality and Guidelines Adherence: Insights from People v. Dixon-Bey

Reinforcing Sentencing Proportionality and Guidelines Adherence: Insights from People v. Dixon-Bey

Date: Sep 27, 2017
Reinforcing Sentencing Proportionality and Guidelines Adherence: Insights from People v. Dixon-Bey Introduction In the landmark case of People of the State of Michigan v. Dawn Marie Dixon-Bey, the...
Clarifying Proximate Cause under the Governmental Tort Liability Act: Ray v. Swager

Clarifying Proximate Cause under the Governmental Tort Liability Act: Ray v. Swager

Date: Aug 1, 2017
Clarifying Proximate Cause under the Governmental Tort Liability Act: Ray v. Swager Introduction The case of Michael A. Ray and Jacqueline M. Ray as Coconser v. Swager presents a pivotal moment in...
People v. Steanhouse: Reaffirming Advisory Sentencing Guidelines and Proportionality in Michigan Law

People v. Steanhouse: Reaffirming Advisory Sentencing Guidelines and Proportionality in Michigan Law

Date: Jul 25, 2017
People v. Steanhouse: Reaffirming Advisory Sentencing Guidelines and Proportionality in Michigan Law Introduction In the landmark case of People of the State of Michigan v. Alexander Jeremy...
Michigan Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standards on Admissibility of Other-Acts Evidence under MRE 404(b)

Michigan Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standards on Admissibility of Other-Acts Evidence under MRE 404(b)

Date: Jul 18, 2017
Michigan Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standards on Admissibility of Other-Acts Evidence under MRE 404(b) Introduction In the case of People of the State of Michigan v. Tmando Allen Denson, 500...
Michigan Supreme Court Recognizes Trial Court Discretion in Holding Franks Hearings

Michigan Supreme Court Recognizes Trial Court Discretion in Holding Franks Hearings

Date: May 13, 2017
Michigan Supreme Court Recognizes Trial Court Discretion in Holding Franks Hearings Introduction In the landmark case of People of the State of Michigan v. Darius Lamarr Franklin, decided on May 12,...
In re Hicks/Brown: ADA Accommodations in Parental Rights Termination

In re Hicks/Brown: ADA Accommodations in Parental Rights Termination

Date: May 9, 2017
In re Hicks/Brown: ADA Accommodations in Parental Rights Termination Introduction The case of In re Hicks/Brown, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan on May 8, 2017, addresses critical...
Clarifying Summary Disposition Standards in Premises Liability: Michigan Supreme Court in Lowrey v. LMPS & LMPJ, Inc.

Clarifying Summary Disposition Standards in Premises Liability: Michigan Supreme Court in Lowrey v. LMPS & LMPJ, Inc.

Date: Dec 14, 2016
Clarifying Summary Disposition Standards in Premises Liability: Michigan Supreme Court in Lowrey v. LMPS & LMPJ, Inc. Introduction The case of Krystal Lowrey v. LMPS & LMPJ, Inc. was adjudicated by...
Adoption of Rule of Reason for Business-to-Business Noncompete Provisions: Innovation Ventures v. Liquid Manufacturing

Adoption of Rule of Reason for Business-to-Business Noncompete Provisions: Innovation Ventures v. Liquid Manufacturing

Date: Jul 15, 2016
Adoption of Rule of Reason for Business-to-Business Noncompete Provisions: Innovation Ventures v. Liquid Manufacturing Introduction Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Liquid Manufacturing, LLC, 499 Mich....
Conspiracy to Commit a Legal Act in an Illegal Manner: Insights from People v. Seewald

Conspiracy to Commit a Legal Act in an Illegal Manner: Insights from People v. Seewald

Date: Apr 26, 2016
Conspiracy to Commit a Legal Act in an Illegal Manner: Insights from People v. Seewald Introduction People v. Seewald is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan in 2016. The case...
Michigan Supreme Court Reverses Full Credit Bid Rule’s Bar on Contract Claims Against Nonborrower Third Parties in Bank of America v. First American Title Insurance Co.

Michigan Supreme Court Reverses Full Credit Bid Rule’s Bar on Contract Claims Against Nonborrower Third Parties in Bank of America v. First American Title Insurance Co.

Date: Apr 14, 2016
Michigan Supreme Court Reverses Full Credit Bid Rule’s Bar on Contract Claims Against Nonborrower Third Parties in Bank of America v. First American Title Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Bank...
Expansion of Payment Exception to Statute of Limitations in No-Fault Insurance Claims

Expansion of Payment Exception to Statute of Limitations in No-Fault Insurance Claims

Date: Mar 22, 2016
Expansion of Payment Exception to Statute of Limitations in No-Fault Insurance Claims Introduction The case of Jesperson v. Auto Club Insurance Association, decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Reliability of Expert Testimony in Medical Malpractice: Elher v. Misra

Reliability of Expert Testimony in Medical Malpractice: Elher v. Misra

Date: Feb 9, 2016
Reliability of Expert Testimony in Medical Malpractice: Elher v. Misra Introduction Elher v. Misra (499 Mich. 11) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on February 8, 2016....
Supreme Court of Michigan Establishes Voidable Nature of Contracts with Unlicensed Builders in EPPS v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLC.

Supreme Court of Michigan Establishes Voidable Nature of Contracts with Unlicensed Builders in EPPS v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLC.

Date: Sep 29, 2015
Supreme Court of Michigan Establishes Voidable Nature of Contracts with Unlicensed Builders in EPPS v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLC. Introduction In the landmark case EPPS v. 4 Quarters Restoration...
Michigan Sentencing Guidelines Rendered Advisory Following People v. Lockridge

Michigan Sentencing Guidelines Rendered Advisory Following People v. Lockridge

Date: Jul 30, 2015
Michigan Sentencing Guidelines Rendered Advisory Following People v. Lockridge Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan, in People v. Lockridge (870 N.W.2d 502, 2015), addressed a critical...
Michigan Sentencing Guidelines Rendered Advisory Following Sixth Amendment Violation: People v. Lockridge

Michigan Sentencing Guidelines Rendered Advisory Following Sixth Amendment Violation: People v. Lockridge

Date: Jul 30, 2015
Michigan Sentencing Guidelines Rendered Advisory Following Sixth Amendment Violation: People v. Lockridge Introduction In People v. Lockridge, the Supreme Court of Michigan addressed a pivotal...
No "Res Gestae" Exception to MRE 404(b) Established in People v. Jackson

No "Res Gestae" Exception to MRE 404(b) Established in People v. Jackson

Date: Jul 29, 2015
No "Res Gestae" Exception to MRE 404(b) Established in People v. Jackson Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Timothy Ward Jackson is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
People v. Stevens: Establishing the Totality of Circumstances Standard for Judicial Partiality in Michigan

People v. Stevens: Establishing the Totality of Circumstances Standard for Judicial Partiality in Michigan

Date: Jul 24, 2015
People v. Stevens: Establishing the Totality of Circumstances Standard for Judicial Partiality in Michigan Introduction People v. Stevens, 498 Mich. 162 (2015), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
People v. Cain: Limits on Appellate Relief for Unpreserved Juror Oath Errors

People v. Cain: Limits on Appellate Relief for Unpreserved Juror Oath Errors

Date: Jul 24, 2015
People v. Cain: Limits on Appellate Relief for Unpreserved Juror Oath Errors Introduction People v. Cain, 498 Mich. 108, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on July 23, 2015, addresses a...
People v. Miller: Establishing Double Jeopardy Protections in Multiple OWI Offenses

People v. Miller: Establishing Double Jeopardy Protections in Multiple OWI Offenses

Date: Jul 21, 2015
People v. Miller: Establishing Double Jeopardy Protections in Multiple OWI Offenses Introduction People of the State of Michigan v. Joseph Miller is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Duty of Defense Counsel to Secure Relevant Expert Testimony in Abusive Head Trauma Cases: People v. Ackley

Establishing Duty of Defense Counsel to Secure Relevant Expert Testimony in Abusive Head Trauma Cases: People v. Ackley

Date: Jun 30, 2015
Establishing Duty of Defense Counsel to Secure Relevant Expert Testimony in Abusive Head Trauma Cases: People v. Ackley Introduction People v. Ackley (497 Mich. 381) is a landmark decision by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert