Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Louisiana Case Commentaries

Establishing Distributor Liability for Implied Warranties in Consumer Automobile Sales

Establishing Distributor Liability for Implied Warranties in Consumer Automobile Sales

Date: Jun 6, 1972
Establishing Distributor Liability for Implied Warranties in Consumer Automobile Sales Introduction The case of Media Production Consultants, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. (262 La. 80)...
Limiting Scope of Duty in Negligence: Celeste HILL v. LUNDIN ASSOCIATES, INC.

Limiting Scope of Duty in Negligence: Celeste HILL v. LUNDIN ASSOCIATES, INC.

Date: Jan 18, 1972
Limiting Scope of Duty in Negligence: Celeste HILL v. LUNDIN ASSOCIATES, INC. Introduction Celeste HILL v. LUNDIN ASSOCIATES, INC., et al. (260 La. 542), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Louisiana...
Negligence in Highway Obstruction: Morgan Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing Establishes Liability Standards

Negligence in Highway Obstruction: Morgan Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing Establishes Liability Standards

Date: Jan 18, 1972
Negligence in Highway Obstruction: Morgan Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing Establishes Liability Standards Introduction The case of Morgan Day et al. v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing and Sheet Metal...
State of Louisiana v. Dan E. Dotson: Clarification on Informer Privilege and Evidence Admissibility

State of Louisiana v. Dan E. Dotson: Clarification on Informer Privilege and Evidence Admissibility

Date: Jan 18, 1972
State of Louisiana v. Dan E. Dotson: Clarification on Informer Privilege and Evidence Admissibility Introduction State of Louisiana v. Dan E. Dotson, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Louisiana on...
Custody Best Interests Principle Reinforced: FULCO v. FULCO (1971)

Custody Best Interests Principle Reinforced: FULCO v. FULCO (1971)

Date: Dec 14, 1971
Custody Best Interests Principle Reinforced: FULCO v. FULCO (1971) Introduction The case of Elizabeth Lucille Bradford Fulco v. Frank Fulco, Jr. (259 La. 1122) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Expansion of Post-Conviction Relief: Jackson v. Henderson Establishes New Precedent in Louisiana Law

Expansion of Post-Conviction Relief: Jackson v. Henderson Establishes New Precedent in Louisiana Law

Date: Nov 24, 1971
Expansion of Post-Conviction Relief: Jackson v. Henderson Establishes New Precedent in Louisiana Law Introduction The landmark case of State of Louisiana ex rel. Lester Jackson, Jr. v. C. Murray...
Establishing Manufacturer Liability for Defective Products: Webber v. Fidelity Casualty Insurance Co.

Establishing Manufacturer Liability for Defective Products: Webber v. Fidelity Casualty Insurance Co.

Date: Aug 13, 1971
Establishing Manufacturer Liability for Defective Products: Webber v. Fidelity Casualty Insurance Co. Introduction Webber v. Fidelity Casualty Insurance Company of New York et al. is a seminal case...
Langlois v. Allied Chemical: Strict Liability and the Limits of Assumption of Risk and Contributory Negligence

Langlois v. Allied Chemical: Strict Liability and the Limits of Assumption of Risk and Contributory Negligence

Date: Jun 29, 1971
Langlois v. Allied Chemical: Strict Liability and the Limits of Assumption of Risk and Contributory Negligence Introduction The case of Emmanuel J. LANGLOIS v. ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION and The...
Louisiana Supreme Court Mandates Defendant-Initiated Requests for Jury Instructions on Impeaching Testimony

Louisiana Supreme Court Mandates Defendant-Initiated Requests for Jury Instructions on Impeaching Testimony

Date: Jun 15, 1971
Louisiana Supreme Court Mandates Defendant-Initiated Requests for Jury Instructions on Impeaching Testimony Introduction In the landmark case of State of Louisiana v. James C. Ray and Charles E....
Ex Parte Denial of New Trial Motions and Due Process in Louisiana Jurisprudence

Ex Parte Denial of New Trial Motions and Due Process in Louisiana Jurisprudence

Date: Jun 8, 1971
Ex Parte Denial of New Trial Motions and Due Process in Louisiana Jurisprudence Introduction The case of Francis L. SONNIER v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COmpany et al. (258 La. 813) adjudicated by the...
Reaffirmation of Jury Discretion in Personal Injury Damage Assessments under Louisiana Civil Code Article 1934(3)

Reaffirmation of Jury Discretion in Personal Injury Damage Assessments under Louisiana Civil Code Article 1934(3)

Date: Mar 30, 1971
Reaffirmation of Jury Discretion in Personal Injury Damage Assessments under Louisiana Civil Code Article 1934(3) Introduction In the case of John Miller, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor...
Affirmation of Plaintiffs' Right to Recover Loss of Earnings and Future Medical Expenses Based on Preponderance of Evidence: JORDAN v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO.

Affirmation of Plaintiffs' Right to Recover Loss of Earnings and Future Medical Expenses Based on Preponderance of Evidence: JORDAN v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO.

Date: Feb 25, 1971
Affirmation of Plaintiffs' Right to Recover Loss of Earnings and Future Medical Expenses Based on Preponderance of Evidence: JORDAN v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO. Introduction In the landmark case of...
Affirmation of Procedural Integrity and Limits on Indigent Rights in STATE OF LOUISIANA v. GEORGE A. SQUARE

Affirmation of Procedural Integrity and Limits on Indigent Rights in STATE OF LOUISIANA v. GEORGE A. SQUARE

Date: Feb 25, 1971
Affirmation of Procedural Integrity and Limits on Indigent Rights in STATE OF LOUISIANA v. GEORGE A. SQUARE Introduction STATE OF LOUISIANA v. GEORGE A. SQUARE is a significant judicial decision...
PIERRE v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY: Establishing Negligence Per Se in Wrongful Death Claims

PIERRE v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY: Establishing Negligence Per Se in Wrongful Death Claims

Date: Jan 19, 1971
PIERRE v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY: Establishing Negligence Per Se in Wrongful Death Claims Introduction PIERRE v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and Opial Stinson is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Solidary and Pro Rata Liability for Attorney's Fees in Construction Contracts: Analysis of OLGA KENNY v. OAK BUILDERS

Solidary and Pro Rata Liability for Attorney's Fees in Construction Contracts: Analysis of OLGA KENNY v. OAK BUILDERS

Date: Jun 9, 1970
Solidary and Pro Rata Liability for Attorney's Fees in Construction Contracts: Analysis of Olga Kenny, Wife of/and Paul Maloney, Jr. v. Oak Builders, Inc., et al. (256 La. 85) Introduction The case...
Reaffirmation of Lex Loci Delicti Doctrine in Louisiana: JOHNSON v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY

Reaffirmation of Lex Loci Delicti Doctrine in Louisiana: JOHNSON v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY

Date: May 5, 1970
Reaffirmation of Lex Loci Delicti Doctrine in Louisiana: JOHNSON v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY (256 La. 289) Introduction Background: The case of JOHNSON v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY...
Waiver of Governmental Immunity in Louisiana: Analysis of Reymond v. State of Louisiana

Waiver of Governmental Immunity in Louisiana: Analysis of Reymond v. State of Louisiana

Date: Feb 24, 1970
Waiver of Governmental Immunity in Louisiana: Analysis of Reymond v. State of Louisiana Introduction The case of MABEL M. REYMOND v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, ET AL.,...
Defining Implied Permission in Omnibus Insurance Clauses: Insights from AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. v. Czarniecki

Defining Implied Permission in Omnibus Insurance Clauses: Insights from AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. v. Czarniecki

Date: Jan 21, 1970
Defining Implied Permission in Omnibus Insurance Clauses: Insights from AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. v. Czarniecki Introduction The case of AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. v. M. J....
Establishing Causal Connection in Workmen's Compensation: The Milton Bertrand Case

Establishing Causal Connection in Workmen's Compensation: The Milton Bertrand Case

Date: Apr 1, 1969
Establishing Causal Connection in Workmen's Compensation: The Milton Bertrand Case Introduction The Milton BERTRAND v. COAL OPERATORS CASUALTY COMPANY case, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Prescriptive Periods in Uninsured Motorist Insurance Claims: EDGAR W. BOOTH ET UX. v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY

Prescriptive Periods in Uninsured Motorist Insurance Claims: EDGAR W. BOOTH ET UX. v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY

Date: Feb 25, 1969
Prescriptive Periods in Uninsured Motorist Insurance Claims: EDGAR W. BOOTH ET UX. v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY Introduction The case of Edgar W. Booth et ux. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert