Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Louisiana Case Commentaries

State v. Willard Allen: Upholding Death Sentence and Affirming Procedural Standards

State v. Willard Allen: Upholding Death Sentence and Affirming Procedural Standards

Date: Oct 5, 1996
State v. Willard Allen: Upholding Death Sentence and Affirming Procedural Standards Introduction State of Louisiana v. Willard Allen (682 So.2d 713) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Employer Not Vicariously Liable for Employee's Sexual Battery Outside Employment Scope: Baumeister v. Plunkett

Employer Not Vicariously Liable for Employee's Sexual Battery Outside Employment Scope: Baumeister v. Plunkett

Date: May 22, 1996
Employer Not Vicariously Liable for Employee's Sexual Battery Outside Employment Scope: Baumeister v. Plunkett Introduction Baumeister v. Plunkett, 673 So. 2d 994 (La. 1996), is a pivotal case...
No Duty to Warn: Louisiana Tech University's Liability in Sledding Accident

No Duty to Warn: Louisiana Tech University's Liability in Sledding Accident

Date: May 11, 1996
No Duty to Warn: Louisiana Tech University's Liability in Sledding Accident Introduction The case of Earl Garland Pitre, Jr. et al. v. Louisiana Tech University et al. revolves around a tragic...
Assault and Battery Exclusions in Insurance Policies: Distinguishing Between Rape and Kidnapping in LEDBETTER v. CONCORD GENERAL CORP.

Assault and Battery Exclusions in Insurance Policies: Distinguishing Between Rape and Kidnapping in LEDBETTER v. CONCORD GENERAL CORP.

Date: Apr 19, 1996
Assault and Battery Exclusions in Insurance Policies: Distinguishing Between Rape and Kidnapping in LEDBETTER v. CONCORD GENERAL CORP. Introduction LEDBETTER v. CONCORD GENERAL CORP. is a landmark...
State of Louisiana v. Freddie Armstrong: Landmark Insanity Defense Reversal

State of Louisiana v. Freddie Armstrong: Landmark Insanity Defense Reversal

Date: Apr 9, 1996
State of Louisiana v. Freddie Armstrong: Landmark Insanity Defense Reversal Introduction State of Louisiana v. Freddie Armstrong (671 So. 2d 307) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Limiting the Scope of Review in Capital Cases: Analysis of State v. Feltus Taylor

Limiting the Scope of Review in Capital Cases: Analysis of State v. Feltus Taylor

Date: Feb 29, 1996
Limiting the Scope of Review in Capital Cases: Analysis of State of Louisiana v. Feltus Taylor Introduction State of Louisiana v. Feltus Taylor is a landmark 1996 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Capital Conviction: Reinforcing Standards in Jury Selection, Counsel Conflicts, and Admissibility of Confessions in STATE OF LOUISIANA v. Willie Lee Tart

Affirmation of Capital Conviction: Reinforcing Standards in Jury Selection, Counsel Conflicts, and Admissibility of Confessions in STATE OF LOUISIANA v. Willie Lee Tart

Date: Feb 10, 1996
Affirmation of Capital Conviction: Reinforcing Standards in Jury Selection, Counsel Conflicts, and Admissibility of Confessions in STATE OF LOUISIANA v. Willie Lee Tart Introduction In the landmark...
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany: Establishing Standards for Defective Product Liability and Appellate Review

Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany: Establishing Standards for Defective Product Liability and Appellate Review

Date: Jan 30, 1996
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany: Establishing Standards for Defective Product Liability and Appellate Review Introduction The case of Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., et al. (666 So. 2d 1073)...
Reallocation of Fault in Appellate Review: Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Deference to Trial Courts

Reallocation of Fault in Appellate Review: Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Deference to Trial Courts

Date: Jan 17, 1996
Reallocation of Fault in Appellate Review: Louisiana Supreme Court Establishes Deference to Trial Courts Introduction In the landmark case of Clement v. Frey, Louisiana Indemnity Company, and...
Bannister v. Department of Streets: Reinterpreting Civil Service Rule II, § 4.16

Bannister v. Department of Streets: Reinterpreting Civil Service Rule II, § 4.16

Date: Jan 17, 1996
Bannister v. Department of Streets: Reinterpreting Civil Service Rule II, § 4.16 Introduction Anne Bannister v. Department of Streets (666 So. 2d 641) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Res Judicata and Bankruptcy Plans: Insights from Terrebonne Fuel Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Company

Res Judicata and Bankruptcy Plans: Insights from Terrebonne Fuel Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Company

Date: Jan 17, 1996
Res Judicata and Bankruptcy Plans: Insights from Terrebonne Fuel Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Company Introduction The case of Terrebonne Fuel Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Company (666 So. 2d 624)...
Reaffirmation of Legal Standards for Insanity Defense: Analysis of State v. Silman

Reaffirmation of Legal Standards for Insanity Defense: Analysis of State v. Silman

Date: Nov 28, 1995
Reaffirmation of Legal Standards for Insanity Defense: Analysis of State of Louisiana v. Silman Introduction Case: State of Louisiana v. Thomas W. Silman (663 So. 2d 27) Court: Supreme Court of...
Reclassifying Other Crimes Evidence Errors: The Landmark Decision in State of Louisiana v. Silas Johnson

Reclassifying Other Crimes Evidence Errors: The Landmark Decision in State of Louisiana v. Silas Johnson

Date: Nov 28, 1995
Reclassifying Other Crimes Evidence Errors: The Landmark Decision in State of Louisiana v. Silas Johnson Introduction State of Louisiana v. Silas Johnson, 664 So. 2d 94 (1995), is a pivotal case...
Defining Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Louisiana v. Brooks, Jr.

Defining Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Louisiana v. Brooks, Jr.

Date: Oct 28, 1995
Defining Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Louisiana v. Brooks, Jr. Introduction Louisiana v. George Brooks, Jr., 661 So.2d 1333 (La. 1995), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Municipal Penalty Limits under Home Rule: CITY OF BATON ROUGE v. ERIC WILLIAMS

Municipal Penalty Limits under Home Rule: CITY OF BATON ROUGE v. ERIC WILLIAMS

Date: Oct 17, 1995
Municipal Penalty Limits under Home Rule: CITY OF BATON ROUGE v. ERIC WILLIAMS Introduction The case of City of Baton Rouge v. Eric Williams (661 So. 2d 445) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Defendant's Right to Surrebuttal: A Landmark Decision in State v. Spencer George

Defendant's Right to Surrebuttal: A Landmark Decision in State v. Spencer George

Date: Oct 17, 1995
Defendant's Right to Surrebuttal: A Landmark Decision in State of Louisiana v. Spencer George Introduction State of Louisiana v. Spencer George is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Marshall v. State of Louisiana: Upholding Double Jeopardy and Clarifying Brady Obligations

Marshall v. State of Louisiana: Upholding Double Jeopardy and Clarifying Brady Obligations

Date: Sep 6, 1995
Marshall v. State of Louisiana: Upholding Double Jeopardy and Clarifying Brady Obligations Introduction Marshall v. State of Louisiana (660 So. 2d 819), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Louisiana...
Louisiana Supreme Court Upholds Time Limitations for Post-Conviction Relief: State ex rel. Glover et al. v. State of Louisiana

Louisiana Supreme Court Upholds Time Limitations for Post-Conviction Relief: State ex rel. Glover et al. v. State of Louisiana

Date: Sep 6, 1995
Louisiana Supreme Court Upholds Time Limitations for Post-Conviction Relief: State ex rel. Glover et al. v. State of Louisiana Introduction In the landmark case of State ex rel. Ronald Glover v....
Juror Challenge Exhaustion Leading to Reversal: An Analysis of STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BARTHOLOMEW CROSS

Juror Challenge Exhaustion Leading to Reversal: An Analysis of STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BARTHOLOMEW CROSS

Date: Jul 1, 1995
Juror Challenge Exhaustion Leading to Reversal: An Analysis of STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BARTHOLOMEW CROSS Introduction STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BARTHOLOMEW CROSS, 658 So. 2d 683 (La. 1995), addresses...
Ensuring the Right to a Full Defense: State of Louisiana v. Patricia Van Winkle

Ensuring the Right to a Full Defense: State of Louisiana v. Patricia Van Winkle

Date: Jul 1, 1995
Ensuring the Right to a Full Defense: State of Louisiana v. Patricia Van Winkle Introduction State of Louisiana v. Patricia Van Winkle, 658 So.2d 198 (1995), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert