Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Louisiana Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Guilty Plea Procedures and Suppression Motions in Louisiana: STATE OF LOUISIANA v. GLEN WEILAND

Affirmation of Guilty Plea Procedures and Suppression Motions in Louisiana: STATE OF LOUISIANA v. GLEN WEILAND

Date: Jan 18, 1990
Affirmation of Guilty Plea Procedures and Suppression Motions in Louisiana: STATE OF LOUISIANA v. GLEN WEILAND Introduction State of Louisiana v. Glen Weiland is a significant appellate decision from...
Enforcement of Promissory Notes and the Limits of Compensation: Insights from American Bank v. Saxena

Enforcement of Promissory Notes and the Limits of Compensation: Insights from American Bank v. Saxena

Date: Dec 14, 1989
Enforcement of Promissory Notes and the Limits of Compensation: Insights from American Bank v. Saxena Introduction American Bank v. Ram S. Saxena, 553 So. 2d 836 (La. 1989), is a significant case...
Rigorous Scrutiny of Racial Peremptory Challenges: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE OF LOUISIANA v. CALVIN COLLIER

Rigorous Scrutiny of Racial Peremptory Challenges: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE OF LOUISIANA v. CALVIN COLLIER

Date: Dec 12, 1989
Rigorous Scrutiny of Racial Peremptory Challenges: A Comprehensive Analysis of State of Louisiana v. Calvin Collier Introduction State of Louisiana v. Calvin Collier, 553 So.2d 815 (La. 1989), is a...
Subjective Intent in Insurance Exclusions: Breland v. Schilling

Subjective Intent in Insurance Exclusions: Breland v. Schilling

Date: Oct 24, 1989
Subjective Intent in Insurance Exclusions: Breland v. Schilling Introduction Breland v. Schilling, 550 So. 2d 609 (La. 1989), addresses the intricate interplay between insurance policy exclusions and...
Penalber v. Kirby Blount and Livingston Parish Police Jury: Establishing Attorney Liability for Intentional Wrongful Seizure of Public Assets

Penalber v. Kirby Blount and Livingston Parish Police Jury: Establishing Attorney Liability for Intentional Wrongful Seizure of Public Assets

Date: Oct 24, 1989
Penalber v. Kirby Blount and Livingston Parish Police Jury: Establishing Attorney Liability for Intentional Wrongful Seizure of Public Assets Introduction Penalber v. Kirby Blount and Livingston...
Deference to Jury Fact-Finding in Negligence Claims: An Analysis of ROSELL v. ESCO

Deference to Jury Fact-Finding in Negligence Claims: An Analysis of ROSELL v. ESCO

Date: Sep 13, 1989
Deference to Jury Fact-Finding in Negligence Claims: An Analysis of ROSELL v. ESCO Introduction The case of ROSELL v. ESCO, d/b/a Jolly Elevator Corporation, et al. (549 So. 2d 840) adjudicated by...
Re-defining Informed Consent: The HONDROULIS v. SCHUMACHER Decision and Its Implications

Re-defining Informed Consent: The HONDROULIS v. SCHUMACHER Decision and Its Implications

Date: Sep 12, 1989
Re-defining Informed Consent: The HONDROULIS v. SCHUMACHER Decision and Its Implications Introduction The case of Viola K. Hondroulis v. John Schumacher, M.D. and Hartford Fire Insurance Company...
Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams: Establishing the Application of Maximum Compensation Rates in Supplemental Earnings Benefits

Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams: Establishing the Application of Maximum Compensation Rates in Supplemental Earnings Benefits

Date: Sep 12, 1989
Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams: Establishing the Application of Maximum Compensation Rates in Supplemental Earnings Benefits Introduction The case of Michael T. DAIGLE v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COmpany,...
STATE v. LINDSEY: Clarifying Brady Obligations and Upholding Capital Sentencing Standards in Louisiana

STATE v. LINDSEY: Clarifying Brady Obligations and Upholding Capital Sentencing Standards in Louisiana

Date: Jul 1, 1989
STATE v. LINDSEY: Clarifying Brady Obligations and Upholding Capital Sentencing Standards in Louisiana Introduction State of Louisiana v. Tyronne Lindsey, 543 So. 2d 886 (La. 1989), is a significant...
Contractor as Final Consumer: Sales Tax Liability in Government Projects – BILL ROBERTS, INC. v. McNAMARA

Contractor as Final Consumer: Sales Tax Liability in Government Projects – BILL ROBERTS, INC. v. McNAMARA

Date: Apr 28, 1989
Contractor as Final Consumer: Sales Tax Liability in Government Projects – BILL ROBERTS, INC. v. McNAMARA Introduction Bill Roberts, Inc. v. Shirley McNamara, Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and...
Prescription in Medical Malpractice: Whitnell v. Menville Establishes Opportunity to Amend Claims

Prescription in Medical Malpractice: Whitnell v. Menville Establishes Opportunity to Amend Claims

Date: Mar 14, 1989
Prescription in Medical Malpractice: Whitnell v. Menville Establishes Opportunity to Amend Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Whitnell v. Menville (540 So. 2d 304, Supreme Court of...
Default Judgment Reversed Due to Unwaived Coverage: THIBODEAUX v. BURTON

Default Judgment Reversed Due to Unwaived Coverage: THIBODEAUX v. BURTON

Date: Mar 3, 1989
Default Judgment Reversed Due to Unwaived Coverage: THIBODEAUX v. BURTON Introduction THIBODEAUX v. BURTON is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Louisiana on March 2, 1989. This case...
Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Three-Year Prescription for Rent Arrearages in Breach of Lease Actions

Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Three-Year Prescription for Rent Arrearages in Breach of Lease Actions

Date: Jan 31, 1989
Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Three-Year Prescription for Rent Arrearages in Breach of Lease Actions Introduction In the landmark case of Donald P. Starns, Receiver for Leasing Services, Inc....
Establishing Corporate Officers' Duty to Refrain from Unjustified Interference with Contractual Relations

Establishing Corporate Officers' Duty to Refrain from Unjustified Interference with Contractual Relations

Date: Jan 31, 1989
Establishing Corporate Officers' Duty to Refrain from Unjustified Interference with Contractual Relations Introduction The case of 9 To 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Petr L. Spurney (538 So. 2d 228)...
Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines for Admissibility of Unadjudicated Crimes as Aggravating Circumstances in Sentencing

Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines for Admissibility of Unadjudicated Crimes as Aggravating Circumstances in Sentencing

Date: Jan 31, 1989
Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Guidelines for Admissibility of Unadjudicated Crimes as Aggravating Circumstances in Sentencing Introduction The case of State of Louisiana v. John Brooks (541...
Termination of Duty to Defend Upon Exhaustion of Policy Limits: Pareti v. Sentry Indemnity Co.

Termination of Duty to Defend Upon Exhaustion of Policy Limits: Pareti v. Sentry Indemnity Co.

Date: Dec 13, 1988
Termination of Duty to Defend Upon Exhaustion of Policy Limits: Pareti v. Sentry Indemnity Co. Introduction Pareti and Pauli v. Sentry Indemnity Company (536 So. 2d 417) is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Copeland v. State: Upholding Death Penalty in Capital Murder Case

Copeland v. State: Upholding Death Penalty in Capital Murder Case

Date: Sep 23, 1988
Copeland v. State: Upholding Death Penalty in Capital Murder Case Introduction Copeland v. State is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Louisiana, adjudicated on September 22, 1988. The case...
Duty of Care in Medical Malpractice: Insights from PITRE v. OPELOUSAS GENERAL HOSPital

Duty of Care in Medical Malpractice: Insights from PITRE v. OPELOUSAS GENERAL HOSPital

Date: Sep 13, 1988
Duty of Care in Medical Malpractice: Insights from PITRE v. OPELOUSAS GENERAL HOSPital Introduction PITRE v. OPELOUSAS GENERAL HOSPital is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirming Legislative Authority: Validation of the Louisiana Recovery District's Tax and Bond Powers

Affirming Legislative Authority: Validation of the Louisiana Recovery District's Tax and Bond Powers

Date: Jun 28, 1988
Affirming Legislative Authority: Validation of the Louisiana Recovery District's Tax and Bond Powers Introduction In the landmark case THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LOUISIANA RECOVERY DISTRICT v. ALL...
Public Records Doctrine Prevails Over Unrecorded Community Property Rights: Camel v. Waller Barber

Public Records Doctrine Prevails Over Unrecorded Community Property Rights: Camel v. Waller Barber

Date: May 24, 1988
Public Records Doctrine Prevails Over Unrecorded Community Property Rights: Camel v. Waller Barber Introduction The Supreme Court of Louisiana's decision in Elizabeth Langley Camel v. Ellen H....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert