Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kentucky Case Commentaries

Interpreting 'Cohabitation' in Maintenance Agreements: Insights from La v. Cook and Matheis

Interpreting 'Cohabitation' in Maintenance Agreements: Insights from La v. Cook and Matheis

Date: Nov 30, 1990
Interpreting 'Cohabitation' in Maintenance Agreements: Insights from La v. Cook and Matheis Introduction La v. Cook and Matheis is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Kentucky on...
Recognition and Enforcement of Antenuptial Agreements in Kentucky: Gentry v. Gentry

Recognition and Enforcement of Antenuptial Agreements in Kentucky: Gentry v. Gentry

Date: Nov 9, 1990
Recognition and Enforcement of Antenuptial Agreements in Kentucky: Gentry v. Gentry Introduction The case of Kathryn R. Gentry, Movant, v. Thomas E. Gentry, Respondent before the Supreme Court of...
Substantial Compliance and Jurisdictional Defects: Devondale v. Stallings

Substantial Compliance and Jurisdictional Defects: Devondale v. Stallings

Date: Sep 28, 1990
Substantial Compliance and Jurisdictional Defects: Devondale v. Stallings Introduction Devondale v. Stallings, 795 S.W.2d 954 (Supreme Court of Kentucky, 1990), addressed a critical issue in...
Supreme Court of Kentucky Restricts the Scope of Outrageous Conduct in Emotional Distress Claims

Supreme Court of Kentucky Restricts the Scope of Outrageous Conduct in Emotional Distress Claims

Date: Sep 28, 1990
Supreme Court of Kentucky Restricts the Scope of Outrageous Conduct in Emotional Distress Claims Introduction In Humana of Kentucky, Inc., d/b/a Humana Hospital Audubon, Mo v. Seitz, 796 S.W.2d 1...
Supreme Court of Kentucky Rules K.R.S. 411.190 Limits Liability for Recreational Use

Supreme Court of Kentucky Rules K.R.S. 411.190 Limits Liability for Recreational Use

Date: May 25, 1990
Supreme Court of Kentucky Rules K.R.S. 411.190 Limits Liability for Recreational Use Introduction Ray Coursey v. Westvaco Corporation (790 S.W.2d 229), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Kentucky on...
Piercing the Corporate Veil: Establishing Personal Liability for Corporate Officers in Tortious Conduct

Piercing the Corporate Veil: Establishing Personal Liability for Corporate Officers in Tortious Conduct

Date: Oct 20, 1989
Piercing the Corporate Veil: Establishing Personal Liability for Corporate Officers in Tortious Conduct Introduction The case of Michael K. Smith v. William Isaacs, Nite Life, Inc., D/B/A Camelot...
Kentucky Supreme Court Declares State's Common School System Unconstitutional for Lack of Efficiency

Kentucky Supreme Court Declares State's Common School System Unconstitutional for Lack of Efficiency

Date: Sep 29, 1989
Kentucky Supreme Court Declares State's Common School System Unconstitutional for Lack of Efficiency Introduction In the landmark case of John A. Rose, President Pro Tempore of the Senate; Donald J....
Establishing Authority and Operational Control in Regional Jails: Insights from REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY v. Tackett

Establishing Authority and Operational Control in Regional Jails: Insights from REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY v. Tackett

Date: Jun 9, 1989
Establishing Authority and Operational Control in Regional Jails: Insights from REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY v. Tackett Introduction The case of Regional Jail Authority, Johnson, Lawrence, Magoffin, and...
Sanborn v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Upholding Due Process through Addressing Prosecutorial Misconduct

Sanborn v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Upholding Due Process through Addressing Prosecutorial Misconduct

Date: Jun 10, 1988
Sanborn v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Upholding Due Process through Addressing Prosecutorial Misconduct Introduction Parramore Lee Sanborn appealed his convictions for intentional murder, first-degree...
NCAA v. Hornung: Establishing Standards for Improper Interference in Prospective Contracts

NCAA v. Hornung: Establishing Standards for Improper Interference in Prospective Contracts

Date: Jun 10, 1988
NCAA v. Hornung: Establishing Standards for Improper Interference in Prospective Contracts Introduction The case of NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, a Voluntary Unincorporated Association,...
Corroborative Evidence Requirements and Death Penalty Proportionality: Insights from Slaughter v. Commonwealth

Corroborative Evidence Requirements and Death Penalty Proportionality: Insights from Slaughter v. Commonwealth

Date: Mar 4, 1988
Corroborative Evidence Requirements and Death Penalty Proportionality: Insights from Slaughter v. Commonwealth Introduction James Earl Slaughter, also known as James Earl Slawter, was convicted in...
Establishing Common Law Dram Shop Liability in Kentucky: Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Patricia Claywell

Establishing Common Law Dram Shop Liability in Kentucky: Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Patricia Claywell

Date: Sep 25, 1987
Establishing Common Law Dram Shop Liability in Kentucky: Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Patricia Claywell Introduction The landmark case of Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles, Aerie No. 3738,...
Kentucky Supreme Court Upholds K.R.S. 532.055: A Comprehensive Analysis of Truth in Sentencing

Kentucky Supreme Court Upholds K.R.S. 532.055: A Comprehensive Analysis of Truth in Sentencing

Date: Aug 7, 1987
Kentucky Supreme Court Upholds K.R.S. 532.055: A Comprehensive Analysis of Truth in Sentencing Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Kentucky, Mo v. John Edgar Reneer (734 S.W.2d 794), adjudicated...
Strickland Standard Upholds Death Sentence in McQUEEN v. COMmonwealth

Strickland Standard Upholds Death Sentence in McQUEEN v. COMmonwealth

Date: Jan 23, 1987
Strickland Standard Upholds Death Sentence in McQUEEN v. COMmonwealth, Kentucky Introduction McQUEEN v. COMmonwealth, 721 S.W.2d 694, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Kentucky on January 22, 1987,...
Clarifying the Boundaries of Extreme Emotional Disturbance and Aggravating Factors in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of McClellan v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Clarifying the Boundaries of Extreme Emotional Disturbance and Aggravating Factors in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of McClellan v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Sep 26, 1986
Clarifying the Boundaries of Extreme Emotional Disturbance and Aggravating Factors in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of McClellan v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction The case of Raymond...
Retroactive Application of Comparative Negligence Doctrine in Kentucky: Knolan Skaggs and Nick Skaggs v. Richard Assad

Retroactive Application of Comparative Negligence Doctrine in Kentucky: Knolan Skaggs and Nick Skaggs v. Richard Assad

Date: Jul 4, 1986
Retroactive Application of Comparative Negligence Doctrine in Kentucky: Knolan Skaggs and Nick Skaggs v. Richard Assad Introduction The case of Knolan Skaggs and Nick Skaggs, Mo v. Richard Assad (712...
Limiting Punitive Damages in Insurance Bad Faith: Insights from Federal Kemper v. Hornback

Limiting Punitive Damages in Insurance Bad Faith: Insights from Federal Kemper v. Hornback

Date: Jun 13, 1986
Limiting Punitive Damages in Insurance Bad Faith: Insights from Federal Kemper Ins. Co. v. Hornback Introduction Federal Kemper Insurance Company v. Hornback, 711 S.W.2d 844 (Ky. 1986), is a landmark...
Reaffirmation of Precedential Authority and Standards of Review in Workers' Compensation Cases

Reaffirmation of Precedential Authority and Standards of Review in Workers' Compensation Cases

Date: May 2, 1986
Reaffirmation of Precedential Authority and Standards of Review in Workers' Compensation Cases Introduction The case of SPECIAL FUND and Coal Miners' Pneumoconiosis Fund v. Freeman Francis et al....
Termination of Parental Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of V.S. and H.S. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Termination of Parental Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of V.S. and H.S. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Mar 22, 1986
Termination of Parental Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of V.S. and H.S. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction The case of V.S. and H.S., Appellants, v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Human...
Affirmation of Effective Counsel: An Analysis of GALL v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky

Affirmation of Effective Counsel: An Analysis of GALL v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Feb 7, 1986
Affirmation of Effective Counsel: An Analysis of GALL v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky Introduction GALL v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Kentucky on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert