Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kentucky Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Due Process Protections in Punitive Damages: Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Golightly

Reaffirming Due Process Protections in Punitive Damages: Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Golightly

Date: Oct 16, 1998
Reaffirming Due Process Protections in Punitive Damages: Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Golightly Introduction The case of Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation v. Carl Golightly; Dorothy Golightly...
Constructive Possession Validated for Firearm-Enhanced Drug Offenses and Clarified Standards for Lesser Included Offenses in Kentucky

Constructive Possession Validated for Firearm-Enhanced Drug Offenses and Clarified Standards for Lesser Included Offenses in Kentucky

Date: Sep 4, 1998
Constructive Possession Validated for Firearm-Enhanced Drug Offenses and Clarified Standards for Lesser Included Offenses in Kentucky Introduction In the landmark case of William Terrell Houston v....
TAMME v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky: Upholding the Death Penalty in Double Murder Convictions

TAMME v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky: Upholding the Death Penalty in Double Murder Convictions

Date: Sep 4, 1998
TAMME v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky: Upholding the Death Penalty in Double Murder Convictions Introduction TAMME v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky, 973 S.W.2d 13 (Supreme Court of Kentucky, 1998), is a...
Supreme Court of Kentucky Upholds Jural Rights: Williams v. Wilson Analysis

Supreme Court of Kentucky Upholds Jural Rights: Williams v. Wilson Analysis

Date: Aug 28, 1998
Supreme Court of Kentucky Upholds Jural Rights: Williams v. Wilson Analysis Introduction In Teri C. Williams, Appellant, v. Patricia Lynn Herald Wilson, Appellee (972 S.W.2d 260), the Supreme Court...
Establishing Standards for Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from M.P.S. v. Cabinet for Human Resources

Establishing Standards for Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from M.P.S. v. Cabinet for Human Resources

Date: Aug 1, 1998
Establishing Standards for Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from M.P.S. v. Cabinet for Human Resources Introduction The case of M.P.S., Appellant, v. Cabinet for Human Resources, Next Friend...
Solicitation as a Substantial Step in Criminal Attempt: Young v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Solicitation as a Substantial Step in Criminal Attempt: Young v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: May 22, 1998
Solicitation as a Substantial Step in Criminal Attempt: Young v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction In Young v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 968 S.W.2d 670 (Ky. 1998), the Supreme Court of Kentucky...
Bierman v. Klapheke: Clarifying Standards for Directed Verdicts and Punitive Damages in Legal Malpractice

Bierman v. Klapheke: Clarifying Standards for Directed Verdicts and Punitive Damages in Legal Malpractice

Date: May 9, 1998
Bierman v. Klapheke: Clarifying Standards for Directed Verdicts and Punitive Damages in Legal Malpractice Introduction The case of Robert Bierman and Joyce Bierman v. William Klapheke II presents a...
Adcock v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Affirming the Use of Deceptive Tactics in Executing Search Warrants

Adcock v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Affirming the Use of Deceptive Tactics in Executing Search Warrants

Date: Apr 17, 1998
Adcock v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Affirming the Use of Deceptive Tactics in Executing Search Warrants Introduction The case of Cynthia Lane Adcock v. Commonwealth of Kentucky serves as a pivotal...
Talbott v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Reaffirming Standards for Post-Arrest Statements and Miranda Rights Interpretation

Talbott v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Reaffirming Standards for Post-Arrest Statements and Miranda Rights Interpretation

Date: Mar 20, 1998
Talbott v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Reaffirming Standards for Post-Arrest Statements and Miranda Rights Interpretation Introduction Talbott v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 968 S.W.2d 76 (Ky. 1998), is...
Kentucky Supreme Court Affirms Sovereign Immunity in Wrongful Death Case

Kentucky Supreme Court Affirms Sovereign Immunity in Wrongful Death Case

Date: Jan 23, 1998
Kentucky Supreme Court Affirms Sovereign Immunity in Wrongful Death Case Introduction In the landmark case Franklin County et al. v. Malone, the Supreme Court of Kentucky addressed critical issues...
Admissibility of Parol Evidence in Medical Consent Forms: Kovacs v. Freeman

Admissibility of Parol Evidence in Medical Consent Forms: Kovacs v. Freeman

Date: Dec 19, 1997
Admissibility of Parol Evidence in Medical Consent Forms: Kovacs v. Freeman Introduction The case of Andrew J. Kovacs, M.D., Appellant, v. George Freeman and Oreida Freeman, Appellees, decided by the...
Admissibility of Expert Opinion on Ultimate Issues in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Stringer v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Admissibility of Expert Opinion on Ultimate Issues in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Stringer v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Nov 21, 1997
Admissibility of Expert Opinion on Ultimate Issues in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Stringer v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction The case of William F. Stringer v....
Enhanced Juror Disclosure Requirements in Ronnie R. Moss v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Enhanced Juror Disclosure Requirements in Ronnie R. Moss v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Sep 5, 1997
Enhanced Juror Disclosure Requirements in Ronnie R. Moss v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction Ronnie R. Moss v. Commonwealth of Kentucky is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Applying the Bad Faith Standard in Evidence Preservation: Commentary on Collins v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Applying the Bad Faith Standard in Evidence Preservation: Commentary on Collins v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Sep 5, 1997
Applying the Bad Faith Standard in Evidence Preservation: Commentary on Collins v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction Collins v. Commonwealth of Kentucky is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Double Jeopardy and Criminal Contempt: Kentucky Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling

Double Jeopardy and Criminal Contempt: Kentucky Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling

Date: Jun 20, 1997
Double Jeopardy and Criminal Contempt: Kentucky Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling Introduction In the 1997 decision of Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Burge, Herriford, Effinger, the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in BOWLING v. COMmonwealth: Implications for Jury Selection and Victim Impact Evidence

Affirmation of Death Sentence in BOWLING v. COMmonwealth: Implications for Jury Selection and Victim Impact Evidence

Date: Jun 20, 1997
Affirmation of Death Sentence in BOWLING v. COMmonwealth: Implications for Jury Selection and Victim Impact Evidence Introduction Ronnie L. BOWLING v. COMmonwealth of Kentucky is a pivotal case...
Sovereign Immunity Affirmed: University of Kentucky Protected from Medical Negligence Claims

Sovereign Immunity Affirmed: University of Kentucky Protected from Medical Negligence Claims

Date: Feb 28, 1997
Sovereign Immunity Affirmed: University of Kentucky Protected from Medical Negligence Claims Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky, in the landmark case Michael O. Withers, Administrator of the...
Administrative Law Judges May Limit Contractual Attorney Fees to Reasonable Amounts under KRS 342.320

Administrative Law Judges May Limit Contractual Attorney Fees to Reasonable Amounts under KRS 342.320

Date: Nov 22, 1996
Administrative Law Judges May Limit Contractual Attorney Fees to Reasonable Amounts under KRS 342.320 Introduction The case of Bobby Lee Combs and Johnnie L. Turner v. Hubb Coal Corporation; Special...
Establishing Victim of Domestic Violence: Preponderance of Evidence Standard Affirmed by Kentucky Supreme Court

Establishing Victim of Domestic Violence: Preponderance of Evidence Standard Affirmed by Kentucky Supreme Court

Date: Nov 22, 1996
Establishing Victim of Domestic Violence: Preponderance of Evidence Standard Affirmed by Kentucky Supreme Court Introduction The case of COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky v. Kathy A. Anderson (934 S.W.2d 276)...
Affirmation of Conviction Despite Expert Testimony Challenges in BROWN v. COMmonwealth

Affirmation of Conviction Despite Expert Testimony Challenges in BROWN v. COMmonwealth

Date: Nov 22, 1996
Affirmation of Conviction Despite Expert Testimony Challenges in BROWN v. COMmonwealth Introduction In the landmark case of James H. Brown, III v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 932 S.W.2d 359 (1996), the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert