Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
PEOPLE v. TRAKHTENBERG: Michigan Supreme Court Limits Collateral Estoppel in Ineffective Assistance Claims, Establishing New Standards for Defense Counsel Performance Introduction The People of the...
Voluntary Acquisition of Mortgages and Foreclosure Recordation: Insights from Kim v. JPMorgan Chase Bank Introduction The case of Kim v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (493 Mich. 98) adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Boundaries of Lesser Included Offenses: Insights from People v. Heft Introduction People v. Heft, 299 Mich. App. 69 (Court of Appeals of Michigan, 2012), presents a pivotal analysis...
McCAHAN v. BRENNAN: Affirming Strict Compliance with Statutory Notice Provisions in Claims Against the State Introduction In the landmark case of McCAHAN v. BRENNAN, decided on August 20, 2012, the...
Duty of Appliance Installers in Addressing Third-Party Hazards: Hill v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. Introduction Hill v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 492 Mich. 651 (2012), is a landmark case that clarifies the...
Admissibility of False Confessions: Insights from PEOPLE v. KOWALSKI Introduction PEOPLE v. KOWALSKI (2012) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that delves into the complexities...
Exclusion of Replacement Services in Third-Party Tort Actions: Insights from Johnson v. Recca Introduction Johnson v. Recca, decided on July 30, 2012, by the Supreme Court of Michigan, addresses the...
PEOPLE v. VAUGHN: Reinforcing the Forfeiture Rule for Public Trial Rights under Carines Introduction In PEOPLE v. VAUGHN, 491 Mich. 642 (2012), the Supreme Court of Michigan addressed pivotal issues...
Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence Standards in Termination of Parental Rights: Analysis of In re FREY (297 Mich. App. 242) Introduction In re FREY (297 Mich. App. 242) is a pivotal case...
Michigan Supreme Court Reaffirms Insurer's Right to Avoid Liability on Fraudulent Insurance Applications in Titan Insurance Co. v. Hyten Introduction In the landmark case of Titan Insurance Company...
Michigan Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Admissibility of Other-Acts Evidence in Offenses Against Minors Over Court Rules Introduction The Supreme Court of Michigan, in its 2012 decision PEOPLE v....
Reaffirming Individual Best Interests in Termination of Parental Rights: In re OLIVE/METTS MINORS Introduction The case In re OLIVE/METTS MINORS (297 Mich. App. 35), adjudicated by the Court of...
Enforcement of Explicit Notice Provisions in Insurance Policies: Insights from DEFRAIN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Introduction The case of DEFRAIN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL...
Mandatory Lifetime Electronic Monitoring Must Be Disclosed at Plea Hearings – People v. Cole Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Cole, the Supreme Court of Michigan addressed a critical...
Waiver of Confrontation Rights and Video Testimony in PEOPLE v. BUIE Introduction PEOPLE v. BUIE, 491 Mich. 294 (2012), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Michigan that addressed the...
Reaffirmation of the Cress Test: PEOPLE v. RAO and Its Implications for Newly Discovered Evidence Introduction PEOPLE v. RAO (491 Mich. 271), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Michigan on May 17,...
Supreme Court of Michigan Reinstates Cameron: Clarifying the Interaction Between MCL 600.5851(1) and MCL 500.3145(1) Introduction In the landmark case of Doreen JOSEPH, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. AUTO...
Michigan Supreme Court Abolishes “Imperfect Self-Defense” as a Freestanding Defense in Homicide Cases – PEOPLE v. REESE Introduction In PEOPLE v. REESE, 491 Mich. 127 (2012), the Michigan Supreme...
Preservation of Common-Law Rights to Resist Unlawful Police Conduct in PEOPLE v. MORENO Introduction PEOPLE v. MORENO, 491 Mich. 38 (2012), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Failure to Admit Crucial Evidence Leading to Reversal in PEOPLE v. ARMSTRONG Introduction In PEOPLE v. ARMSTRONG, 490 Mich. 281 (2011), the Supreme Court of...