Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Louisiana Case Commentaries

Solidary Obligations Between Employers and Third-Party Tort-Feasors: Interruption of Prescription in Worker’s Compensation Cases

Solidary Obligations Between Employers and Third-Party Tort-Feasors: Interruption of Prescription in Worker’s Compensation Cases

Date: Jan 20, 1993
Solidary Obligations Between Employers and Third-Party Tort-Feasors: Interruption of Prescription in Worker’s Compensation Cases Introduction The case of SARAH L. WILLIAMS, Individually and as...
Due Process Violation in Acceptance of Guilty Pleas Without Mental Competency Hearing: STATE OF LOUISIANA v. FREDDIE JOE NOMEY

Due Process Violation in Acceptance of Guilty Pleas Without Mental Competency Hearing: STATE OF LOUISIANA v. FREDDIE JOE NOMEY

Date: Jan 20, 1993
Due Process Violation in Acceptance of Guilty Pleas Without Mental Competency Hearing: STATE OF LOUISIANA v. FREDDIE JOE NOMEY Introduction State of Louisiana v. Freddie Joe Nomey is a pivotal case...
Continuing Tort Doctrine and One-Year Prescription in Sexual Harassment Cases: Insights from Bustamento v. Johnson Controls

Continuing Tort Doctrine and One-Year Prescription in Sexual Harassment Cases: Insights from Bustamento v. Johnson Controls

Date: Nov 26, 1992
Continuing Tort Doctrine and One-Year Prescription in Sexual Harassment Cases: Insights from Bustamento v. Johnson Controls Introduction Deretha Bustamento v. J.D. Tucker, Jeff Hall, Marc Iott, and...
Waiver of Venue by One Defendant Does Not Preclude Objections by Others: Insights from ALEX SPOTT v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY

Waiver of Venue by One Defendant Does Not Preclude Objections by Others: Insights from ALEX SPOTT v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY

Date: Sep 4, 1992
Waiver of Venue by One Defendant Does Not Preclude Objections by Others: Insights from ALEX SPOTT v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY Introduction ALEX SPOTT v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, ET AL., adjudicated by the...
Clarifying the Admissibility of Conspiracy-Related Statements and Withdrawal Requirements: Insights from STATE v. LOBATO

Clarifying the Admissibility of Conspiracy-Related Statements and Withdrawal Requirements: Insights from STATE v. LOBATO

Date: Jul 2, 1992
Clarifying the Admissibility of Conspiracy-Related Statements and Withdrawal Requirements: Insights from STATE v. LOBATO Introduction In the landmark case State of Louisiana v. Daniel Lobato (603 So....
Integrity and False Affidavits: Louisiana Supreme Court's Stance in Boutall Case

Integrity and False Affidavits: Louisiana Supreme Court's Stance in Boutall Case

Date: Jul 1, 1992
Integrity and False Affidavits: Louisiana Supreme Court's Stance in Boutall Case Introduction The case of Louisiana State Bar Association v. Richard J. Boutall, decided by the Louisiana Supreme Court...
Supreme Court of Louisiana Upholds Pre-Comparative Fault and Individual Virile Share Allocation in Asbestos Liability Cases

Supreme Court of Louisiana Upholds Pre-Comparative Fault and Individual Virile Share Allocation in Asbestos Liability Cases

Date: Jul 1, 1992
Supreme Court of Louisiana Upholds Pre-Comparative Fault and Individual Virile Share Allocation in Asbestos Liability Cases Introduction The case of Outher Cole, et al. v. Celotex Corporation, et al....
Safeguarding the Confrontation Clause: Exclusion of Prejudicial Hearsay in Intent to Distribute Drug Cases

Safeguarding the Confrontation Clause: Exclusion of Prejudicial Hearsay in Intent to Distribute Drug Cases

Date: Jun 30, 1992
Safeguarding the Confrontation Clause: Exclusion of Prejudicial Hearsay in Intent to Distribute Drug Cases Introduction State of Louisiana v. Ricky Darren Hearold (603 So. 2d 731) is a pivotal...
Louisiana Supreme Court Upholds Jury's Comparative Fault Allocation in Products Liability Case

Louisiana Supreme Court Upholds Jury's Comparative Fault Allocation in Products Liability Case

Date: Jun 27, 1992
Louisiana Supreme Court Upholds Jury's Comparative Fault Allocation in Products Liability Case Introduction Godfrey COSSE v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COmpany, et al., 601 So. 2d 1349, is a landmark decision by...
Re-defining Employer Liability for Negligent Hiring and Vicarious Responsibility: Insights from ROBERTS v. BENOIT (1992)

Re-defining Employer Liability for Negligent Hiring and Vicarious Responsibility: Insights from ROBERTS v. BENOIT (1992)

Date: May 29, 1992
Re-defining Employer Liability for Negligent Hiring and Vicarious Responsibility: Insights from ROBERTS v. BENOIT (1992) Introduction ROBERTS v. BENOIT, et al. is a seminal case decided by the...
Enhancing Due Process: The Impact of Jury Instruction on Reasonable Doubt in STATE OF LOUISIANA v. CLARENCE SMITH AND ANTHONY SCIRE

Enhancing Due Process: The Impact of Jury Instruction on Reasonable Doubt in STATE OF LOUISIANA v. CLARENCE SMITH AND ANTHONY SCIRE

Date: May 27, 1992
Enhancing Due Process: The Impact of Jury Instruction on Reasonable Doubt in STATE OF LOUISIANA v. CLARENCE SMITH AND ANTHONY SCIRE Introduction In the landmark case of State of Louisiana v. Clarence...
Strict Liability in Medical Facilities: Reevaluating the Scope of Louisiana's Medical Malpractice Act

Strict Liability in Medical Facilities: Reevaluating the Scope of Louisiana's Medical Malpractice Act

Date: May 27, 1992
Strict Liability in Medical Facilities: Reevaluating the Scope of Louisiana's Medical Malpractice Act Introduction The case of Gordon D. Sewell, ET UX v. Doctors Hospital examines the boundaries of...
Reconciliation of Conflicting Penal Provisions and the Rule of Lenity: State of Louisiana v. Fred Piazza

Reconciliation of Conflicting Penal Provisions and the Rule of Lenity: State of Louisiana v. Fred Piazza

Date: May 1, 1992
Reconciliation of Conflicting Penal Provisions and the Rule of Lenity: State of Louisiana v. Fred Piazza Introduction State of Louisiana v. Fred Piazza (596 So. 2d 817), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reasonableness of Attorney Fees in Expropriation: STATE OF LOUISIANA v. NELL CARTER RAMAGE WILLIAMSON

Reasonableness of Attorney Fees in Expropriation: STATE OF LOUISIANA v. NELL CARTER RAMAGE WILLIAMSON

Date: Apr 21, 1992
Reasonableness of Attorney Fees in Expropriation: STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT v. NELL CARTER RAMAGE WILLIAMSON, ET AL. Introduction The case of State of...
Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Recovery of Mental Anguish Damages in Redhibition Actions: IRAY YOUNG v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Recovery of Mental Anguish Damages in Redhibition Actions: IRAY YOUNG v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Date: Mar 3, 1992
Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Recovery of Mental Anguish Damages in Redhibition Actions: IRAY YOUNG v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY Introduction In the landmark case of IRAY YOUNG v. FORD...
Reversing Conviction Due to Unreliable Single-Photograph Identification: STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BRIAN MARTIN

Reversing Conviction Due to Unreliable Single-Photograph Identification: STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BRIAN MARTIN

Date: Mar 3, 1992
Reversing Conviction Due to Unreliable Single-Photograph Identification: STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BRIAN MARTIN Introduction STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BRIAN MARTIN, decided on March 2, 1992, by the Supreme...
Admissibility of Similar Offenses Evidence: Insights from STATE v. MOSBY

Admissibility of Similar Offenses Evidence: Insights from STATE v. MOSBY

Date: Mar 3, 1992
Admissibility of Similar Offenses Evidence: Insights from State of Louisiana v. James K. Mosby Introduction The case of State of Louisiana v. James K. Mosby (595 So.2d 1135) presents a critical...
Attorney's Acknowledgment of Liability Interrupts Prescription in Legal Malpractice Actions

Attorney's Acknowledgment of Liability Interrupts Prescription in Legal Malpractice Actions

Date: Mar 3, 1992
Attorney's Acknowledgment of Liability Interrupts Prescription in Legal Malpractice Actions Introduction The case of Jose E. Lima and Andrea K. Lima v. Jonathan R. Schmidt (595 So. 2d 624)...
Unconstitutionality of Municipal Sales Taxes Exceeding Constitutional Limits Without Legislative or Voter Approval: Triangle Shell v. City of New Orleans

Unconstitutionality of Municipal Sales Taxes Exceeding Constitutional Limits Without Legislative or Voter Approval: Triangle Shell v. City of New Orleans

Date: Feb 21, 1992
Unconstitutionality of Municipal Sales Taxes Exceeding Constitutional Limits Without Legislative or Voter Approval Triangle Shell v. City of New Orleans Introduction The case of Arn Ray Reed, Jerry...
Supreme Court of Louisiana Reinforces Limited Liability of Shareholders: Piercing the Corporate Veil Requires Clear Evidence

Supreme Court of Louisiana Reinforces Limited Liability of Shareholders: Piercing the Corporate Veil Requires Clear Evidence

Date: Feb 7, 1992
Supreme Court of Louisiana Reinforces Limited Liability of Shareholders: Piercing the Corporate Veil Requires Clear Evidence Introduction The case of William S. Riggins and Patricia G. Riggins v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert