Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kentucky Case Commentaries

Establishing Authority and Operational Control in Regional Jails: Insights from REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY v. Tackett

Establishing Authority and Operational Control in Regional Jails: Insights from REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY v. Tackett

Date: Jun 9, 1989
Establishing Authority and Operational Control in Regional Jails: Insights from REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY v. Tackett Introduction The case of Regional Jail Authority, Johnson, Lawrence, Magoffin, and...
Sanborn v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Upholding Due Process through Addressing Prosecutorial Misconduct

Sanborn v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Upholding Due Process through Addressing Prosecutorial Misconduct

Date: Jun 10, 1988
Sanborn v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Upholding Due Process through Addressing Prosecutorial Misconduct Introduction Parramore Lee Sanborn appealed his convictions for intentional murder, first-degree...
NCAA v. Hornung: Establishing Standards for Improper Interference in Prospective Contracts

NCAA v. Hornung: Establishing Standards for Improper Interference in Prospective Contracts

Date: Jun 10, 1988
NCAA v. Hornung: Establishing Standards for Improper Interference in Prospective Contracts Introduction The case of NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, a Voluntary Unincorporated Association,...
Corroborative Evidence Requirements and Death Penalty Proportionality: Insights from Slaughter v. Commonwealth

Corroborative Evidence Requirements and Death Penalty Proportionality: Insights from Slaughter v. Commonwealth

Date: Mar 4, 1988
Corroborative Evidence Requirements and Death Penalty Proportionality: Insights from Slaughter v. Commonwealth Introduction James Earl Slaughter, also known as James Earl Slawter, was convicted in...
Establishing Common Law Dram Shop Liability in Kentucky: Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Patricia Claywell

Establishing Common Law Dram Shop Liability in Kentucky: Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Patricia Claywell

Date: Sep 25, 1987
Establishing Common Law Dram Shop Liability in Kentucky: Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Patricia Claywell Introduction The landmark case of Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles, Aerie No. 3738,...
Kentucky Supreme Court Upholds K.R.S. 532.055: A Comprehensive Analysis of Truth in Sentencing

Kentucky Supreme Court Upholds K.R.S. 532.055: A Comprehensive Analysis of Truth in Sentencing

Date: Aug 7, 1987
Kentucky Supreme Court Upholds K.R.S. 532.055: A Comprehensive Analysis of Truth in Sentencing Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Kentucky, Mo v. John Edgar Reneer (734 S.W.2d 794), adjudicated...
Strickland Standard Upholds Death Sentence in McQUEEN v. COMmonwealth

Strickland Standard Upholds Death Sentence in McQUEEN v. COMmonwealth

Date: Jan 23, 1987
Strickland Standard Upholds Death Sentence in McQUEEN v. COMmonwealth, Kentucky Introduction McQUEEN v. COMmonwealth, 721 S.W.2d 694, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Kentucky on January 22, 1987,...
Clarifying the Boundaries of Extreme Emotional Disturbance and Aggravating Factors in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of McClellan v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Clarifying the Boundaries of Extreme Emotional Disturbance and Aggravating Factors in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of McClellan v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Sep 26, 1986
Clarifying the Boundaries of Extreme Emotional Disturbance and Aggravating Factors in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of McClellan v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction The case of Raymond...
Retroactive Application of Comparative Negligence Doctrine in Kentucky: Knolan Skaggs and Nick Skaggs v. Richard Assad

Retroactive Application of Comparative Negligence Doctrine in Kentucky: Knolan Skaggs and Nick Skaggs v. Richard Assad

Date: Jul 4, 1986
Retroactive Application of Comparative Negligence Doctrine in Kentucky: Knolan Skaggs and Nick Skaggs v. Richard Assad Introduction The case of Knolan Skaggs and Nick Skaggs, Mo v. Richard Assad (712...
Limiting Punitive Damages in Insurance Bad Faith: Insights from Federal Kemper v. Hornback

Limiting Punitive Damages in Insurance Bad Faith: Insights from Federal Kemper v. Hornback

Date: Jun 13, 1986
Limiting Punitive Damages in Insurance Bad Faith: Insights from Federal Kemper Ins. Co. v. Hornback Introduction Federal Kemper Insurance Company v. Hornback, 711 S.W.2d 844 (Ky. 1986), is a landmark...
Reaffirmation of Precedential Authority and Standards of Review in Workers' Compensation Cases

Reaffirmation of Precedential Authority and Standards of Review in Workers' Compensation Cases

Date: May 2, 1986
Reaffirmation of Precedential Authority and Standards of Review in Workers' Compensation Cases Introduction The case of SPECIAL FUND and Coal Miners' Pneumoconiosis Fund v. Freeman Francis et al....
Termination of Parental Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of V.S. and H.S. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Termination of Parental Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of V.S. and H.S. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Mar 22, 1986
Termination of Parental Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of V.S. and H.S. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction The case of V.S. and H.S., Appellants, v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Human...
Affirmation of Effective Counsel: An Analysis of GALL v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky

Affirmation of Effective Counsel: An Analysis of GALL v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Feb 7, 1986
Affirmation of Effective Counsel: An Analysis of GALL v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky Introduction GALL v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Kentucky on...
Wrongful Discharge Doctrine Clarified in Grzyb v. Evans

Wrongful Discharge Doctrine Clarified in Grzyb v. Evans

Date: Dec 20, 1985
Wrongful Discharge Doctrine Clarified in Grzyb v. Evans Introduction The case of Larry Grzyb, Tim Maloney, John Marks, and Ashland Hospital Corporation, d/b/a King's Daughters' Hospital, Mo v....
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Skaggs v. Commonwealth: A Comprehensive Analysis

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Skaggs v. Commonwealth: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Sep 6, 1985
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Skaggs v. Commonwealth: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of Skaggs v. Commonwealth is a notable decision by the Supreme Court of Kentucky, rendered on...
Affirmation of Punitive Damages for Gross Negligence: Horton v. Union Light, Heat Power Co.

Affirmation of Punitive Damages for Gross Negligence: Horton v. Union Light, Heat Power Co.

Date: Jun 15, 1985
Affirmation of Punitive Damages for Gross Negligence: Horton v. Union Light, Heat Power Co. Introduction The case of Ernest C. Horton, Mary Horton, James Daniel Horton, and Anthony Wayne Horton...
Establishing Ostensible Agency: Hospital Liability for On-Call Physicians

Establishing Ostensible Agency: Hospital Liability for On-Call Physicians

Date: Jan 18, 1985
Establishing Ostensible Agency: Hospital Liability for On-Call Physicians Introduction The case of Paintsville Hospital Company, Mo v. Nt, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Kentucky on January 17,...
Manufacturer's Non-Delegable Duty to Warn Ultimate Users Affirmed in Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Ke

Manufacturer's Non-Delegable Duty to Warn Ultimate Users Affirmed in Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Ke

Date: Oct 26, 1984
Manufacturer's Non-Delegable Duty to Warn Ultimate Users Affirmed in Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Ke Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky delivered a pivotal judgment on October 25, 1984, in the...
Kentucky Supreme Court Adopts Comparative Negligence in Hilen v. Hays

Kentucky Supreme Court Adopts Comparative Negligence in Hilen v. Hays

Date: Jul 6, 1984
Kentucky Supreme Court Adopts Comparative Negligence in Hilen v. Hays Introduction In the landmark case of Margie Montgomery Hilen, Appellant, v. Keith Hays, Appellee, 673 S.W.2d 713 (Kentucky...
Court of Kentucky Establishes Five-Year Limitation for Emotional Distress Claims in Craft v. Rice

Court of Kentucky Establishes Five-Year Limitation for Emotional Distress Claims in Craft v. Rice

Date: Jun 15, 1984
Court of Kentucky Establishes Five-Year Limitation for Emotional Distress Claims in Craft v. Rice Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky, in Albert CRAFT and Irene Craft v. Roy RICE, Ashland Oil,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert